The real elephant in the room is that his analysis and conclusion about the nature of the Jews was wholly accurate.

So it is reached through quantum physics too! As above so below, as they say...

thank you

1. control 2. deception 3. blame 4. furthering control 5. demoralisation 6. reasons to repair for the first five stages. 7. complete control for the good of all.

Gonna be real with you. I ain't watching all of that, but I respect the work you put into it. Love Subahibi btw

Is physical dependence contingent on a rejection of atomism?

Video starts at 3:59

This is the best break down I’ve seen of “Being and time” here on YT…as clear and concise as it possibly could be for a book such as this one. Excellent work!!

youre better than university professors, like wtf man, how can it be?

can you plz share the slides

While I absolutely disagree with the notion that we can separate the man from the thought, I do believe that his work - as well as that of others with questionable associations and decisions, a la Ezra Pound - is nonetheless invaluable and worthy of earnest study.

Put this way M. Heidegger is crystal clear understood, thank you.

Another so called Christian, trying to go his own way, reinvent the wheel and came up with a square. How old is this story? Brought up in a Christian home and society. Can’t cut it, can’t figure it out. So, what does the human do? Christianity does not align or flow with natural reason or inclination. It’s counter intuitive. So again, what does the human do? Well, if he’s like most all of us, he makes up his own way, that’s easiest, makes easy sense to his natural yearnings. I’ll tell you this, Christianity is like golf. It’s counter intuitive. You are hitting a huge slice and the ball keeps going way way to the right. So how does the mind, the whole being of the golfer think feel and do? Everything obviously and logically tells the golfer to swing and hit and aim more to the LEFT, duh! The ball is going way to the right, so I’m not a dummy, so I’m going more to the left. In theory, the ball should now go straight. WRONG FOOL !!!! The ball is slicing to the right precisely because you are swinging the club TO the left. It’s counter intuitive. So is Christianity. That’s why most people fail miserably at living it, thinking it through. They make up their own false way and fail. Now, I personally couldn’t and don’t accept such miserable, baffling failure in my life or my golf game. Not to be a D-bag here, but I’ll tell u the truth. I put a 62 on my golf Wednesday golf group last month. 10 birdies no bogies. The came back the following week a threw a 65 at em’. Oh, that’s when they ALL started bitching and complaining. Cause the skins money mostly ended up in my pocket. One guy congratulated and gave me some respect. Only one. I took the time, the effort, the THOUGHT, the frustration, the prayer, to figure out firstly what is really happening in space and time, where is the club itself supposed to go? Then, HOW it’s supposed to get there, as in what do all these different parts of my body DO, in order to move the club through space? THEN, that’s not good enough, the different parts of the club, AND the different parts of the body have to move correctly, NUT, they now have to move correctly AT THE rRIGHT TIME too!!! Synchronicity I think it’s called. Not easy to do man. I’m telling you. Cause I’ve done it. So now I look at almost ALL golfers when I go to the range. I understand they will always play poorly because they’re so far away. The concepts, the body training, the sync. The flow. The idea as a whole. They’re so far off. Same with Christianity. Living it. Doing it. Experience it and it makes PERFECT sense. Life is based on sacrifice at the end and the beginning. The universe is based on this. It’s counter intuitive to natural man. That’s why we suck at life, like our golf game. But…… If not for Logos, the WAY, if not for Jesus Christ, being himself the truth, full of grace and mercy, I would always suck at life, just like I’d always suck at golf, like ALMOST all men and women. Heidegger failed at christianity, shot a 120. As a young man, with a bad or no teacher, of course. Who wouldn’t fail? We all did. But he gave up and made up his own game, a different game. Went his own way. A short cut. But as he found out, it didn’t turn out to be a short cut. It was a LONG cut AND!!!!! It goes to NOWHRE. Heidegger, will get you lost.?he is a failed Christian. No 62, no promised land. He’s worth reading and understanding in the way as to learn what not to do. Don’t listen to people at the golf range tell you their little theories on the golf swing when even in their dreams at night, they don’t and couldn’t shoot a 62. They have no clue of the truth. Blind leading the blind as Jesus said. Any whoo, I have been writing WAY too long. Gotta go. And yes, I’m headed to the golf course. Good luck with YOUR score. Maybe Heidegger will help you. But I know the truth don’t I? I told you the answer. Now, you have to deal with your Natural WILL, like Heidegger had to in his life. Miserable score, miserable conclusion. Miserable life did Heidegger exhibit. Good luck

Awesome! But maybe it's better to use "eastern" rather than "Japanese" at 9:51? Both "Zen" (as a branch of Chinese Buddhism, influencing Japanese Zen a lot) and "Taoist" originated in China. Only "Shinto" is purely Japanese?

I have little knowledge about philosophy, but as a software developer the way his facts and states of affairs are constructed feels really familiar to me. I was reminded of logical gates and boolean logic.

Bicycle is technology?

Thank you for making this video. On terminology, you don't mention translating Befindlichkeit as " attunement.". Stambough is not the only translator to use that tetm. See also Fundamental Concepts....translated by McNeill and Walker. I find the term "attunement" to be useful

I hope you return with another great video, your essays on Heidegger were one of a kind!

This is excellent, thank you so much

He wanted to lay out truth but I don’t think he ever intended to be understood

Yer a legend 🙌

What *is* the meaning of "is", anyway? 🤔🧠

i'd love if you could do a similair video on wittgenstein's later philosophy in the philosophical investigations, thank you for your videos

This video is breathtaking!

Holy shit this is amazing.

Got back here after a while. Dharma is in one sense analytical, but in another very deep, beautiful and poetic. The most beautiful and profound thought humanity has ever created. May everyone be peaceful and free of suffering.

This is a good content, congratulations! I don't agree with every interpretation but it's clear that you care about the subject. Just a zuggestion: you should improve you understanding of ancient Greek, otherwise it is not easy to really understand what Heidegger gest right and what he gets partially wrong.

Thank you! May i request an analysis of 'philosophical investigations' by Wittgenstein? Your video about the tractatus was amazing, and given your clarity of explaination it would be great!

Holy cow so much of Ludwig is horrendous epistemology!! 😭😭

Oh, my dude. Thank you so much for this video. I've been doing a really basic philosophy module to get my head around the topic. Week 1 had a small mention of Wittgenstein, and suggested that we go read more about the philosophers in the module IDK if you've tried this, but it's impossible to find anything about Wittgenstein's philosophy online. So I tried reading the Tractatus, and a few related works. And like, I'm barely grasping what you're saying (I can tell, like you said, that it's the text that's incomprehensible. You're doing such a good job at this omg), but it's helping me so much. Seriously, man. I'm fuckin' stoked.

Amazing video, I hope you keep on posting more philosophy content

Can't believe this wouldn't have been possible if it wasn't for a hardcore gore cp mongolian digital picture book

please do a video on shintoism 🙏🙏🙏

excellent upload. thanks for your work

Wow and still I understand nothing, enough to give me a headache. His essays actually make sense to me though.

Great video. You should read Umineko! I'd love to hear your thoughts about it.

THANK YOU SO MUCH

subahibi into western philosophy pipeline? Thanks for the content. There needs more complete Heidegger commentary on KZbin.

Definitely one of the better commentaries on KZbin. High quality, thoughtful, & close to the text. Thank you!

these are stupidly good dude. you don't have much philosophical videos in your catalogue, i strongly suggest making more. you have a way of cutting thru the "obscuration fetish" these philosophers had without missing the essence. subbed

Thank you so much for making these videos. This helps so much with close reading and trying to understand philosophy. Much love

Why do you always delay in making stuff man. It always ends up being so good(this channel is a classic for mentioning subahibi in a tractatus vid)

damn

INCREDIBLE video - wow! Maybe the best break down of S&Z online. Thanks so much for doing this

" This is for the real adepts in madness, who have gone beyond all psychiatry, psychoanalysis, who are unhelpable. This third book is again the work of a German, Ludwig Wittgenstein. Just listen to its title: TRACTATUS LOGICO PHILOSOPHICUS. We will just call it TRACTATUS. It is one of the most difficult books in existence. Even a man like G.E.Moore, a great English philosopher, and Bertrand Russell, another great philosopher - not only English but a philosopher of the whole world - both agreed that this man Wittgenstein was far superior to them both. Ludwig Wittgenstein was really a lovable man. I don't hate him, but I don't dislike him. I like him and I love him, but not his book. His book is only gymnastics. Only once in a while after pages and pages you may come across a sentence which is luminous. For example: That which cannot be spoken should not be spoken; one should be silent about it. Now this is a beautiful statement. Even saints, mystics, poets, can learn much from this sentence. That which cannot be spoken must not be spoken of. Wittgenstein writes in a mathematical way, small sentences, not even paragraphs - sutras. But for the very advanced insane man this book can be of immense help. It can hit him exactly in his soul, not only in the head. Just like a nail it can penetrate into his very being. That may wake him from his nightmare. Ludwig Wittgenstein was a lovable man. He was offered one of the most cherished chairs of philosophy at Oxford. He declined. That's what I love in him. He went to become a farmer and fisherman. This is lovable in the man. This is more existential than Jean-Paul Sartre, although Wittgenstein never talked of existentialism. Existentialism, by the way, cannot be talked about; you have to live it, there is no other way. This book was written when Wittgenstein was studying under G.E.Moore and Bertrand Russell. Two great philosophers of Britain, and a German... it was enough to create TRACTATUS LOGICO PHILOSOPHICUS. Translated it means Wittgenstein, Moore and Russell. I, on my part, would rather have seen Wittgenstein sitting at the feet of Gurdjieff than studying with Moore and Russell. That was the right place for him, but he missed. Perhaps next time, I mean next life... for him, not for me. For me this is enough, this is the last. But for him, at least once he needs to be in the company of a man like Gurdjieff or Chuang Tzu, Bodhidharma - but not Moore, Russell, not Whitehead. He was associating with these people, the wrong people. A right man in the company of wrong people, that's what destroyed him. My experience is, in the right company even a wrong person becomes right, and vice-versa: in a wrong company, even a right person becomes wrong. But this only applies to unenlightened men, right or wrong, both. An enlightened person cannot be influenced. He can associate with anyone - Jesus with Magdalena, a prostitute; Buddha with a murderer, a murderer who had killed nine hundred and ninety-nine people. He had taken a vow to kill one thousand people, and he was going to kill Buddha too; that's how he came into contact with Buddha. The murderer's name is not known. The name people gave to him was Angulimala, which means 'the man who wears a garland of fingers'. That was his way. He would kill a man, cut off his fingers and put them on his garland, just to keep count of the number of people he had killed. Only ten fingers were missing to make up the thousand; in other words only one man more.... Then Buddha appeared. He was just moving on that road from one village to another. Angulimala shouted, "Stop!" Buddha said, "Great. That's what I have been telling people: Stop! But, my friend, who listens?" Angulimala looked amazed: Is this man insane? And Buddha continued walking towards Angulimala. Angulimala again shouted, "Stop! It seems you don't know that I am a murderer, and I have taken a vow to kill one thousand people. Even my own mother has stopped seeing me, because only one person is missing.... I will kill you... but you look so beautiful that if you stop and turn back I may not kill you." Buddha said, "Forget about it. I have never turned back in my life, and as far as stopping is concerned, I stopped forty years ago; since then there is nobody left to move. And as far as killing me is concerned, you can do it anyway. Everything born is going to die." Angulimala saw the man, fell at his feet, and was transformed. Angulimala could not change Buddha, Buddha changed Angulimala. Magdalena the prostitute could not change Jesus, but Jesus changed the woman. So what I said is only applicable to so-called ordinary humanity, it is not applicable to those who are awakened. Wittgenstein can become awakened; he could have become awakened even in this life. Alas, he associated with wrong company. But his book can be of great help to those who are really third-degree insane. If they can make any sense out of it, they will come back to sanity."