Martin Heidegger Explained, Part 1: Being and Time (1927)

Рет қаралды 39,184

Jade Vine

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 114

@nyx8017 8 ай бұрын

I watched this a month ago and came back to marvel at this video a second time. Absolutely phenomenal work sir.

@wizardite 9 ай бұрын

One of the few philosophy channels not lead by a pseud. Very interesting video, thank you very much for the effort. I learnt a lot about German Whitehead 👍

@timeastwood2666 9 ай бұрын

Do you know any other channels like Jade's? This is basically the only channel I can find not lead by a pseud.

@noobzie8963 5 ай бұрын

@@timeastwood2666 www.youtube.com/@eversbrothersproductions1476 is pretty good

@Kevin-fl7mj Ай бұрын

@@timeastwood2666 Carefree wandering and victor gijsbers come to mind,hit me up if you found some too!

@jknkjnkjnkj8967 Ай бұрын

look around for recordings of philosophy profs giving lectures or running through lecture slides. it's concise and it's a good alternative to looking through SEP if you want to into a certain topic

@lapse9continuum765 7 ай бұрын

Definitely one of the better commentaries on KZbin. High quality, thoughtful, & close to the text. Thank you!

@rrosaseconda 2 ай бұрын

This has served me as a good refresher. Thank you. I attended & recently reviewed Drefus' lectures and later worked w/ his student, Fred Doland, in a course called "Heigegger for Artists."

@ţťþtţtt 10 ай бұрын

The greatest day of my year so far

@pyr_aeizoon 4 ай бұрын

This is the best break down I’ve seen of “Being and time” here on YT…as clear and concise as it possibly could be for a book such as this one. Excellent work!!

@brandoagusti7288 2 ай бұрын

I am so extremely thankful for this. I am finishing B&T and I really wanted a full reivew like this as I get to the conclusion. Thank you so much.

@igorcapelari 4 ай бұрын

youre better than university professors, like wtf man, how can it be?

@Deletedvirus404 7 ай бұрын

subahibi into western philosophy pipeline? Thanks for the content. There needs more complete Heidegger commentary on KZbin.

@laurencehulme173 7 ай бұрын

INCREDIBLE video - wow! Maybe the best break down of S&Z online. Thanks so much for doing this

@noobzie8963 5 ай бұрын

the best without a doubt

@abdul_muhsin97 5 ай бұрын

This video is breathtaking!

@JazzLispAndBeer Ай бұрын

I found this yesterday night and fell asleep. I was dreaming about people I know which all could recite Heidegger which I was very impressed by.. 😂 Anyway. Excellent video - top notch!

@GaryFaulkner-f2d Ай бұрын

Great Job Jade. Without your brilliant explainer I may have simply given up on reading B&T and gone straight to the G&T

@John-ir4id 5 ай бұрын

While I absolutely disagree with the notion that we can separate the man from the thought, I do believe that his work - as well as that of others with questionable associations and decisions, a la Ezra Pound - is nonetheless invaluable and worthy of earnest study.

@stevenpham6734 4 ай бұрын

Do YOU think of a pink elephant just now?

@elmastoras1 Ай бұрын

He may have seen himself as the potential "philosophical führer" who'd advise the Führer much like Plato tried to be the state philosopher to Dionysius II of Syracuse, Sicily. As for his non-disowning his pro-Naziism, I think he refrained from doing so in the spirit that "nothing serious happened in that direction, disown what?". A sad, sad affair anyway. Still, I believe that we can avail ourselves of his philosophical genius.

@joaopedrocastro6306 7 ай бұрын

Amazing video, I hope you keep on posting more philosophy content

@beelol1656 9 ай бұрын

Another W from Jade Vine

@IamLordGriffith 9 ай бұрын

Another Banger, Sir

@joszefrviz398 4 ай бұрын

1. control 2. deception 3. blame 4. furthering control 5. demoralisation 6. reasons to repair for the first five stages. 7. complete control for the good of all.

@tsengmichael9910 Ай бұрын

Thank you for introducing him

@FormsInSpace 7 ай бұрын

excellent upload. thanks for your work

@caffeineandphilosophy 5 ай бұрын

This is excellent, thank you so much

@jakobson219 9 ай бұрын

Amazing. Thanks.

@Wingedmagician 2 ай бұрын

thank you so so much

@parsafakhar Ай бұрын

this wasn't a pseud video! wow, you earned a sub

@yazanasad7811 Ай бұрын

NEXT part: anticipatory resoluteness is unitary (equiprimordial). anticipatory - understanding our being as it truly is via being-towards-death resoluteness - having authentic awareness and ownership of our own guilt and responsibility to choose how we are these imply one another. hermeneutic circle. now going to look at temporality on a deeper ontological ground. Dasein's structure is care whether authentic of inauthentic (both have their own 3's) In authentic structure, dasein appears before itself as a whole. so now we can look at dasein not just existentially (what it means to me) but look at the actual structure, what that being means in and of itself.

@yazanasad7811 Ай бұрын

dasein now reinterpreted on more fundamental basis. what makes it possibile for there to be care and thus anticipatory resoluteness? Temporality. ekstasis - standing out. future (being-towards-death, needs a future, look out and go towards, has meaning towards us, project possibilities into ) past (coming from a past, needed, certain possibilities as a range before me determined from the past, more complex than memory) present (current situations and acts, where things make themselves present) so the definition of the care structure as a definition includes these 3 temporalities. authentic time is finite (death/guilt as centred around ourselves) inauthentic time is infinite

@yazanasad7811 Ай бұрын

temporality and everydayness: were going to review all the existentials of care and ground them temporally. thrownness as focussed on past (there already, anxiety and fear as authentic and inauthetnic. authentic repetition and inauthentic fear fear: fearing is actually past because our past and what we have been is threatened. fear is inauthentic because we are absorbed in the world. thereofre our past understanding is inauthentic as it is in relation to the world and things in it (forgetting) anxiety: authentic because revolving around dasein, not world or object. we see nowhere to take action (which is oriented to the future) but is also occasioned by having been. this is called Repetition. disposedness as focussed on future (always has understanding linked to future whether authentic or inauthentic. anticiiapton and expectation. falleness as focussed on present (always inauthentic, concerned with actual things going on around us.called making present. [there is moment of vision as authentic present but only in relation to throwness and disposedness, see possiiblities before us] Discourse also occurs in temporal beause language has grammar of past future and present.

@yazanasad7811 Ай бұрын

dasein in time: ready to hand is in the present because its without self. there is an awaiting and retain (future and past) of the hammer but they still occur in the present. present at hand - comes hrough by resoluteness from ready to hand. and this only occurs as from the future when we attempt to discover the 'truth' the world - future - something for the sake of which (future possibilities) implied again has little presence (in order to) and past (thrown circumstances) in it too. temporality allows all three to come together into a unified structure. spatiality only occurs in falleness (that phone the person is closer to you) and therefore occurs in the present.

@yazanasad7811 Ай бұрын

temporality and historicality dasien comes to an end, but it also has a beginning. no i before the world. historicising: work out what is most meaningful from a historical perspective. inauthetnic historicality (list of events) authentic historicality (in temporality): heritage: past events that affect one's comprehension of oneself. like america and american revolution, personaly signficiant. take it up as part of tradition (can strike out in different ways). can take it on vaguely. but can't step out of it fully. fate: awareness of possibilities in definite range. resolute towards own possibilities. accepting what may happen. resolutely accepting what may happen on basis of our own authentic choosing destiny: people/nations at once through fate. the future is most important ekstasis. the past becomes meaningful only through future actions. historical: lincoln's pipe is still there but its no longer ready to hand as equipment. the dasien itself is gone (the world is no longer there) and therefore the locus of historically is seen in dasein, not the object existing. history as worlds of daseins that came before. world-history: focussing on fate-destiny of set people and thus particular world (nexus of intelligibility that they exist in). authentically, we get access to what shaped their world of past daseins and we can make future choices more clearly and salient from this. history as a story.

@yazanasad7811 Ай бұрын

clock-time is an abstraction of something more real. but experience ime as ekastsis which allows past and future meaningful. dasiens being is fully temporal. to be dasein is to be temporal

@Awresh 2 ай бұрын

Any such commentary on critique of pure reason on yt?

@LatinxMatt 6 ай бұрын

Holy shit this is amazing.

@melechular 26 күн бұрын

Thank you.

@breezuhs 2 ай бұрын

Are you a philosophy student? Do you have any socials? Would love to chat with you on some of this! Excellent work

@juangamba7664 10 ай бұрын

Woooooow 🎉🎉🎉🎉

@alvaroxex 2 ай бұрын

Wonderful video

@peterblair1759 5 ай бұрын

Thank you for making this video. On terminology, you don't mention translating Befindlichkeit as " attunement.". Stambough is not the only translator to use that tetm. See also Fundamental Concepts....translated by McNeill and Walker. I find the term "attunement" to be useful

@CopperKettle Ай бұрын

Thank you, this is quite interesting

@wes5614 7 ай бұрын

Wow and still I understand nothing, enough to give me a headache. His essays actually make sense to me though.

@martinhersey512 Ай бұрын

I found “Being and Time” to be incomprehensible. Wittgenstein is easy to understand.

@seppovague Ай бұрын

gem

@wgcdsb 5 ай бұрын

Awesome! But maybe it's better to use "eastern" rather than "Japanese" at 9:51? Both "Zen" (as a branch of Chinese Buddhism, influencing Japanese Zen a lot) and "Taoist" originated in China. Only "Shinto" is purely Japanese?

@DwellingInTheFourfold 5 ай бұрын

This is true. I meant to imply that he was very "Japanese" in thought, and that many have pointed out his similarity to "eastern" philosophies that have had significant influences on Japanese culture (including ones that originated in China). I should have been clearer in my language, but oh well. Live and learn :)

@wgcdsb 5 ай бұрын

@@DwellingInTheFourfold Yep, exactly. At least, "being-towards-death" is very Japanese, lol.

@EmilØstergaardAndersen Ай бұрын

I'm not a fan of Heidegger but I really enjoyed your video regardless, keep it up!

@aulus6 Ай бұрын

Amazing! Has inspired me to actually read this by 2027 😅

@JavierBonillaC Ай бұрын

How can we describe "being" from the inside of "being" itself. The meaning of existence can't be defined from within existence, and since there is nothing outside existence, then the question is absurd. Same happens with "being". Am I wrong? Wonderful video, although I sometimes woder if some of these definitions are a bit silly. Let's define and talk about the downside-downes of the world in which we dasin. The world is not upside-down and we always feel the gravity pull in one directikn. This allows us to experience, phenomenologically, the "downside-downess" of the world atevery moment. Existence or "being" is thus "being in the world, in a continuous time and with the proper "das dowsideness" 😉 That's how some of these things sound.

@sunwukong6917 Ай бұрын

What do we mean when we say something exists?

@jacquiecotillard9699 2 ай бұрын

He really seemed to hold Nazism in high regard and helped implement it, and never disowned it. I just can’t decide if he was a real Nazi or not! He thought a lot about Nazism, but it’s impossible to say that it influenced his writing. I guess some people are too sensitive and just see Nazis everywhere!

@mentalitydesignvideo Ай бұрын

The man wrote in his dairy "I'm still a Nazi" and there you are, looking for an out. And his bestiality expressed in his philosophy is not proof enough?

@horsymandias-ur Ай бұрын

And what if he was?

@ButchersBlues Ай бұрын

gross

@mentalitydesignvideo Ай бұрын

@@horsymandias-ur his philosophy is pure Nazi bestiality

@someguy4405 15 сағат бұрын

If he was a nazi, would that make his philosophy any more or less correct?

@d.c.8828 5 ай бұрын

What *is* the meaning of "is", anyway? 🤔🧠

@sholoms 5 ай бұрын

Right & (of course) not for the last time, particularly in re to S&Z!

@rolexpwn 9 ай бұрын

1:26 mistake 2 hannah arendt's pictures

@DwellingInTheFourfold 9 ай бұрын

noted in the description, thanks for pointing it out

@ga7marc484 Ай бұрын

Would you ever make a Whitehead video?

@Megatomicdoragon 2 ай бұрын

Who cares about whether you like or dislike someone regardless, don't ideas make sense on their own? Additionally, I saw your video on the Tractatus. Perhaps you would be interested in doing thematic discussion on literature like VN's or other fiction you like?

@Daaako Ай бұрын

part 1: 4 hours is promising

@afaqjanan7817 4 ай бұрын

can you plz share the slides

@philalethes216 Ай бұрын

Utterly dizzying in its genius.

@matejas8433 10 ай бұрын

FINALLY

@ghevargheese Ай бұрын

Heidegger explained? But, from where? From spiritualism? Or materialism? or idealism? Is it a doxa or a interpetation? Define it!

@yp77738yp77739 3 ай бұрын

The real elephant in the room is that his analysis and conclusion about the nature of the Jews was wholly accurate.

@cryp35 9 ай бұрын

Finally Heidegger is made intelligible on English KZbin 👏👏

@funnywarnerbox300 2 ай бұрын

ow my brain

@SpenderDebby-x6n Ай бұрын

Wilson Elizabeth Davis Barbara White Richard

@msf559 Ай бұрын

Easy but misleading expalantion as the notion things shows up in two ways is wrong cause it is only our subjective experience...the objective world was there in both cases in totality and conceptualizing....it is we who are changing our focus and orientation....the two ways to experience things are not actually world rather in one way we experience world in whole and in other way in particularly above that whole..the relational aspect of world was there in both experiences but its deviation of experiencing that was increased by disturbance....world is preconditioned and prerelated but its manifestation of particular relations that gets oriented by daseins...the ready to hand totality is a holistic understanding or state of mind above that our particular thoughts build up and present to hand is thinking or concepts that build upon on that experience.. Its a shifts from one kind of experience i.e, state of mind, understanding to thinking not from world to deworled...also for distance and closeness the physical things are close to me in my role in objective world but for the phenomenal world, they are far. so objectively physical relational space-time would be primary then this phenomenal would be secondary.......