Hay you doing ok?

The fact you only have 30 views is insane. I hope you're on X and Rumble because we all know KZbin will never promote ANYTHING you said.

My blackout pursuit stacks them on bullseye all day. I just put a gas string on it and a drop away hunter rest. 29.5draw at 65lb pull …. But I don’t know much since it’s my first bow and I’ve only been shooting for 3 years

Yes, they are the best

In the Lee manual, on page 37, it states: "Bullets seated deeper than normal will reduce case capacity and increase pressure. This is not too critical for large rifle cases, but extremely important for pistol loads. Good load data specifies bullet seating depth or over all cartridge length. Do not seat the bullet to deep. On page 96, of the Lee manual, under the section of “The Latest Information On Pressure”, it states: "2) the extreme expansion (XTP and Gold Dot) handgun bullets have a large and deep nose cavity that makes them longer than a regular bullet of the same weight. This requires deeper depth resulting in higher pressure. Seating depth is very critical for handgun ammunition because of the small cases and large bores. ... … The usable volume of … … … the 45 ACP is 1.14cc. Seating bullets 1/16” deeper … .. … reduces the volume … 0.16cc for the 45 ACP. That’s ... ... ... a whopping 14% ... . This large volume reduction has an equally large effect on pressure that is made more critical because the maximum pressure for the 45 ACP is 1/3 of [plus 60,000 pound range as mentioned below. Keep in mind the 45 Colt working pressure is a mere 14,000 psi.] … On page 157, of Lee's manual under "Minimal Overall Length", It states: This is critical on most handgun cases. A small reduction in overall length can cause dangerous pressures because of reduced capacity caused by seating the bullet too deep. See details on page 96." On page 133, of the "Complete Reloading Guide", under "Loads For Handgun Cartridges", in bold font right under the heading it states: Loads for handguns ... with less case capacity ... when loading ... ... ... mere tenths of a grain of powder can make the difference between a good load and one that is dangerous. Approach the loading of handgun ammunition with these facts in mind." Plus on pages 88 thru 89, of the Lee manual, under "Signs Of Excessive Pressure" is a list of seven pressure signs and then the manual states the following: "It must be emphasized that these signs will not manifest themselves in ... low pressure rounds. These are signs of pressure in the plus 60,000 pound range. If you are loading for a gun designed to operate at 15,000 pounds pressure, you will most likely never find a loose primer because the gun would have blown up and spread the primer and gun parts over a wide area." And on page 158, of the Lee manual, in the section of “How To Read The Load Data”, under “XTP” it states : “Use these loads for the Hornady XTP, Speer Gold Dot, or Remington Golden Saber bullets. Now on page 270, of the Lee manual, under the “250 grain XTP” it gives load data with three different seating depths, because the data was taken from three different brand bullets, yet clumped together as if one. So if someone where to take the data developed for the shorter bullet and turn around and used it with the longer bullet they could very well raise pressures far above the 10% reduced starting charge weight. Especially if they use a case with smaller case capacity than that used in the development of the load data, as well as a hotter brand primer than that which was used to develop the data in the first place. Keep in mind that just changing the brand of primer can cause as much as a 2,000 psi rise in pressure alone, which can by itself swallow up the safety margin. Then throw in a case that has a reduced volume than the tested one and on top of all that seating the wrong bullet father in to the case, because it has a deeper hollow point and thicker cooper jacket, than what was used to developed the load data could easily displace the primer into one's own eye - so to speak. Or another way to put it would be as written in the book "Ammunition, Demystified" (page 17-18): War Stories #1 "I used loading data from one manufacturer for the equivalent weight bullet made by a different manufacturer. I picked a starting propellent load based on the projectile weight I was loading. I fired two previous shots without much apparent problem. After the third shot, imagine my surprise when I dropped the lock block on my Ruger no.1 and found the whole primer, cup and anvil, missing! I immediately ceased shooting that ammunition and rifle until I got the rifle taken apart, inspected for various and sundry loose metal pieces from the primer, and successfully put them back together. The ammunition was broken down, never to be fired in that particular arrangement again. I know I do not want to do that again! While the bullet weight is an important factor in selecting the powder type and weight for your firearm, the ability of the bullet to engrave by the rifling (think of friction and radial stiffness) also dramatically affects the peak pressure a given powder load will attain. Use only the loading data published by the bullet manufacture! Substitution of loading data for equivalent weight bullets can get you into deep yogurt!" And I know for a fact that other manuals have stated not to switch brands of bullets even if they are of the same type. I would post them here if I had the time to wade through 70 different manuals to find where they spoke of such, but I am tired just having to have dug up the above and below. One can head the warnings of reloading or not, but what ever they do they should not teach others to ignore them just because they might so choose. Again, the Richard Lee loading manual does not do pressure tests themselves, they only take test data from others that do and jumble it all together, of which they lose the test barrel length, case brand, primer type and brand, as well as bullet brand. And some 45 caliber bullets are .451" and some are .452" diameter. These are all important elements, as one should never take data made for one specific brand and type bullet and turn and use it with a different brand or type bullet. This is due to Brinell hardness and bearing surfaces can be different, as well as the shape can be slightly different with longer or shorter lengths, all of which can cause extremely high pressure issues. One should only use data straight from a reputable data source [see paragraph below] that does their own pressure testing which give the test barrel length, case brand, primer type and brand, and most of all the brand of the type bullet used in developing the data. Each one of these elements that are changed is a compromise of which if all are compromised at the same time could very well add up to a recipe for disaster. First off, I am not implying that Lee plagiarized the data in their manual, just that they jumbled data from different sources together and lost key elements in the doing. And it has always been a given that one should use the starting loads and work their way up. This 10% reduction covers for smaller bore diameters, different lots of powder, different brand/lots of primers, and different brands of cartridge cases. These alone can take up that 10% relatively easy. Especially in pistol cartridges, as a little goes a long way in such small volume chambers. And the .001" difference in diameter with a stiffer jacket can definitely cause pressure issues when it comes to using load data for one brand bullet [i.e. - the smaller one] and using it for another brand bullet e.g. - the larger one]. Lyman, Speer, Nosler, Sierra, Barnes, Swift, Berger, Norma, Lapua, VihtaVuori, Accurate, Western Powder, Hodgdon, or even Hornady reloading manuals are far better suited than Richard Lee's for gleaning load data from, as they all not only do their own testing but they all give the test barrel length, case brand, primer type and brand, as well as the bullets brand and type for each load recipe. Lyman has most everyone's bullets and many powders too, so it is a good all around manual to get first. Then once one figures a particular bullet they want to use they should get the bullet manufacturer's manual, and try and get the powder manufacturer's manuals that they plan to use as well. Then as one decides to use other manufacturer's bullets and powders they should add these manuals too. And Lyman also has a Cast Bullet reloading manual for those who wish to cast their own bullets. There are also other reloading manuals that do not pressure test their loading data and those should not be used for load data but can be used to glean information of the reloading process. So once one has all the powder and bullet manufacture's manuals they could continue to add these other manuals for the knowledge in the first half of them (only). Yet again Richard Lee's manual throws out one of the carnal safety rules of "never use load data developed for one brand of bullet for another brand of the same style bullet". Keep in mind that it is always better to throw out Richard Lee's manual than any of the safety rules. But with all that said Richard Lee's reloading manual has a wealth of knowledge in the front half that makes the book well worth having. Just do not ignore the Cautions, Warnings, and Nevers there within.

I completed the 1 mile milk jug challenge in Utah last summer with a 6.5 grendel. (Very modified rifle and hand loads of course) the BC on the 123 grain 6.5 grendel is amazing, the math is easy, once you get it, you really get it. Not sure I need a 6mm arc to do what my 6.5 gren has done and proven already. Edit: no joke look it up on KZbin, I am one of 2 who hit the jug at a mile with a 6.5 gren, the video is on KZbin.

My favorite sling

I just started reloading 38 special, and I seem to have tapped one of my 158 grain bullets a little deep. I don’t know if it was going to change the pressures all that much however I didn’t want to risk it. Watching your video made me go back and reseat that bullet to the proper depth and recrimp it. There’s no need in not making sure that it’s safe. Thanks again for your info.

Give me the creedmoor As far as the grendel i will take the 6mm arc over the grendel everyday

Academy sports in my city has 6arc every time I go in.

Great video!! This conversation reminds me of what goes on with all the people I tried to ask questions that I probably irritate because I’ve got some questions and each question uncovers more questions. Which level of Patreon would get me being able to email questions that I have?

Serious question: what does a 2x prism do better than the 1x or 3x micro prism? What reasonable reason is there to buy this optic?

300hamr? Isn't that a 300blk essentially

A smaller ar10 in 243 especially with some nice thick fmj 55gr bullets has some interesting uses. And maybe on in 358w or 338 federal. With 220 gr sp, fmj and solid copper. Very very interesting uses

If you like the 870 try a older 835 water fowl gun. Cut the barrel back close to the tube. Have it threaded for a poly- choke. Try out some of the 18 pellet 00 or 58? Pellet #4 or try some hand loading with 44 cal cap and ball round balls. If I remember right you can get 12-15 in there. And they make a mess of big hogs. And will make it through both doors in a 92 blazer

I wonder how much is it there a lot of people that would thats been displacement. Or is it the economy and people can't afford it? Because I see a lot of factor ammo for sale on the secondary market and its cheaper than what the store is selling for. Like some swchp 44 for 19 a box secondary vs 31 if I order it. And how many shooters lost there guns and want be able to shoot for awhile. Hope that Milton stays away from me.

Its a System. Build your system for you. what i mean by system is build your gun out the way you want it and then build up your stock pile for that system. stock pile mags, stock pile ammo, stock pile extra parts. with your mind set and your opinion, then all the AK people are wrong as well. AK's are not common and the ammo is not common compared to to 223/556 and 308 AR's. so get what you want and enjoy it. 6 ARC was design to out perform grendel and it does absolutely. the best part of of AR's is you can change the upper to a 223/556 upper and your squared away. 6 ARC is readily avail now from ammo to parts to uppers to complete rifles. nothing is anywhere close to replacing 223 and 308. also with your argument think about all the M&P handgun owners, they dont take Glock mags and are not as common as Glock. Its America get what you want and enjoy and stock up all ammo and parts

Bro does it have molle in front?

I think you hit it with a disconnect. The people in charge think they can pore what ever sh it they wanted to down on the consumer and they will take it. I really think they over estimate brand loyalty nowadays.

We have gotten to where we are watching old western mostly on tv now. Gunsmoke, Laramie, have gun, they don't have any modern bs in them. Its refreshing

Tolerance is not acceptance or approval. It is not introducing you to a short rope with a lon g d rop

Personally,feel that phrase is out of order.If one digs just a bit,one sees these companies were all hemorrhaging capital.So company wokeness is the last ditch effort,but as you state,it can't stop the inevitable....Go Broke-Get Woke-Eventually Croak

6mm ARC complete uppers are readily available at BCA. And I know the "gun snobs" will scoff at that, but I have one and 2 friends each have one and all 3 are 1000 yard gong ringers with relative ease. Hornady 108-ELD-M shot great, sub MOA, and at 600 yards was still laying sub-MOA groupings. Got to 1000 with under 31 MOA of scope adjustment needed from a 100 yard zero.

It’s made for molle dude

By far my favorite broadheads

Respectfully wtf kinda test is this🙏😭

Simple answer, both.

Are you sure it was a ss mess up? Or is it failure by design?

2024 has been a little too interesting for my taste.

They do not run threw my Glock

They are the all around best fixed!!

POF makes the BEST ar15 parts, everything in the rifle has been redesigned and made better in many ways. I buy PSA as its the same as the rest of the rifles with better warranty and better price, if i go for the best, only POF. all the rest of the parts from all companies are the same design same materials same machines making them but MASSIVE different PRICE. ill take PSA lifetime warranty or HIGH END POF also lifetime warranty.

KZbin is a vagina with gonorrhea.

6MM ARC and 6.5 Grendel both ROCK!!

I like it, have you still got the cb300r, if so will you be doing another update or is that channel no more👍

Thank you...

Damn kyle Rittenhouse is getting old

KZbin keeps deleting any comment i make criticising our 46th president. I noticed they are censoring videos about their censorship even harder

If I went back to bow hunting. I still like the old blade browdhead that you can add the little bleeding cross blades in. I can get them as sharp as my case knife. Hair splitting not shaving. But the g5 is a pretty good all around 3 blade. My problem 20+ years ago the xbow speed hurt alot of broadheads. The old 2 blade held up. I think the g5 would be fine.

can you tell me about the rifle stock you have here? Is it custom? Aftermarket?

This was a great explanation on the 6.5. Thank you very much.

Montec G5 CS are the best in my opinion

I guess the Daniel Defense MK18 is out. They don't seem to be making it anymore.

I’m learning to despise KZbin / Google

Try it with stayloids

The 6mm Remington worked fox, turkey, coyotes, bobcat, hog, deer, really big hog, and blackbear

Big game how big? A lot of bear? 338 win mag. Coyotes to say elk? Are you going to handload? 257 Weatherby. Black bear the top down to fox? 6mm Remington Want a self defense and hunting? Ar10 243 , 338 federal or 358w Unless you can find one of the few ar in 243/ 25 wssm.

I do agree that an AR-10 is a great choice for hunting and home defence. But the ammo cost more. So that's why I choose 5.56