Question 1 is Torricelli's law

This is a nonsense question

So for the last inference, it is stated that the chinese government omit several key areas from its official spending figures. The passage also states that the Chinese government fail to include many other areas, and an example is R&D within military spending. Is it not then to be assumed that this is probably true, considering that there is enough information to indicate indefinitely that the chinese government excludes key areas?

The most useful resource I've found so far, and I love the style!

your package will be updated annually or kept the same from 2010?

Im so confused

When? Tell me the time please 😩🙏😅

I do not agree with the answer on the assumption qq on charities paying less taxes. The statement states that, charities can charge less on books as compared to other bookshops because the don't pay VAT. If charities are paying more tax aside VAT, then not paying VAT doesn't mean they can charge less. So the assumption that charities pay less tax is made

i got it but i still hate how i'm only given 70 seconds to decipher it

so i started by counting. in total we have 3 up arrows 2 down arrows 2 right arrows 1 left arrow the single left arrow got me thinking that maybe we need to equalize what we have left. theres only 2 choises that point left which then lead me to see the location of the arrows and i concluded that it goes clockwise and there was only 1 choise left and it fit.

Down 👇

Hate to admit.... but still did not get it.

See, this question is fine, but then there are many others on your site that are just insane.

can u do more

Hello, I disagree with your answer to Question 14. An assumption was not made. You say an assumption was made, however, in your reasoning, you say that 'the statement says that because VAT has to be charged by non-charities, the prices they charge customers HAVE to be higher'. This is not true. Nowhere in the statement does it say that. It merely states that they CAN charge less. The potential remains, according to the statement, for charities to charge lower prices despite this. It does not assume, therefore, that VAT increases the prices customers pay for things, only that VAT pertains to this happening potentially. I am not assuming, when I say that charities do not pay VAT and can therefore charge customers less for books if they wish, that non-charities will always therefore charge more, nor that VAT always increases costs. This does not logically follow. It appears you have simply got the language confused here. 'can charge higher prices' and have to charge higher prices' are not the same.

Grear answer but how long it took to find it?

Won't you make fluid mechanics tutorials videos for students please 🙏

The practical demonstrations were great. Thanks.

Excellent advice! Cheers!

No public I've ever known - had ever had these tests. Giving me or anyone these tests - is like giving someone a bike - and not showing, how to ride it. Shameful.

I hate these tests.

mindblow

Video are not clear

wrong answer for best. Advice from a expert local recruiter who does it for a living is better than you, who doesnt know $hit. Get your $hit together and stop giving wrong answers

so helpful thanks

Still dont understand this

Hi bsu here HAHAHAHAH

I don't understand how any candidate is expected to answer this within a minute

I'm here because 15% marks is logical reasoning in written exam

where's the part three

I noticed that in rows 2 and 3, the black square is rotating in an anticlockwise manner. This observation can also assist in selecting the correct answer for row 1. Therefore, in row 1, the rotation of the black boxes should be anticlockwise, which aligns with the answer you were given.

You only assume the answer is B, to me there is no right or wrong answer to these tasks. Is should stop.

Another day on the planet of fools :( there is huge unemployment around the world; it is growing, so the companies need to find a reason why they do not give you a job. Lines for jobs in Capitalism are very long, there is no such thing as right to a job, right to a free health care, right to a free apartment, right to free education. Wage slaves must work and make their masters richer and richer, including politicians who promise you a better life. It's all about the system. If there is slavery there are slaves, if there is feudalism, then there are serfs, if there is capitalism there are the unemployed, poverty, homeless, economic crisis, stress and fear of losing your money, no pensions in many countries etc. and poor working hard wage slaves. You cannot change this until you change the system. But we live on the planet of fools whose logical part of brain is dead (no wisdom). We sooner get to the WW3 than solve all these issues on the planet of fools. Earth is the only planet in the universe where humans print money, and the states and people say we have no money, where do we get money?

lol, nope, its the same solution 😅

ok lemme just visualize this problem real quick Large Silver Watch [LSW] = 15:50 Smol siler watch [SSW] = same time as LSW aka 15:50 Gold Watch [GW]= 10 mins slower than LSW aka 15:40 Bronze Watch [BW]= is faster than SSW aka 15:55 IMO, i think the answer is False.

WTF Companies Hire Stupid People Who Can't Do The Job Just Because They Passed A Stupid Test Like This

Hi

It's quite interesting, the orange strap at the bottom, is similar to the red indicator from KZbin. Which indicates once you have already seen a whole video.

wth

This is some fantastical new age snake oil. Flashy.

Wait, wait .... so many questions... First, what is the original fare? Only if the 4 friends went together or if the 5 friends went together without the discount offer? Second, where does the 5th friend come from? Are they doing a two-way travel or do the 4 friends pick them up from the Isle of Man? All of these questions do not allow you to give a definite answer since they are not specified as required information in the math problem.

How can we identify assumptions?

the whole scanio is wrong and doesnt make sense with the answer.

Thanks so much for the brief refresher on these!!!

I literally pass thank you

the instructor has a very academic approach. he makes too much and unnecessary explanation that serves no purpose. or maybe it serves. maybe it is useful for people with low math & graph skills.

This is horrible.

How is this 2022 when it was made 2 years ago...

5 th friend is joining them for the whole trip.. if this is correct then the total fare will be 5*80 (inbound) = 400 5*80 (*0.2 -80 %) discount . 480 .. why are we calculating for 4 friends when 5 are traveling.. 800 is the total fare (5 friends inbound and outbound).. return flight = 80.. 480/800 = 0.6 - 1 = 40% so they saved 320 no.. or did i get the question wrong?

Deliberately made complicated