LSAT Lab

Пікірлер

@신촌엔바나나가없-x9j 8 сағат бұрын

can anyone tell me the another example of ‘false choice’ flaw in the 10th flaw? (and thanks you for the great video. i really appreciate it)

@uraddiictOnx3 Күн бұрын

The painting one 🤦🏽‍♀️

@uraddiictOnx3 2 күн бұрын

13:34🤯

@uraddiictOnx3 3 күн бұрын

10:25

@alejandrochavez5314 6 күн бұрын

For the third question, isnt the physician taking for granted that professional supervision would reduce the number of trampoline-related injuries, and thus he would agree with answer choice D? Maybe my mind is just jumping to the assumption that that is in an assumption the physician may be hold. Perhaps he reccomends professional supervision for other reasons, like there being a person to call 911 when someone gets injured.

@SFuNk24 12 күн бұрын

"scintillating vernacular" HAHAHA YESSS! Also every time you say "Whyyyyyy?" I get a good chuckle. Great videos. Thank you. Here's hoping we all get 170's :D Best of luck to all!

@irvinghanan4230 12 күн бұрын

can these trap answer recognition techniques be applied to LR inference questions?

@BiancaGrant-e6w 12 күн бұрын

these videos are the best! very informative and entertaining.

@uraddiictOnx3 13 күн бұрын

LSAT Lab is saving me in 2024, been struggling with identifying conclusions! 33:37

@uraddiictOnx3 15 күн бұрын

Here in 2024 <3

@jordanjohnson7403 12 күн бұрын

Same 😅

@49marquito 26 күн бұрын

5:23 <3

@dhilanchettri4634 27 күн бұрын

is there anyway at 9:10 you can write out the logical conditional reasoning flaw out with arrows. I think I am understanding it but I want to make sure ------ what i have now from passage: when prob resolved -> succeed ---- AC C says: succeed -> problem resolved? --------- i see why its the wrong answer but i want to make sure my logic chain is correct

@robertbusk1977 27 күн бұрын

I will die on the hill that these are the hardest LR questions

@niawalker7745 29 күн бұрын

Hi there, do you have any tips on how to find words without CONTROL + F quickly for students who take the the LSAT on pencil and paper

@gregorysmith5502 Ай бұрын

Best video I’ve seen to address reading comprehension. Such a boring topic and this video made it so fun and the speaker was so relatable. Amazing

@krampuri11 Ай бұрын

justice for the gingerbread man

@devinhawkinson7975 Ай бұрын

7:00 Can't you follow assume if P than not M then not K thus L. Therefor getting you both P implies L and P implies not L. Does this contradiction matter?

@dfull31 Ай бұрын

Pure GOLD

@Rodion3211 Ай бұрын

Why can’t you include the facts in the conclusion like in answer B?

@capturingthemomentmediallc6799 Ай бұрын

Thanks so much

@capturingthemomentmediallc6799 Ай бұрын

Great teaching and well thought out video. Thanks so much for putting this on KZbin. I truly hope the LSAT starts to put in more evaluate questions now that it is a new format.

@KatAcevedo-i1f Ай бұрын

Thank you thank you !!!❤

@49marquito Ай бұрын

best in the game

@Mariana-wd3mg Ай бұрын

thank you so much for these videos they're so helpful and make studying fun

@AliceConrad-z6o Ай бұрын

Waino Isle

@MaymeJurgensmeier-e6w Ай бұрын

Kassulke Springs

@KieairaLove Ай бұрын

This video was very entertaining and helpful!

@nilanjanadutta5074 Ай бұрын

Can you please make a separate video on the circular reasoning concept and explain them with some LSAT questions?

@vishwajeetwagh7701 Ай бұрын

Please provide this kind of lec daily it's helfull

@KiplingGeorgia-e6p Ай бұрын

Robinson Betty Walker Sandra Davis Barbara

@KiplingGeorgia-e6p Ай бұрын

Martinez Margaret Williams Nancy Walker David

@KiplingGeorgia-e6p Ай бұрын

Brown Susan Miller Sarah Hall Karen

@sarahanne99-p5j Ай бұрын

This is amazing. Way underrated form of prep. Thank you!

@jailbird3159 Ай бұрын

Your channel single-handedly got me a 151, taking it again with 7sage but just goes to show how great these videos are.

@jailbird3159 Ай бұрын

Your channel single-handedly got me a 151, taking it again with 7sage but just goes to show how great these videos are.

@parker4878 2 ай бұрын

Can’t thank you enough for these videos

@FerdilyAlbano 2 ай бұрын

BABE WAKE UP NEW LSATLAB VID DROPPEd

@rebekahr25 13 күн бұрын

real

@colestubing3424 2 ай бұрын

my problem with the french academy one is I would have figured that more financial support would allow for increased innovation. How is that not the case?

@user-p3r5k 2 ай бұрын

Thank you 🎉😂❤

@r.p.8906 2 ай бұрын

this was most helpful. Totally understanding the passage does not guarantee correct answers. So helpful indeed!

@madeleinezoeller3014 2 ай бұрын

I taught Anthropology at UCLA. The fact that, according to the LSAT writers, the "correct answer" to S3, Q25 is A explains a lot about how we have a government full of Harvard trained lawyers that feel qualified to make scientific judgements despite not understanding basic scientific reasoning. Your teaching skills are great though!

@avi4831 Ай бұрын

I’m confused. The author of the this passage used flawed reasoning as stated in A. Do you see choosing this answer as somehow making a scientific claim regarding the accuracy of the passage?

@isabellafunk1672 2 ай бұрын

i like patricks vids bc they're fun

@hannahf5745 2 ай бұрын

Hi, thanks for the video. I am intrigued by your definition of hypothesis -- would you say that a "causal explanation for something that happened" could be an explanation based on evidence that has already been evaluated? I missed rc question #13 on practice test 151/85 due to feeling certain the intro paragraph had a conclusion, theory, explanation, or interpretation, but definitely not a hypothesis. Turns out the correct answer was hypothesis. I thought a hypothesis had to be something tentative or at least an assumption. That is, something untested which you might later gather evidence for in order to evaluate its correctness. Merriam Webster agrees with me, but what matters is how LSAT uses the word. Do you know whether LSAT uses this word more in the way "theory" or "conclusion" are used at the end of research papers? I am asking because I would like to know whether I failed to notice that the conclusion stated at the beginning is actually tentative, or whether I was misunderstanding the way LSAT uses the word "hypothesis." Thanks again for the helpful information.

@oscaromarquez1940 2 ай бұрын

genius humor and overall explanations!

@myceliamacabre9817 2 ай бұрын

How do we know when it is acceptable to use the contrapositive. I’ve been flipping the Necessary/Sufficent in error.

@weldingmywaytolawschool 2 ай бұрын

Love the Tropico 5 soundtrack

@NLSaspirant 2 ай бұрын

what is the difference between main idea and main point ???

@hannahf5745 2 ай бұрын

I think maybe the video doesn't ever say "main idea," just "big idea." I think main idea and main point often mean the same thing. The difference between big ideas in a passage and the main point of a passage is that there is only one main point of a passage. There are multiple big ideas. A passage about why running is good for you could have two paragraphs explaining why some people think it is bad for you. If you had to summarize the passage into a very short bulleted list, "some people think running is bad for you because it causes knee replacements" would be one of the bullet points. Each bullet point might be a big idea. But the overall argument that the author of the passage was making -- running is good for you -- would be the main point. In this video, I think LSAT lab is using the term "big idea" to describe the two or three types of things that happen in each question framework. If you go to 4:15, they have an example of what the big ideas are in a romantic comedy movie. Then they show how the LSAT explicitly tells you to look for some different types of big ideas, and different big ideas are found in different types of question. At 6:20 and 9:18 they explain the big ideas are for a couple different question types. E.g. There is an old thing and a new thing for each old/new passage. If you get that passage, you can figure out a one sentence summary for the old thing and the new thing. Later they show how to identify the main ideas in the Irish grain analysis passage based on its question type. If you search big idea and main point in the search bar for the transcript, you can go right to the part of the video that mentions those terms -- but you might want to rewatch it and keep a lookout for those terms. Main idea note: (If the main point is "cats are good unless you have severe allergies," you could argue that that is two points (1. cats are almost always good. 2. Cats are bad if you have severe allergies,) but in this context the LSAT calls the main thesis/argument/idea of the passage as the main point.)

@mehekabdullah1114 2 ай бұрын

why do these tactics make things more difficult

@zoefumdaaudley7647 2 ай бұрын

Garcia Linda Johnson Deborah Williams Cynthia

Ең жақсы KZbin

Пікірлер