LSAT Lab

Пікірлер

@juliemayhwang4469 23 сағат бұрын

You’re welcome!

@ZZZ-xq9pk Күн бұрын

Thanks for uploading these! Ive been stuck on what lsat prep to start and was trying to see what your course was like , and these videos really help. The trial materials at other prep things were kind of meh. These have really been helping me understand my issues on the questions I'm weakest at. Will be subscribing soon :)

@calmviews99 6 күн бұрын

If you are self studying for the LSAT subscribe to this channel

@firewalker1121 8 күн бұрын

I'm here from reddit. One strategy I haven't seen before but am going to start doing now is coming up with a "rule" for what each answer choice is trying to express and then seeing which one is closest to the situation in the passage. I usually find myself much too focused on the details of each answer choice which leads me in the wrong direction. Great video!

@LisaMarieKao 10 күн бұрын

Thank you LSAT lab..

@juliemayhwang4469 12 күн бұрын

If you ask me, Harvard would say - “love is between a man and a woman.” One nation Under god Indivisible & :p + :) & indivisible and United Nations. Quote quote: :) :ce ce 🌸 Please support Anti asian hate crime p.s. my dad. He died and came back. Also tell him, I’m going to Harvard! ( I think.) we’ll have to wait to wait for Simon j. My boyfriend. Bye :)

@anushridicholkar2961 14 күн бұрын

9:45

@juliemayhwang4469 19 күн бұрын

Like schrodingers cat!

@spikeisking007 Ай бұрын

What section of the LSAT is the gaslighting?

@theodoreniekras9622 Ай бұрын

Can you or anyone by chance tell me how the first conditional, the stimulus I mean, is valid logic. I cannot see it.

@henryroth2510 Ай бұрын

this is dope

@ideyforyou Ай бұрын

Thank you for sharing. This is really helpful!

@Dopamine_fighter Ай бұрын

Hey man, huge thanks for these videos. But it's sometimes confusing for me to understand causal or comparison statements. I saw the 3 reasoning structures videos and got an understanding of the conditional one but not the causal or comparison one. If it's possible, kindly change the video of those 2 with a new recording on how to identify them. Thanks for the content.

@shantemahhaj6934 Ай бұрын

These videos provide very FRESH approaches that I haven't come across before. And Im shocked by how much I am laughing while learning. I swear I am not a bot comment. Im just genuinely and pleasantly surprised! LOL

@biglex9069 Ай бұрын

I’m still confused as to how “E” was the answer to the last question

@hanshalili2248 Ай бұрын

6:36 he says pen*s

@Tuwaisuh Ай бұрын

Hi I don't know if you still answer these, but is it always "Depends" for linking and "required" for defending or was that a coincidence?

@신촌엔바나나가없-x9j 2 ай бұрын

can anyone tell me the another example of ‘false choice’ flaw in the 10th flaw? (and thanks you for the great video. i really appreciate it)

@uraddiictOnx3 2 ай бұрын

The painting one 🤦🏽‍♀️

@uraddiictOnx3 2 ай бұрын

13:34🤯

@uraddiictOnx3 2 ай бұрын

10:25

@alejandrochavez5314 2 ай бұрын

For the third question, isnt the physician taking for granted that professional supervision would reduce the number of trampoline-related injuries, and thus he would agree with answer choice D? Maybe my mind is just jumping to the assumption that that is in an assumption the physician may be hold. Perhaps he reccomends professional supervision for other reasons, like there being a person to call 911 when someone gets injured.

@SFuNk24 2 ай бұрын

"scintillating vernacular" HAHAHA YESSS! Also every time you say "Whyyyyyy?" I get a good chuckle. Great videos. Thank you. Here's hoping we all get 170's :D Best of luck to all!

@irvinghanan4230 2 ай бұрын

can these trap answer recognition techniques be applied to LR inference questions?

@BiancaGrant-e6w 2 ай бұрын

these videos are the best! very informative and entertaining.

@uraddiictOnx3 2 ай бұрын

LSAT Lab is saving me in 2024, been struggling with identifying conclusions! 33:37

@uraddiictOnx3 2 ай бұрын

Here in 2024 <3

@jordanjohnson7403 2 ай бұрын

Same 😅

@49marquito 3 ай бұрын

5:23 <3

@dhilanchettri4634 3 ай бұрын

is there anyway at 9:10 you can write out the logical conditional reasoning flaw out with arrows. I think I am understanding it but I want to make sure ------ what i have now from passage: when prob resolved -> succeed ---- AC C says: succeed -> problem resolved? --------- i see why its the wrong answer but i want to make sure my logic chain is correct

@robertbusk1977 3 ай бұрын

I will die on the hill that these are the hardest LR questions

@niawalker7745 3 ай бұрын

Hi there, do you have any tips on how to find words without CONTROL + F quickly for students who take the the LSAT on pencil and paper

@gregorysmith5502 3 ай бұрын

Best video I’ve seen to address reading comprehension. Such a boring topic and this video made it so fun and the speaker was so relatable. Amazing

@krampuri11 3 ай бұрын

justice for the gingerbread man

@devinhawkinson7975 3 ай бұрын

7:00 Can't you follow assume if P than not M then not K thus L. Therefor getting you both P implies L and P implies not L. Does this contradiction matter?

@dfull31 3 ай бұрын

Pure GOLD

@Rodion3211 3 ай бұрын

Why can’t you include the facts in the conclusion like in answer B?

@capturingthemomentmediallc6799 3 ай бұрын

Thanks so much

@capturingthemomentmediallc6799 3 ай бұрын

Great teaching and well thought out video. Thanks so much for putting this on KZbin. I truly hope the LSAT starts to put in more evaluate questions now that it is a new format.

@uraddiictOnx3 Ай бұрын

No keep this question away😅