Man, you’re so good at explaining. I really appreciate the real example instead of a generic one, it helps a lot. I’m currently writing by bachelor thesis using the newtons method in n dimensions couldn’t understand how to calculate the Jacobian. This video helped me a lot. Thanks for your expertise 🫶
@1ri-san2 ай бұрын
I understand that if, by chance, we plugged in p into g(x) = x + f(x) and we get g(p) = p, then we have found a solution for f(x). What I don't understand is how we know that if we plug in an x - not necessarily p - then we know that to eventually converge to p, we use whatever g(x) = x + f(x) outputs as the new x.
@shannoncurtis82182 ай бұрын
Thank you, my professor's example left my brian dusty
@akhilade-qq7xf3 ай бұрын
wrong method
@the-Math-guy3 ай бұрын
Excuse me on what basis do you claim its wrong
@kimosopjemutainasaline35413 ай бұрын
You are too fast one can't track where you are obtaining your figures
@eduardojesus25223 ай бұрын
Thank you very much for the clear and to the point explanation of how the method works.
@jasonthomas29083 ай бұрын
Good explanation, thanks
@siebedevenyn47314 ай бұрын
merci!
@nvk-aggie4 ай бұрын
Great video! As a note, If we change the initial guess values to (1.0; 0.0) we obtain a different final solution as (2.0; 0.0).
@oscarlind88974 ай бұрын
Great video. I just have one reason why do we have to do the trick where say -x_1+x_1, when you could isolate a_2 without
@rajatyadav71434 ай бұрын
Great video
@israelalozie64074 ай бұрын
Thank you, it was very enlightening
@israelalozie64074 ай бұрын
Why did you have to multiply by 1/3 in the first one then 1/15 in the next and 1/63 in the next
@avocadolover2574 ай бұрын
thank you sir
@rameztabar21864 ай бұрын
How will I know the final answer? after how many iterations?
@gggamingbadspawn1724 ай бұрын
Thank you :)
@manbirjudge84154 ай бұрын
Bro such a good explanation! Thank you!
@alexruiztagle4765 ай бұрын
Why did you remove your numerical methods playlist?
@the-Math-guy5 ай бұрын
It was in error I will set it up again. Thank you for noting
@kacper75165 ай бұрын
Check out the part after 15:52
@user-vd9qk6ix8m5 ай бұрын
13:23 error with the 16 plugging into the original 2nd equation.
@BiplobHossainSorker5 ай бұрын
I love mathematics
@LorPhan84965 ай бұрын
Hello kindly explain how you solve those, I'm confused how you solve it. Thank you
@abdulwasayikhlaq80135 ай бұрын
Perfect and easy to follow explanation!
@abdulwasayikhlaq80135 ай бұрын
Thankyou for the video! It is really helpful
@mohammedferas43936 ай бұрын
now im more confused thx
@irfanmauludin3986 ай бұрын
I felt this equation just like Kalman Filter 🤭🙏
@simonorga-konto53896 ай бұрын
thx!!!!
@pins8496 ай бұрын
Wouldn’t it be Cn+1/Cn?
@edwardyudolevich33527 ай бұрын
U wrote simpson’s rule incorrectly
@saquibsarwer5267 ай бұрын
Awesome video bro❤
@Jowhatis7 ай бұрын
YOU ARE AMAZING THANK YOU!
@abdulwasayikhlaq80137 ай бұрын
Excellent content!
@shinyespeon28137 ай бұрын
at 8:08, I think it is supposed to be 0 = -2. I think there was just a slight error in the multiplication through the first equation, but I am still glad that this video is out since it helped me understand the 3 solution types better!!!
@richards_greatman7 ай бұрын
This video is so so explanatory. Thank you so much.
@nijatshukurov90227 ай бұрын
8:05 you skipped the important steps.
@gyanapriyadarshi7 ай бұрын
Thank God. At least someone explained it clearly. Thank you.
@lanefisher57287 ай бұрын
Thanks, Big help
@MVBMOHDSHADAB8 ай бұрын
👏👏👏👏
@amirabbasnazari50898 ай бұрын
Hello, how can i Solve under relaxation????
@adonaielohim41478 ай бұрын
thnx dude
@aumiosarker8 ай бұрын
Thank you❤
@iftekharulalam388 ай бұрын
Great Explanation. Thank you.
@bobasawrus8 ай бұрын
Thankyou for your very clear explanation!
@pietheijn-vo1gt8 ай бұрын
16:15 Why do you 'need' RK4 to compute y1, y2, y3? Why can't you just RK3, RK2 or even RK1, if you accept the larger error?
@michaelmoore75689 ай бұрын
Would you use a Vander mind identity matrix here to try and fit the polynomial?