Holy moly, that is some jibberish. I was so disappointed because I wanted so much to learn.

Who knows if a trajectory of all the observed frame of reference in time by an observer is a trajectory indeed, I think yes, it can't be a "line". It would also mean no free will, and that the "block universe" theory of Einstein be true (And I thought it had been proven false. I'll probably always prefer the many worlds interpretation for that pesky wave function to describe a coherent space-time for an observer's "grid of determined Planck spaces sized voxels". A trajectory in time means time can't be "ONE dimension "outside" of that frame of reference itself... If that makes sense, or a more absolute point of view of the lives of observers. Sorry, this is probably out of the subject discussed here too, it's just my thoughts since I woke up to this physics video playing. From our point of view, time IS a line from point A to point B or from an event horizon to the next, but because it already happened, always what we observe, we have already observed in the "past" from our own point of view. I believe either the many worlds is the true state of the multiverse or, IDK, I'm at my limit, and I slept horribly badly. Or maybe the universe is a simulation that processes batches of observed frames of references at a *time,* a "many worlds multiverse" at a *time.*

same old, same old

Good talk.

Not bad at all~

PS: The "mexican hat" model is also used by the Cosmologists, and IF it were possible to monitor the spins at the top-side of the hat, versus the low-side of the hat, this would be a very good Magnetic sensor, especially if the Hat were asymmetric oval or warped, since then the direction of the field could easily be ascertained as well. Present equipment does this by using mechanical cross-planes.

This is great theory. Probably good for some metrology applications, like the decades old "dirt-bag" accelerometers and gyros which we worked on. BUT just looking at her/him/they/their (tyring to avoid EU fines for misgendering), actual numbers, and comparing to a modern cellphone memory and gamer videoboard structures, what we see is horrible. CMOS is now capable of 4nanometer structures for a single bit, and 2nm seems possible at ordinary room temperatures, in ordinary sheet processable materials. As such looking at the numbers for Quantum/Comps, we see about 10-to+6th larger memory cell area, another 10-to+3rd Volume for the lasing and large area interrogation, and another 300-to+3rd in Volume for the cooling apparatus needed to process or replicate any modern Cellphone. To replicate an NVIDIA video card, would require somewhere at about 10-to+12th cubic meters of space size, and thousand-to-millons pounds of weight, and megaWatts of equivalent energy. Volume of about 1million football stadiums. IBM has already given up on this area, and millions of investors have lost billions of investment dollars on a hopeless scam propagated by commercial shysters. I'm a trader, this area is a hopeless loser.

Annoying to many ums. Sorry.

So, this is the precursor to non-linear electronics?

love You Dr Isaac Chuaang ❤

Thanks for the video. I'm really excited to learn deeply about quantum mechanic and quantum computer. I'm a Software Developer. I used to use C/C++, Python, javascript and Assembly Language for Programming. Hope I can join with whoever doing research about quantum computer

"Promosm"

I have decoded the Great Pyramid and the Sphinx. 2026awakening.com

Love this video. From Jakarta Indonesia

Shouldn't it be 4^n unique measurements for full QST? Just checking