Schleier-Smith: “Atoms Interlinked by Light: Programmable Nonlocal Interactions for Quantum Sim.”

[@brunonikodemski2420]

PS: The "mexican hat" model is also used by the Cosmologists, and IF it were possible to monitor the spins at the top-side of the hat, versus the low-side of the hat, this would be a very good Magnetic sensor, especially if the Hat were asymmetric oval or warped, since then the direction of the field could easily be ascertained as well. Present equipment does this by using mechanical cross-planes.

[@robmorgan1214]

Good talk.

[@Zbezt]

Not bad at all~

[@jojogaming1013]

Who knows if a trajectory of all the observed frame of reference in time by an observer is a trajectory indeed, I think yes, it can't be a "line". It would also mean no free will, and that the "block universe" theory of Einstein be true (And I thought it had been proven false. I'll probably always prefer the many worlds interpretation for that pesky wave function to describe a coherent space-time for an observer's "grid of determined Planck spaces sized voxels". A trajectory in time means time can't be "ONE dimension "outside" of that frame of reference itself... If that makes sense, or a more absolute point of view of the lives of observers. Sorry, this is probably out of the subject discussed here too, it's just my thoughts since I woke up to this physics video playing. From our point of view, time IS a line from point A to point B or from an event horizon to the next, but because it already happened, always what we observe, we have already observed in the "past" from our own point of view. I believe either the many worlds is the true state of the multiverse or, IDK, I'm at my limit, and I slept horribly badly. Or maybe the universe is a simulation that processes batches of observed frames of references at a *time,* a "many worlds multiverse" at a *time.*

[@dygertsa]

I’m not a physicist but attempting to comprehend the information presented: whether there is free will or not, that doesn’t necessarily change the nature of our states but rather implies at least on some level that we each have the ability to determine the direction we want, influencing this reality as well as others both in a macro sense and a micro sense, meaning even if unable to view the larger picture, every thought has the capability of creating the picture from within the viewers perspective and actively influences its surroundings, like our “physical” bodies, our behavior, etc. providing for the illusion, no matter how real it might sound. This may seem basic to some but this talk seems to validate the idea, if this interpretation of the data presented doesn’t align, I’d love to hear thoughts and suggestions. Thanks to whomever posted the video and thanks for reading this comment. Be blessed.

[@vaakdemandante8772]

same old, same old

[@alejandrorivera2734]

Annoying to many ums. Sorry.

[@brunonikodemski2420]

Even worse in fast speed.

[@Zbezt]

Learn some patience or are your one of those perpetual child types

[@brunonikodemski2420]

@@Zbezt She is functionally stupid and just repeats the screeds on several papers, which are obviously not in her mind as a technical artifact. She is a robot. I've read all of those papers, and this presentation is NOT worthy of a real scientist. Brainless repetitive DEI.

[@fable-veil]

​@@Zbezt it's not really about patience, at least personally, it's just distracting and takes away from the otherwise very good presentation. it's one of the first things you learn in oration, not to fill every bit of silence. while i dont necessarily agree that it's annoying, her lecturing would be vastly improved by her simply getting comfortable with those short silences.

[@CristianmrWuno]

it's normal to stutter when speaking about a complex topic