Thanks for this content, but it seems you're going out of your way to recommend charter schools -- Teach for America, High Tech High, etc. -- and I'm not sure why anyone committed to education would do so. Study after study has demonstrated that charters perform no better than public schools (often worse), despite the advantage of not having to comply with regulations and often refusing to accept special needs students (students with disabilities, English language learners, etc.). From Wikipedia: "Teach For America has been criticized by opponents who claim the program replaces experienced teachers with brand-new employees who have had only five weeks of training during the summer, which are brought in at beginners' salary levels.[23] This criticism applies to the vast majority of new Teach For America teachers, though a small percentage may have some previous experience in education or advanced degrees. Teach for America has responded to critics of its training program by introducing a new program that encourages juniors at undergraduate universities to complete education courses in their senior year before setting foot in the classroom.[24] "Teachers' unions regularly critique the organization, which they see as undermining the professionalization of the education sector by bringing in temporary amateurs to fill positions traditionally reserved for certified professionals. John Wilson, executive director of the National Education Association, sent a memo in May 2009 stating that union leaders were 'beginning to see school systems lay off teachers and then hire Teach For America college grads due to a contract they signed.' Wilson went on to say that Teach For America brings in "the least-prepared and the least-experienced teachers" into low-income schools and makes them 'the teacher of record'.[25] "USA Today reported that in March 2009, Peter Gorman, the superintendent of Charlotte-Mecklenburg, North Carolina schools told board members that because of a commitment made to the program, 100 Teach For America teachers would be retained in spite of the fact that hundreds of other non-Teach For America teachers in the district would be laid off. However, Teach For America spokeswoman Kerci Marcello Stroud says it would be a mistaken notion to say that Teach For America corps members are displacing experienced teachers. 'In every region where we send teachers, we're just one source,' she says. "Once they land, corps members must interview for jobs just like everyone else."[25] "Critics of Teach For America have also cited the results of Mathematica Policy Research's 2004 study as an indication of Teach For America's lack of efficacy (see Educational Impact). These critics claim that while the study shows that students taught by Teach For America teachers perform better in mathematics than those taught by non-Teach For America teachers, the improvement is very small, and that furthermore there is no difference in reading performance between the two groups.[25] "A 2010 article published by Campus Progress suggested that 'TFA’s breakneck training course leaves TFA teachers-or 'corps members,' as they’re called-with insufficient classroom experience, before throwing them headfirst into some of the most disadvantaged school districts in the country.'[26]"
@soundguysean47472 жыл бұрын
I am going to "briefly" describe my experience with Applicant Tracking Systems. I have been gainfully employed since High School. I recently quit my job of 8 years. I have applied for dozens of positions for which my skill set perfectly matches or exceeds the job descriptions. ATS systems have consistently destroyed my resume with parsing. There are not specialized characters, graphics, or odd formatting on my resume / CV. I took the time to copy and paste from my resume into the correct fields, then hitting the NEXT or CONTINUE button. After doing this the ATS system re-parsed / repopulated the the original failed resume extraction. I also attempted a .txt file and a PDF. Neither of these gave me satisfactory results. It should not take me 4 hours to complete a career application. I should NOT have to email iCIMS, watch videos, or search internet forums on how to "beat the system". This is a failure on the part of HR and the tech companies who developed these systems. I am the person who people come to for technology advice, VTC, AV, PC, Basic Networking. My advice is to snail mail a hard copy of your resume to the HR department via certified letter.
@halehaticekizilcik3322 жыл бұрын
Sounds too long
@bohemianhippee2 жыл бұрын
Question - in this hybrid working environment we find ourselves in, is the address of the hiring manager necessary? We no longer snail mail our resumes. Thank you!
@floriris13432 жыл бұрын
9wd1r vun.fyi
@frankdimeglio82163 жыл бұрын
UC Berkeley is political. They teach outdated and maximum money making agenda "physics". Here is the proof. Here are the facts. Demand real physics. Demand the truth. THE ULTIMATE (AND CLEAR) MATHEMATICAL UNIFICATION (AND PROOF) REGARDING PHYSICS/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE IS NOW DEMONSTRATED, AS E=MC2 IS F=MA: TIME DILATION ultimately proves (ON BALANCE) that E=mc2 IS F=ma, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. (Importantly, balance and completeness go hand in hand.) The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. NOW, A PHOTON may be placed at the center of WHAT IS THE SUN (as A POINT, of course); AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light (c); AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Indeed, ultimately and truly, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=MA; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. GREAT. Accordingly, INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=mc2 IS F=ma. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=MC2 IS F=MA. GREAT !!! Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=mc2 is F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Consider THE MAN who is standing on what is THE EARTH/GROUND. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. Great. MOREOVER, a given PLANET (including what is THE EARTH) then sweeps out equal areas in equal times consistent WITH/AS F=ma, E=mc2, AND what is perpetual motion; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Stellar clustering ALSO proves ON BALANCE that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Objects (including WHAT IS the falling MAN) fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), as E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/energy is gravity. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 IS F=ma. THE DOME of a PERSON'S EYE is ALSO VISIBLE. (Notice the flat AND black space of what is THE EYE.) The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. The sky is blue, AND the Earth is blue. THE EARTH/ground AND THE SUN are E=mc2 AND F=ma IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS UNIVERSALLY PROVEN TO BE GRAVITY in what is a mathematically unified fashion. E=mc2 IS F=ma. The middle distance in/of/AS SPACE AND the full distance in/of/AS SPACE are NECESSARILY linked AND balanced. MAGNIFICENT !!!!!!!!!! INSTANTANEITY IS thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. It is ALL CLEARLY proven. Again, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GREAT. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. It is all CLEARLY proven !!!!!!!! TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. GREAT !!!!!!!! BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. By Frank DiMeglio
@samtan73283 жыл бұрын
How can we access part 2 of the series? Cannot find the videos. Could you please put them in a playlist?
@notjinx35453 жыл бұрын
4.4k views 1 year ago Still zero comment
@MxGinnis5043 жыл бұрын
Anyone here from job corps
@cfccofclackamascounty99674 жыл бұрын
Good content. The production quality could use improvement. Maybe some of the marketing students could help?
@prisonmike49714 жыл бұрын
This was just for an office, could you make one with more examples?
@LuisReyes-zs4uk4 жыл бұрын
Sound could be better on this video series. Very informative and helpful videos nonetheless.
@jazz20205 жыл бұрын
Great video! Go Bears :-)
@sophiarobles-mendoza4465 жыл бұрын
Where is part 2 & 3 of this workshop??
@BerkeleyCareerEngagement5 жыл бұрын
They are all within the Career Exploration playlist
@brushedstones58006 жыл бұрын
This is helpful!!
@emilycarter89222 жыл бұрын
You might want to check this out kzbin.info/www/bejne/aHe8hIusqaqVmcU
@onetwothree61087 жыл бұрын
Help with papers. facebook.com/essaywritingservices2016/
@Samael52710 жыл бұрын
I'm really getting tired of hearing about this admitting people and not numbers bullshit.
@thaothai340510 жыл бұрын
I know what you mean. Every law school tries hard to make applicants believe that they're more than just numbers. Unfortunately, the stats of those that got into top law schools tell a different story.
@lawschooladviceguy9 жыл бұрын
***** Stats will always be king, and no school will deny that. But lots of students apply with great GPA/LSAT numbers. Its this kind of thing that distinguishes you from the pack of good numbers
@AmityDawn10 жыл бұрын
Most campus writing centers will help with statements!