Yes, you will still be requesting your maps via our tune request forms, but there are new forms linked on the site for new users.

@@EUROCOMPULSION ok appreciate it

Avant Garde man, we can get them for you.

Absolutely, yes.

Yes, it will definitely work on a Stelvio for sure. Most if not all the performance related parts are interchangeable between the Giulia and Stelvio.

Me too!

No extra power in Drag mode (not anymore than would be in Track mode), which is why we didn't publish that test. The Drag mode changes have more to do with throttle response and shift mapping, steering, torque reserve, etc. No real changes to peak torque and power for the purposes of this kind of testing. Now if we were at the drag strip, it's possible drag mode would produce the best results because of the changes outlined.

​@EUROCOMPULSION Every time I've run my 2020 or 2021 Ecoboost in drag mode, I've never gotten good results. Just straight sport mode with traction control off has always been given me the best. Any reason why? I'd say I'm no expert in drag racing lol. And it's just a brand new perfectly flat side street im driving on.

Probably outrun your Chevy bolt

This is a ram air intake, different from a normal intake. They offer some for 500$ but those don’t use cold air, just boxed temp. That’s because you have to get rid of the stock intake tube that feeds the air intake. This one is designed to fit with oem air duct, and provides a longer filter instead, hence the “v4” just means their latest design. You can still buy old design, but on paper this type of intake actually provides improved efficiency and performance, 800 is pretty entry level considering it’s a 40-50k new car. Picked one up for 22k with only 23k miles. Next is turbo upgrade!

@@Dr.reese_UBR3 ​​⁠i understand the difference between a true cold air and a ram hot box. This intake is identical to the previous minus the housing but then again it’s only a matter of time before this material surrounding the filter gets hot being so close to the engine still and begins to heat soak. again 800 bucks is not entry level by any means when 90 percent of the highest branded intakes for my m4 range from 4-600 and the m4 is actually worth the money u stated. 800 for a guilia not even a qv is not worth it. guilias can be found anywhere from 20-35k almost brand new. those cars make crap for power and 800 bucks will net u next to nothing.

@@1state152 it will still beat 85% of the cars on the road, as for track…. Maybe 5% 😂 also this engine isn’t producing the amount of heat you think it is… have you seen them up close? There’s almost a full arm length from the radiator to the front on the intake… it’s not the v6 one. That one basically has no space in the engine bay, this is fully enclosed and will definitely be cooler than stock abs plastic

First off, we didn't apply any loss corrections. The dyno reads the dissipation (drive train loss) for a given gear, and applies the correction it detects at any given moment. We explained that in the video, but what you're seeing is what the dyno detected. Secondly, drivetrain loss is not necessarily a fixed # across the power band (I don't know if people know this or not). Dissipation is linear in nature, and dependent upon the gear, rpm/speed/load, and the amount of power generated at a given rpm/moment in the powerband. A peak drivetrain loss happens near peak power and near the upper part of the powerband, depending on gear and speed. At a lower rpm/speed, the dissipation is not as high (for example, where you would see peak torque occurring or just before). The dyno detects and measures the resistance through the powertrain going from redline back to below the starting rpm for the dyno run. Resistance/dissipation is less at that point in the power band. Again, mentioned in the video, this is why we don't solely go off of the flywheel hp data. There are too many variables involved, it's only a small part of the bigger picture. We only show them at the end so everyone else can see them. EDIT: Look at the WHP charts in the video, the lines at the bottom show the dissipation reading throughout the run.

Honestly, I haven't paid attention to that at all. I will check and see the next time we fill up.

If you talking about fuel economy is the same I have a 2023 before and now 2024 my new is making 21 by gallons with only 350 miles in odometer, my old 2023 mark 22.3 miles by gallons .

@@Hersses-tech I have noticed that the 2024 runs a bit richer for longer across the middle to top end of the powerband.

Yes, it has our tune as well.

It should be in the closed position when the engine is off. It should only open when the pressure that it is meant to open at is met.

Your mom is calling you kid, shut off your xbox and wash up!

Thank you for taking the time to comment and tell us your thoughts 🙃

Style is subjective, and nobody ever claimed the Mustang EB is a muscle car. If you like 200 less pounds on the nose for better handling, yet appreciate the strong S550/S650 chassis…

Muscle is in the exterior style first and foremost imo. The rest about cars is just so damn hard to objectify. They have V8s in NON-muscle cars all over, so that's not a great way to value it.

These cars run the quarter mile in the 13's bone stock. For comparison, the 289 HiPo only did 15's, and in a car that weighed in at 500 lbs less. Just something to think about before you say this is no muscle car.

My personal opinion is yes. I think the S650 has a better base platform to build off for performance, and just superior drivability. It's fantastic to drive. I would say both the Ecoboost and the GT are better options than the V6 (overall, all things considered). You really cannot go wrong with either one. I wasn't expecting such a huge difference between my 2018 and the 2024, it was a bit surprising how much better the 2024 is. There's absolutely nothing wrong with the V6, it has its place, but worth upgrading? Definitely.

@@EUROCOMPULSION Now that we are 10 months on, have you learned whether that difference was changes to the engine hardware or software? I would be very interested to see how these two compare after both are given a comparable performance tune but stock otherwise.

It's probably hard to tell without seeing it in person (and holding it in your hands) but the filter and canister are huge. They aren't tiny openings, they're about 4 inches in diameter. The canister design is as such that it allows the air to swirl through the box, gaining velocity. This thing is anything but short on air flow. The ram air piece connects directly at the factory ram air duct inlet at the front of the car, go to the link in the description, you can see photos off the car in technical section. There's no sound clips because there isn't much, the entire thing is sealed. This is why we have the V2 intake, for people that care about sound, the V4 is for people who want max performance (regardless of sound).