know it alls

i feel like this just sealed my understanding of special and generate relativity finally. basically objects are always moving through spacetime at the same "rate" (the spacetime interval is invariant). In special relativity, as an object approaches speed c, the component of its spacetime interval in the time direction reduces (time dilation) and the component in the space direction increases (to keep the spacetime interval the same length). In general relativity, to preserve the interval in the presence of warped time, the interval gains a component in the spatial direction (it accelerates)

space time curved.. simple answer

Excellent - very enjoyable

Light like radio waves doesn't bend it travels in straight lines, that's why TV and radio broadcasts only go as far as the horizon. If over the horizon from a broadcast TX you will not receive the signals however strong. As light and radio waves are electromagnetic waves they all act the same, so where you got your information from is TOSH so go back to school and learn the laws of light and gravity.

So basicly, the only way to go faster then the current speed of light, is if God upgraded his PC to cut down loading time on the atomic level. Got it. XD

just reach the speed of light then push on the pedal a bit

Thank you! I didn't understand time dilation before this.

I like the way you tried to "String" us along for a while 😉 Is it helpful to think of spin as simply a form of mathematical transformation?

Thank you! this make a lot of sense now.

black hole is not black

Wow! Thank you so much. 🙂

Star Trek says you can. I believe them, not math.

Does this mean that theoretically we would be able to get to distance systems because ageing would be slowed down the closer we get to the speed of light?

Pls also talk about the formula of entropy ds=dq/dt how is it derived and feels about it..

I am distracted trying to understand the shirt. "I am a acute angle coffee pi?" I am acute mug pi? Is this a pun with magpie (which is a word I don't even know what it means)? english is not my first language xD

Let me make some another definition of refraction, i ll prove that that both of you are wrong.😅 Searching definition of some physical phenomenon on google is so weird

Well.. imagine the fabric of the universe being like a non-newtonian fluid. starch with water. you move it slowly, it behaves like very liquid honey.. you want to move it fast or even punch it, it's like concrete. the same with light speed. it itself is being "pushed" back to this absolute speedlimit. With c speed, you'll not gain infinite energy, but infinite mass (i guess this is more intuitive) I mean, a photon does not have almost infinite energy, when it's flying around, it has no mass.. but also the photon itself "pushes" through the fabric of the universe itself. If you were to go beyond c, you would "punch through" this "fabric".. and fabric is a very metaphorical description, i understand. But it's what most people can relate to while explaining 😅

Hindi me banaa video bhai Jaldi grow karega

Great explanation!

NB: I didn"t see yet the other video, sorry if I write something already addressed there. The idea of a constant acceleration is anyway questionnable, because the ship's mass also increases with its speed, thus the engine would need more and more power to keep the acceleration rate, and it would be infinite at c. A space ship is not needed to check this. Physicist have exactly this issue in particle accelerators. And they also can confirm time dilation, since the decay time of instable particles will become longer from the scientist's point of view.

Don’t be a third degree differential ? I don’t get it (tee)

I see people here are well educated in science I want to ask a question Existence of god (start)or (necessary being) scientifically/on basis on entropy (You can't say we don't see him so don't believe him even as theory cause in this question majority of human will have effect by this)

When he gets excited his inner indian pops up as he speaks lol

I suppose from the muons "point of view" it would think it was stood still and the earth is approaching it at the speed of light?

When the folded cone showed the Apple falling to the ground, I admit, I began howling with joy. This is amazing!

great video mahesh bhai, Planck's story about black body radiation would be great

Man It was beautiful

You can go faster than light..proof is neutrons in a nuclear reaction travel faster than light, so we use water to slow neutrons down...

No, it's simply because at that speed you have converted all of your matter into energy. ( Including you). so there is no more energy to push you faster, and this assumes 100 percent efficiency. It's in the equation, they are equal.

Ok, so then spending 1 hour near white hole should move time back by 7 years? Time traveling is real.

But the bio? Aging of cells? That has no clock but within?

light reacts with the electromagnet not the gravity.

velocity of electrons is random in the foil. why have you considered the velocity needed to give you the rightward force?

Das kann man auch nicht verstehen weil es der totale Unsinn ist und fast gegen alle physikalischen Regeln läuft. Wenn E=mc² richtig ist, wo von ich ausgehe, gilt auch m=E/c², was Masse zu gespeicherter Bewegung/Energie macht. Eine weitere Regel lautet Energie kann sich nicht frei bewegen, weshalb sie untrennbar an die Masse gebunden ist. (Einstein) Die 1.Frage der Physik lautet noch immer: "WER oder WAS bewegt sich WIE?" Dies gilt für alle Formen der Energie also auch für Raum und Zeit, welche aus dem Zusammenwirken von Masse und Bewegung entstehen und auch wenn sie selbst keine Teilchen enthalten ist der Ursprung eine sich bewegende Masse. mein-lernen.at/pythagoras/pythagoras-wuerfel/pythagoras-wurfel-uberblick/ Schwarz steht hier für die Längen (km³) aus der Bewegung (km/h oder m/s²) Rot steht für den Anteil der Zeit (h⁴) an der Expansion (km³/h⁴) Der Schnittpunkt der vier Raum-Diagonalen (rot) ist dabei der Ausgangspunkt der Energie, in Form einer sich bewegenden Masse, was unabhängig von ihrer Größe (also auch für Licht) gilt, denn auch wenn eine Kraft ihre Dominanz verliert, verschwindet sie ja nicht. Bei Teilchen wird die Gravitation durch Schwingung ersetzt als dritte dominierende Kraft, aber das Verhältnis von Masse/Durchmesser bleibt ja erhalten. Das größte Problem ist aber die Übernahmen von c=LG aus der SRT, in die ART, selbst wenn diese Geschwindigkeit gar nicht abgebildet wird, während man das Masse-Äquivalent aus der gespeicherten Energie ignoriert und nach DM/DE verlangt. Was läuft denn tatsächlich? Masse (m) * Umlauf^2 (c1)² * Rotation^2 (c2)² * Gravitation^2 (c3)² = Masse (m) * Raum (V) * Zeit (t) oder m (kg) * c1² (km/h) * c2² (km/h) * c3² (km/h²) = m (kg) * V (km³) * t (h⁴) und zurück denn jede Energie ist umwandelbar. Während beim Theo die Energie bei E=m*LG^2 endet, macht das Universum einfach E=m*(c1<LG*c2<LG*c3<LG)² und kann diesen Wert, weilt übertreffen ohne gegen die Regeln von LG zu verstoßen. Was uns aber nicht wundern sollte denn es macht ja den Job deutlich länger und hat sicher keinen Bock sich mit etwas rum zu ärgern, was sich jeder Kontrolle entzieht. Eine weitere Regel lautet: Am einfachsten Spart man Energie mit Masse die man NICHT bewegen muss, was aber nicht bedeutet, dass es Teilchen ohne Masse gibt, denn spätestens wenn es sich bewegt, hat es Energie und ein Masse-Äquivalent. Genau deshalb unterscheidet man ja zwischen Theorie und Physik, denn erst wenn sich eine Theorie beweisen lässt wird sie zur Physik. MfG P.

Excellent vid. Well done!

All make sence now, thanx

CHILL OUT BRO!! You' re acting like you DO discover this shit! You are just explaining it, arguably very well and intuitively... but still! You made my anxiety level skyrocket! Chill the freak out... tnks! 😳😳😳

It is neither a)alive b)dead c)some combination of both alive and dead d)neither alive nor dead A superposition of alive/dead is a secret fifth thing

Using moving magnetic fields generating electricity (phones) to explain how moving magnetic fields generates electricity

Time symmetry can be broken because Quantum particles like quarks arrange themselves in a way that is different, forwards and backwards in time. Therefore, quantum particles CAN tell the arrow of time ⏳➡⌛. Hence, your assumption at 16:48 that the entropy decides the arrow of time is wrong ❌. It is actually quantum particles that decides the arrow of time.

What's wierd about Einstein's thought experiment is that it would mean the earth is expanding since the acceleration is everywhere on earth, I don't still get it

Kinda sounds like tautology. Photons are massless because they travel at c, And they travel at c because they are massless.

Vsauce like intro "Or does it??" lol 0:22

Answer is simple

Thanks

I wonder what effects this would have on an observer inside the ship. Say we had twins who read at an equal pace. We'll call it one page per minute. At 87% of the speed of light (moving 2x slower to an observer outside the ship), and for ten minutes earth-bound/five minutes ship-bound, would the twin inside the ship read a page twice as slow as his twin outside of the ship (five pages) or would the ship-bound read twice as fast as the earth-bound twin (still ten pages, but in what seems like five for the ship-bound twin)? In other words, would the ship-bound twin feel like their reading speed increased and they were reading one page every 30 seconds now, or would they maintain the one page per minute pace?

Love your energy ❤️

those pieces of crap that starfleet builds can barely get off the ground.

The problem is Einstein was full of shit. How many people peer reviewed him? How many women peer reviewed Einstein. Give me a real number. Feinman told you he was making it up as he went along and nobody understood [QT]. Did you get a Eureka Moment with Relativity? There's a reason you probably don;t know anybody who has.