When I first heard your voice, I said he should be a journalist however after I saw your explanation, I understand why you’re a teacher. Absolutely clear and interesting explanation, thank you!
@FeecofinatedАй бұрын
me a architecture student who sees this at after the finals of surveying 😭 next is mec statics of rigid bodies and mechanics of deformable bodies
@Alpheccca5 ай бұрын
Very thankful for your clear explanation of so many items not covered elsewhere on the Tube.
@guanzhongshi64145 ай бұрын
very easy, simple and smart method
@applesnotoranges6 ай бұрын
Why call a video a computation while slipping all computations? wth
@ALIEUFSAMAH6 ай бұрын
How to pre-determined the Known Azimuth? Please I want to understand.
@dareen64519 ай бұрын
Thaank you thank youuuu Youre yhe besttttt
@dareen64519 ай бұрын
MAANNN you rescued meee!!!
@griffinchangwe632210 ай бұрын
Mr Todd you said when dealing with counterclockwise we have to -180 but from the way you calculated bc you added back bearing of AB to interior angle of B ?
@griffinchangwe632210 ай бұрын
Ve come now to understand the way to compute the closed traverse the WCB anticlockwise and clockwise thank you very much. Very nice explaining
@Samanananananan10 ай бұрын
Thank you. A big contribution to my civil fe studying
@Strux42 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for posting these. You are an excellent teacher!
@Strux42 Жыл бұрын
This is just great dang stuff and excellent teaching. Thanks!
@miracle3959 Жыл бұрын
i thought it mattered alot on whether you add or subtract 180 and the angle(im proabably doing it wrong). but i did it kinda randomly to keep the number within 360 and got it not returning to its origonal azimuth. sorry, random CE undergrad
@tombombadil9642 Жыл бұрын
Thanks bruv!
@ZiggyDan Жыл бұрын
Hubs! In ancient buildings I call them Nubs!
@saraoloomi4970 Жыл бұрын
I could not follow where 103.1' came from?
@vidpie8 ай бұрын
The lowest starting point (lower rt hand corner) was assumed to be a starting elevation of 100 ft. A calculation determined the rise from that point (to the lower left corner) would be 3.1 ft. Adding the two together gives us 103.1 ft.
@joebuzz6430 Жыл бұрын
Very intuitive explanation. Thanks!
@hawit1377 Жыл бұрын
wehave to see the picture of question to solve the problem with u ?? do't u think? ........make everythingg clear fr!!!!
@theowenhomestead9340 Жыл бұрын
why on my calculator do I get 356.0644 for my azimuth. When I convert to bearing it is 3.5316. How do I get the 93-53-16?
@mattensalaco96 Жыл бұрын
This guy seems pretty smart. He should head a land surveying program.
@shadism1714 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the clear explanation
@ernieforrest7218 Жыл бұрын
An experienced builder need not employ anyone to layout for him. He would have much experience in layout of the building. A survey of the property prior to and building work taking place is a separate issue, and should be done by a certified surveyor.
@nyonymousphuck4783 Жыл бұрын
Very helpful 🔥🔥🔥
@mannywalker5783 Жыл бұрын
How do you print out
@tamiratsheginu7238 Жыл бұрын
thanks for great videos lesson
@Ambina22 жыл бұрын
Thanks Dr. Horton!
@skusaid85122 жыл бұрын
Thx ✨✨ sir. Amazing clear-cut explanation
@rksmith52732 жыл бұрын
The field artillery uses the M2A2 Aiming circle which provides direction. The Bosch GOL32 only provides distance while other transit devices provide distance and elevation. Why not develop something that measures all three? The mortgage survey provides distance and no direction. Although the survey provides the PIN, it doesn't identify its actual location as in a grid. I find all of this interesting but almost useless because you have to pay thousands of dollars to own a high tech of machinery only to get part of the solution.
@sayedirshad14792 жыл бұрын
Life saver
@aamirabdulsalam2 жыл бұрын
scale is not 4 feet each of one unit
@Brendiinhaandrade2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for this video! I was stuck in a question of my surveying assessment for days, and you basically saved me! your video is fantastic, clear explanation and an easy way to explain the details, I wish you were my examiner.
@luisramos48202 жыл бұрын
NICE EXPLANATION!!! EXCELLENT
@BRAHKADIR2 жыл бұрын
please why did u add 5 to the last angles and didnt u used the 4.2'' to add the angles
@ehinspections2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing such great videos!
@victorb226222 жыл бұрын
It again remembered my engineering college days
@Demir_Beton_isleri2 жыл бұрын
level lessons in this link kzbin.info/www/bejne/ipvadp1ujZioopo
@nickh55322 жыл бұрын
so at 4:32 how exactly did you come up with 21" what is the conversion formula for the calc
@rajab27412 жыл бұрын
Thank you ...our lecturer brought the same question in an open test n boooom I just came straight here ......#please don't forget to SUBSCRIBE cause this channel is worth it
@whiskeylinux2 жыл бұрын
These videos are wildly interesting and quite helpful to a prospective surveyor. Thanks in 2022!
@geoterminus60402 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video. Nice explanation!
@freedomhillbilly3482 жыл бұрын
I've generalized the process to eliminate the need for a worksheet, eliminate the need to determine +/- 180 each step, and eliminate the problem of negative angles. it is also more amenable to automation via programming or spreadsheets. Here it is: Label all points in the direction of the traverse numerically from 1 (so 1, 2, 3... instead of A,B,C...) For Clockwise (CW) direction and Left Hand Angles (LHA) use the expression: A(n) = [A(n-1) - LHA(n) + 540]MOD360 Where An is the nth Azimuth, LHA(n) is the nth Left Hand Angle and MOD360 is the modulo operation (i.e divide by 360, throw out the quotient and keep the remainder. In simple terms, keep the the final angle result within the primary 0-360 degree circle.) For Clockwise (CW ) direction and Right Hand Angles the equation is: A(n) = [A(n-1) + RHA(n) +180]MOD360 A similar pair of equations can be derived for the complementary operation of finding the angles of turn given the Azimuths. I've confirmed they work for angle turns > 180 as well. These equations are elegant, closed form, and eliminate the plague of errors due to trying to keep track of all those sign changes etc. I'm sure I'm not the first to figure this out, but it's odd to me that everyone seems to teach this as you have. I understand that it's useful in cementing what the underlying mechanics are, but for real work, it's much too laborious. Maybe that's just me.
@dlinzikri17662 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@matteraho1072 жыл бұрын
1,296,000 seconds
@fireballz72 жыл бұрын
Can you please provide a link to the azimuth and interior angle work sheet in the comments?? Thanks!!!
@armorvestrus41192 жыл бұрын
Iit seems to me that in this modern time of new technologies that someone would have made a tape that would not change with heat or cold and not stretch or break when put to hard use. And also come with two handles and not just one. Every tape over 30 feet long should have two handles. Edmund Gunter got it right the first time by seeing the need for two handles at the ends of a measuring line. So a better question is I suppose is why do modern tapes not have any handles? Anyone care to answer this in the comments?
@armorvestrus41192 жыл бұрын
There should be a much better term for this work than just surveying, as that word is used in so many other ways. Surveying is not the best word to describe the work that land surveyors do. They could amend this by just prefixing the word Land, or Geo, and Plane surveying before the term surveying and set their profession apart from all other uses of the word. When taking samples of attitudes of people the word surveying fits very well; however, when locating points on the surface of the earth the word becomes inadequate because surveying is not a sample but a fixed value. Those who measure the land do not place a high enough value on the name of the art and science they do.