A couple tips from someone that has a lot of real traps. Use the auto throttle control function in the airplane. If you have the Thrustmaster throttle, It's the small red button under your left ring finger. Once activated it will show up in the HUD as ATC. This will make it much easier to get aboard. Now use pitch to control your glideslope. Once you pick up the meatball on final, try not to be reactive to the meatball, waiting for a high or low indication. Assuming it's close to centered when you pick it up and you're around 700 fpm, flatten your approach with a little back pressure on the stick and look for the meatball to move very slightly above centered and then adjust back to a slightly lower pitch and drive the ball back to centered. Then repeat until touchdown. Now you're controlling the ball not the other way around. This technique was called "Crowning the Ball." years ago and helped me get aboard every time. This technique works also with any airplane flying a glideslope.
@Archangel_exe23 сағат бұрын
I knew I recognised your voice from somewhere
@lucascolley4532 күн бұрын
Gents, I can see there's been some discussion below, but where is the livery for the A10CII as featured in this video? I have flown it quite recently but dont recall seeing this particular skin as an option. Is this a mod or core? It's beautiful and would love to fly this skin on Caucasus or Normandy. Many thanks.
@samfoxley89723 күн бұрын
Brilliant tutorial
@sol3cito333 күн бұрын
The only aircraft I am even more excited about is the Hercules.
@aplaceinthesky824 күн бұрын
why if I press the "Rshift+h" the pilot remove the monocle but put the nightvision googles on?
@MattWagner4 күн бұрын
Because you are toggling them, both cannot be used at the same time.
@aplaceinthesky824 күн бұрын
@@MattWagner so nvg switch off ? but still the pilot put the nvg back on
@MattWagner4 күн бұрын
@@aplaceinthesky82 The command simply swaps the NVG goggles with the HMD monocle. I think you may be confusing the HMD with NVG.
@aplaceinthesky824 күн бұрын
@@MattWagner yes probably 😅😁 which one is the default one to remove it if the on e a mention is only the swap between the two? Thank you
@jermomu5 күн бұрын
oh, i did enjoy this video. daddy waggy
@MattWagner8 күн бұрын
NOTE! Since the release of this video, setting HMCS as SOI is instead Coolie Switch Down, NOT up.
@rickkeller859610 күн бұрын
bonified legit!
@Joe-6047VT10 күн бұрын
Hi - Thanks Matt for doing these videos. They are excellent! I am new to DCS and I have a question. In the mission editor Tarawa is not listed with the other ships. I do see the other carriers. I do have the AV-8B Harrier. Any advice you can give would be greatly appreciated. Thank you and take care.
@guesswhoiscomingtodinner10 күн бұрын
Long rang line up lights no longer work. So no red, amber or green lights to tell of you are on course. Very frustrating.
@MattWagner10 күн бұрын
I just tested and work fine here. Please make sure your comm to the carrier are correct.
@guesswhoiscomingtodinner10 күн бұрын
@@MattWagner thank you so very much for the quick response. The comms seem to work fine. I get correct reactions from the carrier to 'inbound', ' established', ' commensing' etc . Or do you mean mayby something else? But I noticed that the lights do work in single thread instead of MT.
@racingtheweb13 күн бұрын
I can't bind RHG Manual Tracker to axis using the ministick on my Virpil MC3 throttle because I already binded the Cursor controller to that ministick. But if I'm not mistaken Wags says that's possible (min 31:57). In other words: if I'm using my ministick for slewing the TADS as CPG, can I use the same ministick to move the cursor between the MPDs?
@MattWagner13 күн бұрын
No, they must be two different axis switches. For example: I have one assigned to the mini-stick on my CM3 throttle and the other to the mini-stick on my Winwing F-16C Shaker stick.
@racingtheweb13 күн бұрын
@@MattWagner Got it Thank you so much
@EffieAgatha-e4n14 күн бұрын
Loyal Greens
@Dcs-Brasil17 күн бұрын
Nice 👍
@Caffeine_K918 күн бұрын
when data transfer cartridge for F-16C and F/a-18C?
@MattWagner17 күн бұрын
The countermeasure elements are first being developed and well along. We have no specific date set for release.
@taomahNEGEV18 күн бұрын
The only real simulator out there.
@ben186918 күн бұрын
It's great to have you back!
@daviddoyle98218 күн бұрын
What do plugged fuses do?
@MattWagner18 күн бұрын
They are not a fuze, just a solid cap.
@daviddoyle98218 күн бұрын
Cheers for the reply Wags. So, a plug is kind of like a cap in a hand gun, it’s triggered and sets off the bomb? And the FMU-152, the joint programable fuse, what kind of programs/set-ups are available? Sorry for the questions, I’ve been too timid to try them out myself, and reading the manual is tricky to concentrate since my head injury.
@MattWagner18 күн бұрын
@@daviddoyle982nope. Just an inert plug that fills the hole that a lack of fuse leaves.
@TheCraigHudson18 күн бұрын
Haven’t played for a few months comeback to basically restarting everything I thought I knew. Also they need to make an Apache Hotas as the hornet stick and a10 throttle aren’t enough
@MattWagner18 күн бұрын
There are certainly HOTAS systems that can map everything. For instance, I use a WinWing F-16 stick with shaker and a CM3 Virpil throttle. There are some AH-64D available for the entertainment market if you want to go down that route.
@TheCraigHudson17 күн бұрын
@@MattWagner okay good to know thanks for the reply? Keep up the good work
@postman223718 күн бұрын
F/A-18 The GBU-12, GBU-10 no longer explode on impact. I've tried both the FMU-155 and FMU-135, but it still doesn't work but in the F-16, the bombs work just fine. Is this a bug? Also, why do players have to change these fuzes themselves? Shouldn't the correct settings be the default? as a player, I might just want the bomb to detonate properly, and it would be better to spend time improving the explosion effects to make them more realistic.
@MattWagner18 күн бұрын
Not sure. I just tested and no such issue here. This is not really the place though. Please use our forum here: forum.dcs.world/forum/130-dcs-fa-18c/
@postman223718 күн бұрын
@@MattWagner I can’t create topic on ED forums
@MattWagner17 күн бұрын
@@postman2237 You need to register and then wait a day or two for your account to be active.
@postman223714 күн бұрын
@@MattWagner I've fixed it. The problem was I forgot to change the EFUZ (Electronic Fuze) to Instantaneous. That's why it didn't explode on impact 😅. I'm still new at this, so sorry about that. You guys made a perfect module. DCS forever! ❤
@indianajon798020 күн бұрын
Looks ace!
@ernestwinslow731620 күн бұрын
The Apache looks so much complex to me now. I got lost on these systems tutorials way back. I kind of just fly the bird around these days. I must equally say lots of credit to ED for such a detailed virtual representation of the AH-64D.
@ivaniuk12315 күн бұрын
The best way to learn the apache is to play the campaigns. You have to pay for them and they can be difficult but you'll learn the apache systems.
@BoogalooFL20 күн бұрын
Glad to see you back Matt. Any word on any ATC/AWCS/GCI improvements? This is a sorely missing feature that would really be nice to have.
@MattWagner20 күн бұрын
We are first working on a new interface so we can put the dated nested menu system to bed.
@BoogalooFL20 күн бұрын
@@MattWagner thanks for the reply. Yeah would love any core improvements. Are you able to talk about this new system at all? Totally understand if you can’t. Would love to fly with you sometime.
@MattWagner19 күн бұрын
This channel is more for helping understand how to fly our aircraft. Core items are generally discussed through our newsletter.
@BoogalooFL19 күн бұрын
@@MattWagner had to at least try right? Thanks anyways.
@HeroOfTheDay1620 күн бұрын
When are the AGM114-L's going to be fixed? Everytime i fly a mission for more than like 25 minutes and try to use them they dont hit anywhere near the target im locked to
@MattWagner20 күн бұрын
It sounds like you are WASing far too early. Nothing to “fix” when used correctly. Only WAS right before launching.
@HeroOfTheDay1620 күн бұрын
@@MattWagner is 2-3 minutes before being within launch range too early?
@MattWagner20 күн бұрын
@@HeroOfTheDay16 If you move between then, yes. As a rule, only WAS right before you launch. Once you launch, de-WAS. Please see the video here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/g5bSp62LbJ2ojMksi=A4KAykJ4zxiERIkL&t=423
@HeroOfTheDay1620 күн бұрын
@@MattWagner thanks for your help Matt 🤘🏾
@Jafarnld20 күн бұрын
BAGHDAD 😮 the only map I’m gonna use
@daliborrasic48420 күн бұрын
Do you know how to keep the Jester menu out of my head? When I turn it on, I don't see numbers 2, 3 and 4. So I can't control Jester.
@MattWagner20 күн бұрын
Please see the manual and earlier videos. The AH-64D uses the George system.
@LAWest20 күн бұрын
Great to hear you sounding better! Hope you're well and awesome work as always ♥
@MrGs500f20 күн бұрын
So will that function have a eyepeice overlay like i saw on an unmentionable pc game?
@MattWagner20 күн бұрын
Our AH-64D, F-16C, F/A-18C, and A-10C II all have some form of helmet mounted sight.
@MrGs500f20 күн бұрын
@@MattWagner I mean the map mode from the fcr to put indication of terrain in the eypeice like if it was 0,0 visibility you could see a hill from the radar but in the eyepiece. I'm happy to say I have all those modules and enjoy them all.
@MattWagner20 күн бұрын
@@MrGs500f I have not looked into much yet, but I believe that would more be a function of TPM, not RAMP.
@YYCH220 күн бұрын
Will we have similarly sophisticated AG radar modelling for Viper and Hornet?
@MattWagner20 күн бұрын
Both already do, but you should not expect a very similar image as the radars are quite different.
@Skipper44120 күн бұрын
Thank you Wags! The one of my favorite modules is getting better and better with every update.
@linearsoup223720 күн бұрын
The release of iraq map is 2024?
@MattWagner20 күн бұрын
That is still our plan.
@spirosdelistavros297021 күн бұрын
what is the advantage to use this rmap? if you see on the tsd you already see your height terain an valeys? Q2: any news about F15E? is it still supported? i ve read ED and razbam i still talking. But on their site " they have abandon ( that is what i understoot" DCS because of Aged simulator. Deoes ED now continue the development of the F15E?
@spirosdelistavros297021 күн бұрын
ok so its for night and in bad weather, but in night i use my flir optic
@MattWagner20 күн бұрын
Please the note in the video description.
@spirosdelistavros297018 күн бұрын
@@MattWagner ok noted ill catch up on the forum of ed
@Zatracenec21 күн бұрын
Welcome back, Wags. Great to see You / hear You back in action.
@helldivermando21 күн бұрын
Awesome Wags thank you! A question from a helo enthusiast: I’m the COY lead of one of the last PvP“bastions” for Soviet style helos in DCS. I love the technology that all the systems for bluefor aircraft bring to the table, but I fear that this immense advantage makes redfor helo less viable and pushes us out of significance on the battlefield. 1st: Are you aware of this challenge that the community faces? Secondly, are there any plans to add more modern systems or updates to the redforces? I know that there might be a problem to implement the current systems but I mean Mi24V with low light tv camera and flir (I just read a US paper from the 70s where it states that east Germany had about 300 of those helos), Ka50 Sh or more modern airframes? Thank you.
@MattWagner20 күн бұрын
We are very aware of the desire; the issue is more about available references that we could use.
@helldivermando20 күн бұрын
@@MattWagner yes and I guess a lot of sim pilots hope that there will be more references available in the future. It was probably a little bold question, I just wanted to raise the point from a subjective position that redfor feels to fall behind in all fields of the sim (FW, RW, AA, ATG, Transport/Logi). But I highly appreciate your demand for accuracy and realism in the sim. Thanks again and good to have you back. o7
@gehteuchnixan415621 күн бұрын
We need training missions for the FCR badly xDD
@spirosdelistavros297021 күн бұрын
use the firezone of the nevada map that is how i train with it
@spirosdelistavros297021 күн бұрын
instant action mission
@MattWagner20 күн бұрын
There is already an FCR training mission, and more are coming for the new modes like RAMP and ATM.
@blindflug620621 күн бұрын
Great! Is this already implemented? I saw it in the patch notes, and I tried keybinding it yesterday, but nothing happened. Cool feature
@MattWagner20 күн бұрын
Yes, it's been available since the last update.
@TheSirBlackbird21 күн бұрын
Excellent, topmoumoute :)
@uglyigor305521 күн бұрын
is the FCR still scanning from the TADS position or will this be corrected with the next FCR update?
@Raptor_921 күн бұрын
It doesn't, and never has, despite the community generating rumors about this.
@leer232119 күн бұрын
@@Raptor_9 One of the community members who said so, was an Apache pilot. So, I think he knows what he's talking about.
@Raptor_919 күн бұрын
@@leer2321 First of all, I am a real 64 pilot as well. Having said that, being a real pilot gives no credence to knowing how a video game works without insight from the devs of that game, so a comment from a real pilot is irrelevant anyway.
@felixf461321 күн бұрын
Great to hear that you recovered yourself. <3
@llama191021 күн бұрын
Nice view of Bagdad and a neat new feature :D
@2xKTfc21 күн бұрын
9:00 why does the hellfire cross into the video feed from the side of the frame? I'd expect it to come from the top, because the sensor, shooter and missile are all almost in line. Certainly not half a kilometer laterally displaced.
@MattWagner21 күн бұрын
Because of the radar seeker.
@2xKTfc21 күн бұрын
@@MattWagner I see! Thank you, appreciate your answering =)
@2xKTfc21 күн бұрын
@@MattWagner A follow-up: Does the FCR distinguish between returns from intact and destroyed vehicles? Or does the fire control system hide/purge radar tracks that it memorizes as previously engaged, but still "sees" the returns as normal? I'd imagine that a hellfire makes the radar cross section of a tank stand out even more...
@MattWagner21 күн бұрын
@@2xKTfc please see the earlier videos on FCR linked in the description.
@spirosdelistavros297021 күн бұрын
@@2xKTfc destrouyed tanks will still show up on the radar, use the tads to see if target is destroyed or not
@martinvyhnakable21 күн бұрын
Baghdad... This is 2010+ Baghdad. We dont have 2010 planes. We need 1990 Baghdad.
@MattWagner21 күн бұрын
We don’t really model 1990 aircraft. Many of our aircraft are between 2003 and 2012.
@Jarlerus21 күн бұрын
That's why we have to rely on 3rd party devs. <.<
@userhideyoshi21 күн бұрын
The cockpit mirror is still buggy too. When will they fix it?
@MattWagner19 күн бұрын
Not sure what you are referring to, and I'm not seeing an issue. I am also not seeing on our AH-64D Bug Forum. Please make an item there with a track file that allows us to reproduce. forum.dcs.world/forum/927-bugs-and-problems/ Thanks
@Pricklyhedgehog7221 күн бұрын
Looks like the Iraq map's graphics settings go all the way to, err, 11.
@xxnositxx21 күн бұрын
Show us you set up, Wags!
@MattWagner20 күн бұрын
Really not much to see. High-end PC, Winwing F-16C stick with shaker, Virpil CM3 throttle, and a 43-inch OLED monitor.
@ernestwinslow731620 күн бұрын
@@MattWagner Pretty much my control setup too. It would be great to share keymap binding if that is possible.
@MattWagner19 күн бұрын
Most of my bindings match the default plug-and-play bindings.
@TomP-14821 күн бұрын
Hey dad... I mean Wags. Think you could do another community Q&A video soon? Also maybe a 64 road map video so we know what's all supposed to be happening and when. I know you guys aren't doing the IZLID even though many units from this timeline used it.
@MattWagner20 күн бұрын
A more over-arching video is planned. Based on the one and only we did, the feedback was such that future specific topic videos was net negative.
@Sinni6420 күн бұрын
@@MattWagner Looking forward to it, really liked the first one.
@MattWagner19 күн бұрын
Sadly, many did not, or hijacked it.
@TomP-14819 күн бұрын
@@MattWagner I liked it. I thought it showed more passion and that you guys interact with the community more than a weekly newsletter.
@MattWagner19 күн бұрын
@@TomP-148 Unfortunately, the downvoting campaign told a different story.
@bjrnchrstn21 күн бұрын
Welcome back Wags. Sound all energetic again 👊🏼🫡
@davidlawrence323021 күн бұрын
I have the Airbus stick from Thrustmaster.. I have to set like a high deadzone and the helicopter still has never flown that steady forward.
@MattWagner20 күн бұрын
Quite steady here. Suggest you review some great videos regarding use of trim.
@sloppydog483121 күн бұрын
This has become my preferred method of doing business with the Apache. Great rendition of an amazing technology.
@jubuttib21 күн бұрын
Seeing as the symbology pops up even on the RMAP screen, is there really any downside to using the RMAP instead of GTM, beyond the extra visual "noise" maybe being distracting at times?