THINK Fluid Dynamix

2:34

CFD for the Water & Wastewater Industry: Simulation of Moving Bed Biofilm Reactors (MBBR)

6 ай бұрын

0:47

CFD in Industrial Mixing: Mixer sizing for solids suspension

Жыл бұрын

0:43

M-STAR CFD for hydraulics and free surface problems

Жыл бұрын

1:58

M-STAR: CFD for the Water, chemical and process industry

Жыл бұрын

0:38

CFD: Advanced Fluid Simulation

Жыл бұрын

0:43

CFD for Industrial Mixing: Turbulent vs Laminar Mixing

Жыл бұрын

1:04

CFD for the Chemical Industry: Analysis of Barrel Agitator

Жыл бұрын

0:55

CFD for Industrial Mixing: Turbulent Structures

2 жыл бұрын

1:06

INVENT HYPERCLASSIC: Hyperboloid Mixing Technology:

2 жыл бұрын

1:09

CFD for the Chemical Industry: Analysis of Rushton Turbine

2 жыл бұрын

1:39

CFD for Hydraulic Engineering

3 жыл бұрын

5:14

CFD in der Wasser- und Prozessindustrie: Beispiel eines Video-Projektberichts

4 жыл бұрын

1:05

CFD in the Water Industry: Automatic Optimization of pipe system

5 жыл бұрын

1:27

CFD in Water Treatment: distribution chamber

5 жыл бұрын

1:14

CFD for the Water & Wastewater Industry: The benefits of real time simulation

5 жыл бұрын

1:08

Blending experiment in slow motion

6 жыл бұрын

1:46

CFD for Water Treatment: Mixing Performance on Flocculation Basin

6 жыл бұрын

2:10

CFD in Water & Wastewater Treatment: A Rectangular Clarifier

6 жыл бұрын

1:17

CFD in Water & Wastewater Treatment: Suspension of solid particles in stirred tank

6 жыл бұрын

3:50

CFD Simulations for the Water & Process Industry

6 жыл бұрын

0:54

CFD for the Water & Wastewater Treatment: Splitter Box

6 жыл бұрын

1:13

CFD Simulation in the Oil and Gas Industry: 3 Phase Separator

6 жыл бұрын

0:23

Turbulence Model: URANS vs LES

6 жыл бұрын

3:10

CFD In Water Treatment: Resuspension of sludge in stirred tank

6 жыл бұрын

0:40

CFD for Industrial Mixing: Liquid Blending with Rushton Turbine

6 жыл бұрын

1:10

CFD for Wastewater Treatment: Simulation of Secondary Clarifier

6 жыл бұрын

0:38

CFD & Industrial Mixing: Cavern formation with a rushton turbine

6 жыл бұрын

1:00

CFD & Mixing: Turbulent dispersion model

7 жыл бұрын

1:13

CFD for Water Treatment: Modeling of sludge settling (SVI)

7 жыл бұрын

Пікірлер

@damlayilmaz6604 3 ай бұрын

is it explicit or implicit?

@konradw.4860 4 ай бұрын

how long is calculating such a simulation ?

@remyblanc1851 6 ай бұрын

Fascinating stuff, Efraim! would be glad to hear more.

@ERiess-Gonzalez 6 ай бұрын

Thanks Remy!

@АнатолийСуворов-т1с 7 ай бұрын

Судя по видео - отличная ранс модель. Еще б сравнить эту ранс с усредненным лес

@salahelayachi6445 8 ай бұрын

WHICH SOFTWARE ?

@user-rx5cs2lm5l 8 ай бұрын

Hey, what software do you use to make your simulations ?

@РассадинАлександр-к6к 9 ай бұрын

Great job!

@KunaefiKwok-zk5sn 11 ай бұрын

Hi, we need service for side entry agitator cfd? Can help?

@mohammadrezvan6138 11 ай бұрын

Hi, What is the software name ?

@TerragonCFD 11 ай бұрын

Nice Simulation 🙂

@skunkjobb 11 ай бұрын

I think the laminar case looked quite turbulent too, at least part of it.

@wavenoplays1863 Жыл бұрын

i want to do the same in ansys can you provide geometry or give me some good tutorial for the same

@Cooldude_69_69 Жыл бұрын

What was the reynolds number of the simulation ???

@marianodeanquin 4 ай бұрын

Cierto, ¿Cuanto vale Reynodls, viscocidad, presión, velocidad?,

@carlovonterragon Жыл бұрын

Very beautiful comparison ! 🙂

@mikaelwaltner6976 Жыл бұрын

Very nice. Is the software available for a monthly fee?

@thinkfluiddynamix4834 Жыл бұрын

Yes. For further information contact us at the site think-fluid-dynamix.com/

@punkisinthedetails1470 Жыл бұрын

Are the photoreal parts rendered in Think or a 3rd party

@garygranados2287 Жыл бұрын

What is the cost for a license?

@JanSyu Жыл бұрын

Terrific, can you tell me which software is this ?

@thinkfluiddynamix4834 Жыл бұрын

STAR-CCM+

@vxxed8668 Жыл бұрын

Try a toroidal, it's all the rage...

@sergeianpilov5222 Жыл бұрын

Looks cool :) Can it be somehow compared with "classical" CFD like Star-CCM+ - in terms of simulation and/or model preparation time?

@thinkfluiddynamix4834 Жыл бұрын

We've employed the Lattice Boltzmann code M-STAR CFD. The mesh generation takes under a minute to complete. As a result, it took me a mere 20 minutes to set up the model and commence running the solver.

@sergeianpilov5222 Жыл бұрын

@@thinkfluiddynamix4834 That's interesting, especially the "20 minutes" part :) Can I ask about the simulation wall time and used GPU? PS Do I get it right that LBM is transient-only?

@heatwaveguides15 Жыл бұрын

How are you combating numerical diffusion in laminar passive scalar case?

@thinkfluiddynamix4834 Жыл бұрын

Hi! numerical (or false) diffusion happens mostly with 1-order upwind schemes. These simulations are calculated using a Lattice-Boltzmann Method solver. The explicit time-scheme, together with a very small time-step (Courant number = 0.03) and a very high resolution (50 Million lattice points) makes sure that we do not have any problems with numerical diffusion.

@Artiick Жыл бұрын

So which is better? I don't understand anything about this 🤣

@rusalkin Жыл бұрын

it doesnt make the slightest difference, lol

@tomaccino 10 ай бұрын

@@rusalkinThere's description that explains everything 🤦🏻

@joemicka5222 Жыл бұрын

The music is so intense

@jonnywilliams208 Жыл бұрын

Big if tru

@watmay1 Жыл бұрын

Thats what im sayin!!!

@luren6840 Жыл бұрын

great job

@thinkfluiddynamix4834 Жыл бұрын

thanks!

@almakhrazi Жыл бұрын

which one the more realistic? LES or URANS?

@LoloLolo-px2fb Жыл бұрын

Les

@KW-12 11 ай бұрын

LES because you literally cut the vórtices you can resolve in a simulación with a filter that is defined by your mesh size. With RANS you are avergaing, you aren't really watching any vortices.

@эмборианэмбориадзе Жыл бұрын

star ccm?

@thinkfluiddynamix4834 Жыл бұрын

yes

@luren6840 2 жыл бұрын

geat work, very useful to understand the principle behind vortex shedding flowmeter

@rashaal-kayali3687 2 жыл бұрын

Could you please put the complete toutrial in ansys fluent for this type of mixer

@arshadbasha488 2 жыл бұрын

What software did u use to simulate this, its amazing!!

@stevbillccasan9913 2 жыл бұрын

Whats is name program ? Please

@luren6840 2 жыл бұрын

really beautiful

@kzanbusiness 2 жыл бұрын

Is that Ansys Fluent?

@kzanbusiness 2 жыл бұрын

Can you please tell which software was used for the simulation and the post processing?

@thinkfluiddynamix4834 2 жыл бұрын

The simulation is carried out by a Lattice Boltzmann code and the post processing is done using ParaView

@satishkbonthu 2 жыл бұрын

I knew what is that LBM code's name 😎

@thinkfluiddynamix4834 2 жыл бұрын

@@satishkbonthu :-) we will reveal it... not yet.

@kzanbusiness 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks @@thinkfluiddynamix4834 - was this done using a commercial code, or an in house code?

@sergeianpilov5222 2 жыл бұрын

@@thinkfluiddynamix4834 Are you not using Star-CCM+ ?

@ashutoshbhakte5435 2 жыл бұрын

Informative

@aichaamens6886 2 жыл бұрын

what is the difference please

@Nickzzzera_ 2 жыл бұрын

are you blind

@TerragonCFD Жыл бұрын

More large Eddy turbulence is visible in the Sample Above 🙂

@mohammedfoukrach6897 3 жыл бұрын

Hi, i have a problem for a numerical simulation of agitated vessel (MRF method) Pre Processing CFX 15.0; can you help me please ? DOMAIN INTERFACE: Domain Interface 1 Boundary List1 = Domain Interface 1 Side 1 Boundary List2 = Domain Interface 1 Side 2 Interface Type = Fluid Fluid INTERFACE MODELS: Option = General Connection FRAME CHANGE: Option = Frozen Rotor END MASS AND MOMENTUM: Option = Conservative Interface Flux MOMENTUM INTERFACE MODEL: Option = None END END PITCH CHANGE: Option = None END END MESH CONNECTION: Option = GGI END END In Analysis 'Flow Analysis 1' - Domain Interface 'Domain Interface 1': The interface is placed at a rotor-stator interface and the pitch change option of 'None' has been selected. This option should only be used when the overall extent and shape of each side of the interface perfectly match and the surfaces are aligned with each other. It may therefore be suitable when full 360 degree or exactly equal pitch components are being analyzed. DOMAIN INTERFACE: Domain Interface 1 Boundary List1 = Domain Interface 1 Side 1 Boundary List2 = Domain Interface 1 Side 2 Interface Type = Fluid Fluid INTERFACE MODELS: Option = General Connection FRAME CHANGE: Option = Frozen Rotor END MASS AND MOMENTUM: Option = Conservative Interface Flux MOMENTUM INTERFACE MODEL: Option = None END END PITCH CHANGE: Option = Automatic END END MESH CONNECTION: Option = GGI END END In Analysis 'Flow Analysis 1' - Domain Interface 'Domain Interface 1': Pitch Change option 'Automatic' is not valid if side 1 or 2 of the interface has a 360 degree or greater pitch angle, zero radius, mesh faces normal and parallel to the rotation axis, or mesh faces at the hub curve (low radial or axial position) which are thin in the radial or axial direction.