What will be the time complexity of this problem, and how much time would it take to calculate certain inputs in C?
@simlee61774 күн бұрын
Thanks very much. You haven't posted very many yet, but I really like the ones you've posted - nice work and very interesting!
@charbelghanem95854 күн бұрын
What is this formula shittttt
@dcterr14 күн бұрын
Wow, this is the best lecture I've ever seen on p-adic integers and p-adic numbers, which is a very counterintuitive topic I never really got before, despite the fact that I have a PhD in algebraic number theory. Great job!
@matthewboyd86894 күн бұрын
Feel like I need mushrooms to truly enjoy this unreal experience
@mariotabali26035 күн бұрын
Tetris
@Craigipo9 күн бұрын
Pi is determined using an infinite series. Anything that uses pi will break down and stop working.
@nishatmunshi46729 күн бұрын
Its 2 am and you got my attention. Ima finish this video now
@ferlywahyu34210 күн бұрын
I'm sure prime numbers have a certain recursion pattern somehow Manny random thing can explain using recursion maybe prime number too prime number is so random
@abdul-muqeet11 күн бұрын
...9999999999 = -1 1+2+3+4+... = -1/12 I'm starting to feel that negative numbers are not finite. And if you are in Debt, great job, you just earned infinite bucks..
@calypsocostelo248212 күн бұрын
Never heard this in school. Were they keep it secret? 😂
@brightblackhole24422 күн бұрын
Big Computability doesn't want you to see this formula
@The_Asteroid_13 күн бұрын
My favorite theory ! 😊
@Unbrooken-113 күн бұрын
This is precisely up my alley. I find using functions to produce formulas (no matter how silly they look or inefficient) in a way adjacent to that of coding wonderful. Excellent video!
@SurprisedDivingBoard-vu9rz15 күн бұрын
This is how they store cocacola formula and some chemical formulas. Modern engineering is about the machine crunch of deep learning.
@gabrielsandoval557717 күн бұрын
What if for each size, you take the least (according to real abs) number? You would get an incomplete line, that have some repredentation feature xd
@miloszforman627015 күн бұрын
For each size take the least? Cryptic language. What are you talking about? And what's "repredentation"? I do know roughly what a "predator" is, but repredentation? 🤔
@David280GG17 күн бұрын
Pee addict
@miloszforman627015 күн бұрын
Blind chicken finds a grain of corn. Nincompoop finds his.
@sam293817 күн бұрын
Not efficient but brilliant formula anyway!
@bozydarziemniak185318 күн бұрын
For natural numbers i, j and n>j there exist a product function from i=2 to i=n-1 [sin (pi*n/i)] which is different than 0 and it is a prime number. For such function there is also true that: P= sum j=3 to j=n from [product function from i=2 to i=n-1 psin (pi*n/i)]/product function from i=2 to i=n-1 [sin (pi*n/i)] where P+1 is the order of prime number (O.O.P.N.) which also can be written as O.O.P.N. =1 + sum j=3 to j=n from [product function from i=2 to i=n-1 psin (pi*n/i)]/product function from i=2 to i=n-1 [sin (pi*n/i)] We also must add number 2 as a 1st prime as an axiom to complete this formula.
@antoine257118 күн бұрын
The application at the end id is just mind-blowing!
@mspeir18 күн бұрын
10^n when n goes to infinity doesn't equal zero! 🤨 There will always be a one at the beginning of the number. It grows infinitely larger. The reciprocal of the number appears to go to zero, but even as it approaches infinity, there will still be a one at the end. Sure, after a certain point, we can call it "zero", but that's more of a convention that fact.
@miloszforman627015 күн бұрын
_"It grows infinitely larger. "_ Not in the p-adic numbers, as these have a different definition of "size". So the sequence 1, 10, 100, 1000, .... converges to 0 in the p-adic metric.
@hifriend778919 күн бұрын
What’s the time complexity for the formula?
@kudzem19 күн бұрын
This is kind of tautology, like saying "the nth prime is the nth prime"
@asherasator24 күн бұрын
What is the practical point with any of this besides mental juggling? What are the examples in the real world and sciences where this does something significant, profound and exposes greater truths or accuracy in any tangible industry or empirical environment?
@miloszforman627023 күн бұрын
None. What do you mean with "examples in the real world and sciences"? What sciences? These are all vain. "But of the tree of knowledge thou shalt not eat of it", says God.
@thomaskennedy572818 күн бұрын
A lot of discovery had no practical uses but they give birth to other useful stuffs.
@devanshgupta79425 күн бұрын
2:58 Ok so i saw 11, 23, 47 Then 233 and 467 Then 3779 and 7559 Ohh so its 2n+1 type thing, But pretty inconsistent because we have 47 then 101 So its not that good
@tkyntola26 күн бұрын
Interesting stuff! Just one advice, know your audience. There will not be a viewer who makes it 5 minutes into the video and doesn't know what a logarithmic scale is.
@Holasiquetal27 күн бұрын
Pure dope
@vk8a8Ай бұрын
huh?
@jan_EtenАй бұрын
10-adic numbers can be þought of as being in negadecimal (base -10)
@abehankens7456Ай бұрын
this is the same channel that made the prime factory video! these videos are so high-quality and in-depth and easy to follow its crazy! thank you so much for making these!
@andrewpinedo1883Ай бұрын
Desmos: Nuh uh
@proteuswaveАй бұрын
Fantastic! thank you for sharing this video.
@googleyoutubechannel8554Ай бұрын
When will mathematicians admit that math notation is hot garbage and we should start over? The only reason any of you were remotely interested in this is that you think math notation is somehow indicative of 'solving' anything, and you think that the history of ignoring that information and processing, yes they're real, you can't just 'yadda yadda' infinite calculation no matter how many blackboards you scribble sideways 8s on... and then you realize that this 'formula' is just a ridiculous way to write a dumb prime checker.
@nokhinsiu7210Ай бұрын
When j is prime the output is also odd
@shibendrasingh2907Ай бұрын
How about going for asymptotic results of the given formula?
@BolpatАй бұрын
Now let's do FizzBuzz in this programming language.
@PaperBoat-oz3hbАй бұрын
Show this to the people who say "But 1 billion is a huge number"
@bookaabookaa9446Ай бұрын
change to C(n)=lcm(n,C(n-1)) is better. And you will find its obvious. This does not need not any provement. If lcm(n, product of 1 to n-1) is n itself, then n is not a prime. Otherwise, it must be a prime.
@faruknaneАй бұрын
It looks like bulshit
@Im_RainrotАй бұрын
Instinct tells us the unknown is a threat, instead of an opportunity
@aprilbrandon3441Ай бұрын
Math is so cool
@user-yo4pp7vu3yАй бұрын
that was great! thank you :)
@chandranisahanoneАй бұрын
The joddest proof I have ever seen on prime numbers🗿🗿🗿🗿🖤
@braineaterzombie3981Ай бұрын
Damn such a cool formula , such a shame its too inefficient
@STEAMerBearАй бұрын
So, class, have I convinced you of the practical value of table lookup yet? The smallest EEPROM chip on sale today can instantly return vastly more primes than this clever method can find one-at-a-time in a reasonable amount of time. (Of course MUCH larger tables are available for free online, but that depends on connectivity which is an imperfect technical situation.) [At one time I could buy such a table as a chip or a USB drive, but Amazon’s “service” makes searching for it basically impossible-great naming strategy there Bezos (I thought you were a trained engineer bro).]
@RodrigoviverosaАй бұрын
useless... but better than all our non-existing formula :)
@yetclerckАй бұрын
Observe como são parecidas, mas com finalidades diferentes. Uma quer saber qual é o proximo primo e outra quer saber se o inteiro é primo. Veja: yet-clerk.blogspot.com/2024/04/teorema-complementar-dos-numeros.html
@wujing346Ай бұрын
Wow, this is so cool to create primes, despite primes having no pattern
@Ryuko15Ай бұрын
this is how i exactly planned to produce prime numbers before lol
@wernergamper6200Ай бұрын
This is purely evil.
@carloingravallobaАй бұрын
Perhaps this one about the author can help you:[url]www.theoremoftheday.org/Resources/LinkNeeded.htm