Fantastic lens that covers a GFX size sensor with plenty of room to spare for tilt/shift capabilities, unique in that regard.
@phonerepair-o6h2 ай бұрын
5 times cheaper Helios 44-2 is better than the canon 50 1.4 ? What a steal!!
@Simonsutak3 ай бұрын
Very nice! A wonderful result and love the colour tones too!
@AbDaniel213 ай бұрын
nice footage man :)
@jmoss994 ай бұрын
So, is this shot with a Minolta 45mm as shown in the beginning or with the Canon as shown at the end?
@jimmoss95844 ай бұрын
What is the difference between the Kowa Vidoscope Super-16mm 2X and the Kowa 16-H ?
@jimmoss95844 ай бұрын
What is the difference between the Kowa Vidoscope and the 16-H ?
@jimmoss95844 ай бұрын
Does the Hypergonar 16 = (or is related to) the Kowa Prominar Anamorphic 16-H ? They look similar and both have 16 in the name. Plus H could mean Hypergonar.
@jimmoss95844 ай бұрын
Very good. Your girlfriend is very photogenic. Call me old-fashioned but if you don't want flares, don't point the camera into to the sun or similar light.
@МаксимМинео5 ай бұрын
I bought both lenses, the tokina 80-200 F4 was very sharp in my test at the max aperture, I compared it with Lumix 12-60, the sharpness was at the same level even in the corner, contrast is low, so shoot straight with +5 in camera. Now I bought the tokina 80-200 F2.8, and from the test that I saw in this channel I can say that is very good, may be one of the best of its category. Anymore I saw that it doesn't have chromatic aberration, I will test it soon with Canon FD 200 f2.8 I also recommend it to use the tokina 80-200 f4 with a very long lens shade (10 cm) that helps to give good contrast in difficult light condition, I can mount it in my micro 4/3 without vignetting, the results are amazing
@МаксимМинео5 ай бұрын
Tokina is much better, even at f2.8 is better if add contrast in post the sharpness is good, Pentax have too much chromatic aberration, at F4 the contrast in tokina it's good and Sharper
@christianssongcovers32255 ай бұрын
magic
@ahmedalsardar74756 ай бұрын
TOKINA IS THE BEST.
@JorgeGonzalez-yc3de6 ай бұрын
I would feel cheated too
@richardadelberg89616 ай бұрын
What are your setting for plus. Mine started getting jittery
@guest-tf9he7 ай бұрын
Thx! Like you video so much!
@coS-hv8bj7 ай бұрын
Hello, I would like to ask which adapter ring is used for the mir-11 12mm/2.2 lens installed on eosm? I have one now, but I bought the wrong adapter😭😭😭
@CarmineTavernaPhotography7 ай бұрын
Great content...cheers
@mononciovisual7 ай бұрын
Splendid !
@givara137 ай бұрын
Thank you for sharing this amazing knowledge
@dairenn7 ай бұрын
Absolutely gorgeous. Quit possibly the best non-film footage I have ever seen. What a lens.
@thehedgeknightnc36817 ай бұрын
Just curious. Does anyone know what size filter threads does this lens use?
@Jailoyal17 ай бұрын
Very beautiful footage 🙌
@FIRUFILMS8 ай бұрын
Nice, the shots was on the original BMPCC ?, any crop in post?, thanks
@alanbesedin8 ай бұрын
No crop on the original BMPCC :)
@FIRUFILMS8 ай бұрын
@@alanbesedin OHH Amazing! you shot the videos on CINEMA DNG RAW? or prores?
@theotherHOLLYWOOD8 ай бұрын
Excellent presentation. Thank you. You answered a lot of the questions I had.
@randallstewart12248 ай бұрын
I'm a big fan of the SP class of Adaptall II lenses from Tamron, of which its 28mm prime lens is NOT included. I own a number of them. However, in terms of doing what you buy a lens for, putting an image on a piece of film, this 28mm is no better than a mediocre to average performer by the standards of its time, and even less so now. That is perfectly expected, as it is not one of the SP lenses, where Tamron pulled out the stops and made lenses which were as good or better and most of the maker camera/lens producers. Depending on your need lens mount, you should be able to find a 28mm from a major maker or another independent maker which will exceed the performance of this lens for a similar price. Example, for Nikon, the later versions of its 28mm 3.5 will greatly blow this lens away, and probably cost less because of the hype given this lens.
@LaceyFilm8 ай бұрын
'it's very sharp, even wide open' then cuts to a soft shot of a pretty girl.
@Apollolabsphoto9 ай бұрын
Years later but pretty helpful. Which is the lighter of the tokina or tamron?
@AC7_76 ай бұрын
Probably the tamron since it’s not made of metal
@DentReversal9 ай бұрын
I have a 70-210 RMC 3.5 the look is very similar to your f4 especially background bokeh
@RosaIselaUrbanoGonzslez10 ай бұрын
Iugh Canon 😂
@diMaks_inc10 ай бұрын
😍😍😍
@vintageaudiohifi554510 ай бұрын
please tell me, what do you know about sankor 16c anamorphic lens ? is better then kowa ?
@vintageaudiohifi554510 ай бұрын
very nice video ! tnx a lot! one single question please. What is the minimum focal taken lens you can use with these anamorphic adaptors ? you can use below 50mm lenses ?
@safemode859811 ай бұрын
looks very pleasing for video, but I think it might be to soft of an image for Photos
@apostolicbible111 ай бұрын
I have a Konica Hexanon 35mm f2.8 to do my YT videos; but I just purchased a FD 35mm f2.8. It will be interesting to see the difference on my Canon R8. The Hexanon is super sharp. I do head shots at f16 trying to get the background library super sharp. Help stamp out Northrup Bokeh!
@ДмитрийВерзилов-т3в11 ай бұрын
чому не державною?
@awolsurf-TC11 ай бұрын
Nice!!! I'm just getting back into shooting with FD lenses on a Sony camera. Always loved the look.
@lowIQstuff11 ай бұрын
radioactive lenses
@sdufg Жыл бұрын
come on people..is this just a m42 mount?? ...is that all i need..i'm not gonna spend $75 on an adapter to m43. help please
@jorge-3768 Жыл бұрын
Great video. Very nice birds and music. I could relax and think about manu nice stuff watching it
@makemystronger..freemegapi6800 Жыл бұрын
Tokina or tamron? For image quality
@LuDawgg Жыл бұрын
5 years later we’re looking at closer to 3k for this set
@353Studios Жыл бұрын
I just bought it ... I'm anxious to try it. I searched for the flexible track .... dang, it's expensive!!!!!!
@ZeLoShady Жыл бұрын
Why do you need a capturing lens for some of these?
@alanbesedin Жыл бұрын
Anamorphic projection lenses and adapters can’t focus to infinity without a spherical lens behind them
@pix4work Жыл бұрын
Great conversation with amazing content/information! Thank you.
@D1N02 Жыл бұрын
I think this is the same lens as the Raynox 135mm 1:2.8 and the Ringfoto 135mm 1:2.8 It was made by Cimko in Japan. But take care, there are several versions, also by different manufacturers. It has to look like the lens in the beginning of the video (58mm filter thread if I'm right). Simply being called Optomax 135mm 1:2.8 means zilch since different suppliers were used for the same brand name. This video looks excellent. I guess you stopped down for some sharpness.
@VietinghoffAlex Жыл бұрын
Awesome interview! Thanks for doing this! Last winter I shot a short film with my FX3 to Prores Raw (on Helios lenses with a Great Joy 1.33x anamorphic adapter), and I used Assimilate Scratch to convert the Prores Raw to CDNG so I could edit in Resolve. There's also an app called Raw Converter that can do the same thing.
@MarkHoltze Жыл бұрын
Great convo you two!! The Cinema Lens Manual is my favourite piece of literature I've bought....EVER.
@alanbesedin Жыл бұрын
It's so good!
@pokrovsky-production Жыл бұрын
Hi, which exact gears you used from cool lax?
@dpixvid Жыл бұрын
Great interview! Thanks so much!!! Best of luck in the future Oren! Great work! Merci Alan! Love the lens info and why you like what you like 👍👍👍 + the lighting 👍👍👍