Capitol invaded..you sound like a woke dem...they let them in ~ J6 was created to take the attention off of Bidens stolen election...drain the swamp and deport 2025

Who's here in 2024?? 👇🏿👇🏿👇🏿

I was told there was some confusion in the comments to this piece, and it's clear that it's hard to understand this clip in a vacuum; it is one tiny part of a 4 hour exploration of an Integral Metatheory of Conservatism. The broader backdrop is my essay on The Great Release, which explores the ongoing breakdown of the world system and its move through an adaptive cycle's Release phase and into a coming Reorganization phase (it's 100 pages, feel free to grab it online for free if you're interested in understanding more about the structural-systemic dynamics that we're living through right now). In any case, the election that just occurred is a revolt to the system regime that has defined American hegemony since the end of WWII, and in particular to the last 50 years of neoliberalism, which saw a supranational capital holon supersede and repress the interests of the domestic political holon through decades of globalization and financialization, in turn wrecking the social contract and fueling reactionary populism (and not just in the US, but in all of the US client states). This is typical, we see similar patterns of late stage financialization in all of the major hegemons of the past 800 years (Genoa, Dutch United Provinces, UK, US). In any case, this particular clip has as context the idea that Harris would have been a weak but status quo mode of reform that largely maintained the elite financialization, and even though it's not cognized as such, at a deep system level Trump was voted in to destroy and reorganize it to a new form of functioning; he is clearly a form of upwards panarchical Revolt in the adaptive cycle of the holarchies above.

The main thing the integral meta theory lacks is Love. Appalling that you'd justify the worst of behaviors to appease your own delusions of grandeur. Boomerittis meets karenism pretending to have the capacity to manage the new Liberty ring. Expert demagoguery.

Bro, just say "I like it." 😂

We're going to get the collective experience we want and many want a utopia or dystopia to prove themselves right. And most people would rather be right than be happy. For some reason I can't let go of the metaphor of Millennials stacking plates for the server at the end of a meal. It's something we just do and we'll continue to do that work regardless of what happens. Like any shadow work, we have to wrestle with our collective pathologies. Individuals go through a deconstruction and I suspect we'll do the same collectively. We just can't do so in a way that doesn't destroy our foundation but not deter our willingness to question it. I have a framework that coincides with development about our core desire. The desire to be welcomed. The desire to be loved. The desire to be protected. The desire to be remembered. The desire to be rewarded. The desire to be accepted. The desire to be needed. The desire to be harmonized. The desire to be unified. I believe Green post-modernism shifts from the desire to be rewarded to the desire to be accepted, which awakens a relationship to vulnerability, grief, and shame leading to humility because accepting and being accepted will become more important. This brings about a whole new realm of sacrifices. We had a cultural post-modern awakening in the 60s and now that transfers to structure. But we've gotta sort our pre-post fallacy first, which will be unintended positive effect of DJT installing many red people into his cabinet so we can collectively clearly see the difference just we did on the liberal side with things such as cancel culture. All of that to say, we are where we need to be.

What is ...true, truth and more truthful.... coming forth and going forward? What ...sense, science, and salience.... may come as our technological know how and technologically interconnecting advance continues? Are we destined to forever wallow in the pathos of entertainment propaganda spinsters? It seems the neo-con warmongering military mafia RINOs and the neo-lib fearmongering medical mafia DINOs are the controlling entertainment propaganda spinsters of the ongoing narratives🤦‍♂️

Such rubbish. This guy is effing clueless about political history.

Integral Life needs to break out of it's Professional Managerial Class bubble. Robb has no idea what a morass of nonsense he lives in. Biden just tried to start World War III and he's calling that administration the "Staying in a Democratic & Reform Oriented Paradigm" The Trump coalition WAS the Reform Paradigm. Biden/Harris was the path of REVOLT from every American Idea that we hold dear. But it's under the morass of mainstream media propaganda designed for the Professional Managerial Class, the very class that Robb fits into and he's taken the bait hook, line, and sinker. He even takes on the language of the clergy class as a way to sound like he knows what he's talking about rather than looking directly in the face of the censorship industrial complex, the military industrial complex, and American De-Industrialization. .... yet Trump is a "Monarch" What a joke. Arrogant as Hell, Robb. The constitutional crisis is the permanent bureaucracy that will not even allow the will of the people to move forward. Are we democratic republic? .... or Oligarchy with extra steps? Grow Up. Integrate Your Perspectives. This ain't it. Turns out Integral Theory don't matter. You can get a PMC to believe anything as long as you fluff their ego as being superior to the rednecks. Yet, the rednecks were smarter than you on this one.

Obama's legacy is Trump. The 'hope and change' never happened, the reforms of wall street.. the regime change wars never stopped, nothing happened. So desire for change was only delayed. The notion that Trump has NPD is questionable, since he doesn't display many of the characteristics of the type. Btw there are arguments about Obama being NPD (even by people on the left), that one could consider too.. The idea that this era could be a protracted period of democrats being in the wilderness i don't doubt, because it's likely they will learn nothing and triple down on what isn't popular and what doesn't work., because after all, they know far better what is good for the people than the ignorant rabble... don't they.

- Humanity's Collective Consciousness did not chose "a reform or revolt" but in scientific term "FUCK IT, LET ALL BURN" - Humanity's Collective Consciousness have a Short Term Memory and people never learn and it only will get worse with time. Thank you SkyNet! - Remember, hubris is not for free and due day has come.

I wish you’d provide the names of the folks in this video so I could look into more content from them. Signed, a long time integral fan who is currently wondering about developmental issues in our polarized political landscape.

kermit sounds like an angry peterson rant lol

Interesting thoughts, though it seems Ken takes the typical--and mistaken--view that Theravada is dualistic. It's the old "lesser vehicle" trope, the "hinayana" denigration. Not sure what he's read from the Pali Canon, but the early Buddhism within it is not duelist whatsoever. Surprised he has absorbed and kept what has been discarded.

Omissions to speaking about the heinous child sacrificial crimes of Jews are blatant here. Is this guy protecting the magical Jews?? Hmm. Can't go further when he is so deeply biased.

Ken is one of the biggest influences in my life from a philosophical/spiritual perspective. But given that he’s asked for feedback, I think that the wig looks ridiculous. No judgement, just how I feel. I also still think that he absolutely rocks.

'we need to be convicted' Means something quick different to we need to have conviction

My main observation would be that regardless of intent (or perhaps because of it), DEI, in practice, has been almost exclusively negative, destructive and regressive. Comparing concepts such as 'Equality of Opportunity' with 'Equality of Outcome' and surmising or implying that some sort of ideal middle ground exists may be misleading. If I imagine a world in which Equality of Opportunity has been maximised for all and one in which Equality of Outcome has been maximised, it is clear to me that one of those worlds would be a decent place to live (for most if not all) whilst the other would be an intolerable hell (for most if not all). I remain unconvinced that forging a 'dialectic process' in which these polar opposites are integrated is beneficial.

These are great conversations.

Free Speech. Now $22 per month.

This is really interesting content - I wish I understood all the colors and levels. It seems to be some kind of inner language of this group. Maybe if you didn't use colors, but if you also used the words that the colors stood for, I would have understood what you were talking about. This is a fascinating subject and I've never heard anybody else talk about it. Right now integral theory sounds a little bit too esoteric to grab onto in a video.

I askari don't think progressive equal post-modern and it's more about general idealism and the awareness needed to focus on b that ideal. Can come from liberals or conservatives.

Basically people memify worldviews even if they don't embody them.

Have you played Spore from the makers of The Sims. You start as a microorganism then you become an animal, then you become a tribe, then you become a world population, then you head of into space and can start colonizing solar systems etc. Really fun game where you inhabit these different stages of evolution.

Word 🔥👍🏼

Well said Corey!

All the important stuff this guy said, and people want to focus on his hair! Guess it tells you where the audience at.

Let her talk Corey

Mother theresa has been proven to be a child trafficker and she was a man.

Cliff Note Final Fantasy Six

No sentient being, regardless of race, sex or species, deserves to be enslaved, considered and used as a mere resource or tool for the benefit of others. «Animal Rights without veganism are like Human Rights with slavery: nonsense» ~Gary L. Francione

All this thinking about awakening that it include everything is big misunderstanding. Experience of oneness, samadhi isn’t inclusivity in this meaning at all. I am wall, table and a bird out of window, i experience all of it as me (not me as person, just being it all without me or that). And trying to let everyone to be right no matter what they say is just delusional. It’s convenient for „woke” people to demand from everyone around to bend to their emotions, because healing their own emotions requires effort, regularity and honest look into ourself. There was communism, fashism etc, wokizm will pass too, but let’s hope we will see it through fast enough

Spot on analysis. Do you support election reform advocacy for ranked choice or score voting?

Best KZbin video I've seen in months. It's exactly right.

Can the integral community please reach out to political streamers to introduce integral theory to them. I would love to see you speak to contrapoints as my favourite example

Love your cap! 🇨🇭🧀🧡

cool gang you have here

Outer - inner, one- many are just language implied structure(not every language imk)

This analysis represents a flaw I see regularly in integral analysis. One way to describe this flaw, in integral theory's voice, is to say that the polarities of objectivity and subjectivity are not harmonized. They are not in balance. To use another frame from integral, in the same way that 'integralists' critique post-modernists (i.e., green) for throwing away all hierarchies because of the bad taste dominance hierarchies have left in their mouth, here, he throws out subjectivity because he thinks objectivity tastes better. But his stance as objective because of his understanding of integral is incorrect. He does not understand that his analysis starts in the wrong place due to his incomplete worldview and his subjectivity. To start with a critique of DEI after centuries of oppression of marginalized people doesn't offer the analysis the world really needs, no matter how eloquent he attempts to sound. If a person is hungry in front of me and all I have is a candy bar to give, do you critique me for giving it? You can critique DEI, but it is what we have to fix the problem for now. Why waste your time on this? Fully critique the problem, racism, not the partial and incomplete solution. Likely to this, you will respond that you have critiqued racism. But your critiques there, too, have the same flaws as this critique of DEI. They assume an objectivity that an understanding of integral alone cannot imbue. You need to consider fully the cultural and historical context, including your own. And in this case, especially your own. I will note here that a feeling/belief of objectivity is a symptom of white supremacist culture in the US, where white people, white men especially, assume they can be or are objective when they are not. I have not seen a sufficient analysis of how racism affects the majority of white people. Who has asked the question if whiteness is serving you? How does racism oppress white people? What has racism denied you as a white community and as individuals? How has it, and how does it impinge on your efforts to wake up, grow up, clean up, and, in this case, show up? I wonder if this man thinks his work here represents allyship of some sort to POCs and toward the growth of humanity at large. Does he think he is showing up for something worthy with this analysis? I am not sure why he chose this topic. Maybe it is due to a focus on trends because DEI is in the news. Or maybe he considers himself conservative. It doesn't matter. Either way, this analysis is not potent because it leaves out the necessary elements to understand this issue more fundamentally. This work makes a mistake that many analyses that are unaware of whiteness make. It thinks it knows more than it does. It cannot admit and maybe does not even know that it, too, is subjective. I have heard Corey Dewitt make statements wherein he rails at the idea that his whiteness limits his perspective. When a white person is not listened to because they are white, it is problematic because all perspectives are not being heard. Therefore it is not integral. But I think you are forgetting the next step. One has to rate these perspectives on partiality after they are heard, and whiteness is partial. In the short run, I encourage you to listen deeply to Beema Sharma, a frequent contributor, when she suggests that it is not 'you' that is growing and developing in awareness. It rather comes from the same impulse that moves plants towards the sun. I don't suggest that you lack *some* awareness or perception. I don't think that is what she is saying either. Rather, I think she wants you to let go of the *identification* with the notion that you can fully perceive issues or even just more fully perceive issues because you know the integral model. The model is not the territory, right? What I am saying is that there are blind spots in you and your panels because of their whiteness and maleness. They are too racialized and gendered. And I think Beena wants you to know that without getting kicked out of the clan. But Beena is acting like many people of color around the privileged. She knows you aren't ready yet and will throw a tantrum at the idea that you are still ignorant in some ways. But your ignorance stunts the world if you represent its best hope for development. Look, let me be clear. No one is saying you are bad. What I am saying is that who you've been told you are is a lie. Whiteness, like all dominant worldviews, holds an unchallenged notion of being something outside of the personal. It thinks it is universal. So taking an impersonal, or objective stance only seems natural. But again, you were you were lied to. You are the personal, as are the rest of us. The real you, your person, is just as good as the rest of us. You just don't know that real and good person yet. So I recommend that you do a bit more work on the left side of the quadrants before stepping into identities again.

You write in the shownotes " But my guest today, Stephanie Lepp..." Who is 'my'? I think it would be helpful to mention the name of the person who is moderating this interesting conversation. Thanks Rainer

Brilliant! ❤

Almost all of his ideas are just taken from Hinduism/Buddhism

I swear I discovered some of this stuff on my own doing introspection and thinking about topological spaces. I am having a surreal time discovering this body of literature. THIS MAN IS READING MY MIND!

It was the same for me. Age 20 1978 discovered Hippocrates four humours by Dr Tim laHaye. What I was able to observe and extract over the next 45 years in conclusion would in all respects mirror this four quadrant realization. I knew melancholy as the internal individual Similar to sanguine mirror to the external individual the Christ temperament as most carpenters appear even today. Further more the introvert internal collective clearly the phlegmatic temperament who internalizes an external collective material view Then similar to phlegmatic the external collective Choleric everything material in the external world. This was my thought conclusions that mirror the four quadrants. Did Hippocrates offer our most basic formula from which all else manifests from. The collective being the world material system opposite the Christ temperament. Jews have all four like everyone but are dominant with the collective Choleric Phlegmatic temperament opposite the christ.christ was a Jew whose dominant first two temperaments that of the individualists

O M G......This is what I have been noticing for decades....and yet you have spelled it out so simply....something I've never been able to do. This is not a mere "suggestion"...it is reality...and it really is this simple. I think maybe the hard part is gettng folks to understand just how simple it is, in a way that can un-condition us all from the "or thinking" we've been stuck in... Every now and then I hear something that brings back a sliver of hope for humanity and this is one of those times. I LOVE your use of breath as an analogy. How could anyone fail to "get it" within that framework?

5:49 "You have to be somebody, before you can be nobody." I just referenced this video on Jeffrey Mishlove's youtube video "Integral Education with Thomas Brophy" kzbin.info/www/bejne/lYmmao2urbyoias

I think that everything boils down to the way we make decisions, as are we using logic / reason while being open to experience, against makeing decisions using emotions / whim / subjectivity. On the other hand, we evolved to use our instincts ( herd thinking, halo effect, primal fear ) and that prevents us from making rational decisions ( like taking drugs, becoming a thug, shooting 9 year old girl ). So, i think tha mindfulness can solve a lot of issues, but only people who are high on consiusness levels will be interested in mindfulness, while other will have to grind their way through. WOrld isnt perfect, and it is such it is.

Evil implies intent. Don't ascribe malice where ignorance or incompetence or both can adequately explain something. Hanlon's Razor

yes that is what I mean by : UNTWIST:INFINITY . You even showed the lemniscate. They are us. We are them. Mirror this ! : MY GOD IS ALL !

More important question is - WHO knows?