How would this change if the current density was uniform along the wire?
@let_s_do_physicsАй бұрын
Thanks for your question! If J was uniform, then in the region 0 < r < R, the current I(r) would be equal to J * pi * r^2. On the other hand, for r > R, the current I would be constant and equal to J * pi * R^2.
@epaabeboАй бұрын
Also, I have another question professor why did not express capital I as dqN/t change over time
@let_s_do_physicsАй бұрын
Electric current is defined as dq/dt. In this problem, there is no N.
@epaabeboАй бұрын
I have a question professor why did you not integrate from to o to a instead of o to R
@let_s_do_physicsАй бұрын
The radius of the disk in this problem is R, not a.
@epaabeboАй бұрын
Thank you so much professor I will study this Great problem
@let_s_do_physicsАй бұрын
You're welcome! Let me know if you have any questions.
@epaabebo3 ай бұрын
I have a question professor how did you get cos 0
@let_s_do_physics3 ай бұрын
Thanks for your question! Vector F and vector ds are parallel, so the angle between them is zero. The dot product calls for the cosine of the angle between the two vectors, which is where cos 0 comes from.
@kdivyansh3003 ай бұрын
Thing to note is, this emf is at t=0, 6:50 To find more accurate fxn of emf with time, replace r with (r+vt) in the equation of flux, and then take derivative wrt t
@let_s_do_physics3 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment! Here, r is really r(t), which is a function of time. One could replace r with r_0 + vt (which requires the introduction of an intermediate variable, r_0). One should still get the same final result eventually. Note that the emf should be expressed in terms of the given variables, which does not include t. So this emf is the time-dependent emf, but the time dependency is hidden within r.
@epaabebo4 ай бұрын
I have a question professor how did you isolate h from the denominator
@let_s_do_physics3 ай бұрын
Thanks for asking! I multiplied both sides by h, and divided both sides by g * lambda.
@epaabebo3 ай бұрын
@@let_s_do_physics Thank you so much professor
@nibba58285 ай бұрын
GOATED TEACHER!!!
@let_s_do_physics5 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@cem_kilic_16 ай бұрын
Nice channel to learn basic university-level physics! ❤👍✍️🤓
@let_s_do_physics6 ай бұрын
Thanks! 😃
@ardacelen77418 ай бұрын
Thank you for the very instructional video!!
@let_s_do_physics8 ай бұрын
My pleasure!
@studiosdetodo82958 ай бұрын
From which book do you get the problems of your chanel
@let_s_do_physics8 ай бұрын
Hello, thanks for your message. These are not necessarily from a specific source, and they are typical introductory college-level problems. If there is a specific problem that you'd like to see the solution for, please let me know and I'll be happy to create a video for it.
@lyingcat90228 ай бұрын
Very cool. I’m unfamiliar with these formula. I’d be interested in how to derive them.
@let_s_do_physics8 ай бұрын
Thanks for the feedback! I will post the derivations soon!
@shamimmalik35378 ай бұрын
Nice 😊
@let_s_do_physics8 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@kocavrancic53249 ай бұрын
A question, rather than a comment: Why did you postulate J = alpha x r? Everithing further on is rigorously stated, but this seems as comming out of thin air?
@let_s_do_physics9 ай бұрын
Right, in this problem J is not constant, and it is equal to alpha x r. Alpha is a given constant in the problem.
@kocavrancic53249 ай бұрын
@@let_s_do_physics I asked why. Never mind...
@let_s_do_physics9 ай бұрын
@@kocavrancic5324 This is how the problem was originally designed.
@AbsharHussain-z6m9 ай бұрын
Great explanation
@let_s_do_physics9 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@coltenkibodeaux25229 ай бұрын
Keep up the good work 👍
@let_s_do_physics9 ай бұрын
Thanks, will do!
@hayaalkar35039 ай бұрын
Hi can you please make video to review physical 2 for the book serway from chapter 23 to 30 ? More idea.