Energy and power in R-L circuit
3:28
Пікірлер
@ELENKTRIK
@ELENKTRIK 4 күн бұрын
thanks
@let_s_do_physics
@let_s_do_physics 2 күн бұрын
You're welcome!
@alexisdiaz8537
@alexisdiaz8537 Ай бұрын
I love you
@goldenpooper4326
@goldenpooper4326 Ай бұрын
How would this change if the current density was uniform along the wire?
@let_s_do_physics
@let_s_do_physics Ай бұрын
Thanks for your question! If J was uniform, then in the region 0 < r < R, the current I(r) would be equal to J * pi * r^2. On the other hand, for r > R, the current I would be constant and equal to J * pi * R^2.
@epaabebo
@epaabebo Ай бұрын
Also, I have another question professor why did not express capital I as dqN/t change over time
@let_s_do_physics
@let_s_do_physics Ай бұрын
Electric current is defined as dq/dt. In this problem, there is no N.
@epaabebo
@epaabebo Ай бұрын
I have a question professor why did you not integrate from to o to a instead of o to R
@let_s_do_physics
@let_s_do_physics Ай бұрын
The radius of the disk in this problem is R, not a.
@epaabebo
@epaabebo Ай бұрын
Thank you so much professor I will study this Great problem
@let_s_do_physics
@let_s_do_physics Ай бұрын
You're welcome! Let me know if you have any questions.
@epaabebo
@epaabebo 3 ай бұрын
I have a question professor how did you get cos 0
@let_s_do_physics
@let_s_do_physics 3 ай бұрын
Thanks for your question! Vector F and vector ds are parallel, so the angle between them is zero. The dot product calls for the cosine of the angle between the two vectors, which is where cos 0 comes from.
@kdivyansh300
@kdivyansh300 3 ай бұрын
Thing to note is, this emf is at t=0, 6:50 To find more accurate fxn of emf with time, replace r with (r+vt) in the equation of flux, and then take derivative wrt t
@let_s_do_physics
@let_s_do_physics 3 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment! Here, r is really r(t), which is a function of time. One could replace r with r_0 + vt (which requires the introduction of an intermediate variable, r_0). One should still get the same final result eventually. Note that the emf should be expressed in terms of the given variables, which does not include t. So this emf is the time-dependent emf, but the time dependency is hidden within r.
@epaabebo
@epaabebo 4 ай бұрын
I have a question professor how did you isolate h from the denominator
@let_s_do_physics
@let_s_do_physics 3 ай бұрын
Thanks for asking! I multiplied both sides by h, and divided both sides by g * lambda.
@epaabebo
@epaabebo 3 ай бұрын
@@let_s_do_physics Thank you so much professor
@nibba5828
@nibba5828 5 ай бұрын
GOATED TEACHER!!!
@let_s_do_physics
@let_s_do_physics 5 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@cem_kilic_1
@cem_kilic_1 6 ай бұрын
Nice channel to learn basic university-level physics! ❤👍✍️🤓
@let_s_do_physics
@let_s_do_physics 6 ай бұрын
Thanks! 😃
@ardacelen7741
@ardacelen7741 8 ай бұрын
Thank you for the very instructional video!!
@let_s_do_physics
@let_s_do_physics 8 ай бұрын
My pleasure!
@studiosdetodo8295
@studiosdetodo8295 8 ай бұрын
From which book do you get the problems of your chanel
@let_s_do_physics
@let_s_do_physics 8 ай бұрын
Hello, thanks for your message. These are not necessarily from a specific source, and they are typical introductory college-level problems. If there is a specific problem that you'd like to see the solution for, please let me know and I'll be happy to create a video for it.
@lyingcat9022
@lyingcat9022 8 ай бұрын
Very cool. I’m unfamiliar with these formula. I’d be interested in how to derive them.
@let_s_do_physics
@let_s_do_physics 8 ай бұрын
Thanks for the feedback! I will post the derivations soon!
@shamimmalik3537
@shamimmalik3537 8 ай бұрын
Nice 😊
@let_s_do_physics
@let_s_do_physics 8 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@kocavrancic5324
@kocavrancic5324 9 ай бұрын
A question, rather than a comment: Why did you postulate J = alpha x r? Everithing further on is rigorously stated, but this seems as comming out of thin air?
@let_s_do_physics
@let_s_do_physics 9 ай бұрын
Right, in this problem J is not constant, and it is equal to alpha x r. Alpha is a given constant in the problem.
@kocavrancic5324
@kocavrancic5324 9 ай бұрын
@@let_s_do_physics I asked why. Never mind...
@let_s_do_physics
@let_s_do_physics 9 ай бұрын
@@kocavrancic5324 This is how the problem was originally designed.
@AbsharHussain-z6m
@AbsharHussain-z6m 9 ай бұрын
Great explanation
@let_s_do_physics
@let_s_do_physics 9 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@coltenkibodeaux2522
@coltenkibodeaux2522 9 ай бұрын
Keep up the good work 👍
@let_s_do_physics
@let_s_do_physics 9 ай бұрын
Thanks, will do!
@hayaalkar3503
@hayaalkar3503 9 ай бұрын
Hi can you please make video to review physical 2 for the book serway from chapter 23 to 30 ? More idea.
@let_s_do_physics
@let_s_do_physics 9 ай бұрын
Yes of course! What topics in particular?
@faiyazchowdhury9097
@faiyazchowdhury9097 10 ай бұрын
Thank you
@let_s_do_physics
@let_s_do_physics 10 ай бұрын
Of course!
@arindammandal9378
@arindammandal9378 11 ай бұрын
You can take potential first than differentiate
@let_s_do_physics
@let_s_do_physics 10 ай бұрын
Correct, thanks for the suggestion.
@let_s_do_physics
@let_s_do_physics 10 ай бұрын
Of course!