Пікірлер
@Kaiyuni
@Kaiyuni 2 күн бұрын
9/10. Didn't know about Book of Eclipse. I've never played the card so the interaction hasn't come up, haha.
@IvoNinja_
@IvoNinja_ 5 күн бұрын
Furious to pop druis chain beast is 3 pops for the price of one
@andrewcalcetas5911
@andrewcalcetas5911 6 күн бұрын
song?
@andrewdyogi9820
@andrewdyogi9820 8 күн бұрын
I watched 4 videos and finally watched this and understand branded lost
@andrewlerma3348
@andrewlerma3348 10 күн бұрын
Thank you for not talking fast and going at a basic pace!!!! 🙏
@vinimarex2529
@vinimarex2529 13 күн бұрын
Q4 aluber dont search, eclipse are in the imperm column :D haha, good job, i like so much your videos
@cali8196
@cali8196 14 күн бұрын
if they have branded lost and play branded fusion and i have an ash, i cant ash the fusion right? what do i use my ash blossom on?
@YamiElut
@YamiElut 14 күн бұрын
Ash will still negate branded fusion under branded lost
@cali8196
@cali8196 14 күн бұрын
i was debating whether to click on this since it’s an hour long but i‘m so glad i did!
@cali8196
@cali8196 14 күн бұрын
amazing video! just lost today 3 match ups against branded and this video helps a lot!
@ameeremad7514
@ameeremad7514 17 күн бұрын
What about using despia comedy it pay pass imperm targeting any despia and fusion monsters
@FIRE-LOTUS
@FIRE-LOTUS 20 күн бұрын
I really appreciate the explanation in these videos. It gives me insight on why certain cards are being played during chains or revealing alternatives depending game state. I know it's annoying to the content creator or sometimes the viewer to announce what each card does but reminding people what cards do helps memorize them since sometimes people read cards either don't understand them or just straight up don't read. It all helps understanding each cards purpose and not just straight away do the combo without an explanation like 97% of all these combo tutorial videos. In which case defeats the purpose of understanding a combo or the deck and how to fully utilize them.
@rephayersecondchannel
@rephayersecondchannel 21 күн бұрын
First question why all in low rarity?
@tapatio_XIII
@tapatio_XIII 22 күн бұрын
I would of banished the SP after it came back and have an additional end phase effect go off 😂
@MegaCain16
@MegaCain16 23 күн бұрын
Q4 im not sure that scenario is pretty weird
@narongtawatsoinark-5360
@narongtawatsoinark-5360 23 күн бұрын
I never knew that Q4 will work that way. Thank you so much.
@darkragnarok999
@darkragnarok999 23 күн бұрын
great video. learned a whole lot. If you do more of these, I'd recommend adding the card effects in question to the side somewhere, as the hardest part of this was remembering the exact wording of the cards as you counted down.
@TwistedBOLT
@TwistedBOLT 24 күн бұрын
Overall a good video but I do have a slight nitpick about the comment at 21:56. They can't really go back and forth passing priority all day. There's a strict set of rules on how priority is handled and I'll explain it here for those not in the know. There's 3 steps in exiting a phase where you have effects that you must resolve. You start at step 1 and every time a player passes you go to the next step. (The "opponent" in this case, means the non-turn player) Step 1: The gamestate is open. The turn player can activate or resolve any optional or mandatory effect or can pass priority. Step 2: The opponent can activate or resolve any optional or mandatory effect or can pass priority. Step 3: One of the following 3 depending who has mandatory effects to activate or resolve: >If only the turn player or both players have mandatory effect to activate or resolve the turn player is forced to activate or resolve an effect*. >If only the opponent has has a mandatory effect to activate or resolve then the opponent is forced to activate or resolve an effect*. >If neither player has a mandatory effect to activate or resolve the phase (and turn in this case) ends. (* = doesn't need to be a mandatory one, just needs to advance the game-state.) I've chosen to omit some irrelevant stuff regarding chaining/quick effects focusing only on when players are allowed to do stuff but for anything not mentioned you resolve it normally and when you return to an open game state you go back to step 1. Hope this helps.
@YamiElut
@YamiElut 24 күн бұрын
Appreciate that, thank you
@saitougin7210
@saitougin7210 25 күн бұрын
I got 7 out 10 correct. I definitely learned a lot. Especially the details and reasoning. Thank you very much for this video.
@YamiElut
@YamiElut 25 күн бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@saitougin7210
@saitougin7210 23 күн бұрын
@@YamiElut I mean, I am a Branded player. It's my favorite deck of all time. And even I could learn something. Especially Branded Lost is kinda tricky. At locals, where many people don't really interrupt so much, at some point one gets used to just use it as a combo piece and search with it
@romeanselhorst9285
@romeanselhorst9285 25 күн бұрын
... what I'm wondering is, in question 2, why the opponent wouldn't use the 2nd imperm on cartesia, stopping the summon of granguignol and preventing aluber's dodging of imperm?
@YamiElut
@YamiElut 25 күн бұрын
That would be a more correct play with two imperm but not what I am intending to show lol. You can consider the second imperm to be a single imperm that was chained to a greedy cartesia effect as well (cl1 aluber/lubellion/etc, cl2 cartesia after no opponent response initially, then cl3 imperm target aluber/lubellion/etc to call the bluff)
@WayfarerGuy
@WayfarerGuy 25 күн бұрын
Imperm player had tunnel vision and was focused on stopping Aluber no matter what 😅
@wyomingptt
@wyomingptt 24 күн бұрын
Maybe they really wanted to cut the turn player off of BF.
@nicom.7559
@nicom.7559 25 күн бұрын
If mirrorjade is attached to your opponent’s xyz , does that count as him leaving the field therefore able to nuke the field?
@YamiElut
@YamiElut 25 күн бұрын
No, Mirrorjade being attached as xyz material will not trigger him. Even if he was detached from an opponent's xyz monster Mirrorjade will not trigger because it is not under its owner's control leaving the field. Xyz materials in general are not considered to be "on the field". In a similar way detaching Bystial Druiswurm from an xyz monster will not trigger Druiswurm in the graveyard
@nicom.7559
@nicom.7559 25 күн бұрын
@@YamiElut thank you!
@wyomingptt
@wyomingptt 24 күн бұрын
It's like the old sangan/tour guide situation
@cozyy7442
@cozyy7442 25 күн бұрын
great video! you should get much more support for explaining that great!
@kakiko2142
@kakiko2142 25 күн бұрын
In the last one you can also active mirrorjade again, to banish the little knight for good, also if your opponent removes that mirrorjade, can still trigger its raigeki effect
@YamiElut
@YamiElut 25 күн бұрын
This is correct and I'll add on just in case anyone is curious reading this: S:P Little Knight's effect does not banish the targets to then resummon them back on endphase. What it does instead is banish them UNTIL the endphase, meaning that Mirrorjade is still considered to be Fusion summoned from the Extra Deck when it returns from S:P effect, rather than special summoned back to the field like with Quem or Ad Libitum reborn effects
@AlexAnastaso
@AlexAnastaso 25 күн бұрын
@@YamiElut What happens with cosmic Blazar I want to know, can they force me to play all my effects first and then return cosmic blazar or there is any kind of priority based on spell speed ? For example u cant say 'priority lubellion'
@AlexAnastaso
@AlexAnastaso 25 күн бұрын
@@YamiElut How return works in terms of resolving effects? I know cosmic blazan can negate everything if u cant chain! I think is similar of what u said about littles knight, but I want to confirm
@YamiElut
@YamiElut 25 күн бұрын
@@AlexAnastaso Cosmic Blazar's return is essentially the same as S:P's. So the ordering will depend on who turn player is and then its a matter of choosing which order you want to resolve end phase effects when you have priority. Keep in mind that if the turn player resolves an effect in the end phase priority stays with them after the fact, and they can choose to resolve another effect OR pass to their opponent to resolve one effect. Opponent can choose to resolve one effect or simply pass priority back to the turn player if the turn player still has things they need to resolve. Does that help?
@bradleybaynard5536
@bradleybaynard5536 25 күн бұрын
Wait so you can proc mirrorjade if it’s destroyed by battle?
@YamiElut
@YamiElut 25 күн бұрын
Yes
@jasonchau6629
@jasonchau6629 25 күн бұрын
What happens if branded lost is on the field and you summon fallen of Albaz then activate effect to fusion with opponents cards, can it be negated?
@YamiElut
@YamiElut 25 күн бұрын
Depends on the card negating Albaz. If it negates the effect (imperm, veiler, Bystial Dis Pater, Number 90, etc) then Albaz can be negated under Branded Lost. If it negates the activation (Red Eyes Dark Dragoon, Baronne de Fleur, Apollousa, etc) then Albaz will resolve regardless under Branded Lost.
@AnimeRecksYou
@AnimeRecksYou 26 күн бұрын
i dont understand how PEP dies if mirrorjade activated in the battle phase?
@YamiElut
@YamiElut 25 күн бұрын
The short version is that Mirrorjade's effect does not resolve when it activates. If that were the case PEP would be immune to it. But since it resolves later in the end phase and does not start a chain in the end phase, it is not considered an "activated" effect anymore and is considered an effect that already activated and partially resolved. If it started a chain and fully resolved immediately PEP would be immune, but it does neither of those two things
@AnimeRecksYou
@AnimeRecksYou 25 күн бұрын
@@YamiElut wow i had no clue that seems overly complicated. would that also apply to expurrely noir with 5 material?
@YamiElut
@YamiElut 25 күн бұрын
@@AnimeRecksYou its definitely weird to think about if the concept is new to you I agree, and yes the ruling is exactly the same for Noir if you are able to pull it off
@joseakanino
@joseakanino 24 күн бұрын
To add on to this, “unaffected by activated effects” protection will not get you around Mirrorjade. However, unaffected by all effects (some variation of “unaffected by your opponent’s effects” or “unaffected by other card effects”), protection will protect from Mirrojade, because this protection doesn’t care about when the effect applies. It only cares about if it’s an effect that is applying, lingering or otherwise
@tsoutsounidis420
@tsoutsounidis420 26 күн бұрын
Can bystial dis pater quick effect negate mirrorjades field destruction effect?
@YamiElut
@YamiElut 26 күн бұрын
If Mirrorjade is destroyed by card effect then yes Dis Pater can negate it given it has a banished opponent card to shuffle back. If Mirrorjade was destroyed by battle then it occurs during the damage step, meaning Dis Pater will not be able to negate it since Dis Pater negates the monster's effect, not the activation.
@InvokedAlbaz
@InvokedAlbaz 26 күн бұрын
You have to negate it when it activates in the GY, like Destroyer Phoenix Enforcer. Once it resolves in the GY, then its too late and cant do anything about it.
@tsoutsounidis420
@tsoutsounidis420 26 күн бұрын
@@YamiElut oh i get it now thnx
@TheRussGuy
@TheRussGuy 26 күн бұрын
Are that count for Master Duel to?
@YamiElut
@YamiElut 26 күн бұрын
Rulings here will be the same in Master Duel as TCG
@HackerLord63-ng2gf
@HackerLord63-ng2gf 26 күн бұрын
Very helpful, thank you!
@tahmidislam5208
@tahmidislam5208 26 күн бұрын
"swordsoul players getting rekt in this video", ya love to see it lol
@Mizzle200
@Mizzle200 26 күн бұрын
Can duplication copy shaddoll fusion
@LuisGonzalez-tv7ty
@LuisGonzalez-tv7ty 26 күн бұрын
Yes.
@Carwinley
@Carwinley 26 күн бұрын
@Mizzle200 I assume you mean Fusion Duplication? Fusion Duplication says "Target 1 "Fusion" or "Polymerization" Normal or Quick-Play Spell in either player's GY; banish that Spell, then apply that Spell's effect when that card is activated." Shaddoll Fusion is a Normal Spell and has "Fusion" in its name, so it meets the criteria. The thing that might trip you up is that you need to make sure that Shaddoll Fusion is still in the GY at resolution, as Fusion Duplication says "Then", so A has to happen in order for B to happen, and they happen in sequence.
@Mizzle200
@Mizzle200 26 күн бұрын
@@Carwinley thank u
@Rjkingpants
@Rjkingpants 26 күн бұрын
This is kinda confusing and probably going to get me some judge calls
@feraf4405
@feraf4405 27 күн бұрын
Small heads up but might not matter too much in the end. At 6:55ish you said that starting with Lubellion while having opening and getting drolled stops your fusion access for the turn. But, you could in theory Opening to discard Saronir and summon quem then Quem and Saronir can dump Retribution and Fusion to get it to hand!
@YamiElut
@YamiElut 27 күн бұрын
This is 100% true, should have specified Opening for Aluber when talking Droll. Thats my b
@vagelis5254
@vagelis5254 Ай бұрын
Hello really like your vids i wanted to ask some questions about branded i basically have 3x the albaz strike structure decks 3x alluber and 3x opening 2x super polly tradegy fusion deployment branded in red branded in high spirits branded in white and the patchwork engine i also have rindrum garura chimera quaertis dragostapelia masquaerade and muddragon for the extra deck now i can afford to buy the beastials cartesia and granguignol right now as an upgrade that would leave quem and sanctifire for the near future waht i wanted to ask is what direction should i take the deck until i will be able to add things like thrust and if it is worth to go to the branded chimera route since it seems more affordable right now
@YamiElut
@YamiElut Ай бұрын
If you plan on getting Quem/Sanctifire/etc pretty soon then I think for a bit you'll be fine with the patchwork engine as a substitute (and even after getting Quem you can still totally play it). Feel free to try Chimera as well but just know that Chimera Branded and Branded Despia are completely different playstyles, so if you want to play Branded Despia due to its style you may not be as happy playing Chimera, and vice versa
@vagelis5254
@vagelis5254 Ай бұрын
Thanks a lot for the response man
@mahfuzhasan576
@mahfuzhasan576 Ай бұрын
Super poly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
@omarromero3152
@omarromero3152 Ай бұрын
i have a question, which card(s) can substitute quem and the bystials? mostly asking for the quem
@YamiElut
@YamiElut Ай бұрын
Quem is a difficult one to replace since no card does everything she can in one. Part of the power of the two Bystials (specifically Saronir) is to get you to other spells through the graveyard when paired with Quem's on summon effect or Albion the Shrouded Dragon's send to GY. Without two of those 3 pieces it will limit you in certain scenarios. I would probably either swap in a tech of your choice like the patchwork engine/super poly/etc, and/or bump Cartesia to 3 for strictly more gas
@4evertyranitar
@4evertyranitar Ай бұрын
I don't play paper but I keep considering it, for now my only practice with Branded happens in MD where it's considerably less consistent. My version of the deck is overall the same but I do still play superpoly which helps a lot against the still legal baronne and such. One thing I have noticed though is that people in the TCG tend to skip branded banishment. Why is that? Yeah the superpoly effect doesn't come up much right now but just reborning a fusion is something I always liked. I also didn't see Kitt in this list I think but I guess in a format where basically no cards were hit there's no reason to run it?
@YamiElut
@YamiElut Ай бұрын
Banishment is not a bad card, but I think it can sometimes be perceived as "win more" in a lot of cases. I have sided the card before if the superpoly effect is good enough, but I just have not ever felt a real need for it in the main. Kitt is occasionally played in tcg, but never at more than 1 copy. One reason as you said is a lot of the power cards have not been hit in tcg like they have in MD, but also Kitt only really shines if the build plays Branded in High Spirits, especially at multiple copies, and is getting Kitt as a free special summon or to recycle something from banished. Usually this is not needed and Aluber is strictly better in terms of card advantage. If Branded Fusion was at 1 and the need to recycle it was more prevalent Kitt would be a mainstay in every list.
@alexstreet9470
@alexstreet9470 Ай бұрын
This playmat is disgusting . Where did you get that ?!! It’s so cool .
@YamiElut
@YamiElut Ай бұрын
from chainlinktcg, was a preorder only thing early April i am sorry to say
@TheNinjasoncrack
@TheNinjasoncrack Ай бұрын
If im not mistaken, Mercourier can just say no to nib and ash right?
@YamiElut
@YamiElut Ай бұрын
Technically yes, as I wrote in the description Mercourier can negate any monster effect. Thing is though at the times ash and nibiru are usually played mercourier isnt often in your hand yet and able to be activated. To have an albaz fusion on board and mercourier in hand before even activating branded fusion can happen, but its not a regular occurence by any means. Additionally, most people will not nibiru at the end of main phase and will instead nibiru on the summon of bystial lubellion to prevent access to branded lost, which would search mercourier and punish the nibiru if they waited to play it.
@ViralFonz
@ViralFonz Ай бұрын
Need u so bad
@YamiElut
@YamiElut Ай бұрын
?
@JesseEVH
@JesseEVH Ай бұрын
Can't wait for the Synchro variant!!!
@gustavoramos942
@gustavoramos942 Ай бұрын
Finally a decent short deck list! Wish i had money left for thrust though😅 would you recommend running 3 TTT instead for the moment?
@YamiElut
@YamiElut Ай бұрын
There is no true replacement for all that Thrust does, but some combination of Talents and/or Crossout whether in main or side will do you well
@simonsalzeder1235
@simonsalzeder1235 Ай бұрын
Love your puppet-less approach 👍
@YamiElut
@YamiElut Ай бұрын
🗿
@Tine4
@Tine4 Ай бұрын
Why no branded banishment :o
@LikeTheBirb
@LikeTheBirb Ай бұрын
Same thing as super poly apparently not bein good rn, making it only a mirrorjade refresh. Which is nice too.
@YamiElut
@YamiElut Ай бұрын
Its not a bad card, I've just never found it necessary. When setting off Albion I usually would want red anyway and even in the mirror match I'd rather have other side cards like bystials
@Tine4
@Tine4 Ай бұрын
Interesting.. for me its a must have, i always plays with 2, my fav combo is albion and mirror jade w albions effect, then bystial lubellion from gy by sending albion to the gy,setting branded beast/regained/lost with bystial and finaly branded banishement by albions effect in gy. Very good win ratio, but just online
@Mizzle200
@Mizzle200 Ай бұрын
Is there any possible way u can make a branded synchro build for MD PLEASE
@YamiElut
@YamiElut Ай бұрын
I won't say never.... but man maxx c💀 Tbh idk what the MD banlist looks like now I'd have to check all that out, been a while
@Mizzle200
@Mizzle200 Ай бұрын
@@YamiElutreally would love this been trying to make it work