Why didn't you provide YOUR CRITIQUE to his FACE vs. BEHIND HIS BACK, so HE COULD CLARIFY??!!! You look and sound SHADY!!!

There's a duality running through the Bible. Paul despite my issues with him, tells you that most of the stories are symbolic. The seeming inconsistencies are necessary because there is a story underneath that was meant for us. They decoded it, what it said frightened them so they started messing with it. If I say too much, the message will get erased. I can show you a few places to get some information about what's really going on in the book. It will shock you but it's legit. If interested, let me know, it is online.

Rabboni When will you and Ron sit down again and discuss? You proved your point very well! Appreciated

Based on writings do you come to at least 5 daughters??

Amaah why don't you debate on his 700 page book Hebrews to Negroes. Ron Dalton says he will debate anyone. It was a 1000 page book he had to reduce it to sell it.

When it speaks on Jacobs sons and daughters being 33. That is talking about all the people who came into Egypt with him, including his sons children. We need to be careful to read scripture in context. He only had one direct biological daughter, the other daughters referenced to are his sons daughters.

I’ve been “listening” to this guy and it sounds like he considers the Children of Israel are counted according to the mother. However, scripture clearly states that the Children of Israel are counting according to the Fathers. What is your focus on Dinah all about? This is why Genesis 46:14-15 lists sons born to Jacob, birthed by Leah. And I will never listen to a rabbi Schlomo my guy!!!

Brother you really need to reread the scriptures and absorb proper understanding. Jacob only had 1 daughter from his own stock. The others mentioned are daughters in law and granddaughters. This book isnt meant for everybody clearly. I see why the ancestors only shared this information with people who had comprehensive skills

Just like Ron Dalton, you are also speaking in error. PLEASE NOTE: 1. Jacob had 12 sons and only one daughter (Dinah). 2. Jacob went to Egypt with 70 people that included Jacob's 11 sons and their wives (JACOB'S DAUGHTERS aka Daughters-in-laws (wives of his 11 sons). The sons also had sons and daughters (Jacob's grandchildren, etc.). That is the population of the Israelites which increased to a population/multitude of multiple sons and daughters during their time in Egypt.

Hahahahah peer review lmao.

You forget An Isrealitish woman married an Egyptian man in the bible? Leviticus 24:10-16 And Joseph married an Egyptian woman? The bible is not detailed on everything that transpired. Judah married a Cananite woman. Genesis 38. Simeon married or had a son with a Canaanite woman Genesis 46:10. The mixed multitude could be very well mixed with canaanite, Egyptian and other nation we dont know about. We dont know.

Could these be his daughters in law? Why only name Dinah and not the other daughters?

I know he was wrong on the brothers marrying in Egypt, other than Joseph. We do not know about Benjamin as he was young and not likely married when he was taken to Egypt. I think any presenter can make a mistake. If he had just said Joseph married an Egyptian then his premise would be better. I agree with you that we read texts and are so familiar with them that we overlook things. Like the fact the Messiah was to be of seed of David and Matthew tracks that through Joseph, yet we do not believe Joseph was the father. If he was not then Jesus or Yahusha was not the seed of David and Matthew wasted his time. or Genesis 13:1 where clearly Abraham went south from Egypt into Africa. I think you spent too much time on this issue showing a fault. It does not in any way show that his overall premise is wrong. Unless we think he is trying to deceive. I think he misread that only. I really want to get to the nitty gritty so this was a bit disappointing. I will wait your next.

Good Afternoon Prof. As for this one, you are doing great with Ron Dalton's funny ideas turned into assertions. I really don't know why he is so convinced about a story that has no substance in it. Is like someone saying that ancient Abyssinia is in West Africa, and he can prove it. That is impossible because the location should match the history. Ron is trying to tell us that Abraham was living in the Congo forest with the Canaanites before he went to Egypt with Sarah. His assertion about the animals mentioned in the Torah can only be found in Africa is laughable. A simple google search can tell you the kind of animals living in North Africa and the land of Israel in the ancient times. He must I explain 2Kings 25: 25-26. Also, Jeroboam and his connection to Egypt and the Northern Kingdom of Israel. Bro. I am enjoying your analysis so far keep it up. Facts are facts. Shalom

⚖️📚✅️

I appreciate all the work Ron is doing, has done and will do, my concern is why don’t he and other brothers and sisters with this knowledge not reach out to others as a way to check/critique the info being disseminated.

This was awesome Rabbi.

Food... Feeding me man, give thanks!!

If I may, couldn't it be that Jacob considered his sons wives as his daughters?🤔 technically, they are his daughters in law, so if he referred to them as his daughters would make since, wouldn't i? When you read the old books their aren't any other references of any other daughters were born by any of his wives besides Dynah. Just saying.

Genesis 3:14 the serpent is curse but that same curse serpent was going to heal you in Numbers 21:8 mind blowing.

Genesis 3:14 the serpent is curse but that same curse serpent was going to heal you in Numbers 21:8 mind blowing.

Exodus 20:4-5 don’t make or worship graven Images but Numbers 21:8 tells Moses to make a graven snake to look upon to get healing.

Exodus 20:4-5 don’t make or worship graven Images but Numbers 21:8 tells Moses to make a graven snake to look upon to get healing.

Thanks for the video but looking at you sitting in a chair is very distracting…it takes away from the message…IMHO

Genesis 25:25 says Esau is the first born, but Exodus 4:22 says Jacob is the first born, how do you square that?

I believe that you have been very dishonest, because the bible is not a reliable source of truth historically fact, there is a lot of inconsistency in the bible and they varied from version to version.

We need more of this, I need more of this. I also want to get an understanding of your beliefs, practices and faith.

The brother Ron Dalton no doubt missed details, which can draw critism. It has been said if his movies and books, that there is no smoking gun to prove the case...and the case ultimately that he trying so hard to prove it that, negros and tribes in the continent of Africa are what the English Bible translates as the Israelites. Sometime these things are in steps or two fold...as in "Aaron and Moses", Moses becoming the greater but Aaron born first..."Manasee and Ephraim" Ephraim the greater but Manasee born first, similarly John the Baptist and Jesus...Likewise although he doesn't possess all the details let's consider him a forerunner for the case of Africa being the holy land, the 12 tribes being from it. And when you recieve the fortified proof at least the idea had already being suggested...settling in the place til it can be watered with the facts.

Apparently it suggests that there possibily weren't enough women for the men...

Awkwetey, sir you have lost credibility. I have lost faith in you and have questions about your intentions. If you have an issue with anything brother Dalton has said, be a man and engage him in a discussion. This smacks of a sense of growing irrelevance and I question your purposes.... Not cool brother. Not cool at all.

That is proxy Egypt. Its fake. Real egypt is in Asia. Our true homeland is in Asia, not Africa. You all better look at Thailand's original name. Siam (Zion) your progenitor's name is not Shem. TMH name is HAYA forever. H1961.

Jeremiah 2:14 "Israel a servant, a slave by birth? Why then has he become plunder?" This is a question of Africa.. Western racist scholars tend to discount, disparage and out right lie about Alkebulan and its contributions to the 7 arts. Therefore, logic dictates to look at the Mother of us all more keenly.

Peer review work quote from Jurji Zaidan and the Foundations of Arab Nationalism. "The Arabs: Who Are They? When we talk about “Arabs” today, we mean the inhabitants of the Arabian Peninsula, Iraq, Syria, Egypt, Sudan, and North Africa. In the period before Islam, however, “Arabs” meant only the inhabitants of the Arabian Peninsula, for the population of Iraq and Syria was composed of Syrians, Chaldeans, Nabateans, Jews, and Greeks; the Egyptian population was Coptic; the population of the Maghreb was Berber, Greeks, and Vandal; and the population of Sudan was Nubians, Negroes, and others. When Islam appeared and the Arabs expanded their territory, they settled in these lands and the Arabic language replaced the original languages of those lands, and so their inhabitants were called Arabs. In ancient history-in the period of the Pharaohs, Assyrians, and Phoenicians-“Arabs” meant the nomadic people in the northern part of the Arabian Peninsula and the east of the Nile Valley, in the land stretching from the Euphrates in the East to the Nile in the West. It included the deserts of Iraq, Syria, and the Sinai Peninsula, together with the adjacent eastern part of the Delta and the eastern desert of Egypt between the Nile and the Red Sea. The Nile Valley was the natural frontier between Libya in the West and Arabia in the East. The Egyptians called the eastern mountains that bordered the Nile in the East Jabal al-‘Arab or Bilad al-‘Arab, and they called the mountains to the West the “Libyan Mountains.” Geographical location names were never static and were based upon the conqueror's whims. From the Doctrine of Discovery to eminent domain. The one with the greatest power makes the rules and dares the weak to change them. The point is that parts of Africa's east side of the Nile river was once considered Arabia.

7:24 mark Ron is referring to the book of yasher that’s mentioned twice in judges IJS

I have Jordan & Lebanon DNA... a dark skin brother from Arkansas USA

Why would Moses cross the red sea when Kushites were with Moses and Moses was king of Kush for 40 years... BOOK OF MECCABEE

Thisis why i love your peer reviews

The 7ethnic groups of the tribes of isreal are Abos Akan Edo Ewe Ga-ananbge Mallis Mossi

Excellent peer review, and it is necessary for us to reconstruct and annotate our true biblical history.

*Concerning the Promised Land of God, Given to us Israelites* . ( The Land of Canaan was Occupied by Heathen Nations (Strangers ) before Moses lead us to It ) . . *Exodus 6:4* 4) *And I Have also Established My Covenant with The* ( Israelites ) , *To Give Them the Land of CANAAN* , the *Land of Their Pilgrimage* , Wherein *They were Strangers* ( Gentiles ). . *Exodus 12:25* 25) *And it Shall Come to Pass* , when *Ye Be Come to The Land which the LORD* will *Give You, According as He hath PROMISED* , that ye shall keep this service. . *Genesis 2:12* 12) *And the GOLD* of that *Land is GOOD* : there is *Ddellium* and the *Onyx Stone* . . *Deuteronomy 6:3* 3) *Hear Therefore, O Israel* , and *Observe to Do it* ; ( the Law ) that it may be well with thee, and that ye may increase mightily, as *the LORD God of Thy Fathers hath PROMISED* Thee, in *The Land That Floweth with Milk and Honey* . . *Deuteronomy 8:9* 9) *A land wherein thou shalt Eat Bread* without scarceness, thou shalt *not Lack any thing in it* ; *A LAND* Whose *Stones are IRON* , and out of whose *Hills thou Mayest Dig BRASS* . . *Deuteronomy 11:11* 11) *But the Land* , whither *Ye Go to Possess It* , is *A Land of Hills* and *Valleys* , and drinketh *Water of the Rain of Heaven* : . *Isaiah 2:7* 7) *Their LAND also is FULL of SILVER and GOLD* , neither is there any end of their treasures; their land is also Full of Horses, neither is there any end of their chariots: . . ( Apostle Paul an Israelite Speaking ) . *Romans 9:1-4* 1) *I Say the Truth in Christ* , *I Lie Not* , *My Conscience* also *Bearing Me Witness in the Holy Ghost* , . 2) *That I Have Great Heaviness* and *Continual Sorrow in My Heart* . . *3) *For I Could wish that myself* were Accursed from Christ for *My Brethren* , *My Kinsmen According to the Flesh* ( Bloodline ): . 4) *Who Are Israelites* ; to *Whom Pertaineth* the *Adoption*, and the *Glory*, and *the Covenants* , and the *Giving of the Law* , and the *Service of God* , and *THE PROMISES* ; . . ( Wake Up Israel, the time is at Hand ) . *All Praises to the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob*

I think you should angle for the lie that was placed in the story of them not sleeping with other people. Genetics proves that has never been the case in homo sapien sapiens history. Every group mixed with others. The Bible itself says they always slept with other people and still do today.

Didn’t Abraham leave Egypt and went up to the south because the elevation is higher the further south you go. And this is were he sat up his tent

You are correct. Abraham went south of Egypt and then went up. Central and further south, the elevation is up hill, as the Nile’s flow from a high level down towards Egypt which is north. I understand that it is more detailed

Great analysis using the scripture. Our brother Ron and other Israelites sincerely want sub Saharan Africa to be our promised land, but they are sincerely wrong. I love it, but it doesn't match a lot of the Biblical descriptions.

No one is one hundred percent correct but we are getting information and doing ower research so that is great.

Whether Joseph’s brothers had already established families before Egypt don’t make it up in your mind that they didn’t take on those women in Egypt. They were humans like you and me and they took on women that were available to them. This whole thing about Israelite men not taking on other women just sounds funny to me, because ancestry is passed down through the father anyway. You think they didn’t want a feel of those fine Hametic women in Egypt? Come on bro. Stop it.

When you have various writers in one text everyone has a different viewpoint and the amount of time that passed before hard copies were made names of geography changed. The written pen has more veracity than the spoken word. My written lie last longer than my spoken truth.

Personally, years ago I researched who the negro is when it comes to us being TRUE ISRAELITES. I then used my DNA test to cross reference and confirm that it’s true. So these days I don’t wonder, I know. That being said, when I hear different interpretations of scriptural history today, it doesn’t matter to me because I already know without the benefit of a doubt. Also, I have Hebrews to Negros, all three volumes, written by Ronald Dalton. The old evidence is the true evidence, just like the Old Testament (TORAH & TANAKH) along with the books that were removed, hidden and are now found, is the rightly divided word. People thinking they’re awakened today are still bound by religion’s and their god’s jesus (zeus etc. and allah) and whatever other god’s there are.