I think microsoft must deal with programmers to build big apps with blazor like facebook clone,Udemy Clone,big ecommerces to enlarge community of blazor and give trust for use it i love blazor very much and i hope it will be the best in web development
@shabanelmogy7912Күн бұрын
Thanks
@DevLeaderКүн бұрын
🧑💼Get Promoted As A Software Engineer: - dometrain.com/course/career-getting-promoted-as-a-software-engineer/?ref=nick-cosentino 🧑💼 Nailing The Behavioral Interview: - dometrain.com/course/career-nailing-the-behavioral-interview/?ref=nick-cosentino 💡 Learn how to program in C#: - dometrain.com/course/getting-started-csharp?ref=nick-cosentino 🧠Deep dive on C#: - dometrain.com/course/deep-dive-csharp?ref=nick-cosentino 🎁Zero to Hero C# Bundle: - dometrain.com/bundle/from-zero-to-hero-csharp/?ref=nick-cosentino 🪞Reflection in .NET - dometrain.com/course/from-zero-to-hero-reflection-in-dotnet/?ref=nick-cosentino 💪 Skill up your refactoring: - dometrain.com/course/from-zero-to-hero-refactoring-for-csharp-developers?ref=nick-cosentino ✉ Subscribe to my free software engineering newsletter: - weekly.devleader.ca
@linkdotnetКүн бұрын
Great video! Thanks for the nice explanation. If you have an GitHub Account, you can use the "Devcontainer" feature so you wouldn't need anything locally set up at all.
@DevLeaderКүн бұрын
Awesome stuff, thanks! I've not yet tried this!
@kaleshilpa88892 күн бұрын
can we use benchmark to write test cases for performance testing in c#?
@DevLeader2 күн бұрын
Absolutely - but it's just the harness for benchmarks, so you'd still need something to perform the assertions on results
@kaleshilpa888914 сағат бұрын
@@DevLeader VSTS from perspective of writing tests cases for JMeter, HAR files, VS Webtests Load test, monitoring "this is my requirement"
@kaleshilpa888914 сағат бұрын
@@DevLeader which library is better or useful for writing test case about performance testing
@GuillaumeMaka2 күн бұрын
I always wanted to explore this type of architecture, I think I found where to start my journey
@DevLeader2 күн бұрын
Glad to hear it! It's a powerful pattern that you can use for all sorts of interesting projects 😁
@impero1013 күн бұрын
4:00 I had the same exact idea 4 years ago, when I first started playing with record types. They're perfect for the Options pattern. I asked Stack Overflow, and got the same answer - cannot be done. It wasn't for nothing though - it became my most upvoted question on Stack Overflow. XD
@DevLeader2 күн бұрын
@@impero101 yussss 😅 very nice!
@impero1012 күн бұрын
@@DevLeader I'm very proud. One does not simply get upvotes on SO. 😏
@anthonyapm3 күн бұрын
I'm more concerned by the experienced programmers that trust llms completely.
@DevLeader3 күн бұрын
🧑💼Get Promoted As A Software Engineer: - dometrain.com/course/career-getting-promoted-as-a-software-engineer/?ref=nick-cosentino 🧑💼 Nailing The Behavioral Interview: - dometrain.com/course/career-nailing-the-behavioral-interview/?ref=nick-cosentino 💡 Learn how to program in C#: - dometrain.com/course/getting-started-csharp?ref=nick-cosentino 🧠Deep dive on C#: - dometrain.com/course/deep-dive-csharp?ref=nick-cosentino 🎁Zero to Hero C# Bundle: - dometrain.com/bundle/from-zero-to-hero-csharp/?ref=nick-cosentino 🪞Reflection in .NET - dometrain.com/course/from-zero-to-hero-reflection-in-dotnet/?ref=nick-cosentino 💪 Skill up your refactoring: - dometrain.com/course/from-zero-to-hero-refactoring-for-csharp-developers?ref=nick-cosentino ✉ Subscribe to my free software engineering newsletter: - weekly.devleader.ca
@sbditto853 күн бұрын
Use whatever tools, but the code isn’t don’t just because “it works”. You can’t leave a mess for the next dev (or yourself later on) which mean you have to understand what the code is doing and the trade offs etc. if the jr is just asking ChatGPT to output code and then shipping it then that is wrong. It’s on the use of the tool to make sure it’s being used correctly and the end result is correct.
@DevLeader3 күн бұрын
@@sbditto85 yeah I don't think we can even infer that's happening from this post to be honest. Maybe they are doing that, maybe they aren't.
@matten_zero4 күн бұрын
Leet Code has ruined hiring
@matten_zero4 күн бұрын
But I can't a job. Who hired that dev? FML
@matten_zero4 күн бұрын
A lot of engineers don't know machine code or anything below the compiler.
@DevLeader4 күн бұрын
I mean, I certainly don't. Absolutely would not be a good use of my time to focus on that either 😁
@Anonymous-dk5qu3 күн бұрын
That's like saying "a lot of drivers don't know engines or anything under the hood". But do you NEED to know those things to just drive? Sure, it's cool and can be practical. But you REALLLLLYYYYY expect Sally from HR to be a full blown mechanic too?
@Zuranthus4 күн бұрын
AI is basically the new calculator, as long as you know the concepts who cares
@DevLeader4 күн бұрын
@@Zuranthus this seems like the direction things are headed in -- so it's very interesting to see the paradigm shift right before our eyes
@Zuranthus4 күн бұрын
@@DevLeader absolutely. people are so outraged and scared of AI, i on the other hand am excited, and i say that as someone who is learning to code/art without AI because i do want to know the concepts but i don't see anything wrong with a guy that just wants to spin something up real quick like a planner app or a writer who wants character art for his novel but doesn't have money to spare...legalities aside
@lucasrocha1035 күн бұрын
why a company is wasting money in a guy that all he does is prompts? That guy is using the IA to think for him.
@DevLeader5 күн бұрын
@@lucasrocha103 /remind me of this in 5 years 😉 Will be interesting to see how things change.
@Anonymous-dk5qu3 күн бұрын
That company should use AI to build their prompts instead of hiring a prompt engineer!
@ahmadjerjees4285 күн бұрын
Is it possible to do the samething but with Json files ? dynamically handle JSON properties using a similar approach? I'm working on retrieving drink information from an API via HTTP requests. Each drink in the JSON response has multiple ingredients, up to a maximum of 15, but the actual number varies (e.g., sometimes 5, sometimes 3). The ingredient properties are named in a predictable pattern (strIngredient1, strIngredient2, etc.). Would reflection be a feasible way to dynamically handle and process these variable properties, or is there a better approach?
@DevLeader5 күн бұрын
@@ahmadjerjees428 reflection applies to types in dotnet, so you're thinking about the right idea, but it's not applied to the same thing. I think you just need "parsing" or "deserialization" here. If you declare a class in C# that matches the structure it the JSON, it sounds like you just need to use an array to handle the multiple ingredient situation. I'd try searching for deserialization examples using the System JSON classes. Hope that helps!
@Time216 күн бұрын
what about lower level software engineers? What is needed to progress and advance seniority? I feel like am stuck to that level way to long.
@DevLeader6 күн бұрын
I talk about this stuff in my AMA live stream videos all the time because this kind of thing comes up frequently (I also spend the majority of my people management time working with people in this range). I haven't blasted KZbin videos on this topic because I actually partnered with another engineering manager to create a course on it: dometrain.com/course/career-getting-promoted-as-a-software-engineer/?ref=nick-cosentino (This is currently heavily discounted because Black Friday) Once this has been out for a while I'll make more content on it -- or you can jump on to one of my streams if it's good timing and ask away 🙂 happy to try and help! (If you have a more targeted question you can submit it to me on my other channel KZbin.com/@codecommute and I'll talk about it there)
@DevLeader6 күн бұрын
🧑💼Get Promoted As A Software Engineer: - dometrain.com/course/career-getting-promoted-as-a-software-engineer/?ref=nick-cosentino 🧑💼 Nailing The Behavioral Interview: - dometrain.com/course/career-nailing-the-behavioral-interview/?ref=nick-cosentino 💡 Learn how to program in C#: - dometrain.com/course/getting-started-csharp?ref=nick-cosentino 🧠Deep dive on C#: - dometrain.com/course/deep-dive-csharp?ref=nick-cosentino 🎁Zero to Hero C# Bundle: - dometrain.com/bundle/from-zero-to-hero-csharp/?ref=nick-cosentino 🪞Reflection in .NET - dometrain.com/course/from-zero-to-hero-reflection-in-dotnet/?ref=nick-cosentino 💪 Skill up your refactoring: - dometrain.com/course/from-zero-to-hero-refactoring-for-csharp-developers?ref=nick-cosentino ✉ Subscribe to my free software engineering newsletter: - weekly.devleader.ca
@daymaker_trading6 күн бұрын
Very interesting, thank you
@gpltaylor6 күн бұрын
a great discussion but I would like to see you do this from the leaders PoV as this was developer focused. If we think about the tech leader, how can they help their teams avoid burnout and depression? As Generation X, it's hard wired into me to say "suck it up buttercup" both to my teams and to myself. However, I fight this urge. We are no longer working down the mines, but using our brains to earn money. Therefore we need to look after that brain. If one member of the team is burnt out, it can have a lasting impression on the teams performance. This in turn can cause burnout for the whole team. Developers should understand that burnout is not acceptable and that it's their responsibility to regulate their own feeling, emotions and mental health.It's unfair for them to keep drawing a wage every month without commiting to their team. Their poor performance impacts everyone, not just themselves. However, I feel that leaders should know their teams; identify and resolve areas that cause burnout together. For example the two week death march that is Sprints could be relaxed (Don't panic Scrum Master, you're still important). What can leaders do to help their teams avoid burnout?
@carlosbom6 күн бұрын
I would love to see his take on this too
@CaioCodes5 күн бұрын
I feel your "developers should understand that burnout is not acceptable" take lacks a ton of empathy, but perhaps I can view it through different lenses. Would you mind talking more about it?
@DevLeader2 күн бұрын
Here you go: kzbin.info/www/bejne/m2jFkoN7qtCjppY Did this in vlog format
@gpltaylor7 күн бұрын
isn't Blazor dead :)
@DevLeader7 күн бұрын
Something like that 😉
@DevLeader7 күн бұрын
- Steven's blog: steven-giesel.com/ - Repository: github.com/linkdotnet/Blog 🧑💼Get Promoted As A Software Engineer: - dometrain.com/course/career-getting-promoted-as-a-software-engineer/?ref=nick-cosentino 🧑💼 Nailing The Behavioral Interview: - dometrain.com/course/career-nailing-the-behavioral-interview/?ref=nick-cosentino 💡 Learn how to program in C#: - dometrain.com/course/getting-started-csharp?ref=nick-cosentino 🧠Deep dive on C#: - dometrain.com/course/deep-dive-csharp?ref=nick-cosentino 🎁Zero to Hero C# Bundle: - dometrain.com/bundle/from-zero-to-hero-csharp/?ref=nick-cosentino 🪞Reflection in .NET - dometrain.com/course/from-zero-to-hero-reflection-in-dotnet/?ref=nick-cosentino 💪 Skill up your refactoring: - dometrain.com/course/from-zero-to-hero-refactoring-for-csharp-developers?ref=nick-cosentino ✉ Subscribe to my free software engineering newsletter: - weekly.devleader.ca
@xpresspackage8 күн бұрын
Sheet bro, it’s like you know what I need. Hitting all the points
@DevLeader8 күн бұрын
@@xpresspackage trying my best 😉💪
@DevLeader8 күн бұрын
🧑💼Get Promoted As A Software Engineer: - dometrain.com/course/career-getting-promoted-as-a-software-engineer/?ref=nick-cosentino 🧑💼 Nailing The Behavioral Interview: - dometrain.com/course/career-nailing-the-behavioral-interview/?ref=nick-cosentino 💡 Learn how to program in C#: - dometrain.com/course/getting-started-csharp?ref=nick-cosentino 🧠Deep dive on C#: - dometrain.com/course/deep-dive-csharp?ref=nick-cosentino 🎁Zero to Hero C# Bundle: - dometrain.com/bundle/from-zero-to-hero-csharp/?ref=nick-cosentino 🪞Reflection in .NET - dometrain.com/course/from-zero-to-hero-reflection-in-dotnet/?ref=nick-cosentino 💪 Skill up your refactoring: - dometrain.com/course/from-zero-to-hero-refactoring-for-csharp-developers?ref=nick-cosentino ✉ Subscribe to my free software engineering newsletter: - weekly.devleader.ca
@gunterotte8 күн бұрын
Very well explained, thanks! Really helpful for what I need. Was looking for this since a long time.
@DevLeader8 күн бұрын
@@gunterotte awesome stuff! Glad you found it helpful!
@Gioeufshi9 күн бұрын
What is tried nulled class/structure?
@DevLeader9 күн бұрын
It's nearly exactly like the OneOf Nuget package - just a type that only allows you to create an instance containing one or the other type to wrap, but never both. In this case, it's a nullable object or an exception, but never both
@charles_kuperus9 күн бұрын
@DevLeader I would like you to test out Codeium's Code Editor Windsurf with AI tool Cascade.
@vickyli669 күн бұрын
Curious how would you measure whether the dependency injection is working effectively for WPF? For example, one scenario can be that we are closing the main window, meaning not using data and services related to this window and I would like to free the data. But the app is still running. How can we free the unwanted memory and know DI is doing its work effectively?
@DevLeader9 күн бұрын
@@vickyli66 this is a question of lifetime of objects - if you need objects to be coupled to the lifetime of another, so your dependencies only exist as long as you do, you don't want to use single instance behavior. If the dependencies are disposable, you can try putting a breakpoint in there to ensure it's getting called. But essentially you want to match dependency lifetime with the thing that uses them. Most of my "services" are either stateless (so this doesn't matter) or they're stateful but exist the entire duration of the app -- so it avoids this a lot. Sometimes I'll make dedicated factory pattern objects so I can EXPLICITLY control lifetime just so it feels more obvious.
@SimGunther10 күн бұрын
No wonder companies have that 5 year experience minimum for entry level jobs! Brain drain is officially here for the noobs!
@DevLeader10 күн бұрын
@@SimGunther I'm not sure that's totally the case -- there are people successfully building things with a heavy reliance on them. That's not how I learned (I assume probably not how you learned), but I'm curious if this will just... Look different. On the surface it makes me feel like "oh hell no", but I'm trying to keep an open mind and see how things shift.
@favhwdg11 күн бұрын
Finding the solution after 10 mins of searching on stack overflow kept it in your mind, now you can get a solution so fast that you don't keep the information
@favhwdg11 күн бұрын
Getting a job right now is a nightmare, I can code on my own, but most of my friends who landed some internship or job they made a bunch of "projects" which are honestly pathetic, and I know for a fact that they didn't make them themselves, being honest costs.
@DevLeader11 күн бұрын
@@favhwdg no denying things are tough right now -- but things have never been "easy" in this field either. It's a competitive space. Let's dig into your point further though: your friends have "pathetic" projects and they didn't make them on their own and you believe that helped them land jobs? What were they building? Who were they building with? How much was their contribution? (It's actually a much more realistic representation to be building software with others vs building solo - so maybe they're able to demonstrate some of these things effectively in their resume and/or interviews)
@favhwdg11 күн бұрын
@DevLeader solo calculator cli .exe's and i am not even joking, the best one of those made a student grading system, also an exe no sql or anything...
@RickyWiild4 күн бұрын
Know this feeling dude.
@vast63411 күн бұрын
LLMs can help good programmers a lot in efficiency. But they can completely sidetrack novice programmers.
@DevLeader11 күн бұрын
@@vast634 I feel like I agree with this -- but I'm curious to see if/when and how a learning paradigm shift takes place 🙂
@sm557411 күн бұрын
2:51 This is the bane of learning software these days. There are _so_ many tutorials, _tons_ of answers on Stack Exchange, but very few of them teach coding from scratch.
@Manwith6secondmemory11 күн бұрын
welcome to the future old man
@DevLeader11 күн бұрын
@@Manwith6secondmemory I'm pretty sure I'm in support of things changing so... 🤷♂️ I don't get your comment haha
@Manwith6secondmemory11 күн бұрын
@@DevLeader oh haha, did not mean to be offensive was just saying that, its a common joke/phrase
@Manwith6secondmemory11 күн бұрын
@@DevLeader I agree, AI is too integrated, critical thinking is officially gone
@NobleAbsinthe11 күн бұрын
Wait they don't know how to make a struct or function??? That's like super basic. A struct is a pseduo object that holds a bunch of variables. Like a car stuct, that holds name, yearmade, price etc.... A function is a chunkof resuable code you can call that call by invoking the function name. It can return a value, set a new value for an object, or print something to your console. Like that's some serious skill issue. Because that's 201 stuff.
@DevLeader11 күн бұрын
@@NobleAbsinthe I don't think it's clear that they don't know what it is, but it appears that they don't know the syntax -- I think that's all we can tell from what the author wrote. I know what both of these things are, but if you asked me to go write it in rust or C++ or something else I don't program in, I would absolutely need to go consult a web search. ... Or ask an LLM.
@NobleAbsinthe11 күн бұрын
@ I should have watched more before jumping the gun. Yeah I think it might just be a syntax thing. And I never thought about it. When changing languages there's that shifting of gears feeling when having to do the same kinda work.
@wtsharpproductions11 күн бұрын
Well put together video, Bro! I fully understood exactly the point or concept that you were trying to get out. Makes total 💯 sense. 🤙👍
@DevLeader11 күн бұрын
@@wtsharpproductions very glad to hear that! 💪
@aev607512 күн бұрын
Before AI the title would say search engine. Before search engine the title would say "Book". Before book the title would say "Reasoning". Before reasning the title would say....... .... AI is just a tool.
@DevLeader12 күн бұрын
@@aev6075 I agree -- it's very interesting to watch the hesitancy though!
@mamneo212 күн бұрын
Incroyable.
@Joshua.Developer12 күн бұрын
This is why you only hire people that have built working stuff. I hate JS I stick with ELM and Laravel and PACT. But really part of the job is being able to read docs and pick up new things. But that is a skill in and of itself. Coding from scratch takes YEARS you have to know the entire syntax.
@DevLeader12 күн бұрын
I think in this context they *did* hire someone that has built working software. Sounds like how they built it was the part that was different than expected 🙂 There's not enough context from the original poster to know if this new hire was actually under performing or if they were just navigating a language that was new to them (and using tools the more senior engineer wasn't fond of).
@nicknicolosi113 күн бұрын
I am more amused by the fact that people that can’t code entirely and only rely on AI, make it to a team entirely 🤯 Very good information, thanks Nick.
@DevLeader13 күн бұрын
It's interesting, right? They're able to demonstrate their abilities successfully in the interview at least! So there's SOME level of understanding outside of the LLMs
@nicknicolosi112 күн бұрын
@@DevLeader As long there is a level of understanding. The rest can be thought via vetting from more senior developers. But totally relying of these tools is a red flag in my opinion. I have been tinkering with GEMENI for code review, and performance reviews, and it is interesting to see the grate point it makes to spark critical thinking, and kind of help you thinking to see area for improvement. But I never rely on it for generating code for me to build on top of it. I think starting from a blank document is the fun part for coding anyway.
@EviaAir1913 күн бұрын
Indeed, some believe they can write code in their own way without thinking it through. Despite being taught from us, they may disregard the guidance, which can be quite frustrating. Unfortunately, there are those who do not commit to learning.
@DevLeader13 күн бұрын
Yup -- but we need to keep learning! I have no problems with LLMs but I want people to challenge the output, understand it, etc... We need to keep the learning machine going!
@EviaAir1912 күн бұрын
@@DevLeader I completely agree with you! We aim to impart this knowledge to them. It's crucial for them to comprehend the content written by these tools. Regrettably, some individuals disregard our guidance and persist in copying and pasting, continuously asking questions on ChatGPT to progress to the next step of their task is what disheartens me. It's the fact that some individuals still won't listen, regardless of the effort made.
@joevaghn45710 күн бұрын
Well, learning takes more effort than having AI do the effort for you. I wonder if “efficiency” is going too far to the point whether it’s not worth learning anymore when you can just pump out “productivity” using AI. I hope I’m conveying my thoughts well, cuz idk how to word it other than… “Efficiency for Productivity” > “Accuracy through Sufficiency” Because making programs _that work_ is more expensive than _making programs work_ if you know what I mean At least where I work (Retail in Wally World), it’s that way. Idk how tech corpos work but I feel like they are the same Edit: Fixed typos
@DevLeader10 күн бұрын
@joevaghn457 yeah -- it's uncomfortable for me but it'll be interesting to see if the next wave of software developers can truly lean into AI and be effective to the point where the really didn't need to learn the way many of us did 🤷♂️
@jmon24ify13 күн бұрын
I see this happening quite often and not just with junior engineers. I typically only interview senior and lead engineer candidates because companies I worked for only hired senior level engineers and despite the candidates’ qualifications, they would still attempt to use AI to solve all the, mostly basic, questions. Most recently, a friend of mine interviewed a bunch of candidates for a mid level role and again, none of the candidates knew basic syntax and would have to rely on AI. Another interesting thing, when I interview frontend devs, they’d only know React and not Javascript. I hear this question a lot from of aspiring devs, “which framework should I use”. So someone is giving them bad advice which could contribute to using AI in an interview. Now, I don’t expect perfect answers from those I interview and I firmly believe in mentoring and pair programming but I think devs, regardless of level, should meet me half way. While AI is great for searching for solutions, I would normally use StackOverflow for, but because of my experience with interviewing others, as well as my peer’s experience, I can’t help but think that the quality of engineers are diminishing. And that is very scary to me. This makes me feel that most devs should not use AI because they become too reliant on it. And I know there are business owners thinking, “why should I hire an engineer, if I could cut cost and let AI do it”.
@Scotthutchinsonking13 күн бұрын
This is 100% true , I was on a contract with a giant car company . I had to teach them breakpoints , watchers , uncaught exceptions , OO standards it was very surprising
@DevLeader13 күн бұрын
AI tools are helping drive a TON of progress but there's an interesting side effect that some of the basics are being overlooked. Pretty fascinating!
@pratikthorat348013 күн бұрын
Amazing Video. I came here from the linkedin post and I had no idea I was in for some wisdom! Absolutely nailed it Nick!
@DevLeader13 күн бұрын
@@pratikthorat3480 very glad that you enjoyed it 😁 thanks for checking it out!
@LukeAvedon13 күн бұрын
I like yaml
@DevLeader13 күн бұрын
@@LukeAvedon we don't tolerate lies on this channel! 😂
@LukeAvedon12 күн бұрын
@@DevLeader LOL!
@LukeAvedon13 күн бұрын
Arnold tried to warn us.
@DevLeader13 күн бұрын
@@LukeAvedon he did, it's true.
@DevLeader13 күн бұрын
🧑💼Get Promoted As A Software Engineer: - dometrain.com/course/career-getting-promoted-as-a-software-engineer/?ref=nick-cosentino 🧑💼 Nailing The Behavioral Interview: - dometrain.com/course/career-nailing-the-behavioral-interview/?ref=nick-cosentino 💡 Learn how to program in C#: - dometrain.com/course/getting-started-csharp?ref=nick-cosentino 🧠Deep dive on C#: - dometrain.com/course/deep-dive-csharp?ref=nick-cosentino 🎁Zero to Hero C# Bundle: - dometrain.com/bundle/from-zero-to-hero-csharp/?ref=nick-cosentino 🪞Reflection in .NET - dometrain.com/course/from-zero-to-hero-reflection-in-dotnet/?ref=nick-cosentino 💪 Skill up your refactoring: - dometrain.com/course/from-zero-to-hero-refactoring-for-csharp-developers?ref=nick-cosentino ✉ Subscribe to my free software engineering newsletter: - weekly.devleader.ca
@LukeAvedon13 күн бұрын
I also found this post fascinating.
@DevLeader13 күн бұрын
It's going to be very very weird (good and bad!) in the upcoming years to see how things evolve!