This was so interesting..however the constant smacking, spitting, and heavy mic breathing were all so tortuous 😮

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

Darwin never used the word evolution. You do. There was no animal life preexisting the Cambrian Explosion. Darwin would conclude he failed . You are conflating evolution with natural selection. Get over the religous zealotry. You actually use the term “believe,” you don’t vote on “truth.”

Great! But I feel sorry for those who need it explained. Brilliant actor-singers who remain in character supported by incredible pianist. What became of their magnificent talents? They deserve the best. No 'if'--I loved them!

If you have not already selected a camp between religion or science, the confrontational language used by the speaker does little to move you to his side. I found myself responding to his intellectually chauvinistic attitude more than the reasonable information he had to give. Science is supposed to be apolitical, but this seemed more like propaganda than true edification.

I had an encounter with God 3 times in my Life. One time is literally impossible to explain, unless there is literally an X-men gene that allowed a Christian sister to read my mind. NO ONE, EVER, can explain how a Christian sister told me how I was feeling and thought about myself. It was a specific thought and feeling, I NEVER shared with anyone. It wasn't something that I was projecting or anything like this. These were very specific words, as if someone opened up my brain and told me EXACTLY what I was thinking. So please spare me the idea it was all in my head, it wasn't, sorry for your disbelief. You have to understand that Christians ACTUALLY have supernatural events happen in their life that prove Jesus. I am sorry you want to dismiss this, but the fact is this world is not just plain and all we see. There are people who ACTUALLY experience the unexplainable and evolutionists are just putting their head in the sand each time this is brought up. Maybe if you all humbled yourself, not in a "God you do this, or I won't believe in you" (that isn't how God responds, sorry) you all would have an encounter with the Living God as well. In the end, I have nothing to lose when I die. I can't say the same for those who continue to want to put their head in the sand and refuse to look at what Christians present. Without Faith, you will never find God.

If there is no ontology, no pattern, then how did it all randomly arrive to be fine tuned and mathematically accurate. If mathematics and natural law produced and guided it that does not explain their origin. There is speculation in the new physics that all is consciousness, matter being condensed consciousness with mind a play of ideas on substance, or consciousness. Mind emerging with quantum events is plausible.. Evolution from this perspective would make sense. Consciousness emerging with quantum events would subject consciousness to the same limitations as mind which would appear to be inaccurate. Little wonder it is the hard problem.

wynton jazz and blues music is more powerful than all nuclear weapons america has in its arsenal

Thank you.

Are we all too afraid to accept it?

bogus. the theory of evolution is being rejected more every year.

If we accept the DNA of the monkey according to the environment at that time, diffenitly it doesn’t looks like the DNA TODAY. YOU MED RESEARCHERS, when they come to dead end create another similar idea to get the fund. Isn’t

Evolution is fact but keep your stupid left-wing politics out of the debate.

Well a evolution speech which starts with Bushes knowledge of virology, Ronald Reagan, Trumps opinion on evolution, how many people read Henry Kissingers last book. At least we're enlightened on his politics if not evolution. I bet this guy is a barrel of monkeys at faculty parties.

religon attracts those who believe in their immortality, science says you are dead and there is no after life, I will take science.

Using “evolution” by itself is deceptive. What kind of evolution? Evolution by natural selection is on its last legs. However evolution is difficult to deny. Almost all interspecies evolution has to do with timing, not novel protein changes. There is no proof of entire groups producing novel changes of chromosome pairs in a manner that could produce a novel species.

a tree is not less of a tree because there is another circle on it's bough

Please do not leave us . Humanity needs your voice . I have lived long enough to see early exits . Be not afraid to carry on. CT (who you rhyme with) did it

puts a smile in my heart

Thank you! for saying it's about possession, not love. I find the novels fascinating but Marcel is not endearing.

This is absolutely hilarious.. listen so.. my guess is it works like this.. but it's definitely still true. But, we cant possibly know because we dont understand this yet, but this is my best guess.. which is definitely true. Like did a single person actually listen to anything this guy actually said!? 😂 Second.. ill bet my house.. this guy is a member of the Free Mason's.. why is that relevant.. well to all you Evolutionist.. and Atheist.. who worship Darwin. What is it the Romans say? If you have been proven a liar once.. everything you say is worthless. Point in fact.. actually truth. Charles Darwin was in fact a Free Mason. Free Mason's believe in a higher power or they willingly accept the punishment of Death. If Darwin was a Mason he believed in a higher power. Therefore, he was in fact not an Atheist. Actually, The Masonic Bible directly describes Atheist as vile idiots and unworthy as they believe what they are told. By thier famous misleader. What else do they say.. if your dumb enough to be mislead.. then be mislead. Wake up. Its simple. Watch this again. He literally repeatively says.. this is my (????) But, its definitely true. 😂 Bruh!? What!? I mean look at his smile the whole time he is saying this shit he cant even believe your actually this stupid!!?? 🤔

You compare your science with what you consider to be backwoods, unintellectual, Christian people..in fact you ridicule them. How about you arrange for a debate with Stephen Meyer or Hugh ross or James tour. What about the Cambrian explosion? There's countless evidence for micro evolution in the fossil record, and almost none for macro evolution. Major body types show up suddenly in the fossil record.

Evidence is not the same as Proof. It is only ''evident''. It is fairer to say that the CONSTRUCT of the theory of Evolution is ''massive''. The actual evidence... is stuff that's waiting to be interpreted.

Evolution has overwhelming evidence for its mechanism after the first cell was formed and few who have studied it would dispute most of the theory. No one agrees about how cosmic evolution cosmic chemistry… bumping particles produced … living conscious biology. No one has the first clue how Chemistry becomes conscious biology … and currently evolutionary theory does not help one bit. The hard problem of consciousness … how dead unconscious groups of atoms experience the taste of coffee the feeling of love The hard problem of life … if you define the first 9.5 billion years after the Big Bang a dead mechanical unconscious process … how … as soon as the Earth stopped being molten … did chemistry suddenly become conscious biology. The only fix? the Universe has never been dead or unconscious at any system level big bang plasma to Einstein. The Universe is alive and Conscious … how do we know . We know because it made you and I and this understanding … from just some waiting around and some clumping and cooling … Not a single human thought or scientific theory involved

Was these memories of Proust fiction.....do we know?

Well genetic evolution does happen occasionally. For example, Mt. St. Helens has had a rapid evolution because the environment changed because of the eruption.

I'm a truck driver doing self taught art when I can. Thanks for the tips. following.

Why most Americans reject theory of evolution? Simply because it is not true.

evolution is the biggest lie in history.

Wait... So, even most Christians believe in evolution according to polling, and you mode a title like that? Very bad look for a science channel. Oof.

😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😊😊😊

And the war criminal

woke is broke art

He is either knowingly deceiving people, or he is so uninformed that he shouldn’t even be a professor in a high school. First of all right in the beginning he uses switch bait language. Conflating the regular term theory with what scientific theory. He talked about the fossil record as showing gradually more complexity, while completely ignoring the Cambrian explosion as that is totally contradictory to what evolution would have predicted. All of the changes were so big and fast, and didn’t show slow progression. It’s why Stephen j Gould came up with the theory of punctuated equilibrium, to explain the sudden changes instead of gradual changes. Then he goes on into the horse evolution which was proven false over 50 years ago. Then he claims that no modern bird has teeth, while there are birds that have teeth. On the talk of vestigial parts, he is either completely unqualified or misleading, as those bone are necessary to support the reproductive organs, and without those the animals would not be able to reproduce, and so they are definitely not vestigial. Is this the best he’s got? because it is ridiculously pathetic so far. If I was an evolutionist, I would be deeply embarrassed by this talk

I have read numerous times that Elstir was based to a large part on Whistler, or on a combination of several artists, but I don't think Monet was ever mentioned in that connection. Btw, Mr Burnham, Mme Verdurin marries the Prince de Guermantes, not the Duc of the same name. Gide was on the editorial board of the Nouvelle Revue Française, and rejected the book, the first volume being published at Proust's expense by Bernard Grasset. Gide then realised his mistake, and begged to take over publication for the NRF, and Grasset, I believe, was bought out of his contract with Proust, or graciously relinquished it.

Very interesting watch. **What a bombshell (of possibility) at the end there... My Dad was 50 when I came into being.

Why is that so many (as in many commenters in this thread) need to be taken by the hand like little children and explained to, over and over, time and time again, in clear terms by thousands of scientists (biologists/molecular bilogists/evolutionary biologists, paleontologists, biochemists, botonists, geologists) who have spent cumulative lifetimes and careers, studying/debating/arguing/drawing careful conclusions of over a century of facts and physical evidence from all parts of the globe [ _is the Earth REALLY a sphere?_ ] within the context and framework of rational thought/the scientific method, only to have them plug their ears, close their eyes and hum while concocting ridiculously concvoluted and non-sensical streams of bullshit because they can't or won't accept reality? Operators are standing-by for answers.

This is a crock. You would have to be out of your damn mind to believe these lies. It has already been proven that it's mathematically impossible.. Do your own dang research if you want to know the real truth instead of listening to these Liars that has a hidden agenda.. the reason that most Americans do not believe it is because most Americans aren't stupid enough too..

I respect you for respecting evidence. Most creationists accept micro-evolution. In our every day life, we see or hear about the mutations and variations of the bacteria or viruses. Some creationists even accept macro-evolution. I do not understand why you put evolution and creationism incompatible? Teaching about the Creator, the Intelligent Designer and scientific study can go together. My problem about the theory of evolution is not evolution itself. I acknowledge that there seem to be lots of evidence of evolution like the developments of embryos and vestigial organs in whales. But I also recognize that, at least for many thousand years, a peppered moth is always a moth whether they are white or gray. A virus is always a virus not a human being. Even tiger-colored butterfly is always a butterfly not a tiger. If evolution is gradual and continuous, why is there no evidence of continuous evolution? Why are there a lot of evidence for discontinuity and gaps? Why is the so called simple organism so complicated like the structure of a cell and DNA. The most critical problem for me is natural selection or random mutation. For example, some scientists argue that a stone became a house with flushing and electrical systems after 3 billion years. It may be true. My point is that a stone became a house by somebody rather than by natural selection or random mutation. Every computer program is made by the computer programmer. It is much more scientific and intellectual to explain the world in terms of Intelligent Design. Natural selection or random mutation is too poor to be a scientific term. Not because of scientific evidence but because of naturalism and materialism in our culture, Intelligent Design is suppressed and persecuted in many scientific communities. Finally God will vindicate the true science while God will destroy fake science and false ideology. Hallelujah! Praise God! We don't need God? What a fool. Only fools say in their hearts, "there is no God." To fear God is the beginning of true science, wisdom, and life.

Kody Lee Autistic/Blind artist. kzbin.info/www/bejne/marJZ3yEi8SnoMU

Don died this week.

Every single day of your 21st century lives you utilize modern technology that has been intelligently designed and engineered, never ever do you question that as you understand complexity and information necessitates it. A single cell in comparison to the same technologies you use, including the one you have used to access this KZbin channel is orders of magnitude more complex and contains specified information throughout its New York like city construction. That a person who is not blinded by an insanely flawed paradigm seems to think evolution is exempt from a daily observation simply because it removes God from the equation, is proof of just how desperate the evolution theory is. That people with brains actually think an unguided random process can solve real world problems like flight, in the real world of non fantasy this requires an enormous amount of knowledge, information, engineering, and construction expertise to achieve. But not in Narnia evolution land, here fantasy billions of years can solve anything, no need for an understanding of physics, math, aerodynamics, or engineering, nope cell mutation chucking random dice and hoping for the best is all that's needed. God solves all chicken and egg situations from the macro to the micro, whereas evolution has zero answers and ironically a much larger appeal to 'Fantasy'. Everything comes from nothing, inanimate matter becomes life, then goes on to construct the most complex code in existence, and that's not 'MAGIC'?

There are so many great actors and actresses, its always been bizarre that one can select just one and say he was the greatest. Surely he was up there with the best. Possibly what turned us off to the guy was his off stage life and abuse of other people. Nobody should get a pass on that.

I was hoping for "emergence" of life. None

So how did the woodpecker eat until it had a shock absorber in its head?

Lizard arms turned in to wings? How did it eat with thin boned things instead of hands?

Dog breeding is forced evolution

Cubs win in the next 50 years. Possible but No evidence.

Religion or not. I can't believe this is all an accident.

10 minutes in and facts