Perhaps when you realize that the fruit has the seed, the tree transforms into the tree of life and Adam receives his inheritance. There is speculation these trees are one somehow. The lesson is have faith in the seed don’t be deceived by the fruit.

It’s very loaded symbolism there in the Garden 😊

Thanks Luke ❤

It’s at the end of the video yes 🎉

And Sagittarific if that’s not too much 😅

Hrm well I don't think of this as my system. It's the system of human sense making generally as expressed in literature, painting, photography, music and any other art, and also science with it's modeling of reality project. I think that this symbolic thinking has a tendency to create idols and ideologies that are recursive to it's own symbolism, This is identifiable by its, "We have found the actual truth rather than our interpretation." proclamations. However, if carefully restrained from all such egoism in a humility and the realization that you're thinking in approximation, it can in this way lead one towards communion via love. Love is always humble.

@Stephen.D20 My apologies; I wasn't trying to say in any way that your system was doing this. I was just pointing to the fact that most systems portray themselves as totalizing unconscious to the fact that these totalizations are imaginary projections, but imaginary projections are needed for what it means to be human. I think you are spot on this egoism, and its totalization is where the problem lies. Your use of the garden analogy is wonderful . It seems the ego is trying to protect itself from the other. this builds up defenses and trying to protect itself from the other's desire but in doing this a fantasies/idolatry, which also cut off the subject from their own desire, and cutting off desire cuts off love. The tightrope walk of rational knowledge and unconscious desire is very perplexing but also very interesting. I think your study and seeking out these questions through liturgy, science, and other means is so cool. Thanks for another great video

@ I’m quite deficient in any psychological analysis, so you’re identifying aspects that I wouldn’t see. Thank you for that, and for your support in this project, whatever it may be haha.

Uh oh!

I changed nothing! What did you do to your ears??

@Stephen.D20 I dunno, but 8/10 times I have to turn you up m today started alright. Listen to a JBP at a comfortable volume then start playing yourn. You should be able to tell what I'm on about

@@GrimGrizah yes. Something obviously got better with this I’ll try to make it permanent 😂

I fear the reaper! 😢

Awesome! 🎉

There is no way this would interest him! Way. Too. Woo. 🎉

Decoherence happens in time though. Reversing would violate laws of thermodynamic entropy. But it’s interesting to speculate as I’ve demonstrated 😅

Yes. I’m a bit disappointed that I’m leaning toward the relationship between massive particles of gravity is probably not the pure relationality I was hoping for. This is the danger of thinking. You might change your mind! 😂

@@Stephen.D20 Right, and I should have said “energy process” rather than “material mechanism” in my previous comment. I like David Bohms’ Implicate Order & his spiritual outlook too. Lots of cool science & religion entanglement theories floating around these days.

Yes I think we basically agree. These ideas are Christian for me. God is in the world, everywhere, all the time. It is Orthodox. More of the Eastern strain of Isaac the Syrian and Jacob of Sarug perhaps.

@@Stephen.D20 Great ! Although in one of your short videos I thought you said theologically, God is outside of the universe? Classic Creator/creation dualism. ?

@@RichardCosci ah I meant we in our created world cannot know the mechanics of an uncreated God who created and continually creates us. Outside in a knowability sense. It’s hard to say everything properly all the time when doing these stream of consciousness videos.

@@Stephen.D20 You’re telling me ;) even just pondering on my own.

And then of course we are blind to a timeless world. Just some random thoughts. Also sorry for blowing up your theory:)

Also, quick question, could this be explanatory of the idea that God is everywhere present, filling all things? Still thinking….

@@shari6063this one is easy. Yes 😅

It does. I know what you mean and I think I agree. But we’ll see. That last part is so mystical ❤

@ ❤️

We do like to build machines and I think God is very much impressed by us! The many worlds is a very accurate predictor using quite simple math. It seems right until we try to think as a God existing out of spacetime. Then we shake our heads, insert some correction factor and check out the latest CERN results :-)

@Stephen.D20 yes the hardway way of thinking of human freedom is a paradoxical brick wall both religion and science keeps crashing up against. very much enjoy connecting dots for this corner of the internet that is a huge blind spot for so many in both religion and scientific studies.

Yes that wasn't planned but at least I now have another purely relational created "being" besides gravity as an analogy to uncreated love. If gravity is eventually quantized we have a backup 😀

We shall see. I only have a rough idea of where this is going. You may well know more!

I fear the reapers 😂

The observer sees a probability of one. We conjecture the "become" part. Thats where the theology seeps in :-)

@ the eye with which you perceive God is the eye in which God sees you… Seeing by sight. Pure vision. Uncreated light. Love what you’re doing.