Then would we have to build a wall to keep the Texans Out?

The reason the siege was 13 days was because the Mexican army was scattered thru the wild horse (el Camino Real no more than a weaving trail)desert and finally reached the Alamo the cannon barrage killed almost every body and the soldiers went in to mop up,but hero's and martyrs were needed...

One regular Infantry Squad could have won

Depends on how much ammunition they carried

Great movie

If you sent a WWI dreadnought back in time, you would have to send the crew too, because nobody from the 1805 time period would even know how to START the engines, let alone operate it effectively.... Great show!

Galahad also plays an important role in Fate/Grand Order.

One thing to correct in a vid is that Cumans haven't invaded "Rus" and neighboring Ukraine. Rusland = Ukraine. ʳussians as we know them today - stole that name to try and appear as cradle of rus civilization, basically. While their initial name is moskovity (basically, "people of moscow"). At that time there was a Kyivska Rus - actual initial cradle of Rus civilization - which is a Rus that had government in Kyiv, the current capital of Ukraine. Sorry for a long read, it's just sad to watch history lessons that are unintentionally using soviet-butchered interpretation, especially, as a Ukrainian myself. Not biased, just a normal old-fashioned history here.

Army Rangers with muskets would have won. Pretty positive

This is kind of silly isn't it? If the Alamo can have Rangers, then why can't the Mexicans have tanks?

How childishly stupid.

Why not just give them a Imperial Star Destroyer.

Bruh even if the game is biased, you literally play as the child to the kings hetman, of course you won't like the other guy.

There is no contemporaneous evidence of Arthur, and no archaeological evidence either. If indeed he existed at all, he certainly would not have been 'King of England'. For the concept of England did not develop until the 7th century, and that because the Anglo-Saxon settlement had been so successful.

Biden would have sent them to oppose the Texans...

Cake walk, especially with modern infantry weapons.

Forget Rangers,think SAS. 🇬🇧

Agreed! Or…. x13 0311’s w/ x3 Corporal’s x1 Sergeant x9 0331’s with x3 M-240’s x9 0341’s with x3 60mm’s With a battalion’s complement of munitions respective to the weapons. We wouldn’t require that much. It would have been over in 3-minutes once the Mexican Army was in range of all weapons.

I'd give'em 50-50 tombstone has parts in it that are better in their own way, but wyatt earp has an edge in areas that tombstone is too quick to dismiss that can be uncovered in tombstones deleted scene pack.

What is the music at 2:50?

GD ALL US. GD TEXAS.

GDASU Monday Sunday.

Put it in that viedo game simulation.

If only America had joined the Allies in WWII in 1939.....

I think Mexico would have won. 5,000 against 50, and both sides with modern weapons, yeah, 100 - 1 odds are not looking good for the Rangers. Oh, and with the current President, the ROEs would probably not allow the rangers to shoot at night.

They must use HE shells, 'cause AP will pass througout this old wooden ships without explode

Santana brought 4000k soldiers because he only had 2 trucks.

Crockett served in the House of Representatives, not as a Senator.

I don't know how you could have Sigismund in a positive light when he keeps loosing his wars.

RIP Crockett

The wives had me dead bro good shit XD

It would help, but the outcome would be the same. Your looking at a couple of hundred compared thousands, attacking from all sides, and they were inside a small church made with sticks and plaster for the time. Remember, the Mexican army was battle hardened.

The Turkish pronunciation for Cumans is "ku-maan".

there was 50 rangers at the alamo

It would depend on the equipment the rangers had.

They were mercenaries of the King Milutin of Serbia. Cumans settled in a town that still holds their name, Kumanovo (now North Macedonia). Kumanovo literally means Cuman's (town or place).

I think the AA guns with airburst ammunition could wreak havoc on a ship-of-the-line's sails.

I will interject one thing into this battle and not even use the modern soldiers. Custer had 4 Gatling guns at his disposed but didn't bring them along. Had he brought them, the same devastation that the Green Berets would have inflicted with the use of those weapons alone. Just a thought. Besides, Custer was an idiot for splitting his forces without knowing the disposition of his enemy.

They better bring cash, souvenir is about all they can do.

If the Rangers were on 12 up armored HUMVEE each with an M2 or MK19 and they had AT4 or LAW. Each vehicle could have a designated marksman and an M240 or even M249 with the driver and RTO having M4. That degree of firepower and mobility with armored protection would be an absolute disaster for Santa Anna.

I love the hypotheticals this can get into. A pair of AH-64D Apaches at The Battle of the Somme, a flight of F-15s already on patrol at Pearl Harbor, USS Texas supporting the C.S.A., the Texians at the Battle of the Alamo but with .45-70 singleshot rifles and SAA revolvers instead of what they had.

BUT THEN…just as the Danton thought it had won, a modern british submarine which also came back in time straight after the first terminator, sinks the Danton with 2 torpedoes, and British ally USA also managed to squeeze the USS Gerald r ford through the Time Machine and swiftly shreds and French ships with sea whizz and F18 bombing runs, but then a megalodon who hibernated for 50 million years waiting for this battle, swims up from the depths and sinks pretty much everyone. And just then, darth Vader comes out of hyperspace in the Death Star and destroys planet earth. THE END. Thankyou for today’s pretend play. 🙄

Crockett had been a Congressman.

Modern soldiers at the Alamo? You'd need like 20 rangers, a large cardboard box and a cct team to call in A10 runs. That way you could do two 12 hour shifts and the box works okay as a portable card table to play spades on.

how about Gettysburg

Or how many rangers needed at Rourkes drift. Five enough?

What is the troops from Rourkes Drift and The Alamo swapped....same outcomes?

A more interesting question would be this - what if 50 modern day army rangers found themselves stuck in the Alamo during the battle , with only the kit/equipment/weapons they could beg/borrow from other Texicans. "What could fifty highly trained special forces armed with the most high end elite weapons , body armor and equipment do to a 4000 strong army of barely trained men wearing cloth uniforms and equipped with primitive muzzle loaders , muskets, swords and lances ?" Well, duh . 😁

What about jeti s

There is not a single historical record that cumans had blond hair or blue eyes. Not one.