Thanks

Gene, Thanks for the comment I am Dave N1UAV, while I am not real active in ham radio I do a lot of what I think are interesting projects. I have built a ground station to receive images from GOES 16,18 and 19 weather satellites. I am working on improving my feed horn and just about have peeked for it's performance. I have a video that shows how I did it. Thank again Dave N1UAV.

I really can't answer that question, I have never worked with a growatt inverter, I believe that address 0000 and 0001 are reserved for use with the growatt inverter try setting one battery to 0001 and the other one to 0002. I am just guessing, I have no Idea if it will work.

I know I started it but haven't finished it yet. I will but don't know when. Is there something that you would like to know about it? I just look at your Power Jack 8,000 watts since Puerto Rico video you do nice VERY work.

Thank you, How did you find my channel?

Yes you could. I was in New Zealand in January of 2001 and loved it.

You are welcome. How did you find it?

@onmyworkbench7000 I look at alot of odd motors, ect. utube keeps them coming, lol

Thanks for the comment I am very glad that you enjoyed DJ-ing at WYNO. I had a lot of fun building it, How did you find the video? Dillingham was only 70 miles from King Salmon as the crow fly's and WYNO's transmitting antenna was 120 ft above ground level so with the right weather conditions the signal could make it to Dillingham.

I intentionally left out the the TeeDee series of Cox engines because they use a venturi with crankshaft port timing for their fuel air induction system. In the video I was talking about the reed valve engines, as I stated in the video engines that use a venturi and crankshaft port timing will not run CW. It is my understanding that Cox tried to make a reed valve .010 but it would not run very well so they went with the venturi and crankshaft port timing. *_NOTE: The follow is from Wikipedia. To find it Google Cox model engine._* "In 1960 Cox hired an engineer named Bill Atwood (who had already built his own line of engines), to develop a new .010 cubic inch engine. Atwood was also responsible for the Tee Dee and Medallion line of engines. These engines put Cox on the map as a leading engine in the world for many years to come.[10] One of the things Cox wanted Atwood to do was make him a .010 engine. Cox had already tried to halve the size of the Pee Wee .020 but couldn't get it to run for some reason. The suspicion surrounded a problem with the tiny reed valve. Atwood found that the front rotary valve worked well on the .010 size hence the .010 was born.[20]"

I have a couple of 5 cylinder radials in storage, if I can find the I will do a video on them.

I would be happy to, please send me your email address to [email protected]

Yes the were fun and now we all need hearing aids!!!😂

Yes he did!

I looked at the scanned photo and it looks to me as if it is a geared motor like the one built from the .049's. What leads me to believe that it that radial engines all have to have an odd number of cylinders. such as 3,5,7or 9 cylinders. I suspect that you are on the right track that it has a main gear that's attached to the crankshaft and the smaller gears are on the motors 90 degrees apart from one another.

@@onmyworkbench7000 the odd number has something to do with balance, I think, & the .049 is light enough "balance" isn't a big concern.

@@Iowa599 Below is from Wikipedia. Four-stroke radials have an odd number of cylinders per row, so that a consistent every-other-piston firing order can be maintained, providing smooth operation. For example, on a five-cylinder engine the firing order is 1, 3, 5, 2, 4, and back to cylinder 1. Moreover, this always leaves a one-piston gap between the piston on its combustion stroke and the piston on compression. The active stroke directly helps compress the next cylinder to fire, making the motion more uniform. If an even number of cylinders were used, an equally timed firing cycle would not be feasible.

@@onmyworkbench7000 yeah, basically balance. If one will run with 2, it will run with 3, or 4, cylinders. Maybe not smoothly, but your grandma won't be riding in it. makes me think, the piston isn't moving the fastest at 90° crank rotation, half-way up the bore. It is at 72.5° rotation, just over halfway up the bore (when going up or down.) edit: assuming the bore is centered over the crank, but that's not always the case

Perhaps, but it has much less vibration.

@@onmyworkbench7000 ...aaa.. still cool..

More torque.

@@patrickradcliffe3837 And more torque would let it swing a bigger prop.

I have a lot of old Cox parts but it's the glow heads that that are critical with out good glow heads the motors are useless, my dad drilled and taped the center of an old glow head for a glow plug and it worked good.

Google COX TWIN MOTOR and you will find some.

Thanks for the Sub, I need all of the that I can get.

@@onmyworkbench7000 Here is a link to one of my flying Subaru engine videos: kzbin.info/www/bejne/eIGvh4RobJhmebM

Now you can get the aluminum from Home Depot or Lowes and the gears are available at Boston Gear I included a link to the in the discerption, the gear are listed in the article of if you would I can send you the scans.

Thanks, he was very innovative.

I may do a video of it running if I can find some 20 or 25% nitro glow fuel with 20% oil.

Glad that you liked it. Thanks.

She has not yet brought home a boat, but she keeps bringing home Wiener dogs (Dachshund)!!! See some of our other videos.

It is, thank you sir.

Thank you

I used a total of 48 holes, consisting of two rows of 24 holes. The rows are set 90 degrees from each other. I used 8, 1 inch holes in each of the two rows located at the caped end of the pipe. I used 8, ¾ holes in each of the two rows located at the center of the pipe and I used 8, ½ holes in each of the two rows located at the elbow end of the pipe. I hope this helps

I used a total of 48 holes, consisting of two rows of 24 holes. The rows are set 90 degrees from each other. I used 8, 1 inch holes in each of the two rows located at the caped end of the pipe. I used 8, ¾ holes in each of the two rows located at the center of the pipe and I used 8, ½ holes in each of the two rows located at the elbow end of the pipe. I hope this helps

Thank You for watching it.

After the way that LG treated me regarding this projector I still will not buy or own any LG products. LG would have to give me there best projector and it would have to last 10 YEARS or more before I would ever PAY my hard earned money for any of there products ever again.

@onmyworkbench7000 I wouldn't buy a projector from them, although my HF65LA is still going strong. (That LG Smart TV on it is dumb as Sh**.) I have a Fire TV stick in eben my 25K projector, on down to my "Amazing" Brookstone Bigshot. It's discontinued and 720P but, it upscales higher, has 20W JBL speakers and had a better internal App center. (The remote is trash and the app store is done for years.) The image is about the same, maybe a slight screen door, if you are a foot away. It has about 3,000 hours on it and is a rock. I've taken it for superbowl parties and roughed it up a bit. Back then, it had Bluetooth, sound out with subwoofer and 3 HDMI ports. It looks 100 times better than the LG as well. Maybe 2 inches more of short throw. (I've used both at about 90 inches for years.) It was 299 dollars originally on sale from 699 retail. Nothing beats the LG Maguc Remote. That thing does everything/universal for things that came out way after. I still don't know why LG couldn't update this to say a modern or older LG base Skart TV. I can buy a 2017 LG smart TV for 50 dollars that has a modern smart TV. The mirror is the weak part. I have a LG cover for the projector. It's tough to find. It's a plastic Z pretty much and necessary. The mirror should be adjusted properly, cleaned and not warped. They knew that UST tech is done. I can buy an KG 120hz 86" TV for 996 dollars. It puts any UST to shame. Nobody ever talks about the absolutely necessary gain screen at a minimum of 300 dollars to 5000K for a screen. Portable? Projected on a regular paint white wall. Amateur hour. You had to treat these UST projectors with level 7 air handlers and surgical gloves. Not in the kids room and used never or constantly. An UST only makes sense when it's half or less the price of a decent TV. Or8ginakky 1299.99 or PF1000II at 1399.99 = NO!