wrotoeshaw has come a long way

Mathematics is the Art of Simplification.

why does the top left look like harry from the sidemen

Why do they have interviews? Is is so they can let in the people they want? Seems especially dodgy in the area of maths because a) the exams are pretty objective and b) you could be very good at maths but not across well in an interview.

Impressive young lady

why is she saying only 2 to the 2 to the n while its 2 to the 2 to the 2 to the n?

Want to short vedio clips on Mathematics. Thanks.

well... at the last few questions, I paused for way too long, just because I hadn't done this question before, I wanted to find out the solutions to the equation and even though I knew pretty early on I wouldn't be successful because (e^(ax))=x is not made to be solved on simple ways, I kept sticking with it for too long, until eventually doing the ye^(y)=ax. I'm way too stubborn. I found the first question much easier than the other ones, as just using the properties of e and ln-functions will carry you to the solution with barely any effort.

I will shake to see a teacher writing upside down😮

I am wondering that when sketching the graph like this there are two vertical asymptotes at x=1 and x=-3 .May I ask if I should indicate on the graph?

I love this channel reminds me of Olympiads and those beautiful challenging math problems

The second and third one was pretty fun

Indeed a positive gradient here is necessary but not sufficient for a function to tend to positive infinity. Proving that ln(x) tends to infinity as x tends to infinity might take a while, and in this short example of interview questions the aim was to explore the question “For what values of m there are zero, one or two intersections between ln(x) and mx?”. It is often the case that an interviewer might choose not to pursue a line of inquiry and move on with the question. In this video it has happened - in different ways - with both questions.

Obviously f(n)=2^2^2^n grows faster than g(n)=100^100^n ... log(log(log(f(n)))) / log(log(log(g(n)))) ~ n / log n -> infinity.

Does anyone here know what the mean radio of the earth is? I’m lead to believe it’s 3959 miles. Can anyone here confirm and agree this axiom so we can discuss further this. Thanks

I'm so thankful I never have to do thia kind of maths ever in daily life after being gaslit in secondary school being told 'you won't always be able to use a calculator and you'll need to use proper maths'

Take base 2 logarithm once, we get 2^2^n vs C1*100^n Take logarithm one more time: 2^n vs C2 + C3*n Can stop right here - the exponent on the left always beats the linear function on the right for large enough n. How could this solution can take more than two minutes at the most? “Logarithms with base > 1 are monotonously increasing functions” - that’s all she should’ve answered to justify how proof for logarithms proves the original statement. Which she did not. As to the generalized second question, the “strategy” should’ve been stated as follows: for arbitrary functions f(x) and g(x) finding the point x0 where they both touch each other is a matter of solving two equations: f(x0) = g(x0) f’(x0) = g’(x0) In high school in Russia I finished that would be considered an extremely weak performance. Not Cambridge quality … or perhaps Cambridge quality is not what I imagined?

Maths is nonsense and unnatural but she seems nice so i hope she gets a place

very easy math shown in that video!

I think im lost, I was looking for the cute cats channel

Maths is silly and should be outlawed effective immediately

Be more like you. Wow!

nightmare blunt rotation

Was she a student coming out of hs and applying to an undergraduate program or a higher level like graduate?

Im living turkey and ı admit turkey math lessons are more dificult then cambridge lessons

In the first question here, they are actually wrong. This is a trick question as N goes to infinity which is a concept that we cannot conceptually grasp, meaning they are equally big (or sized, as their size is actually undefinable)

Ah, this reminds me of my mathematics interview at imperial college London 22 years ago, which I aced, might I say. 😁

I was watching people falling down stairs. What am I doing here

The trouble with this selection process is that it eliminates all potentially exceptional students who have not yet learned the skills of problem solving. Surely that's your job, Cambridge, to teach such skills! Or are you just upping your university rankings by taking in the already-skilled problem solvers?

What is this? Do i have to do this when i apply for cambridge chemical Engineering and biotechnology?

Amy is the person I would like to sit next to during a math exam 🧐

Why did this video summon some of the most annoying people on the planet in the comments 😭

Is the mathematics in the room with us right now

After all that, wait till a candidate arrives at university, only to discover a dystopian hell of micro-aggressions, safe spaces, woke dogma, repressed speech and all the other nonsense that apparently passes for a university education these days. Who would trust institutions fearful of saying, for example, that there are two sexes?

Why does the guy on the left kinda look like Harry from Sidmen 😭😭😭

she was noobie

They lost me when they asked the question.

Not me here waiting for some autistic people to mock each other

This logs not leaving me alone even now😅😅

God, I hate maths.

The prospective student is really strong, in my opinion. She will have a fun time studying maths :)

That first question was a horrible question to start with.

Future woke interviews

is this for undergraduate or graduate courses

why would they interview students for mathematics? is is for prefential admission to a specific program?

Mocking mathematics???? Are you insane??

Many commenters well versed in mathematics seem unable to grasp the difference between a maths exam and a maths interview.

W

Surprisingly All questions asked, were from computer science engineering, design and analysis of algorithms, asymptotic functions analysis chapter.

would love to see one for economics!