Nice documentary, and very well made and illustrated. Congratulations to the author!
@loredana81992 күн бұрын
Thank you, this was very useful.
@jamesdavies47254 күн бұрын
Im not here for school im doing research. Religion was made for social acceptance. We as humans have out grown it and it shows. What is next. What should we believe. I dont want to go to a religious war its redundancies is painful.
@spookycat10674 күн бұрын
edit better dude the transitions need work. good try though.
@omerkzlaslan61136 күн бұрын
hi macron
@paromitasarker1516 күн бұрын
Such a good synopsis. Thank you. Helped me so much paul.
@Jeagerfx15 күн бұрын
Watching this because I'm writing in 30mins🤣🤣😭😊
@marckennethcabanero746716 күн бұрын
Hussite wars
@MrGuitarman800018 күн бұрын
Better than the rest that I have seen or heard. thank you Paul Sargent
@patrickvernon476619 күн бұрын
Much better than liberalism. Anything is
@isaacfr274622 күн бұрын
2 days before the exam anyone?
@takefreeakajustplaya24 күн бұрын
Diving in the origins of Lies of P brought me here. Thank you so much for your videos!
@prolltarodiesАй бұрын
Macron? A high school teacher in the US in his spare time? Who knew! :D
@Brix96Ай бұрын
It`s a load of nonsense to claim that the soviets allowed the deaths of the farm workers and took the Seed that were for the next years crop,they needed the Farm workers as much as the industrial workers not only to produce what was needed but also the manpower for the war they knew was coming the Germans thought they had killed and captured the great majority of the Red Army in the first few months of the war they were amazed to find themselves facing millions more,this could`nt have happenedif millions had died of starvation also in the years spoken of Russia had a very high birth rate this does`nt happen in times of famine if you want to teach history try teaching facts in future.
@oreopanda5779Ай бұрын
Reviewing for the AP test and my final 4/30/24
@davidenatoh359Ай бұрын
5:52, What type of image is that?
@ulysses8785Ай бұрын
Mr. Sargent, Great presentation!
@sleepingmeat3920Ай бұрын
Your videos are really informative and great. I also enjoy the awkward sense of humor you have!
@mrbutch308Ай бұрын
No mention of his involvement in Mexico and the attempt to set up a regime headed by Max and Carlotta? The guy was an opportunist.
@Lori-jf5kvАй бұрын
I randomly found this video as well. I subscribed. Great info!!
@kerryjennings2661Ай бұрын
thanks
@CakesWardenАй бұрын
American to a Brit: “your system is designed to govern where ours is designed to debate”
@daryl1467Ай бұрын
I thought the same thing to. However Renaissance was not a thing. There was no rebirth. Art and culture never stopped for a thousand years. The Catholic Church gave its approval to Subdue other countries by force of the “Doctrine of discovery.”
@user-ey6oi4xw8r2 ай бұрын
It was a Power Revolution. In Britain from 1800 1900. 20,000 Waterwheels declined in number. Windmills declined in number. Englishman Thomas Newcomen's 1500 Atmospheric Pumps disappeared. Scotsman James Watt's 500 Steam Engines and their descendants increased in number to 10,000,000 !!! For every SINGLE Waterwheel in 1800 we now had an additional 500 Steam Engines in 1900. If that's not an Industrial Revolution, I don't know what is ! That's like an extra 10,000,000 Waterwheels you can put anywhere! It was an increase in the total Power Supply of the whole country of between 400 and 500 times !!! A percentage increase of between 40,000% and 50,000% !!! I was surprised myself when I saw these numbers. James Watt's Invention of the world's first PRACTICAL Steam Powered Engine in Scotland was the one and only Invention that created the Industrial Revolution. It was a Power Revolution! All those other Invention, including Textile machinery were just the natural development of society, science, and knowledge of the world. The Steam Engine changed every Industry, Factories could multiply like bunnies! Steamships Locomotives and entirely new industries. It wasn't an improvement, it was a giant leap! And all thanks to James Watt.
@Arnmpsunotijogoth2 ай бұрын
❤
@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc2 ай бұрын
NON-catholic Christians who disagree with Catholicism have Anathemas (curses) officially written against them (“Heretics”) because of their Biblical faith + focus. ALL 151 Anathemas from Council of Trent remain unchanged as RC Dogma.
@richardmatt-obabu21292 ай бұрын
Thanks, just covered 3 months of study material in 2 minutes
@tonytagliaferri12542 ай бұрын
The history that is coming out from milit.archives,univers.arch.,etc.etc.from decades,it is a little different:video:"Regno delle due Sicilie Ass.Sentimento Meridiano Dott.A.Romano da Stato Avanzato a colonia"with docum.from the archives,census of Francesco Saverio Nitti,video:"L'Inghilterra contro il Regno delle due Sicilie--unita'd'Italia made in London",book:"La storia proibita.Quando i piemontesi invasero il sud",od the histor.A.Romano,video:"La piu'grande rapina della storia 3",video:"I Primati del Regno delle due Sicilie",book:"Cronaca civile e militare delle due Sicilie sotto la Dinastia borbonica"of the prof.Luigi Del Pozzo,video:"L'attacco dello stato all'industria meridionale",video:"Ruberie dei Mille,Ippolito Nievo e la prima strage di stato",video:"La storia oscura di Garibaldi,uomo spregiudicato che la storia ce lo presenta come eroe,ma........",book:"Garibaldi.L'invenzione di un eroe",of the Historian Lucy Riall,video:"Le condizioni del Mezzogiorno negli atti ufficiali del primo Parlamento italiano",book:"Il REgno delle due Sicilie.Tutta la verita'",of the prof.Gustavo Rinaldi,video:"Regno delle due Sicilie--citazioni illustri",part 1,2 e 3,etc.etc.
@roxiethecockapoo11383 ай бұрын
Your last statement about choosing the obvious choice and absolute choice rather than thecomplex/broad one that it could be, helped me so much. I'm always, constantly stuck between two choices and never sieze to select the wrong one. But based soley on that advice I've began interpreting the answers differently. I've also realized a lot of the questions I get wrong is because it's correct but not at all what the question was asking. Thank you!!!
@matheusnaracci18573 ай бұрын
Sou brasileiro, professor de filosofia e sociologia en escolas estaduais, estou começando a estudar história para lecionar essa matéria também, seu vídeo me ajudou bastante, obrigado de coração!
@Dan2x15.3 ай бұрын
Real answer for the exploration era was when former pirate king, Gol D. Roger announced that he has left his treasure in one place.
@sennaviljoen11363 ай бұрын
You rock dude, I seriously wish you were my history teacher. Thanks for the help! : )
@user-zk8dy3sl5s4 ай бұрын
Even non-English speakers would surely grasp this!Excellent delivery!
@mavi47794 ай бұрын
Thank you ❤
@TheGpaul4 ай бұрын
Very good video. The answer is this little booklet called. The way to happy. Read it and be happy.
@wattage-uk9zt4 ай бұрын
The first and most important Industrial Revolution, quite simply, was, not very rich James Watt's INVENTION of the world's first PRACTICAL High Pressure Steam Engine in a not very rich Scotland. It was a Power Revolution. James Watt dumped Newcomen's Atmospheric Power and Arkwright's Water-Power for High Pressure Steam Power. For the first time in human history we had something to replace and vastly outnumber the rare 2000 years old Water-wheel, which meant, thousands more Factories springing up everywhere, not just by flowing rivers of water. Powered Utilities, Steamboats, Steam everything and Locomotives. Imagine what the Industrial Revolution would have looked like without James Watt's High Pressure Steam Engine. It wouldn't have happened!
@kangleipak_pride4 ай бұрын
All other so called eastern philosophy was barbaric with concept such as casteism etc. ***we can see that the humanism dripped down and permeated into popular conciousness through age of enlightenment after the protestent reformation which was all caused by common mans accessibility to bible after it got translated and printed***
@jiyahere4 ай бұрын
HI YALL, WATCHING THIS CUZ OF GH?!?
@venrakkhita4 ай бұрын
Thank you sir
@TheHSoko4 ай бұрын
Super informative. This is a great overview and analysis of Rousseau. I’m curious to read him now.
@user-kk9ee3fb4x4 ай бұрын
The most integral part of "socialism" that is never given the coverage it deserves is that its not about everyone getting equal pay, it isn't about sacrificing liberty for equality, and its not when "the government does stuff". Socialism as Marx described it is a society in which the workers own their own workplaces and they democratically decide how to run their workplaces. He decried that the workers themselves should be the ones who lead a revolution; not a party. The point of socialism is not economic equality, but economic democracy. Marx himself even stated that under the classless society of communism that there would still be people with more than others, and that's not necessarily a problem. What he was worried about was the liberty and democracy of the worker.
@resorcinolamide4 ай бұрын
Hi Sargent; I am watching this for my G10 Modern History class, and in your video, you only briefly stated that Romanticism was a failure and that people aimed at unification only because of fervour. I would like to hear you elaborate on your perspective on why Romanticism was a failure. Romanticism is much deeper than emotion: it stems a lot from the philosophy of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and his work _Discourse on Inequality_ has sufficient ideas showing where the Romantics are coming from.
@ashbanaziz3 ай бұрын
hes a car salesman now
@norm11584 ай бұрын
A priest or any clergy are not necessary for salvation or communion with God. The Holy Bible is sufficient for all.
@seanmcmanamon37735 ай бұрын
Thanks for presenting this topic in a fair and balanced way.
@aliceresnick41955 ай бұрын
Thanks for mentioning the scramble for Africa. Can you do a video on the Berlin conference in regards to the scramble for Africa? I think your videos are very informative and pleasant. Like a favorite professor 😊.
@haydenwilsonx5 ай бұрын
Thanks for the clear explanation
@jessebarnes19635 ай бұрын
Mussolini used the term “totalitarian” to refer to his own fascist state, embracing the label and using it in a way that highlighted the fascist view of the state. However, fascist Italy was really not thoroughly totalitarian, as Hannah Arendt points out. The Fascists really didn’t control the private lives of its citizens, and the regime was nothing like the brutal regimes of Hitler and Stalin. The regime of the Italian fascists was basically just an imperialist, ultranationalist one, albeit with an interesting, Hegelian philosophical conception of the state.
@namo90605 ай бұрын
Thank you 👍🏻 You remind of Phil Dunphy from Modern Family