the only useful part about coming here is seeing peoples worthy comments mach3 for years has USB and works perfectly on win 7 10 and 11 mach3 has much more support and features that no GRBL software can do when I first used a Mini cnc it was with Grbl and to say for the cost it is suitable for these little machines as free controller software and a good amount of support from the GRBL community But after a short while i moved to Mach3 as i got a 4 axis desktop and wont change the back to GRBL and to say i love Arduino as i develop stuff very often , but to use on a 4 axis high voltage and with 1.5 kw with Limit switches and camera and safety sensors for a such cnc nuh!
@grahamwhitehead5629Ай бұрын
your so wrong, 30l per min is no where good enough for wood, need 25-30 psi
@HamiltonRod-r9dАй бұрын
Boehm Turnpike
@artnouveau78Ай бұрын
Mach3 is better. Grbl made many trobles.😊
@DanNeil-b3h2 ай бұрын
Batz Brooks
@wesleyclayswank67322 ай бұрын
I've got a 20 Watt fiber laser and I'm trying to make high quality playing cards for various games. I was wondering if you had any information on how to get not particularly glossy anodized aluminum to be higher gloss. I have both thin business cards and thick trading card blanks but the thicker are not very glossy. I would like to if possible be able to get the 100% photo realistic results out of the thicker cards which I'm getting with the thinner ones. Any guidance would be appreciated.
@TheOtherMisterRogers2 ай бұрын
Omg… blah blah blah… get to the point.
@gregorywalsh71152 ай бұрын
AI bullshit?
@EletricistaEmBrasilia2 ай бұрын
That's a generic video fully made by chatgpt
@suarwoodid3 ай бұрын
Thank you😮
@lilalali67533 ай бұрын
Very bad vid.
@The_K_Project4 ай бұрын
Seems these people are no very experienced in CNC. They have sold USB based Mach 3 boards for decades, parallel is still available but pretty rare.
@moki123g4 ай бұрын
This is AI content SPAM! Ignore everything.
@davidpemberton75204 ай бұрын
Lots of misinformation in this video.There are many Mach 3 and Mach 4 USB controllers. Mine is for a start.I use a tiny Beelink mini pc to run mine , to save space. I have never used parallel for cnc nor have I had to. Mach 3 has been around for many years so there is a lot of knowledge and information to help you all over the web.I started using Mach 3 with my USB Mach 3 controller just over 4 years ago as a total novice ,I had never used a cnc machine, not even seen one in the flesh.Within the day I was running it like I had been using it for years..Mach 3 is not perfect and it is old and will never be updated.But there are many users all over the world still using it and there are many companies making things to work with it.
@NoChoke5 ай бұрын
Could you place a link to the article in determining the rotary rotation in mm's
@LukeyTim06 ай бұрын
The sound effects are awful
@Mike-xw4gm6 ай бұрын
I wanna makr 5 axis amchine at home is ot possible do u know how
@AdaptivePhenix6 ай бұрын
Talking about toys while (mostly) showing _real_ CNCs. Open-loop steppers are a joke; here, CNC = Computer Numerically _Commanded_ because they run totally _blind_ . "Controlled" is when you have feedback to verify that the axes are following the commands.
@rok14757 ай бұрын
The amount of misinformation packed into this video is staggering. It was clearly prepared by a KZbinr with little or no experience with any of the tech covered.
@FrustratedBaboon7 ай бұрын
3:52 You said GRBL can only control 3-Axis. You can control 4, 5, or 6 depending on how many you need with GRBL.
@santhoshkanchanabatla91537 ай бұрын
It's too fast can u explain slowly
@arbjful7 ай бұрын
What is the alternative option for GRBL?
@Naten6098 ай бұрын
This video is a joke
@johnathannicholson91839 ай бұрын
"PromoSM"
@FrustratedBaboon9 ай бұрын
1:28 Did he say parallel port? Why is this stuff of the past in the 80s and 70s when we had ditto machines and FAX machines? COME ON Mach3 upgrade to USB.
@rok14757 ай бұрын
Mach3 compatible controllers with USB and Ethernet interface have been available for over a decade. COME ON FrustratedBaboon, upgrade your knowledge to at least 2010 level.
@vgimenezs9 ай бұрын
Which do you think it would be better for making detailed wooden chess pieces with smooth surface? With a rotary axis. Thanks.
@chintanfeta20289 ай бұрын
How to increase air assist? I have a problem getting flame while I do cutting. Could you please recommend?
@PuppetWood9 ай бұрын
very helpful information!
@KuranYuukiKaname10 ай бұрын
Just the answers im looking for! (among the many other questions i still have. 😂) Now i know which plywood works best (among the many other types of wood). But then, is engraving/cutting cherry wood also doable? (Im fairly new to laser engraving/cutting)
@JesseSchoch10 ай бұрын
arduino grbl and g2core are both pretty much abandonware. sorry to say but this video is irrelevant. also, why not mention linuxcnc, grblesp32, grblhal??
@Duraltia10 ай бұрын
Why even bother making a comparison between the two Firmware when one has such a glaring problem like constantly forgetting its Machine Settings? 🤨 By the time I'd be needing a 4-6Axis Machine the costs for a proper Controller not running a Firmware pulling such a stunt should be a non-issue! 😑
@AdjustinThings10 ай бұрын
An esp32 alone would multiplex the entire thing over a single wire faster than the arduino can do in parallel. Plus has wifi and bluetooth and is probably actually cheaper too.
@dennismasi973610 ай бұрын
Very biased comparison. GRBl on arduino doesnt need break-out board? That's effectively what a shield is. Mach has been supporting ethernet for breakout connection in lieu of parallel ports for several years. High step rates benefit from the much faster cpu speed in a pc or laptop.
@dillardhayes361210 ай бұрын
Anyone that has programmed for a living knows that the canned cycles and variables and macros are a huge advantage also machines like HAAS and robots in the auto industries use Fanuc based programming code. grbl will always just be a toy cnc for 3d printers and laser engravers.
@ArcAiN611 ай бұрын
GRBL will not "outdate" linuxcnc/mach3/4... simply put, GRBL is NOT a realtime controller. Because of that, there are quite a few features it simply cannot do. On top of that, there are a plethora of other reasons such as IO's, and additional hardware that can be added to the stack on realtime controllers that GRBL can't handle at all, and won't be able to unless it's ported to another hardware platform. There are very good reasons that GRBL is almost exclusively used in beginner / hobbyist environments, and almost never used in professional settings. Features, IO, Stability, repeatability etc are all among these reasons.
@ArcAiN611 ай бұрын
Don't forget to mention that GRBL is turn based, send commands, wait for them to finish, send more. LinuxCNC and Mach3/4 are real time.
@ArcAiN611 ай бұрын
don't forget linuxcnc
@yodaco11 ай бұрын
There is a lot of nonsense here to be honest. All of the options have pros and cons somewhat, but really there is just the choice to make between GRBL and Mach3, open source options may not be as user friendly as Mach3 in some cases. all the other variables are arbitrary.
@johndennis318111 ай бұрын
Where can I get a spindle for a $1000.00, I just had one rebuilt and it was 25k. 😂
@txz00311 ай бұрын
AI Generated Crap.
@gordon120111 ай бұрын
This is just laughable "content".. you're comparing different generations of machines as if it's a relevant comparison... Also the AI voice is just awful. Get a real narrator
@cryoine719411 ай бұрын
only correction you can write G-code using any text editor, to generate it you need a CAD/CAM program
@deaddolfin680411 ай бұрын
This video is no longer relevant: Mach3 is still able to compete with GRBL on Arduino. But he is already an outsider in comparison with FluidNC on ESP32 platform
@killer_dad33332 ай бұрын
Mach3 stopped being developed in 2012 and still better than any of that shit. Mach3 supports lathe's, mills, router's, etc with ATC. Mach4, UCCNC, WINCNC, LINUX CNC, etc there are plenty of PC based controllers that far better and mature that grbl nonsense. Even 200K to 1 million ++$$$ machinery comes with PC based controllers they are going anywhere.
@sandboxaccountz.zy.701211 ай бұрын
thx
@delbrey196611 ай бұрын
I made my own cnc with arduino mega 2560 r3 and I control 6 axis, and I don't use the arduino shield I use nema 23 stepper motor with external drives controls, I have a axis y x,z,a,b control then independently
@markyu709 ай бұрын
Same but nema but nema 34, 12.5Nm servo step motors
@slicktires20118 ай бұрын
But what software are you using? GRBL and Universal Gcode sender?
@markyu708 ай бұрын
@@slicktires2011 There are a lot of software. I have 10-15 freeware installed but I preferred BCNC because you can write scripts, auto level, use laser, plasma, spindle, you can visually delete part of gcode or in text mode .... it is really great piece of multiplatform software, windows, Linux, Raspberry Pi works on everything and it is light but with great visual presentation in different perspectives.
@james1073911 ай бұрын
Mark sounds like a computer
@brameelen646411 ай бұрын
this is not good information co2 lasers can cut metal and prices are much higher in real life
@themicer11 ай бұрын
I was thinking the same thing. I worked for a manufacturing plant and we had lasers both co2 and fiber that cut sheet steel and I believe we're 50 Kw. We got the fiber shortly before I left and it was 1.2 million.
@Festivejelly11 ай бұрын
GRBL32 bit port is the best. Mach3 is just old and proprietary. Open source ftw.
@SB-bz1fu Жыл бұрын
just getting a S1 myself and its my 1st , looking forward to more of your videos
@dabooge Жыл бұрын
Grbl is garbage to control a cnc. It works but honestly it's a huge pain in the @$$. Mach 3 is old and mach 4 is crap. I still have machines running mach 3 but i will be going to Linux cnc for my mills and lathes and my plasm for my plasma machines.
@ray-charc313110 ай бұрын
Mach3 is a great piece of motion software, I learned and used it some 14 years agos, it helped me to finish a lot of work. Some 5 yrs ago, I learn LinuxCnc, it is difficult especially for those who learned Mach3 first and used to do programming in C language, l managed to succeed to run it as well to make the programming of the auto toolchanging. Then, I get back to Mach3 lately and finish all the programing stuffs, in addition to auto toolchanging, also the graphic interface and auto touch probe programming, the software offers me much of function and features to accomplish, they are user-friendly. In view of LinuxCNC, I think I can't easily succee or will I turn to download someone free software to use instead, but I am not used doing that. Most importantly, for this software, like the Gbrtl , you need to grab much informaton that are scared around in internet