so ur saying the French and Cuban revolutions were bad? u seem to make sense but I''m not quite getting you

Most certainly I’m saying the Cuban revolution was insanely bad. The French Revolution might’ve had good points at its origin but it quickly devolved into chaos as a power vacuum was filled with unqualified psychopaths who immediately took their new found power and abused the shit out of it resulting in the deaths of so many innocent people. And then eventually was organized under Napoleon who then crowned himself emperor. Which also failed and ended with the monarchy returning to the throne. What I’m saying is you have to be very careful with revolution. If you want to change the power structure especially in an immediate fashion, as was the case in both Cuba and France, you’re almost certainly going to end up with a catastrophe of epic proportions. I agree with the speaker that it is of paramount importance that his people better themselves and rebrand culturally ASAP to better themselves and relations with the other races they share a country with. But then when he starts in with the revolutionary spirit and mentions Cuba a few times I don’t think he just means getting better job opportunities and living situations. It sounds like he means full take over. I don’t care what race you are. History has shown what happens when you forgo more organic assimilation and just uproot the old and replace it swiftly the results typically lead to war and civil unrest and a lot of death. It’s too radical.

@@drewpd7 okay I get you now,.. there is a guy by the name of Myles Munroe who did a sermon to that effect.. i never got to watch it fully, but it was about how all change isn't necessarily good and revolutions can make things worse etc...etc. etc change is better when it is organic

@@kala-adaidakariopusunju6809sweet I’ll check it out thanks!

Crazy he said this 20 years ago 😮