ENGLISH4ICAO

Пікірлер

@horstmesser3944 13 күн бұрын

Herr Scheuer hat im Corona Jahr 2020 über 30 Milliarden € fürs ICAO für subventionierten Luxus verballert. 1944 haben 52 Staaten fürs Kapital das ICAO ohne Referenden in Chicago eine Versicherung installiert! Nur das ICAO mache ich alleine für die globale künstliche Klimaerwärmung verantwortlich! Keiner erklärt mir warum das 40 X teurere Flugwesen billiger angeboten wird wie die öffentlichen VKM? Das ICAO heizt seit 74 Jahren, Anfang des Düsenjetalters die SCHUTZschicht Tropopause auf! Seit genau 1950 werden dadurch alle Sommer + Winter immer wärmer? Und Wissenschaftler dürfen das das nicht ermitteln warum, weil sie nur das Brot ihrer Vorgesetzten fressen! Bin PPL Pilot.

@BORZI572 19 күн бұрын

It's so hard)

@eloigrondin1583 23 күн бұрын

"Marselle controls" its make me laughing from a French guy ahah ; ITS MARSEILLE NOT MARSELLE

@alibabazade2873 2 ай бұрын

Excuse me, is it the English test only? It is much more than a language test. I have been preparing people for TOEFL, IELTS, DUOLINGO type of certificates and a non-native pilot asked me to help him to practice passing ICAO English test, but this thing seems insane.

@corner559 4 ай бұрын

I speak English and would have difficulty remembering all that and repeating it back. Add on to that the garbled mess that the radio sounds like.

@viktorekman863 4 ай бұрын

VATSIM experience really coming in handy here

@real_dddf 4 ай бұрын

why is a compressor stall an emergency but an engine failure is totally not an emergency...

@jiritapal2347 5 ай бұрын

I think I'm more nervous watching this video than that guy doing an exam.

@JustAnOrdinarySimmer 5 ай бұрын

Did he pass considering he asked the controller in all situations to say again?

@dmdmdmdmdmdm 6 ай бұрын

😊

@dmdmdmdmdmdm 6 ай бұрын

😊

@openbabel 6 ай бұрын

I think you need to clarify your blogg as it has caused a lot of resentment in the UK,USA, Australian GA PIilot community, the EUAA and CAA who appear to be in complete confusion over this subject UK PPL holders who passed RT examinations in English have already been approved English language standard to hold a UK and EU level qualification as a private pilot. Captin Joe is correct...those pilots who passed examinations in languages other than English will need to demonstrate proficiency to a level to command an aircraft. The UK exited the EU in 2020 and removed EU regulations from UK law. The UK is bound by the treaty of Fundermental Human Rights which deals with qualifications acheived through examination and recognition thereof as a human right and cannot be reexamined or barriers unreasonably put into existance which errodes in any way that qualification. So to be clear If you have an english examination CAA recognition in RT this cannot be challenged as a qualification acheived through examination. If you have passed the same examination but in a different EU language you may need to demonstrate a minimum standard of English level 6. Any barrier which effects the status of a qulification in the UK in English which has already been passed by the CAA is considered an unreasonable errosion of the qualification held as a human right. This is automatcally struck out of UK law. Should you wish to volunarly take a check ride with a suitably CFI in English or at English common law this is a personel expression and will not effect in anyway the qualification of UK PPL Pilots English Qualification. The CAA has been asked to issue to all pilots in the UK a circular clarifying the CAA interpretation of this law post EU world.

@Rafaez_66 6 ай бұрын

There is no need to readback wind information.

@tckrmassa5967 6 ай бұрын

Many things he is saying are wrong

@FlightAce100 6 ай бұрын

Better than a lot of pilots already flying out there.

@JessePilot 7 ай бұрын

Is this enough for EPTA level 6?

@ConnorAllenTN 7 ай бұрын

they really said “inform the controller you’re defending to flight level 100” this shit ain’t real 💀

@77SimulationsFS 7 ай бұрын

I understood everything, but i have bad memory so i forgot what the atc was saying lol i guess i need to work on that!

@stevehenderson3432 7 ай бұрын

Yeah let’s not read back wind direction and speed lol

@kimkoyulk3298 7 ай бұрын

Quiero ir al curso por la instructora 🥹

@hacktopamasdos9622 7 ай бұрын

mockingbird

@gabrielvillar966 7 ай бұрын

As far as I know, when the ATC clears you to take-off is not necesary to readback the winds 7:49

@Adam-hf7hn 6 ай бұрын

yeah youre right. that is what I was thinking

@jamiemyers4696 4 ай бұрын

Its an ICAO english exam not radiotelephony / communcations, its to make sure pilots understand what is being said not that they understand what the mandantory readbacks are thats a different assessment

@Adam-hf7hn 4 ай бұрын

@@jamiemyers4696 being able to speak in aviation form is needed. If it wasn’t then they wouldn’t have that section. I got a level 6 so I know.

@jamiemyers4696 4 ай бұрын

@@Adam-hf7hn Well if you look through the comments the OP, so an actually training facility has said the same as myself. As much as i understand what ur saying and in the cockpit it matters yes, in this exam and circumstance i think the training facility will know more than one person that passed the exam

@eljif4306 7 ай бұрын

say again

@abdullaalhaddad8030 7 ай бұрын

Funny thing we are not allowed to say ' say again ' more than once for the whole test

@grahamehedger4498 7 ай бұрын

"It’s easy just learning". This is possibly the best response which underlines just how naive a lot you are. Aviation English is just ONE element of the communication skills required in order to fly internationally. A 5 year old child could learn some standard phraseology! What pilots NEED more than anything else, is PLAIN ENGLISH. The ability to advise ground stations of any problems you might have. The ability to understand interragotive clauses and the ability to respond APPROPRIATELY to avoid potential disaster. Honestly, I cannot believe to lack of understanding shown by so many contributors on here. The langauge proficiency training and testing is NOT easy! And you won't become a professional pilot by thinking it is.

@coredeveloper 8 ай бұрын

1) Why ANAC isn't phonetically pronounced as Alfa November Alfa Charlie? 2) Weather information read back is unnecessary, in this case RWY and QNH should be included. 3) Go around maneuver should be declared as: executing missed approach. 4) Read back should be short, it's unnecessary to repeat word by word, like the instruction to contact CENTER/TOWER etc, its recommended to say WILLCO 122.231 (or any other freq.). 5) When you talking to ATC say your call sign, your position (alt included), intentions and only then all other information, like reasoning etc. ATC need to know critical information first. Don't forget that you are talking on radio not on the cellphone anyone can jump in and start talking and override or just disturb your speech.

@jamiemyers4696 4 ай бұрын

This is an ICAO test NOT a communications exam / radiotelephony exam to gain a radio license. The test is to ensure pilots are understanding ALL information and dont just learn to repeat numbers after hearing "QNH" as an example, they need to know what they are being told hence are told all info is important and to almost forget mandantory readbacks and just give it all. Also to answer the first question its pronounced ANAC because its a commerical callsign, just like British Airways are Speedbird on Shuttle if domestic not "Sierra Papa Echo Echo" and so on

@sultanman 8 ай бұрын

He is still been asking “ Say again”

@aerogray2500 8 ай бұрын

"Cleared to line up and take off"??? Who writes this stuff?! No wonder there are STILL so many incidents and accidents due to poor communication skills imparted by "teachers" who are involved in an area they nothing about!

@victorrubiodelrio1692 9 ай бұрын

You don’t need to read back the wind

@jamiemyers4696 4 ай бұрын

@victorrubiodelrio1692 4 ай бұрын

Okay sorry brother 😂

@AlexDRocca 10 ай бұрын

You should definitely pronounce the L in Calm and Palm especially if the purpose is aviation and being understood. Pronouncing those words as Com and Pom is not correct and confusing. I am American

@a320nick 10 ай бұрын

If you can "hear" loud and clear - not listen... Also, you don't have to read back the wind but you can say "wind copied" He is doing fine, it's a great course!

@aerogray2500 8 ай бұрын

"Loud and clear" does not exist. It's "Reading you five or strength five".

@jamiemyers4696 4 ай бұрын

@christos_con 11 ай бұрын

question: shouldn't the pilot identify ANAC123 based on the pilots' alphabet pronunciation?

@aerogray2500 8 ай бұрын

Not with a callsign like this. If it's a callsign like G-ABCD, the controller MAY abbreviate your callsign to "CD", but the pilot can only abbreviate the callsign AFTER the controller does it.

@jjares 6 ай бұрын

the callsign has two parts, first is an identifier or operator, it's usually the company or the plane brand (ie iberia 123 or cessna 123), that bit you just read, don't spell. It can even be written shorter (IB123) and then read aloud in full (Iberia 123)

@jamiemyers4696 4 ай бұрын

@@aerogray2500 not sure where you are based but thats a UK registration meaning its shortened to "G-CD" not "CD"

@KunekuneTravels Жыл бұрын

Interesting that "say again"can be used repeatedly during the exam, to request a full readback.. without negative consequences. Asking for a repeated readback during an actual flight test would result in annoyance to the controller and a possible fail grade by your instructor. Also noted than in one of the situations the pilot had a tailstrike but is asking to accend to 7000 to "test pressurisation" ...in a real life situation a good pilot would return and land asap.

@aerogray2500 8 ай бұрын

"Accend" or climb? Answers on a postcard...........

@aerogray2500 8 ай бұрын

"Say again" CANNOT be said this often in all approved tests. That alone should tell you something.

@coredeveloper Жыл бұрын

I assume that during this exam, RT skills are not evaluated, since there are a lot of mistakes. Like DISTRESS message and read back.

@aerogray2500 8 ай бұрын

Technically, the EPT is not a test of operational proficiency. However, as a qualified pilot / trainer/examiner, I would correct a student at the end of the test.

@rabbi_dragon_slayer Жыл бұрын

A real American would had said “New York Center, we got a bomb and so I’m gonna roll the plane upside down for a bit, sound good? ANAC 123”

@rabbi_dragon_slayer Жыл бұрын

Also dang, New York be like “we don’t want no more crap happening in the news over here, send it to Chicago where they’re used to this”

@roadweather372 Жыл бұрын

Where can I find the ICAO TEST PART 1 AND 3 ?, I can't see it on your KZbin channel. Thank you.

@stephenstead7270 Жыл бұрын

it a lot of stress doing this some people wright it down he do very well if you asked me. he going to pass id say great job mate

@aerogray2500 8 ай бұрын

My 12 year old neice could pass this "test"

@resulismayilov7127 Жыл бұрын

i consider that your proqramm will help many people.thank you

@lachainedesaid5963 Жыл бұрын

Les modias laaa

@farhanmohd78 Жыл бұрын

But is it good everytime say again in realtime also

@farhanmohd78 Жыл бұрын

Love from India 🇮🇳👍❤️

@farhanmohd78 Жыл бұрын

Very nice information, for the first time I saw this in pratical. Its very diffcult to become commercial pilot

@farhanmohd78 Жыл бұрын

Everytime he is saying say again

@Leonardo-rp1gk Жыл бұрын

As far as I know when doing a Go around you must say "Going around" only, because of the cockpit workload. I would have said Miami tower anac 123 going around due to traffic crossing the runway or just going around

@aerogray2500 8 ай бұрын

Absolutely right. And the correct word is "initiate", NOT "start"! Sadly, this is all too common when TEFL tourists enter the world of aviation English with no actual flight or controller experience. There are other errors, too, like "line up and take off"! I mean, FFS! Again, it's another example of the wrong people providing training in a sector they know nothing about. And we wonder why communication issues continue to endanger flight safety. And before people ask, yes, I am a pilot as well as an aviation English instructor/Examiner.