Currently, the manufacturer website is 2024. The 2025 models should be up soon, hopefully in the next few weeks.

Completely new hull designed for both motor packages

what mpg are u seeing at cruise? the website doesn't show performance on different engines like others. thanks!

This boat gets 2.8 mpg at 34mph… one of the most fuel efficient boats on market

@@turnermiles8022 that’s not bad!

Maybe but then when you sell it, it will have a higher selling value?

@@poyorudo it never works that way with modified equipment in my experience. You never get your money back at resale or if you get anything, it’s pennies on the dollar. Might help the sale but it nets no real money. Another consideration, who’s going to work on that prop the first time I ding a log? Local guy in BF nowhere southeast AK, doubtful. Till it’s cheeper, much cheeper, or I see compelling actual performance data on a 22,000 lb boat with 350 Yamahas the same as my own or very similar, im good with the plain old ~800$ per, three blade Yamaha prop.

That obviously depends on several factors. First of all how much you use your boat but fuel prices and your specific application will naturally also play a role. I did the math based on a test I found here on KZbin. That test was done on a smaller boat with a single engine but based on the efficiency improvements at optimal cruising speeds using their figures and today's gas prices the prop had paid for itself after about 180 hours of cruising. But as they say your mileage may vary.

@@ThorRavnsborg hence i specified my boat and engine config. Im burning 42-50 gph going 35-45 mph, at 41-50 rpms. Looking at a similar boat test with this style props and 250 hrs a year its going to take a long time. Cost is ridiculous at this point. No way im investing 15k in props on a 7 year old boat. Sillyness

@@perrycarditi5 Yes, they are definitely pricey and hopefully they will be able to lower manufacturing costs and reduce prices in a not too distant future. I obviously can't tell you what the exact fuel savings would look like in your case but a reduction of 10-15 gph doesn't seem far fetched if you reduce your engine rpms to the 3000-4000 range which is typically where these props excel (and that should give you nearly the same speed as running around 1000 rpms higher with standard props). I think there's a good chance you would break even on the investment within two years at 250 hrs per year (even without taking added resale value into account) but don't hold me up on it. But even if it takes four or five years to break even I would say that's actually still a very respectable return from a financial standpoint (assuming the props will last at least a few years longer than that).

$176K found from another video at FLIBS.

@@redman2751 really by me it’s 150k