Nasty woman.

Trump Leveled This Condescending Remark At A Female Journalist - And Experts Have Thoughts

So what is the truth with the fiancee? Another video Hanan is in, she said they were married in 2018 and yet the story is he had a fiance and was going to the consulate to get papers that showed he was divorced. There needs to be clarity on this. The documentary The Dissident shows his fiancee at the flat he bought in Turkey and speaking at the UN and various speaking venues after his death. What is the truth about this woman and the fiancee. Is one lying? I'm confused.

Caitlin Clark is "The Caitlin Clark Effect" because without Caitlin Clark there would be no "Effect". Caitlin "is" the draw card, what she can do with a basketball, her personality, the love she has for her parents, friends, teammates/friends, coaches etc, and her fans... is visible. There's no one in basketball that's had such a profound "Effect" on people from all walks of life. Her impact on me is something i have difficulty in describing, i'm 67 years of age and the WNBA never interested me, however after seeing Caitlin i was, and continue to be, totally blown away... i hold Caitlin in the highest regard possible, she's an exceptional human being that's bringing together people from all walks of life!!!

Racist RACHEAL BE A JOURNALIST BEFORE A PARTY😢

Rachel Scott sorry excuse for a reporter talking like harris last person these liberal shouldve pick

GROSS SPEAKER: @RACHAELVSCOTT A MANIACALLY DERANGED,, UNBALANCED, UNHINGED, CRAZED SUB-HUMAN.

Rachel sucks lmao

..... Scott has been, from day 1, a Democrat Hack journalist.

She's typical affirmative action educated fool.

Thanks for sharing

Just watched this reporter rudely harass Nancy Pelosi in a corridor. The world doesn't need desperate reporters. We have enough people invading public reps lives. Let their record in public speak their truth.. Rude, loud and intrusive

Hey Who put that ring on her finger 👀😡🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺

I remember this speech, it was an honor to attend. I found it hilarious when he skipped a page and acknowledges it at 29:58.

I’m glad the lady that whines about lack of attention because she’s black, didn’t get any attention. Pathetic loser always making it about race if they ain’t center of attention

🏃 Promo sm

Aww, the discussion started so well and then it just went downhill to the liberal agendas. Conclusion that you would get listening to this would be that people watching Clark are racists. I guess you could have known something is coming when all four panelists were black.

"Equity"??? She's "woke" and obviously a hypocrite.

LOL Ms. Clark's problem is she is white, heterosexual and Catholic, doesn't jive with the LGBN through Z heterophobia WNBA community! Let alone it's bias towards people of non color so to speak. Its a shame because the new blood and dynamics that is infusing Women's college basketball today will ignite the WNBA attendance and profitability as did Magic and Byrd's style of play did, saving the NBA back in the late 70's and 80's from being completely ill relevant as the WNBA is today!

With all the talk of Caitlin Clark it got me intrigued about her. I have never followed or been interested in baseball at any level, outside of having to spend some gym time high school haven't dribbled a ball. I find it slightly more interesting that than the CFL or NFL where hardly ever touch the ball.I now can say I watched one full game and most of a second. I have heard her called a generational player. Can she have the impact like a Greztky who it is said helped hockey expand into the sunbelt. Would there be a player grow up in Arizona like Austin Matthews without the Great One. If Clark is the one that helps women's sports, yes even for a non fan, basketball, it is a good thing.I also understand what the concern about perhaps the may be a racial bias in the coverage.

I disagree that the Caitlin Clark story would be so different if she were black. First off, Hope Solo got so much attention because she’s drop-dead gorgeous, not because she’s white, and attention on the WNT had been sustained when she arrived as well. Caitlin gets so much attention and praise because she’s flashy with her logo threes and crazy passes, which no other player has done in the women’s game like she does on such a regular basis. And it’s also because she’s so great off the court, stayed at home in Iowa instead of going to one of the perennial powerhouses, loves the attention and uses it to sign autographs forever after the game while also consciously serving as a good role model. If you put all of that into a black girl, I think you’d get close to exactly the same result. Juju and Bueckers (one black, one white) get praise but less attention than Caitlin because while they are both more efficient than Caitlin, they don’t have the flash she does. For instance, Steph Curry is black, and he was an instant superstar when everybody got to see him with Davidson in the NCAA tourney.

Caitlin Clark has made historic strides like no other! Her boundless energy, remarkable abilities, fearless attitude, and relentless drive to succeed have significantly shaped the landscape of women's basketball. Her contributions should be celebrated for their merit, rather than focusing on her skin color. Let's express appreciation for her accomplishments, which have garnered well-deserved recognition for women's basketball. Her achievements serve as an inspiration to women and girls worldwide, motivating them to emulate her success and, perhaps one day, even surpass it, thereby elevating women's sports as a whole. However, it is my sincere hope that the current trend of excessive focus on race, propagated by certain misguided individuals or groups, will not interfere. Such emphasis on skin color is both irrelevant and inappropriate.

An interesting thing is that not a single white person was n the panel. If it is a black v white conversation why is only one side represented.

It’s not the game as a whole silly. It’s one person who plays the way she does. She of course has been inclusive of others trying to carry everyone with her. MJ got the attention like no other. He is black. He got it because of the way he played. Caitlin Clark gets the attention because of her style of play on court, no off court antics and in a country that’s still pretty strait laced about all things sex she’s a regular girl next door..

So I tried to watch this, a few minutes into it, we are on to the agenda, You guys still don’t get it do you, No , you get it , you just are going to shove your side agenda down people’s throats Shame on you,

Of course the level of interest in Caitlin Clark would have been different if she had a different skin color. It might be 95% to 20% of the present situation. Different people support sports stars for different reasons. If there was a Chinese American girl playing like that, the interest from China would be through the roof. There would have been basketball tours from China to see her games, home and away. Same thing for a Korean or Japanese girl, but not for an Indian girl. People from India would not have come to see her.

The Jewish literary critic Harold Bloom once noted that a great tragedy in American life is that whenever you see books by blacks (or in this case a panel) you instinctively know you will be hearing the same single narrative and conclusions, over and over again-in perpetuity. In essence, there are rarely interesting surprises because we can predict with near accuracy everything they are going to say, like the former soccer player who spoke on stage. Meanwhile, millions of white Americans exalted with god like fervor Michael Jordan, Michael Jackson, Beyoncé, Oprah --some of the biggest and celebrated names ever, yet all we hear is that same boringly predictable woe-is-us narrative. Every time.

I’m not an American nor black nor white. If a white player gets a lot of attention in a country that still has a majority of whites what’s wrong about it? At some time you guys have to see people as only Americans irrespective of what their race, religion, sexual preference. A mathematical analogy-division gets you closer and closer to zero until you get there eventually. Multiplication and addition have no upper limit.

I don’t totally agree that if Caitlin was black she wouldn’t get the same attention, some of my reasons are Stevie won 4 Nats in a row and she didn’t get attention like CC, Serena & Venus GOD knows have gotten their attention. And best reasons are MJ and Tiger Woods, both black and are considered the Best in the world. So I don’t agree if she was black she wouldn’t get the same treatment. Just my opinion

In the discussion of race, I found it interesting that there was no mention of the USA article stating that the face of women's basketball should be black. Let's dismiss Caitlin as the face because of her skin color. Where is the fairness of that.

No no no no no no no the media lies cable and tv all lie lie lie. I'm not going to undo that knowledge Mr Matt lazlo. And if you try to let's say convince us that there not that they're not lying that makes you a liar.

promo sm

Any DJ job opening in Asia?

Congratulations on your engagement. You are a good reporter.

Ex-Wife divorcee not a widow, just a broke divorcee.

Great Job keep Smiling

🎉🎉🎉 yes

Love you great Reporter

please may i have your email address so we can talk later really love to study there

A wonderful, important book. That room should have been packed.

is this same college found within the university of maryland or its a college on it own

So let me get this straight… blacks only make up 12% of the US population, and you make up 80% of the entire NFL player list. Extremely over represented. And yet y’all come on here acting like you aren’t represented enough in coaching? 😂 what kind of garbage is this? More toxic BLM bullshit!

Nathan Stevens has been a fantastic teacher since his days at University of Kentucky

Dope!!! ❤❤❤❤

Great title. Very open to alot of interpretation. No doubt honesty isn't and hasn't been popular for quite some time. Seems it's all about $ and then power. Whatever!

Excellent interview

The CIA and other intelligence agencies have been and remain the single greatest threat to our freedoms and the possibility of peace in the world. The murder of Patrice Lumumba by the CIA is one of the most vile chapter's of this nation's history. Risen's comments on the failure of the media in covering the Church Committee is of note. That history is no accident. The corporate media has long had an incestuous relationship with the CIA, which has often carried the agency's dirty water. The role of the CIA both at home and abroad is just one example of how the United States is a mockery of democracy.

This one the most important books out there

Love that Otis is in this! B

Congratulations Damon. I am very proud of you. Looking forward to meet you soon through Steve Francis, The Franchise Be blessed