ahh i understand everything now (doesn’t get it at all)

whats the font used in the video, looks really nice

What about deciturn?

This video is tau propaganda

As the Banach-Tarski paradox, I am offended.

why are you using tau

1:31 that logarithm function🤣

Tau is a weird way of explaining radians, it just complicates things and nobody uses it. You can think of radians in a far simpler way. If you have a circle with a radius of 1 meter then it’s circumfrence will be 2pi meters (remember, pi is just a number. Just like 7 or 6428, pi is 3.1415…). A full turn is 2pi radians. So a radian is quite literally the length of the arc with any angle in a circle with a radius of 1 unit (like if you just took a tape measure and literally measured it).

Why tf did you use tau

Im trying to figure out how many brownies to put into this pan - how should i square fudge pack?

The problem with the Monty Hall problem is that it presupposes I would not like to win a goat.

I learn the mil as A‰ but the full circle has 6400 A‰.

Man these red squares seem so familiar

Ross littlewood paradox doesnt make sense to me, for each N you take out, theres at least 9 more balls in the vase? So even if you take out "all" the balls, the range of N+9 is still in the vase...

Guys, the Hilbert's hotel theory is broken becuz the person in the room no infinite can move into the next room but the new one can't

5:46 misaligned Thetas.

this video has a script written by an AI

Is a parabola a special case of a hyperbola? Or the reverse?

It was all going great until he said centimeter like a robot

I vividly remember watching the 'outside in' video so many times trying to imagine what happened. It reminds me that I wish I could select some faces of the original sphere to watch how the sphere everted patch-wise. Maybe someone build that as a 3D web app now, which wasn't possible at the time of course.

I love how your videos jump right into the topic. No 'skip the first 1/3rd of any video' or any such nonsense.

The Kobon triangle problem is very interesting because it seems computationally approachable since the exactly angles of the lines don't matter as long as the topology of the graph (the order in which other lines intersect a line) they create doesn't change. I 'conjecture' that I am wrong in this assertion.

in Fermat's theorem ∀n we use 2 terms - (x1)^2 + (x2)^2 = z^2 that if you use n terms for ∀ n, that is: (x[1])^n + (x[2])^n ... (x[n-1])^n + (x[n])^n = z^n tell the article where you can see it???

Yes on replacing pi with tau!

Xeno needed Napier

How can a devenerate conic be parallel lines? I don't get it.

Collatz conjecture ζ(2)=π^2 /6 3ζ(2)/2=π^2 /4 =π^2 /2^2 π⇔1 1/4+1 1/4+4/4 5/4 //5 is an odd number// 3×5+1=16 16=2^3→1 All natural numbers Collatz conjecture reduces to 1.

Isn'ta 2D dimension a paradox due to infinite thinness?

The witch of Agnesi is not a lorentzian though, as its width is not related to its height in the right way. So it is not the PDF of a Cauchy distribution.

In the first problem, it would be 2 meters bigger, because it is being lifted on both sides

And mobius strip?

Gonna be real honest… some of these are just nonsense. They aren’t paradoxes it’s just rigging the math then providing a stupid statement. Why wouldn’t someone infinitely roll a 50/50 chance? Because the payout chance is infinite. My friend said if you did it 21 times you’d be me a millionaire starting with a dollar and doubling it. The probability of success for it even just 21 times is for all intents and purposes never going to happen. And you suggest that as an infinitely small probability (it will never happen). Just because you arbitrarily say “b-but the pay out is more than you put in” doesn’t magically change that you won’t be a millionaire even starting with a dollar. You won’t ever become a infinite-aire. It’s not a surprise or contradiction that no one would play this game regardless of the starting bid because the game itself was stupid from the start. The only person who would suggest playing this game is a casino because the house always wins. I’m conclusion he was just trying to scam people. Also the dart board one is equally stupid, a point has no area and the dart will take up area or space when it connects with the board. This is basically just the other game again, you are trying to hit nothing with a thing then acting surprised that you never hit nothing, that’s self explanatory.

what about the steradian?

Single sided closed surface? Surface(cos(u/2)cus(v),cos(u/2)sin(v),sin(u)),u,0,pi,v,0,pi

2:55 It's not pronounced fuck-eye but foe-sigh...

This video kinda sucks. I like the paradoxes but the explanations are horribly executed.

I hate mathematicians

All my braincells are fusing together to try to understand this

The universe has to be looped, no hard edges in spacetime, that includes the point at infinity, thus it is just a shape of infinite size that loops upon itself, like how a line is really just a circle of infinite radius.

there's another paradox going around criticizing rick Astley's never gonna give you up. the way you start it, ask him for his 4k copy of the Disney movie up. he will never give you up, but in doing so lets you down.

What are the names of the songs you used?

Video suggestion: every temperature scale explained. Because besides Fahrenheit, Celsius and Kelvin there are a bunch of weird, obsolete ones.

The one with the base and 10 balls doesn't seem, at a glance, that complicated, the base won't be empty because you allways leave inside 9 times more balls than the number of balls outside

Tau gang rise up!

Just use infinite lines to get sqrt(PI).

The modern abbreviation for grade is gone? Where did it go? 😉

Polish have atention

2(2x*2y)=(x^2+y^2)^2

Soooo, even scientists don’t know shapes? 😭😭

The ending🤣