Let me know if there's a topic you'd like me to cover next. 😊
@mono619814 күн бұрын
all infinities explained
@ak-ee7zq10 күн бұрын
hiHi
@Martan20105 күн бұрын
an explanation why is 6=9 (a higher dimensional calculation or whatever) edit: is it even true tho?
@soulsofspirit9729Ай бұрын
5:30 Literally the best explanation of a function. It takes a number, does a bunch of stuff to it, and spits out an answer.
@isavenewspapers8890Ай бұрын
Yes, for a function on numbers, this is true. However, a function does not necessarily take a number as input. It can take in a vector, a matrix, a set, or even another function, among many other things.
@MrTicky4Ай бұрын
Oh boy, wait until you find out about functionals (a function that takes in a FUNCTION, does something to it and spits out an answer). Mathematics is just getting started.
@TheAdriyaman28 күн бұрын
@@isavenewspapers8890 In computer science a function can also take nothing as input
@soulsofspirit972928 күн бұрын
@@isavenewspapers8890 I did not know that, I’m not that deep into mathematics.
@miniropАй бұрын
In "Benoit B. Mandelbrot, the B. stands for Benoit B. Mandelbrot"
@daniel_77.Ай бұрын
It took me a while to realize what you did
@CosmicHaseАй бұрын
Benoit Benoit B. Mandelbrot Mandelbrot?
@josephjohnson313Ай бұрын
@@CosmicHase Benoit Benoit Benoit B. Mandelbrot Mandelbrot Mandelbrot
@DhoklaAboveVadapavАй бұрын
f(B)= benoit B Mandelbrot fof(B)= ?
@rayzhao491Ай бұрын
@@josephjohnson313 Benoit Benoit Benoit Benoit B. Mandelbrot Mandelbrot Mandelbrot Mandelbrot
@davidhopkins6946Ай бұрын
Mathematician: Yay! I proved it! Weierstrauss: No you didn't.
@Are3.14Ай бұрын
Weierstrass* :)
@jerometeorАй бұрын
I can't help but be amazed at how original the ideas of German mathematicians from 19-20th centuries were.
@lijauju21 күн бұрын
this made me think of how Gottlob Frege was a German mathematician from that same time period that laid out the principles for the study of logics which ended up as the basis for semantics
@suhnih4076Ай бұрын
“log😄 😅 = 💧” 💀
@cosmax1448Ай бұрын
😂😂
@Yarik_XАй бұрын
He's not wrong tho
@AzarinthUnknown25 күн бұрын
i hate i understood that
@scarletevans447428 күн бұрын
1:15 Dude, WTF! I think I checked like few times in past what this fractional dimension thing is and I never really grasped it, but the way you explained it is so simple!! Just consider the way it scales and you get the dimensionality! Thank you! ♥
@RishwanaHoqueАй бұрын
i cant decide if my life is really good or pitiful based off of the fact that im watching a video explaining mathematical concepts that aren't in my syllabus-
@HermesKhadivar-n5lАй бұрын
11:34 now watch the video again and take a shot every time he says "german mathematician"
@rutterj2Ай бұрын
I like a challenge
@borisslavchev132826 күн бұрын
Ight bet
@borisslavchev132826 күн бұрын
its 5 shots weak
@TayhayАй бұрын
thought this has way more views, just realized its below 1k, awesome quality
@LearnWithPaintАй бұрын
The explanations of fractals like the Serinsky Triangle and the concept of fractal dimension blew my mind. It's amazing how mathematics can turn seemingly simple objects into something so intricate and beautiful, especially with fractals like the Mandelbrot set. Awesome content!
@TheMiguelHuey4 күн бұрын
Sierspińky*
@emmanuelsimaurio6078Ай бұрын
The Legend of Zelda fans on the first one: ITS THE TRIFORCE
@shaquille656628 күн бұрын
1:32 The logarithmic notation of the emoji 😅to base 😄 is some next level genius explanation. Now, I'll never use the emoji without thinking about logarithms
@damarzrealm773117 күн бұрын
You forgot my blanket at 3am
@jsalsmanАй бұрын
If you're a mathematician and you find yourself compelled to denounce a function, it's time to take a step back and re-examine all the pertinent premises.
@raccoonmellows1243Ай бұрын
6:12 ALL HAIL THE ∞
@noonesknightАй бұрын
when your youtube feed is so cooked that you watch "every geometric shape explained"
@lukatolstov5598Ай бұрын
0:25 IDK he was from Poland, until I saw him in a math book. Now this video confirmed to me that he is from Poland.
@testname420Ай бұрын
The surnames give it away
@mrakat_27Ай бұрын
Cool
@4.0.4Ай бұрын
Fun fact the Sierpinski Triangle, and also the similarly constructed 3D shape the Menger Sponge, technically have no area/volume.
@scottydu81Ай бұрын
Your mother has no real area/volume
@MadScientyst22 күн бұрын
Brilliant exposition indeed! As a Math Lecturer the content is invaluable, worthy of subscription! Many thanks for highlighting the beauty of Seifert Surfaces, which hardly get due recognition. Now whilst not entirely geometric (Differential Geom., Chaos Theory, Complex Anaysis, etc), I'd suggest: *Polytopes (link to Crystallography) *4D Fractals *Riemann Surfaces *Hilbert Curves *Lie Groups *Conformal Mappings *Bifurcation Maps *Kusudama Origami (yes it's paper-folding, but Math knowledge helps immensely) ...To be included from an advanced study point of view & also to expose the sheer beauty of Mathematics...IMO 🤔
@MrSerbianOrthodoxАй бұрын
I have nothing to do with maths and science but I just like watching your videos!
@ForgottenInForestАй бұрын
The music matches your video so well😊
@AustinTheWeenieTickler19 күн бұрын
i have absolutely no idea what this video just said but i love it
@santipiola275222 күн бұрын
"Aparment complex? I find it quite simple"
@84bombsjetpack23Ай бұрын
My favorite is the Menger sponge. Bob SquarePants. 😂
@rayzhao491Ай бұрын
ohhhhhhh, who lives in a pinapple under the sea? SPUNCH BOP SQUER PANCE!
@DanialTarki18 күн бұрын
The Tesseract will always be favorite of these.
@matthewpollock9685Ай бұрын
0:00 Oh, this should be cool, I like science stuff. 1:50 Oh crap. What have I gotten myself into?
@floretionАй бұрын
Note the Sierpiński triangle is connected directly to quaternions via floretions.
@fullesteggАй бұрын
you are reading this
@Shack283Ай бұрын
Yes I'm reading
@GimmickvrАй бұрын
No, I’m not
@SanityInAnAmazonBoxShortsАй бұрын
I might be reading
@rapallayahuma9417Ай бұрын
And this
@AMig-ht8nwАй бұрын
And?
@glennlaroche152418 күн бұрын
Either I'm waayyy smarter than I thought, OR you are VERY good at explaining this stuff lmaoooo.
@fishy39815 күн бұрын
My absolute favorite, fractals
@dinoeebastianАй бұрын
I did a presentation for my highschool speech and debate class a few years ago about fractal geometry
@SpidermansSymbioteАй бұрын
I just barely passed high school math and youtube recommended this
@Evgeni_AleksandrovАй бұрын
The only time where calculus is useful in life: making videos like this one
@kingofawesomeness5375Ай бұрын
2:24 I have to point out the fact that you talk about "a world with only 3 dimensions" while showing a 2d representation of Earth
@isavenewspapers8890Ай бұрын
Yeah, a 2D representation is kinda the best you can do on a 2D screen. Maybe not this 2D representation specifically if you're picky about shading, but a 2D representation regardless.
@targuscincoАй бұрын
Thats a triforce. Just a really festive one. Its the triforce of fun summery colors
@damedanedameyodamenanoyo2594Ай бұрын
Less than two minutes in, I just wanted to see the funny shapes and my brain's already like, this shit's too complex for us bro
@JustSomeoneHiАй бұрын
I have no reason to be watching this but I'll do so either way education is nice
@anaisnintuitionАй бұрын
Please please please do statistics videos!! Im a psych student and want to learn more from you ahout cool statistics things
@zolvАй бұрын
00:00 Sierpiński triangle is not defined the way it's presented. It's defined as connecting middle points creating an internatl triangle. You even do this in 00:17 . If you want to be consistent, your triangle shouldn't be "divided" but rescaled and multiplied as previously in the video.
@isavenewspapers8890Ай бұрын
The Sierpiński triangle has multiple equivalent definitions.
@RibusPQRАй бұрын
You could say it has three equivalent definitions.
@zolvАй бұрын
@@isavenewspapers8890 True, not all of them are equivalent. E.g. If it's defined like in the video (by expanding), the side lenght and area go to infinity. If it's defined as original (by dividing), side and area are limited. Therefore these definitions are not the same.
@isavenewspapers8890Ай бұрын
@@zolv That's not expanding; it's shrinking and copying. The length of the outer boundary of each shape in the sequence remains the same.
@Justchillingstrangers201212 күн бұрын
Me watching this: This is incomprehensible but I like this-
@Mhebsandstuff0Ай бұрын
0:05 IS THAT THE LEGEND OF ZELDA??
@emory5533Ай бұрын
I understood some of this video
@aetheralmeowstic2392Ай бұрын
Sierpiński Triforce
@x88.berkayАй бұрын
Couldve added that shape of how a sphere needs to form to turn inside out without sharp edges
@Be_a_znigАй бұрын
Mandelbrot is my favorite.
@Yukicutiepatotie11 күн бұрын
I had a stroke trying to understand this video
@Shack283Ай бұрын
The tesseract one is the hardest thing to understand in my life☠️☠️☠️
@thatrobloxguyАй бұрын
penteract💀💀💀💀💀
@enoyna1001Ай бұрын
Women
@Shack283Ай бұрын
@@enoyna1001 no question☠️
@iimuffinsaur15 күн бұрын
Is this how I finally learn what a derivative is???
@matthewboire6843Ай бұрын
I find fractals so cool
@yackawaytubeАй бұрын
Great!
@SwagatronofcybertronАй бұрын
0:05 bros got the complete triforce
@JohnSmith-zw8vp4 күн бұрын
0:05 -- Triforce!
@The_PavaExplainer25 күн бұрын
Nice video
@crispbacon-wx8quАй бұрын
Honestly most of this was jibberish not because this video is bad but because I'm a little dumb, this does not mean I did not leave without learning anything! Good work
@Bcokjwdbc9 күн бұрын
1:05 wait 2,4,8 SO 4D TESSERACT IS 16
@argf-ur3ib24 күн бұрын
0:05 zelda refrence
@Theos-zj3ys17 күн бұрын
I didnt understand anythig but it was interesting to watch'
@Lunar994Ай бұрын
Huh, so that's what that Yume 2kki world is about.
@rjkrkkjАй бұрын
Love these
@modlich_30314 күн бұрын
oh wow, first time seeing someone pronounce a Polish name and Last name properly, whilst not being Polish themselves
@Garfield_MinecraftАй бұрын
A mathematician named Klein thought the Möbius band was divine. Said he: "If you glue the edges of two, you'll get a weird bottle like mine." POEM! 10:50 bruh this is like a meme equivalent in mathematics community LOL
@tukan1652Ай бұрын
What is the background music?
@_4pplePen623 күн бұрын
The first song is Minute Waltz by Chopin and the second is Badinerie by Bach
@reformajulesrowald9998Ай бұрын
I made a fractal, so if the creator of the sierpiński triangle was named sierpiński and it was a triangle. I call mine the rowald swastik-
@gamingdiamond1682 күн бұрын
0:05 the triforce
@LordShrek420Ай бұрын
0:08 IS THAT THE TRIFORCE?!
@isavenewspapers8890Ай бұрын
11:06 Wait a second, that's a Seifert surface of a trefoil knot, not a Hopf link.
@Phrogsage17 күн бұрын
IS THAT A TRIFORCE REFERENCE???🤺
@sheepyisthecutestАй бұрын
can someone explain what that triangle that appears in the beginning of the video means? I still don’t understand. what is scale up by 2?
@RibusPQRАй бұрын
Scale up by 2 means make it larger. Multiply the height by 2, and multiply the width by 2.
@sheepyisthecutestАй бұрын
@@RibusPQRohhhh, but why does that triangle become 3 times larger if scaled up by 2, not 4 times larger?
@RibusPQRАй бұрын
@@sheepyisthecutest That's the whole idea behind fractals. They take up a fractional dimension of space. A normal triangle is 2-dimensional, and this thing is 1.5-dimensional.
@MdDulal-t3gАй бұрын
/\/\/\ this is the only complexity i need know
@Hiljaa_Ай бұрын
Fly high Michigun 🕊️/\/\/\
@santumi229829 күн бұрын
5:20 too much for zblock
@lordtachanka8018 күн бұрын
"ADMIN HE'S DOING IT SIDEWAYS" 🗣🔊🔥🔥🔥
@12baumarobiАй бұрын
Is the Sierpinski Triangle considerd to be a type of Mandelbrot?
@isavenewspapers8890Ай бұрын
Depends on what "a type of Mandelbrot" is.
@RibusPQRАй бұрын
The Mandelbrot set produces a fractal. The Sierpinski triangle is also a fractal.
@thigmotropeАй бұрын
"If you scale up the dimensions of a sapinski triangle by a factor of two, it becomes three times as large. " How are we measuring largeness though? area?
@akkiaddizone6889Ай бұрын
He's talking about dimensions, so ofcourse it's area. How else would we measure the "largeness" of a 2d shape?
@The_Trident_Master15 күн бұрын
How is a definitionally 2D shape roughly 1.6D?
@strawberrymilk976725 күн бұрын
Rename this video to "how to fall asleep easily tutorial"
@cocomierАй бұрын
0:07 “Triforce”
@MizaiАй бұрын
pretty cool
@JuicyJam22 күн бұрын
Well, now I know where fallout new vegas: old world blues got their character names from.
@Ggman854Ай бұрын
I think this broke my brain
@CMDNPLYZ22 күн бұрын
Im in middle school and yet i still get it
@GlitchPloit28 күн бұрын
Bro I imagined a tesseract before I even learned about it????????
@marcelob.5300Ай бұрын
You're excellent, at least.
@Yabba_yabba_doКүн бұрын
KLEIN BOTTLE FROM TEAM ROOM 125 AGAIN IS THAT YOU😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱
@aleksanderagiurre29Ай бұрын
You get a like for all the classic memes, 🥹 so nostalgic
@nilsgensert5814Ай бұрын
Lots of German names here today.
@x88.berkayАй бұрын
nice
@KaleidoscopeGalaxy8 күн бұрын
What would a 3d model of a human look like in 4d with the tesseract thing
@Dark_Dragon1337Ай бұрын
I think I broke my brain Hjalp
@jasonromans3016Ай бұрын
6:10 AND BEYOND!
@Olliee70921 күн бұрын
where is geometry dash?
@Lizz-o4k10 күн бұрын
YUME 2KKI?!?!?!?!?!?!? Note: theres a actual world called sierpinski maze
@jerrylou9285Ай бұрын
Benoit Benoit Benoit Benoit..... Mandelbrot
@pedrocruz4409Ай бұрын
Lolols I’m a “closet” nerd. I got the feels at about 3:20 after closing concept of the tesseract, then it goes into my favorite: the möbius strip/Klein bottle!! Ufff I got a Maths boner… 😳😬😅
@SomeTouhouPlayerАй бұрын
Yooo i just realised illusion ultimate in elemental battlegrounds(a roblox game) is a tesseract
@TheWingus21 күн бұрын
No calabi-yau manifold? That shape doesn’t have enough dimensions to exist in the reality we can observe!
@Snake-l4g13 күн бұрын
lmao me watching these at 3 am
@QuizlzАй бұрын
i want more
@SuperiorStegoАй бұрын
Fractal, fractal, fractal, and ummm fractal
@scarletevans447428 күн бұрын
3:38 but we clearly can see that it is counterclockwise?? How can these two be indistinguishable??
@isavenewspapers889027 күн бұрын
You ever notice how, if a rotation looks clockwise from one side, it looks counterclockwise from the other side? Well, that's similar to what's happening here. When you look at the same rotation from a different orientation, your point of view gets flipped, so the rotation seems to be going the other way.