I just purchased new lap should i use screen guard or not? Pls clear me

Don't do this guys it's not safe for your monitor screen

I cant even ever open the amd software because it just says software isnt compatible with amd drivers.

Since you asked, yes, Doom Eternal was a fluke. That's one of the only games that will use all your cores. As of 2024, most games don't use more than six cores, so single-core performance is critically important. Newer CPUs have better single-thread performance, so they'll do better in games.

"I really enjoyed smashing people with a hammer."-- RestoTek, 2024

just bought a 11th kf today for 230 so its a good deal i think

5:15 From what I remember, nvidia GPUs use a software scheduler. The top frequency of the Xeon could be the reason for the low GPU utilization.

teh answer - yes its bad saved ya 15 min

Nice video👍 but 1 CPU is going to be faster in games because of the massive latency when you have 2 CPU. 1 Russian KZbinr already tested 1 and 2 CPU. Massive latency with 2 cpu

cpu/ram bottlenecked 5:10

So this dual cpu board is interesting.. what about, a quad version? for less than $200.00 in processors.. it's certainly tempting to try.. If nothing else I'm sure I could cook meals on it.

Try Doom 2016 on a "fast" P4 cpu (3.2ghz 2mb cache or faster) and your 3080ti using Vulcan. You will be surprised how playable it is.

It works on phone?

sadly windows cannot utilize all the cores but thanks for the video either way :D in Linus's video he used a threadripper and it only utilized 64 threads in a game made to use CPU

the board is the issue . dual channel ram plus those boards are weird so im betting thats why it cant see more then 16

YESSS SIRRR!! DO IT!

Toothpaste is good too

To remove the scratch you have to somehow polish the surface

This actually does not remove the scratch, vaseline only makes it invisible

For m.2 booting its better to modify BIOS or get modified BIOS. Its UEFI and there is UEFI Module to make m.2 bootable. But you'll need an adapter for it. There is few AM3 boards with m.2 - Crosshair 3.0, Gigabyte GA-990FX-Gaming and ASRock Fatal1ty 990FX Killer

Exactly! Just add a price for electricity bills for let’s say two years, and with this new price try to lookup a modern alternative. It will be better. It even could have an ECC RAM support. PS The only question for me is Threadripper 39x0X or i9-13900K ;) I’m not sure. Perhaps I prefer to go to a local store. That’s only the reason

Short answer: No, it's a solid cpu, very stable. Now if someone upgrades every gen, it would be lackluster. Also, you're using cheap Intel stock cooler on a flagship CPU, on that locked motherboard (which you gave disclaimer on), substantially nuked performance about 50% (I scored over 1200 in CB 24 multicore)

I was a bit lost on building a workstation with a i7 12700kf or 2 e5 2697v4 but this video convinced me to do xeon, it's also pretty cheap on aliexpress

Next time can you please show us the LOW 1% FPS? Thank you

in the first test for tomb raider, the steam os cpu was using 20% less cpu even if a few less frames, system will run cooler, similar results in GTA V. same thing in hogwarts legacy as well. the CPU is 20% less loaded than on windows. frames such because HL is poorly optimised but even the CPU is 4-5 degrees cooler as well. oncve heat soak from the windows system sets in it will slow down and much faster. also given the massive CPU usage power draw will also be much higher. hell divers CPU load and temps are almost identical but yet more frames. I feel like steamOS will yield better efficiency given the lower CPU usage and temps perhaps not by much but it matters where I live as we pay pretty high prices for power as far as the US market is concerned and Im sure the power is even more pricey for our friends across the pond great video, I have a 9590 sitting in the next room perhaps I'll throw steam OS on it for giggles and mess around. I feel inspired. subbed

cap, sorry :)

The problem with the i9 11900k is that it isn;t a i9, It's an i7. If the 11th gen was priced better, it might have been better recieved.

As a person who collects Sony's Walkman's, I can say that you physically offended me in so many ways and you will pay for my mental bills cause I'm going to a therapist 😭 😭 😭

On GTA V steamOS had locked 30fps, with double vsync, that wasn't a fair comparison

Why no 1% and 0.1% low bench mark?

It would be great if you could collect 1% and .1% lows next time. This way we could see the numbers for frame pacing, without having to resort to subjective feel, which differs from person to person A great video nonetheless

Oh yes... Fx 8300 stable at 5ghz. A good heater, but barely any performance.

Nice one, we need more OS for games only, F the features.

Man, I remember using the 8320e and oh boy that CPU was actually terrible.

Thanks for taking one for the team. ;-)

I got it for free from a buddy of mine lol so idc. Its way better then my old cpu

Definitely run benchmarks against a 4790k

"Pretty much nobody uses them anymore" Cries in FX6300.😭

There is no con in faster stronger smarter smoother. These other guys out there are being paid by asus, nvidia and others to promote one cpu "gaming boards" to have the need for the most expensive gpu.

a8 7600 , dota , cs , apex legend , valo

People these days should definitely seek out the prior gen Ryzen CPUs as they are at their cheapest in the user market. Leave the FX series in a museum.

I used mine back in the day as a Rust Dedicated server CPU,

Look the CPU usage in Linux is lower

ideal for temperature .... winter 😂😂😂😂🤗....

Bro, please test game for Rust/Escape From Tarkov

I've still got a 8350 in my older PC paired with a GTX 1080 and 16GB of RAM. Plays Starfield and Cyberpunk 2077 at ~30ish FPS @ 1200p. Gonna try it if can run Fallout 4 VR.

what aio did you use? i have a dual E5 2697 v4 with stock HP coolers , i want them gone lol

FX CPUs were pretty much ded on arrival

Which is more powerful fx 9590 or i7 4790?

AMD FX retails so high because some of their chips don't have telemetry built into them like all modern chips, they were the last series of chips not to have PSP (although some of the models did so you'll want to do your research first). Also you openly admitted that Linux was the better operating system for playing Tomb Raider but used a 2fps average to proclaim Windows the winner, my advice is to also record 1% and 10% lows which will show you which frame rate was actually more stable since that's generally what gamers actually care about...