@@SAMGO4 Thank you. Honestly, this is my first time using Ardupilot, so I am just a rookie. I did some autotuning in multirotor mode and tweaked some transition delays and speeds, but I can't remember exactly what changes I made. Sorry

@@washingtonstatepicker3460 3D printed. Build log in description.

@@washingtonstatepicker3460 I'm not sure if they still sell them.. I built this one myself

@@mauror79 3S and quad is custom. All info in video and description

I actually can't remember if I adjusted the camera settings here. Sorry

Search for "3d stunt double" on Thingiverse

@@jimlwolfe-empty-midwest yes, that is what I used here 👍

@@ampedfpv Great, thanks for the reply.

And what 18650 battery are you using?

@@ngedenkiondalle216 Yes, with a switch on my radio

@@unixoid33 Yes must have line of sight to go that far. I fly over flat land. Yes Prodrone antennas are awesome 👍

@@XingtoBattery Sorry I can't remember how much it weighed

@@NunoFlyer Yes it is. Polymaker LW-PLA

Yes. LOL

@@QEDFPV yes

@@mativve yes just to squeeze every bit of efficiency that I could.

@@ampedfpv Oh, okey :) thanks for fast reply 💪

@@giespot Details listed in the KZbin description. No antenna tracker. Just my head. It was heavy and my nose had a mark on it for a few hours after. LOL

Legend, thank you! ​@@ampedfpv

They are labelled as DJI replacement cells from Ali Express.

I looked into 21700's, but there's no way to keep it under 250g AUW. 18650's work of course, but the highest capacity available is 3500mAh with a continuous current of 10A. The problem with 18650 2S is if you take the cells right down to 2.5V each you're at 5V, which is technically below the minimum voltage rating for the FC. So for 2S at least, I've found that these high capacity, high volt lipo's are a better choice, because they aren't much heavier and you get more voltage over the whole discharge range. This means you can fly at a slightly higher average speed and when the pack is empty you're still at 6.6V.

@@tai9927 HAKRC F411 20A AIO (Rotorbuilds link in description for details)

Runcam Phoenix 2 SE

@@fordboyzzzz sure those components should get you 15km, but unlikely to keep it below 250g, if thats your goal.

@@jamesmichaelcabrera9613 ha ha. Ya, I don't know how that happened 😁

@@flyinbryanfpv you and me both 😁 nothing like pushing a little longrange to get the heartrate up!

@@personalunderstanding7055 Sounds like you're assuming I'm in the US, which I am not. In my country there is no altitude limit for sub 250g craft. FWIW though, I was rarely above 120m during this flight. I only blurred the altitude to avoid Karen comments.

@@ampedfpv You would not have need to blur if withing the limits. You can't call rarely above if for most of the flight altitude was blurred. To most that would indicate above 400ft for most of the flight or at least for the amount of time with blurred out altitude. Calling names (Karen) is a defensive move and a bit sad as comments and opinions from all should be welcome. Regardless you can't claim a record if you are outside the limitations of other pilots. Try again with altitude not blurred and under the 400ft.

​@@personalunderstanding7055 Again, I didn't need to blur the altitude, because I was in adherence to the regulations in my country. The only reason I blurred it, is to avoid potential questions/comments from viewers that assume I'm in the US. And I just blurred it for the whole flight to make editing easier. The term "record" is used loosely of course, because there is no governing body of FPV records and there are no specific "rules" regarding altitude limits, etc. This is just a fun personal challenge. And maybe you didn't noticed that the thumbnail has a question mark "Record?", so I'm not making any "claim" as you say. If you don't think it's eligible for a record, because I didn't stay below 400ft, that's your opinion and your welcome to it.

@@MatzeMaulwurf No, this turned out to be a font issue causing the home arrow to be incorrect.