3 ай бұрын
6 ай бұрын
11 ай бұрын
Жыл бұрын
Жыл бұрын
Жыл бұрын
Жыл бұрын
Жыл бұрын
Жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@rosabernal3148 53 минут бұрын
Barcelona has a telecomunication tower with 288 meters. Then has 3 skyscrapers
@pedroangeat3449 2 сағат бұрын
Top two: the less European the city is, the more skyscrapers it has
@PassionVille96 Сағат бұрын
There are also the most populous cities in Europe. I can say that with the top 4.
@mrklv1593 2 күн бұрын
Im sorry but american city downtowns and skyscrapers are extermely ugly and boring. Meanwhile in China, they have all unique architecture and much more modern vibes
@PassionVille96 Күн бұрын
I'm not agree, I think the US have the most diverse skyscrapers and skylines. It's true that some cities can be better (Phoenix, San Antonio, ...) but it's not worse than any other country. For example in New York there are way more remarquable and diverse skyscrapers than in Shenzhen (and there are a bit more skyscrapers in Shenzhen).
@rjg7112 4 күн бұрын
Yes, a loss of 100k over a short time is much different for L.A. than a small city like Youngstown. If the criteria were for municipalities with peaks of at least 10,000, then cities like East St. Louis, East Cleveland and Cairo Illinois would be on it.
@PassionVille96 4 күн бұрын
Yougnstown has lost 100k inhabitants in around 75 years compared to 3 years for Los Angeles. And yes, I saw there are a lot of cities (proper) that have lost more than half of their population. But in this video, I choose -50k for the limit. Otherwise it will be too complicated if the limit was -10k for example. Because I should have checked the statistics of maybe ten thousand of municipalities in the US to be sure that I didn't forget one of them, or more.
@drakeblackwood5893 5 күн бұрын
Coincidentally, every city listed is a shithole
@Alan-lv9rw 6 күн бұрын
McKinney!
@MrCho14 6 күн бұрын
Nice. For the future, I would highly suggest adding a quick map of where these are. The smaller cities aren't recognizable names so I had to keep pausing and doing my own search.
@jmo8934 7 күн бұрын
In terms of Detroit as you always hear about it from outside the US as a poster child for urban decay etc. The car industry has been gone out of there for the best part of 50 years. That industry is subject to change at the best of times with global players involved. Did anyone ever try seriously to establish another economic model for the place, something else people could do there rather than just watch it slip away a long long time ago and just watch everything slide into ruin?
@charlesmcclune8892 8 күн бұрын
All these cities have raised property taxes for decades to fund failing programs and did you notice Detroit has the highest loss of population and the highest taxes, yet in 1951 was the highest per capita income in the WORLD 😮 pay attention San Francisco you're next 🤨😎
@platonique 9 күн бұрын
We all know what the reasons are..
@mikeerlenbach3037 10 күн бұрын
Not sure why the “doom-n-gloom” music was in the background. It’s simply logistics; the US interstate highway system started in the early 50’s and 3-digit spur routes didn’t follow until the early to mid 60’s! That explains the exodus for 27 of the 33 listed
@frankblasky1296 10 күн бұрын
I think of the stranded assets from the population losses. How can these cities continue to operate if bonds for those assets are still outstanding? With fewer property tax payers the debt burden will suck all of the financial resources leaving less money for road, bridge maintenance and schools.
@petercena9497 11 күн бұрын
Great video, I'd like to point out several of these cities like Portland had tremendous growth up to 2020, and have since declined.
@PassionVille96 11 күн бұрын
Yes outside Portland it's mainly in California and in New York area that there was the same phenomenon. Primarly due to the cost of living I presume.
@dsdwtn5911 11 күн бұрын
I'm glad you state early on that this is based solely on city proper limits. This also makes the list meaningless. A city's economic power is based on it's greater metro stats. Many city's have small "city limits" but huge growth outside those limits.
@PassionVille96 11 күн бұрын
Yes I understand. But a lot of cities ranked (even within city limits) are huge by size. And for some of them there are a lot of abandoned places in an urban environment (Detroit is not the sole example). And linked to that the majority of the cities in this video have a low density for a core city. In this video, the only cities that have small limits by area compared to the total urban area are San Francisco (first place for sure), then New York, Boston, Washington DC, Providence. I can add Newark too even if it's not a core city. And I hesitate to include Chicago and Philadelphia. It's 6 or maximum 8 cities compared to 33.
@dsdwtn5911 11 күн бұрын
@@PassionVille96 Thank you for your reply. My point is the list does not speak to a cities overall economic growth as a metro stat would help identify. I'm not sure what "city limits" really tells me in todays world. It certainly doesn't speak to an urban core vitality as many cities are experiencing a renaissance that is not merely reflected in transitions in population. I work for a company where we decide where to expand on greater metro stats and an urban core's redevelopment and vitality.
@Tundra71 11 күн бұрын
No playgrounds for kids, no daycares in neighbourhoods. No good public transportation. This country not for regular people
@PassionVille96 11 күн бұрын
It's america... A very rich country but the money is used strangely. Even if I'm not american I know that public transports in the USA are not great at all compared to Europe or half countries of Asia, it's a nonsense.
@yoaaauuiohheee7726 12 күн бұрын
Good music 🎶
@PassionVille96 12 күн бұрын
Thank you!
@bmrz38 12 күн бұрын
Anyone else think of Risky Chrisky while watching this video?
@barryrahn5957 12 күн бұрын
Not very comforting is it?
@PassionVille96 12 күн бұрын
Yes and no. At least for most of the cities (or metro area) that lost inhabitants, the cost of living rising less than most of the cities that gain inhabitants. For example, a lot of cities in Texas becoming more expensive primarly due to their growing (Austin ...).
@BalBurgh 15 күн бұрын
This is somewhat misleading. While some of these places are tanking in a big way, others are holding their own, as the overall metro region continues to expand, albeit slowly. I would say this about Pittsburgh, in particular.
@jeffsmith1798 15 күн бұрын
Manufacturing based cities peaked in the 50s and 60s. After Clinton, these cities went into accelerated decline. What’s NYC, Chicago, San Francisco and LA’s excuse? Is it just poor government policies?
@PassionVille96 15 күн бұрын
For NY, LA or SF it's mainly due to the cost of living. It's now too expensive to live there and most people have a "normal" job, so they can have a similar career in a more affordable place. For Chicago it's different, the loss has begun in the 1950s, and the reasons are: more people went to the suburbs and there were fewer jobs in the industry.
@jeffsmith1798 15 күн бұрын
@ isn’t it interesting that the state and local tax policies of NYC, SF, and LA are so high as the cost of living becomes so high? ;-)
@richardmiller7622 16 күн бұрын
The loss in population has a different case in each city. I bet that with the cities with the highest population in 1950 had post war housing shortage causing overcrowding and the 50’s freeway construction removed thousands of home in these cities.
@PassionVille96 15 күн бұрын
Yes there are multiple reasons. It depends on the city and on the period.
@willp.8120 22 күн бұрын
33. Los Angeles : 2.00% <- Democrat run 32. New York : 6.20% <- Democrat run 31. San Francisco : 7.43% <- Democrat run 30. Washington D.C. : 15.36% <-Democrat run 29. Boston : 18.42% <-Democrat run 28. Minneapolis : 18.52% <-Democrat run 27. Milwaukee : 24.27% <- Democrat run 26. Providence : 24.74% <-Democrat run 25. Norfolk : 25.01% <-Democrat run 24. Philadelphia : 25.15% <-Democrat run 23. Chicago : 26.42% <-Democrat run 22. Jackson : 29.17% <-Democrat run 21. Toledo : 30.88% <-Democrat run 20. Newark : 31.06 % <Democrat run 19. Hartford : 32.54% <-Democrat run 18. Syracuse : 34.01% <-Democrat run 17. Akron : 35.01% <-Democrat run 16. Rochester : 37.66% <-Democrat run 15. Cincinnati : 38.27% <-Democrat run 14. Baltimore : 40.48% <-Democrat run 13. New Orleans : 41.97%<-Democrat run 12. Birmingham : 42.31% <-Democrat run 11. Camden : 42.92% <-Democrat run 10. Scranton : 47.24% <-Democrat run 9. Dayton : 48.34% ,<-Democrat run 8. Buffalo : 52.65% <-Democrat run 7. Pittsburgh : 55.19% <-Democrat run 6. Flint : 59.55% <-Democrat run 5. Cleveland : 60.36% <-Democrat run 4. Gary : 62.06% <-Democrat run 3. Youngstown : 65.23% <-Democrat run 2. Detroit : 65.76% <-Democrat run 1. St. Louis : 67.12% <-Democrat run 100% run by Democrats. Yet, they want to claim that they are "progressive". 🤡
@auvet1986 7 күн бұрын
You mean democrook
@spg5658 23 күн бұрын
Almoat no cities in the South
@PassionVille96 22 күн бұрын
Yes, only Birmingham and Jackson have lost a lot inhabitants in the city limits (proportionnaly). And since 2020 in the south it's mainly in the SF Bay Area and in LA Area that the lost is the most important. By the way, I don't know if San Francisco is considered as the South.
@b2dary890 21 күн бұрын
@@PassionVille96New Orleans has lost population also
@PassionVille96 21 күн бұрын
Yes it's true, I completely forgot!
@greatloverofmusic1 23 күн бұрын
One city's loss is another city's gain.
@mikewolfe3845 24 күн бұрын
Chicago metro area has increased to 9 million I believe
@PassionVille96 24 күн бұрын
9.62 Million in 2020
@JoeyKO757 24 күн бұрын
Keep voting for Democrats
@BENTennyson-o7z 25 күн бұрын
Bro where is mumbai ? Mumbai city have 252 skycrapers
@lifeonearth94 17 күн бұрын
In your dreams
@Daniel-hj8el 14 күн бұрын
It is on the list…
@PassionVille96 13 күн бұрын
On some websites, I saw that there are more than 200 skyscrapers in Mumbai in 2024. But for some of these buildings, the height is not officially clear, or the building is not finished yet or I was sometimes redirected to other skyscraper page when I want to saw more informations... Then I saw 102 skyscrapers on other websites, and there all the buildings existence and height were clear and confirmed. Otherwise still in 2024, I saw on every websites that there were 122 skyscrapers in India, so if this information is true it's impossible that there are 250 skyscrapers in Mumbai.
@BENTennyson-o7z 13 күн бұрын
@PassionVille96 bro actually Google don't have proper information you also know it we can't trust on Google but if someday you can visit Mumbai so you see the skyline then you can realise here is really have more than 252 skycrapers
@lifeonearth94 12 күн бұрын
@@PassionVille96 There are two difinitions of a skyscraper, a building taller than 100m or a building taller than 150m Nowdays the second one is mostly used
@girlgod7201 27 күн бұрын
Thats the official way skyscrapers are measured. CTC has a major spire well integrated with rest of bldg. Its not just a pole stuck on top like some. Fyi you can ggle skyscraperpage for a place with lots more info.
@vitaliiyarema 27 күн бұрын
Where all these people gone?
@PassionVille96 27 күн бұрын
Mainly to the Sunbelt. Or some people stayed in the same area but in the suburbs.
@Azizmations271 27 күн бұрын
Is it already done? That picture looks really hyper realistic
@PassionVille96 27 күн бұрын
No, it's expected that the tower will be completed in 2028 or 2029. But I would no be surprised if there are new delays or if the tower will be never completed.
@babakpakbaz 27 күн бұрын
gary. indiana. hasgone to nearly 0
@girlgod7201 27 күн бұрын
NOPE! TOTALLY WRONG! COMCAST TECH CENTER PHILADELPHIA IS #3. ITS THE TALLEST OFFICE TOWER IN WESTERN HEMISPHERE OUTSIDE OF NYC AND CHICAGO.
@PassionVille96 27 күн бұрын
By architectural height.
@neroignatiusrosewater 23 күн бұрын
Ease back on the caffeine, friend. You're gonna have a heart attack.
@covertguy1575 28 күн бұрын
I can guarantee the Cincinnati area lost probably 20 to 40 thousand people as a direct result of Delta dehubbing CVG airport and shutting down Comair. Chiquita, Toyota North American HQ, and several other large corporations left the Cincinnati Northern Kentucky area after that.
@r4jpyr24us3 28 күн бұрын
How about the population change of each metropolitans ? I am familiar with Detroit, suburbs are expanding, city center is under redevelopment, overall it looks getting nicer. when I took a public bus running on M1, Woodward Avenue, I noticed some part of the city looked troubled, however carrying traveling I could see posh residential areas in Oakland. ❤
@spg5658 23 күн бұрын
Detroit is growing now. It's an awesome City
@JCBinder7 29 күн бұрын
Populations fluctuate for all kinds of reasons. Someone once told me, “when the economy is expanding & doing real well - people move into the cities. When the economy is contracting & is cooling - people move to the suburbs.” I think they are right.
@stevenwilliambaylessparks3730 29 күн бұрын
Lots of fentanyl customers
@PassionVille96 28 күн бұрын
Baltimore, Philadelphia, San Francisco, ...
@mikekerr6747 29 күн бұрын
Urban sprawl
@PassionVille96 28 күн бұрын
One of the main reason.
@electricmediavideography9483 29 күн бұрын
Mostly due to everyone just moving right outside city limits in the suburbs so they can have more privacy and bigger homes. And to escape crime. the populations are still there, just not in city limits.
@r.pres.4121 29 күн бұрын
They would have to move to the outermost suburbs for all of that. The older first ring suburbs are higher density and have been in decline since the 1980 and 1990 Census readings.
@TheMotz55 Ай бұрын
Americans, for the most part, have no pride in their cities. It's sad that these cities have been so decimated. In the 50's and 60's they represented America's industrial might. I hope someday that everyone of these cities will experience a renaissance.
@PassionVille96 28 күн бұрын
There's hope. Some cities listed regain population since 2010 (Buffalo, Cincinnati, ...). And for other cities the decline has slow down for several years, and it's possible that these cities will regain inhabitants too (Detroit, Pittsburgh, …).
@alpat6374 25 күн бұрын
@@PassionVille96Dayton lost so much NCR Standard Register GM Crysler Harrison Radiator Mead Papers Appleton Papers Cox Media Huffy Bikes Cooper Tires we at one point in time was major a guy could graduate and maintain a decent living in area without going to college and forgive me for my many post I'm just pro Dayton
@BWyatt76 Ай бұрын
A lot of people in the 50's and 60's moved to the suburbs, so the metro area tells a different story. Many metro areas have stayed the same, or grown. However, cities have lost a lot of tax payers to the suburbs, and are broke
@r.pres.4121 29 күн бұрын
People have been moving further out from the older first ring suburbs since the 80s. What were once tiny country hamlets further out are now booming growing suburbs.
@kryptism Ай бұрын
U forgot Jacksonville, Raleigh, Tallahassee, & Oakland!😮
@tomfields3682 29 күн бұрын
They didn't lose population.
@PassionVille96 29 күн бұрын
Raleigh is the complete opposite.
@johnsullivan6843 Ай бұрын
But Scranton is so cool in 'The Office.' 🤔
@PassionVille96 Ай бұрын
Like most sitcoms, almost all the scenes were shot in studios in Los Angeles area... But even if Scranton has lost population in the past, the city can be cool anyway. Moreover the city hasn't lost inhabitants since 2000.
@Paradoxisthefingerprintofgod Ай бұрын
UGLIEST COUNTRY ON EARTH - AMERICA!!
@1aikane Ай бұрын
Several reasons probably......cost of living in urban areas is outrageous, crime rates, job availability, people want to live in a different place now throughout their life instead of staying in one place. Warmer places are more popular than colder ones.
@PassionVille96 Ай бұрын
I think the cost of living has become the number one reason since 2020.
@PassionVille96 Ай бұрын
The 33 cities ranked by percentage lost. 33. Los Angeles : 2.00% 32. New York : 6.20% 31. San Francisco : 7.43% 30. Washington D.C. : 15.36% 29. Boston : 18.42% 28. Minneapolis : 18.52% 27. Milwaukee : 24.27% 26. Providence : 24.74% 25. Norfolk : 25.01% 24. Philadelphia : 25.15% 23. Chicago : 26.42% 22. Jackson : 29.17% 21. Toledo : 30.88% 20. Newark : 31.06 % 19. Hartford : 32.54% 18. Syracuse : 34.01% 17. Akron : 35.01% 16. Rochester : 37.66% 15. Cincinnati : 38.27% 14. Baltimore : 40.48% 13. New Orleans : 41.97% 12. Birmingham : 42.31% 11. Camden : 42.92% 10. Scranton : 47.24% 9. Dayton : 48.34% 8. Buffalo : 52.65% 7. Pittsburgh : 55.19% 6. Flint : 59.55% 5. Cleveland : 60.36% 4. Gary : 62.06% 3. Youngstown : 65.23% 2. Detroit : 65.76% 1. St. Louis : 67.12%
@JdeC1994 Ай бұрын
Thank you. The % loss is the real issue.
@patbrennan6572 29 күн бұрын
Thank you for all that work , saved me a lot of time.
@NormanSilver 28 күн бұрын
San Francisco may even have more than stated
@brianh9358 4 күн бұрын
Although some of these cities lost population within the city limits the overall population of the metro areas hasn't decreased, and in some cases has increased.
@mattwoolsey2758 Ай бұрын
We as a nation need to turn the suburban nightmare into the urban dream.
@patatebanine4278 Ай бұрын
All because of baskettball people
@greatloverofmusic1 23 күн бұрын
Thanks for filling the stupid comment quota.
@patatebanine4278 23 күн бұрын
@greatloverofmusic1 Tell me I'm lying. Im black canadian btw
@greatloverofmusic1 23 күн бұрын
@@patatebanine4278 I'm not calling you a liar. I'm calling you an ignoramus. You know as much about American cities as I do the Canadian national healthcare system (btw the game is called basketball and I happen to play it).
@T.Webster-h5b Ай бұрын
Meaning the population that has stayed and makes up 80 percent are blacks .
@JdeC1994 Ай бұрын
NewsNow_2050 (as of 12-9-2024): "It’s really just Chicago blood Milwaukee on the other hand is doing good" Nope. Milwaukee has lost population for the last SIX decades. Last I checked, this decade is showing more loss. As for Chicago, it had 617 homicides last year. If Milwaukee had the same population as Chicago, it would've had about 800 homicides.
@JdeC1994 Ай бұрын
Why are you ranking them by gross loss? The real issue is the % lost-duh!🙄
@r.pres.4121 29 күн бұрын
Gross loss are the real numbers. Duh!
@JdeC1994 29 күн бұрын
@@r.pres.4121 Peak populations are just as real-duh!🙄