Wrong. Mass does not become infinite at the speed of light. Matter does not 'dilate'. And there is no such thing as dark matter. When you base your observation on false science, you are going to get 'sphegetification' nonsense Newton's Laws of Motion. For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. To accelerate mass forward, mass is accelerated on the opposite direction. Its how you get cargo into orbit. Rocker engines turn the ships mass into thrust. By doing so, the ship ends uobwith less mass in final orbit. Where did the mass go? It was turned into energy that disapated into space. No different that taking a car out for a drive. The energy in gas tank gets transformed into carbon emissions and expelled out the tail pipe. Gravity is a false narrative. There is no gravitational attraction. Galaxies are not held together by gravity. The earth does not get its motion in space from the sun. It charts its own course through space, independent of any other object not in direct contact. Thats like saying pool balls are gravitationally attracted to each other and to the pockets. F=ma and the inverse square law of motion. As mass increases, acceleration decreases and vice versa. You cant have infinite mass and infinite acceleration.

I'd like to go visit Hoag's Galaxy one day & find out for myself !!

Relativity forbids astronomical concentrations of mass. Einstein wrote in 1939 - "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (he was the first to raise the issue of Relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light." He was referring to dilation/gamma. It's the phenomenon our high school teachers were talking about when they said "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". This doesn't mean mass increases, it means mass becomes spread throughout spacetime relative to an outside observer. Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation, it's not just time that gets dilated. Even mass that exists at 75% light speed is partially dilated. It occurs wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers. The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. More precisely, everywhere you point is equally valid. In other words that mass is all around us. Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has been confirmed in 6 ultra diffuse galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter. In other words they have normal rotation rates.

This is a highly informative channel

Oof. Just awful. Ai sucks.

There might be more of these ring objects, but oriented edge on, which would look just like any "normal" edge-on spiral. Unless we can differentiate a clean tilted ring vs. those of spiral messes, we'd never know.

It would be nice if the English subtitles were uploaded at the same time.

Scientists must stop spreading the myth of "Dark Matter", "Dark Energy", "Unobservable Universe Theory", and etc., etc., etc. ... or they will get hit by another Copernican Revolution. We've spent almost a century to find Dark Matter and Dark Energy but still there's no sign of them. No matter what we do, a thing that doesn't exist cannot be found even if we can justify its existence mathematically. May be it is time to find an Alternative Way to Explain Dark Matter and Dark Energy. 4-D Hypershere model of Universe can easily explain Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Void and even the reason why the measurement values of Expansion Rate are around 70 km/sec-Mpc. Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Gravity, Void and Antigravity, ... all these are same phenomena. They just look different. I agree to the idea that the interaction between mass and space must be explained with quantum mechanics. But that doesn't mean gravity is the QM phenomena. That's because gravity is not a force. Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Gravity, Antigravity, Void... all these are just joint effects of the expansion of the Universe and the curvature of spacetime. Details are given below. Einstein’s theory of General Relativity states that spacetime is curved by the presence of mass. This curvature influences the motion other objects with mass and gives rise to gravitation. Thus, gravity is a result of geometric features in spacetime. However, we also observe gravitational effects - curvature of spacetime - in areas without any detectable mass. This has given rise to the concept of dark matter, which is matter that does not interact in any detectable way with normal matter, except through gravity. So, there is some large quantity of dark matter scattered throughout the universe, which curves spacetime and causes gravitational effects just like normal matter, but we cannot see or detect it with any known method. An alternative theory to the identity of dark matter is proposed - it is not matter at all, but rather an intrinsic curvature of spacetime. In other words, spacetime is not naturally flat. Even in the absence of matter, we observe some inherent curvature of spacetime. So, the question is now - why is spacetime naturally curved? Why is it not flat in the absence of mass? The universe is 4-dimensional, with 3 spatial dimensions and one dimension in time. Rather than consider time as a linear dimension, we can consider it as a radial one. Therefore, rather than describing the universe with a Cartesian coordinate system, we describe it with a 4-dimensional spherical coordinate system - 3 angular coordinates, φ1, φ2, φ3, and one radial coordinate in time, t. We live on the 3-dimensional surface of a 4-dimensional bubble which is expanding radially in time. Thus, the Big Bang represents t=0, the beginning of time. The crucial point is that the expansion of the universe is not homogeneous in all directions. The expansion rate at one point on the bubble’s surface may differ slightly from another point near it. The universe is only roughly spherical in 4 dimensions, the same way that the Earth is only roughly spherical in 3 dimensions. The same way we observe local mountains and valleys on the surface of Earth, we observe local “mountains” and “valleys” on the surface of the universe bubble. The inhomogeneity of the expansion of the universe has given rise to natural curvature of spacetime. This natural curvature causes the phenomenon of “dark matter”. “Valleys” in spacetime pull matter in, similarly to the warping of spacetime of massive objects. So “dark matter” is really “valleys” in spacetime that are expanding slower than the regions surrounding it. These valleys tend to pull matter in and create planets, stars, and galaxies - regions of space with higher-than-average densities of mass. Conversely, “mountains” in spacetime will repel matter away, an “anti-gravitational” effect, which gives rise to cosmic voids in space where we observe no matter. Each point on the surface of the universe bubble traces out a time arrow in 4-dimensional space, perpendicular to the surface. These time arrows are not parallel to each other since the universe is not flat. This causes points to have nonzero relative velocity away from each other. It is generally accepted that the universe is expanding faster than observable energy can explain, and this is expansion is believe to be still accelerating. The “missing” energy required to explain these observations has given rise to the theory of dark energy. The time dilation caused by non-parallel time arrows can be proposed as an explanation for dark energy. Alternatively, dark energy is real energy coming from potential energy gradients caused by non-parallel time arrows. As a sanity check, we can calculate the expansion rate of the universe based on the universe bubble model. Since the radius of the universe bubble is expanding at the speed of light in the time direction, it increases at 1 light second per second. Therefore, the “circumference” of the 3-dimensional surface increases by 2π light seconds per second, or about 1.88*10^6 km/s. This expansion is distributed equally across the 3-dimensional surface, so the actual observed expansion rate is proportional to the distance from the observer. At present, the age of the universe is estimated to be 13.8 billion years, so the radius of the universe bubble is 13.8 billion light years, or about 4233 megaparsecs (3.26 million light years to 1 Mpc). Thus, we can calculate the expansion rate of the universe, per megaparsec from the observer, as: Expansion rate = ((d(circumference))/dt)/radiusofuniverse=(1.88*〖10〗^6 km⁄s)/(2π*4233Mpc)=(1.88*〖10〗^6 km⁄s)/26598Mpc=70.82(km⁄s)/Mpc The popularly accepted empirical expansion rate is 73.5 +/- 2.5 km/s/Mpc, so our calculated value is close. There may be some additional source of expansion (or observed red shift) to make up for the discrepancy. For example, if two adjacent points have some gravitational gradient due to non-parallel time arrows, then light passing through these points will be red-shifted. - Cited from www.academia.edu/82481487/Title_Alternative_Explanation_of_Dark_Matter_and_Dark_Energy

An assumption of lamdaCDM is that the universe is infinite but expanding. If something is infinite then you could never prove it's expanding. So I just assume that black holes are absorbing matter over time, which lowers the temp of the universe, thus accounting for the cosmic redshift. When that's finished, all that's left is Hawking radiation, which gradually fills the universe, until it reaches a flashpoint, i.e. another big bang, and the process starts over. No need for dark energy or inflation and Einstein gets his static universe, yay!

We are still waiting a picture from the James Webb

Bring the evidence which can be seen and proven in reality not on papers...

What rubbish this whole thing is.... Don't make theory after having drugs

Hire a human to do your voice over. As another user mentioned, "I - Uh" should be "One - A". If we think about it, other systems may give us helpful analogies, e.g. air pressure in weather generation - high pressure areas give rise to higher winds flowing into lower pressure regions. 'High pressure' areas could perhaps be analogous to areas of higher temperature in the CMB which eventually became higher density areas of matter.

3:44 "Type (pronounced in video) eye-uh supernovae..." Printed, those phenomena would be 'Type 1A' One-A.

Great vid! I didn’t know timescapes was that old but I did hear recently about it. I think dark energy is a measuring error.

Let’s say hypothetically if we brought back to earth a couple of Great Lakes volume of water and organic matter from ceres. Portion them off into giant agar dishes (maybe pour a bit of crude oil in one to see what it does) exposed to various climates and environments at quarantined , atmospherically (probably) controlled/isolated facilities, then hit them a few hundred trillion times with very powerful pulses of energy, like lightning (or a close to the equivalent we can get). I think there’s a good chance of getting pretty close, or bugger all of nothings progress to “finding life” on Ceres.

I'll narrate these videos for you. This ai voice stuff is an immediate thumbs down.

Im confused.. how an object way smaller than earth can contain more water than earth… we already all water

Ceres into orbit around Mars will kickstart the Martian planet-core and bring Mars to life...

This might not be possible, but here goes my thoughts on Hoag's Object. What if it is nothing more than a supersized version of a Saturn like planet, but in this case it's a double galaxy. We now know that saturn like rings are more common than we at first thought. There's even a dwarf planet that has a double ring, and 2 moons; and the dwarf planet is egg shaped rotating once every 3 hours, end over end! Scientists would have rejected this possibility as wild speculation, but then it is discovered. Like Hoag's Object, no model yet described by astrophysicists can explain its existence, yet it exists. I think Hoag's Object is a galaxy sized version of a ringed planet. And it probably was formed in a similar way.

Would prefer a human voice and not AI. Also please ensure you pronounce Uranus correctly. It's typically a hard pass for me for any channel that stops to incorrectly pronouncing it.

Dude. You got me excited about Ceres…. You are a legend in the making.

The AI generated voice is disturbing and cold. No sense of humanity whatsoever. PLEASE do your own narration, or have a human friend do them for you.

Because the physics of fluid dynamics is constantly at work in space and in the spaces that appear devoid of matter yet are literally filled with gases and fluids and solids that sometimes work like mirrors when viewed from a few hundred light years away Space is literally churning like a giant cauldron that we can’t see but can be certain that it is happening right now!

We can see it now, but are we seeing the real deal like we see the ring but is the ring reacting to the light and heat from the star at its center?

When supernova occurs the super heated matter shoots out into deeper space where temperatures can exceed -14 K so firey stuff will get trapped by the rapid cycling of physics of fluid dynamics does its thing. Where we see nothing can be masses of gases in frozen solid form where hydrogen freezes solid or at the least is in a liquid state as the temperature differential is just wicked!

It’s an old black hole, just wait till it goes supernova

You really need to narrate this yourself, i skip any videos with AI narration. Just some friendly words of advice :)

GRAVITY IS TO WEAK ?? Gravity is a weak force, or you would not even be able to raise your leg off the ground. More importantly Gravity is a Linear Straight Line Force ! Gravity moves at approximately the Speed of Light (Much too slow). It therefore takes Gravity about 8.5 minutes to travel between the Earth & the Sun. But both Earth & the Sun are moving. Indeed the Sun is moving at around 2000mph, on its steady journey around our Spiralling Milky Way Galaxy. So in 8.5 minutes neither object is where Gravity is "aiming". Which would result in all the planets going off course, and disappearing into deep space. Further Gravity has a definite limit to its range, the Suns Gravitational field fades out with distance and only reaches some way beyond Pluto. Not nearly far enough to explain why the Solar System is part of the much bigger Galaxy, and doesn't simply disappear into inter-galactic space. In other words Gravity cannot explain anything that Circles or Spirals. So what controls the Solar system or indeed the Galaxy has to be a force far, far bigger and stronger than Gravity. Indeed a force that naturally likes to Spiral ! And there is only one such force, and its called Electricity. Indeed Electricity in space is 10 to the power of 39 times greater than Gravity. That's TRILLIONS & TRILLIONS of times greater than Gravity. And Electricity is NOT limited to the speed of Light, it travels TRILLIONS of times faster. Radio Astronomers who conducted a test some years ago, bounced an electrical pulse off a Star on the far side of the Andromeda Galaxy, a journey there and back of 4 Million Light Years. Gravity would have taken 4 Million years if it had been powerful enough. But the Electrical pulse did the journey in less than ONE SECOND. As a result a number of IEEE Scientists (that's Electrical Scientists), are of the opinion Electricity may in fact be instantaneous across the whole Universe ! Electricity's power and speed is of course big enough to explain what powers all the Universe. And as Electricity in Space "spirals" (the plus and minus threads intertwine at up to 3 Light years apart) in what are called "Birkeland Currents" (Named after Professor Kristian Birkeland who in 1903 discovered the electrical connection between the Earth & the Sun and earned a Nobel prize for this discovery.) So the repetitious references in this programme to "Gravity" are totally incorrect. Galaxies and everything else in the Universe are powered by Electricity ! THE UNIVERSE IS ELECTRIC - THERE ARE NO ISLANDS IN SPACE - CHECK OUT PROF DONALD E. SCOTT AND HIS PROGRAMME BIRKELAND CURRENTS & ELECTRICITY IN SPACE.

How crazy would it be if when they assess the rotation of the inner and outer galaxy they found them to be rotating in opposite directions at similar speeds maybe one of the few ways I could think that this could get any weirder

I mean the universe is pretty big, The odds of two really really rare Galaxy types just lining up on the right plane to superimpose on each other is unusual yeah but I mean there's probably tons of other planets that have similar phenomena... There are a lot of weird strange coincences though like for example when we have lunar eclipses if we were just slightly different in our orbit or any of another bunch of different factors it wouldn't appear that and I don't think there are tons of examples of being able to have such a perfect eclipse and many other places, And this is actually changing in the far future the eclipses won't be nearly so perfect. Imagine if we meet some other intergalactic civilizations and stuff before that happens I could see tourists coming All the way to Earth to be spectators of that It's such a fantastically rare coincidence, It would definitely be worth firing up the faster than light drive for

bullseye!

Is the voice AI or no? Just curious.

I've never thought about that. But you're right. Why is our Star alone?? We should be able to see its siblings really bright in our sky but we dont

Love this channel!

Please oh please run your scripts past an editor who has any knowledge of science. You would embarrass yourself less.

What gets me is at one o'clock on the image ( inside the rim), there's a SECOND galaxy, exactly the same. What are the chances of that? Two similar extremely rare objects in the same image? Someone work out the odds please .

Would that, if we could understand any of it, make us if not einsteins at least one of the great science minds !?

With such a mental capacity for at least most of us, we wanna go on presuming to understand where everything is out there. Especially after we learnt that the universe is expanding rather rapidly. And that all our planets move around the sun in very different ways rather circular motions.

I am here but where are you ? If you told me your exact location of where you are, I would only just be able to figure it some.

Slight misfire. When they showed Hoag's Object rotating the similar object in the far distance rotated in space in sympathy with the foreground galaxy. Oops. Good video, though.

Such a great coverage! I only knew about JuMBO 😁

Thank you🙏

What you are looking at is an electric plasmoid. Black holes are the Doctrine of the Devil.

Voice sucks.

Great video 👍😀 Finally not a A.I. generated garbage with random stuff promising new webb discoveries 🤢

Once these so called scientists accept that electricity, magnetism and plasma are fundamental in shaping this universe, things will become clear to them.

And the aliens that are living on a planet orbiting a yellow star on the edge of the central bulge in the middle of the gap, think the Milky Way is uninhabitable because of all the radiation from the younger stars. and the star formation in the galactic disc...

It was engineered.

DARK MATTER COULD BE PART OF THE EMPTY RING