how to find theta value from this

WAOW AMAZING EXPLANATION LOVELY SIR

They are nutty not to realize that e/2 times 101 is the fine structure constant. The fine structure is e/2, the mass of the electron that you see in front of you at rest, x101 means it contains 101 DIMENSIONLESS unit particles, made of the original prime number 1, of the unit particle dimension . 101 is the 26the prime in the series, therefore the electron is the 26th prime of reality. You cannot exist without being part of the prime dimensions. Your level of existence is the sum of all that exists, e is the sum of all that exists.

baraka llahe fik

SUPPOSED THE ELECTRON IN ENERGY LEVEL HE CANT COLIDE WITH THE ATOMS RIGHT ?

U GOT THAT INFORMATION FROM SUPJECT CALLED CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS RIGHT ? I WANT TO BE LIKE AWARE OF THOSE STUFF

❤❤

Isn't the crystallographic data base inbuilt in the software ?

How am i supposed to sketch it graph

This derivation is wrong! Maxwell equations have source terms and you can not set them to zero if the fields are emitted by a source. Instead the wave equation must be set equal to a source term, and when this inhomogeneous PDE is solved, one sees that the phase vs distance relation from the source is nonlinear in the nearfield and only approximately linear in the farfield. Applying well known relations for the phase and group speed which are proportional to the imverse of the slope of the phase curve, shows that the phase speed, and group speed are instantaneous in the nearfield and reduce to about speed c in the farfield,.starting about 1 wavelength from the source, and never becomes exactly c even at astonaumical distances from the source. So, the speed of light is not a constant as once thought, and this has now been proved by Electrodynamic theory and has also bewn proved by Experiments done by many independent researchers. The results clearly show that light propagates instantaneously when it is created by a source, and reduces to approximately the speed of light in the farfield, about one wavelength from the source, and never becomes equal to exactly c. This corresponds the phase speed, group speed, and information speed. Any theory assuming the speed of light is a constant, such as Special Relativity and General Relativity are wrong, and it has implications to Quantum theories as well. So this fact about the speed of light affects all of Modern Physics. Often it is stated that Relativity has been verified by so many experiments, how can it be wrong. Well no experiment can prove a theory, and can only provide evidence that a theory is correct. But one experiment can absolutely disprove a theory, and the new speed of light experiments proving the speed of light is not a constant is such a proof. So what does it mean? Well a derivation of Relativity using instantaneous nearfield light yields Galilean Relativity. This can easily seen by inserting c=infinity into the Lorentz Transform, yielding the GalileanTransform, where time is the same in all inertial frames. So a moving object observed with instantaneous nearfield light will yield no Relativistic effects, whereas by changing the frequency of the light such that farfield light is used will observe Relativistic effects. But since time and space are real and independent of the frequency of light used to measure its effects, then one must conclude the effects of Relativity are just an optical illusion. Since General Relativity is based on Special Relativity, then it has the same problem. A better theory of Gravity is Gravitoelectromagnetism which assumes gravity can be mathematically described by 4 Maxwell equations, similar to to those of electromagnetic theory. It is well known that General Relativity reduces to Gravitoelectromagnetism for weak fields, which is all that we observe. Using this theory, analysis of an oscillating mass yields a wave equation set equal to a source term. Analysis of this equation shows that the phase speed, group speed, and information speed are instantaneous in the nearfield and reduce to the speed of light in the farfield. This theory then accounts for all the observed gravitational effects including instantaneous nearfield and the speed of light farfield. The main difference is that this theory is a field theory, and not a geometrical theory like General Relativity. Because it is a field theory, Gravity can be then be quantized as the Graviton. Lastly it should be mentioned that this research shows that the Pilot Wave interpretation of Quantum Mechanics can no longer be criticized for requiring instantaneous interaction of the pilot wave, thereby violating Relativity. It should also be noted that nearfield electromagnetic fields can be explained by quantum mechanics using the Pilot Wave interpretation of quantum mechanics and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (HUP), where Δx and Δp are interpreted as averages, and not the uncertainty in the values as in other interpretations of quantum mechanics. So in HUP: Δx Δp = h, where Δp=mΔv, and m is an effective mass due to momentum, thus HUP becomes: Δx Δv = h/m. In the nearfield where the field is created, Δx=0, therefore Δv=infinity. In the farfield, HUP: Δx Δp = h, where p = h/λ. HUP then becomes: Δx h/λ = h, or Δx=λ. Also in the farfield HUP becomes: λmΔv=h, thus Δv=h/(mλ). Since p=h/λ, then Δv=p/m. Also since p=mc, then Δv=c. So in summary, in the nearfield Δv=infinity, and in the farfield Δv=c, where Δv is the average velocity of the photon according to Pilot Wave theory. Consequently the Pilot wave interpretation should become the preferred interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. It should also be noted that this argument can be applied to all fields, including the graviton. Hence all fields should exhibit instantaneous nearfield and speed c farfield behavior, and this can explain the non-local effects observed in quantum entangled particles. *KZbin presentation of above arguments: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qZazlX1tq7iErLM *More extensive paper for the above arguments: William D. Walker and Dag Stranneby, A New Interpretation of Relativity, 2023: vixra.org/abs/2309.0145 *Electromagnetic pulse experiment paper: www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.170862178.82175798/v1 Dr. William Walker - PhD in physics from ETH Zurich, 1997

Thankyou sir for explain

Provide me the text file

Thank you dear.

Thanks for the help!

Hello sir... The video is good but I have only one doubt whether this 2 is for indirect bandgap or for direct bandgap? Can you please tell me if we use 2, which bandgap will we get and if we use 1/2, then which bandgap will we get?

thx man

Thanks alot sir❤.

This is an interesting problem related to rest mass. kzbin.info/www/bejne/rKmVpaWgprmSgZo

Thank youuuuu

How long does it take to run the BAND?it seems forever.

What about xx yy zz data for Seebeck coefficient ? How we can get it

Exactly what I've been looking for ❤🎉

what is the unit of fwhm usinng this method?

I don't know how to thank you you really helped me a lot thanks again

Thank you so much <3

Thanks👍👍👍

Merci mon ami !!

How can i install boltztrap in 2020 version

شكرا 😅

learn english piece of s*it

thank you

It would have been great if there was no music and voice over of the work.

❤

Very helpful! Thank you!

Thank you for your help 😊. Finally I grasped the concept

Thanks!

Very well explained

Hii Thank you. I have installed .exe file. I am able to run .exe in cmd also. But after that, commands in cmd not working. I have not installed cygwin, MPICH and psedopotentials. Are these necessary to install?

thank you so much!!

what will be the value of S for solution method, using standard 1cmX1cm cuvette

Now you have solved it ❤❤

I am searching the ans of this question 1 hour ago

Love you ❤

Thank you so much

how to make a pie chart? I managed to make it in one file, then in another file it didn't appear

How to create a bcc structure

Thanks a lot🙏🏻🙏🏻🙇🙇

How to calculate Raman shift in graph data??

Werd

do we need to download boltztrap2 ? from which website?