Arnhem report,has the real people and the actors who portrayed them in The Bridge too far film,Captain Mac kay is interviewed too.
@Pvanderborg8 сағат бұрын
Ernhem
@organicpaul8 сағат бұрын
Superb!
@organicpaul9 сағат бұрын
Fascinating.
@martynmcnulty78212 сағат бұрын
I have visited Omaha Beach ! a very humbling experience 😢
@johnbremner145321 сағат бұрын
Enjoyed this series of historical walks, kudos to you chaps. Would you fellows consider walking the ground of the 51st Highland Division in any future ventures you may be planning? As you no doubt know, they were involved in some pivotal actions during the war from North Africa, Sicily and Northern Europe both at Dunkirk as part of the BEF and after D Day. I feel they deserve to have a light shone on them as they are largely forgotten. The 5th Battalion, The Seaforth Highlanders are of particular interest to me as they are from my local area. I have read the book “Sans Peur” which is basically the War Diary and no doubt there are stories that would benefit from your articulate portrayals. Keep up the good work chaps 🫡🇬🇧
@citizenVader22 сағат бұрын
Anyone else who travel to Arnhem every September to participate in the airborne march? I've been there there at least 10 years and done the march 4 times. Greetings from Denmark 🇩🇰
@stevenpiper97022 сағат бұрын
What of the Son bridge?
@Mad-Hatter-Man23 сағат бұрын
I have Leo Heaps book Grey Goose of Arnhem.
@Harryhas26Күн бұрын
This really shows the fight around the bridge covered a much large area than I previously thought. I know you can never judge history from movies but the film makes it out to be just a few buildings nearer the embankment that were occupied.
@thefilmandmusicКүн бұрын
But could you put deck chair up blindfolded
@jamesross1799Күн бұрын
One of my grandads best friends was captured at osterbeek hed been glider borne infantry.
@philipwells2793Күн бұрын
I would love a recommendation for a well balanced book on this subject.
@davemac1197Күн бұрын
Arnhem 1944: An Epic Battle Revisited vols 1 and 2, Christer Bergström (2019, 2020). A Swedish historian, Bergström comes across as being very unbiased and used unpublished documents and interviews from the Cornelius Ryan Collection of his WW2 papers held at Ohio State Univerisity (much of it digitised and available online) that did not make it into A Bridge Too Far (1974). Ryan said in his defence he was primarily interested in the personal stories of the people involved and was not writing a comprehensive history, but of course his work is taken as a comprehensive history and not challenged enough. Bergström also seeks to debunk the many myths in the Hollywood film, which was based on Ryan's book and is compromised by Attenbrough's anti-establishment politics and the American producer's and screenwriter's own motives to entertain and present an American point of view - the film was financed by pre-selling the US distribution rights to United Artists on the strength of the cast's guaranteed box office. My only criticism is the use of Robert Kershaw's German order of battle (OOB) data in sidebars from his own book, It Never Snows In September (1990), which is a book I would still recommend, but it comes with a health warning that it is out of date and contains some errors, but it is 'the' pioneering work on the German side of the battle and until someone does an update it is still the best out there without going into the specialist book market on German units. Bergström is a military historian and not a MARKET GARDEN specialist, so he has not picked up the errors in Kershaw's work. On that score, I am highly anticipating a new book by Dutch expert on German armour, Marcel Zwarts' new book, Einsatz Arnheim - German Armoured units and their opponents at Arnhem and Oosterbeek September 1944 (due February 2025). This updates his own 2001 book German Armoured Units at Arnhem September 1944, which he freely admits is out of date and contains errors as well. Such is the nature of historical research, the frontier is always moving. This is a specialist coffee table type book and the price tag will reflect that. If you want a more modest general coffee table type book, Operation Market Garden: September 1944 by Simon Forty and Tim Timmermans (2018) is a beautiful book with 'then and now' style photos of the battlefield (the 'now' photos are in colour) and some good maps and documents included. The ultimate in photo and documentary reference is After The Battle magazine's publication Operation Market Garden Then and Now, edited by Karel Margry (2002) in two volumes, were very expensive (I think £40 each when new) but now only £25 each volume, an absolute bargain. In 800 pages, I'm only aware of one incorrectly captioned photo, and that is astonishing for two huge volumes now 23 years old. If you combine Bergström and Margry's volumes, you would have a comprehensive history, photo and document reference, for the operation.
@borchen07 сағат бұрын
@@davemac1197 What's your opinion of Arnhem by Antony Beevor?
@davemac11973 сағат бұрын
@@borchen0 - wasted the money buying it. Learned nothing new except a joke ('you know why it's called operation Market? It's because we've all bought it' - credit to Neville Hay, Phantom Signals Regiment). Around the same time I got Anthony Tucker-Jones' The Devil's Bridge (2020), which I hoped would be an update of Kershaw's work on the German side of the operation, but again learned nothing new except for a German unit ID that I found checking back in Cornelius Ryan's interview bibliography (a lot of Ryan's interviews didn't make it into the text of the unfinished book because of his terminal cancer), which tells me they haven't advanced the research frontier with either of these books, or even used the latest research to catch up with the frontier. Beevor in particular has recycled the Cornelius Ryan narrative I presume to sell books in the lucrative US market - we have a word for that in the UK - he's a 'tart'. It's interesting that on some of the KZbin videos where he discusses topics like Arnhem, the comments are turned off - that might tell you something. TIKhistory channel has done a video review of the book and you can watch that and read the comments - kzbin.info/www/bejne/nKOcY3Wtns18pbc I have a lot of respect for TIK and I think he's quite generous when he summarises the book as 'good, but based on a flawed argument.' He suggests reading Robin Neillands' book as well to get some perspective on Beevor, which I haven't done. I would have to be convinced that Neillands, although he is highly recommended, is ahead of me on the research frontier to justify spending the money, so I can't comment on Neillands. Both my copies of Beevor and Tucker-Jones were donated to the Oxfam Bookstore under Covid conditions, so they were more trouble than they were worth to me. Hope they did some good feeding children in Africa! Kind regards.
@jamesross1799Күн бұрын
Al has excellent knowledge of this fascinating battle.
@simonjohnson1585Күн бұрын
I’ve followed this brilliant series but this was definitely the best so far !, it really gets you to grips how horrific it was. Thanks Al and James I am so looking forward to next upload. All the best from Somerset 👍🏻👍🏻💯🍺🍺
@carthy29Күн бұрын
Good docu on you tube called " the traitor of arnhem " about a dutch double agent who worked for the germans who apparently gave them a tip off, pre market garden ahead of the operation
@brianjames8677Күн бұрын
I've read about this bridge for 45 years. You two brought it to life. I can "see it" in my books now. Thank you.
@NomdeGuerre-j6hКүн бұрын
This pair really know how to flog a dead horse
@3922JDMКүн бұрын
Loving the location icon marker for James and Al and the references to school , water company etc …. A great idea moving forward 👍🏻
@callumgordon1668Күн бұрын
What I admire most about this and your written work is the accessibility, while still being accurate and serious and the human dimension, the description of first hand experience and the clear empathy for the individuals discussed. So much military history, and it has its place is terrain, strategy, units, equipment. You do that, but never lose touch with the human dimension
@TheAussieb0bКүн бұрын
I hope you eventually do operation Varsity as my father was involved with towing gliders as he was a flight engineer on a Wellington. He did not tell us much about his tough end of his time in the RAF. One story he told was taking ball bearings to Russia where the took some wood pulp gin over to flog to the locals. They consumed it nett and were surprised when some of them went blind. Dad and the rest of the queue had to fly home PDQ !!!
@carthy29Күн бұрын
On you tube, there is a docu about a dutch double agent who worked for the germans and gave the game away about market garden pre operation, its called " the traitor of arnehm Robert Verkaik "
@davemac1197Күн бұрын
There are several theories of betrayal, and while one or two may have ended up as a report on someone's desk in German intelligence somewhere, there is no evidence the information was read in time to be acted on. The betrayal mythology was comprehensively debunked in 1963 by the publication of Dutch Colonel T.A. Boeree's De Slag By Arnhem, translated into English with Cornelius Bauer as The Battle of Arnhem (1966). By studying the movements of the 9.SS-Panzer-Division 'Hohenstaufen', Boeree was able to demonstrate that they were not sent to Arnhem to counter an expected airborne attack, and that all but a few 'alarm' units had already been withdrawn to Germany for refitting at the time of the landings. James Gavin (82nd Airborne Division) had also investigated the myths and was satisfied the operation was not betrayed. Boeree's papers and Gavin's correspondence with A Bridge Too Far (1974) author Cornelius Ryan is in the Cornelius Ryan Collection of his WW2 papers held at Ohio State University Alden Library (box 101, folder 09: James Gavin) and can be accessed online. The entire German command was surprised by the landings at Arnhem and Nijmegen (82nd Airborne POW interrogations confirmed the latter), and only a warning from Luftwaffe Generalmajor Walter Grabmann of 3.Jagd-Division at Deelen airfield that the fields around his accommodations at the Wolfheze psychiatric hospital were ideal landing grounds were on the money but purely speculative. Model refused to believe his headquarters at Oosterbeek were vulnerable so far behind the lines and several river barriers, and only Sepp Krafft of the SS-Panzergrenadier-Ausbildungs-und-Ersatz.Bataillon 16, an old friend who had served in the German police with Grabmann, believed there was a danger and had his two training companies moved out of their Arnhem barracks and camped in the woods northwest of Oosterbeek as additional protection for Model. It was still a shock to everyone when the landings actually happened. I should add that Grabmann was not an 'inmate' of the hospital - the many pavilions in the extensive grounds were used to house Luftwaffe senior officers and (conveniently I would say) female auxiliaries (called 'Blitzmaiden') from Deelen and the fighter control bunker at Schaarsbergen, as well as being a collection centre ('auffanglager') for artillery troops from units shattered in Normandy being used to refit Artillerie-Regiment 184 (84.Infanterie-Division). This was the reason General Urquhart (1st Airborne Division) wanted the hospital bombed and the USAAF refused until they got written confirmation from him the grounds contained German troops.
@seanbradley2134Күн бұрын
Fantastic account gents, absolutely loved it. A complete pox on You Tube’s adverts interrupting the narrative at key points, but top marks for presenting PhD level insight and knowledge in your usual chatty but searingly clear style. Thank you. More please
@davemac1197Күн бұрын
It's the third iteration of the bridge built in 1935 to the same design. The first was demolished by the Dutch Army in 1940 during the German invasion. It was rebuilt during the war and only reopened in August 1944 (it was not shown on the Allied maps used in the operation and had to be drawn in by hand), only a month before the airborne operation in September. When Montgomery decided to abandon efforts to take the bridge and redirect his attention to a new operation towards Wesel through the Reichswald (operation GATWICK), he ordered the bridge bombed and USAAF B-26 Marauders finished the job on 7 October.
@KinolensКүн бұрын
Apparently that’s not the original bridge. It was bombed by the allies a few weeks of months later.
@davemac1197Күн бұрын
It was rebuilt to the same original design and the current bridge is the third iteration on the site. The original 1935 Rijnbrug was demolished by the Dutch Army in 1940 during the German invasion and rebuilt during the war, reopening in August 1944. The rebuilt bridge was bombed on 7 October 1944 and rebuilt again in 1950, renamed the John Frostbrug.
@williamvorkosigan5151Күн бұрын
Great video as always.
@eelcobiemond4012Күн бұрын
There is a great booklet available at the Airborne museum with a collection of 1st hand accounts on the defence of the school: "With nothing bigger than a Bren Gun" by N Cherry
@carlhepton5059Күн бұрын
Happy new LP Video out 😅
@adriang6259Күн бұрын
Just over a year ago my son and I walked that bridge on our mostly military historical tour. Very surreal to be there after countless viewings of “A Bridge Too Far” growing up and now BOB since 2001. And these blokes do such a great job walking it. Great series guys.
@Youp1eКүн бұрын
Alright, one minute in and I feel the need to comment on that overlay on the picture. That was so incredibly insightful, straight away. Well done.
@corycheckettsКүн бұрын
I just received my copy of Arnhem Black Tuesday! Thanks for these videos. I’ll be rewatching them as I read Al’s book.
@adriang6259Күн бұрын
I ordered the same book! Just because of the series.
@davemac1197Күн бұрын
0:20 - only a few houses in the block next to the river had to be demolished. The embanked ramp was built over the remnants of the medieval moat in the star-shaped ramparts around the old town, and the remaining ornamental lakes and green spaces in an arc around the town centre that loop back to the old harbour to the west - that still existed in 1944, but now the Roermondsplein under the Nelson Mandelabrug - are all that is left of the old medieval defences. 6:04 - there's a good account of the Royal Engineers using a remote-controlled Bren gun on a tripod to get German snipers to respond and give away their position, and because the RE were not issued with the telescopic sight version of the Lee-Enfield rifle, they used a man with another Bren (a very accurate weapon) firing single shot to take out the German sniper. It's an example of how the RE used their own ingenuity to solve the same infantry problems everybody else had, but they often had to come up with a different approach using the equipment they had. Source: Engineers At The Bridge: The 1st Parachute Squadron Royal Engineers At Arnhem, John Sliz (2010) 6:40 - first time in this series I've heard Al make a mistake - Mackay does not return on Operation PEGASUS but makes his own escape and evasion from a transit camp at Emmerich in Germany on 21 September with three other men, including Lieutenant Simpson from his own A Troop 1st Para Sqn RE, finding a rowing boat and made their way down the Rhine to reach Allied lines at Nijmegen on 23 September. The photo you show here is the four men reaching Nijmegen. PEGASUS was in late October further west on the Neder Rijn between Randwijk and Heteren in an operation organised by David Dobie of 1st Para Battalion with the help of the Dutch resistance. 12:43 - Captain John Killick was head of the 89 (Parachute) Field Security Section, a counter-intelligence unit attached to the division with 16 men in total. I believe their role was to search German headquarters for documents and arrest known individuals who were collaborators or war criminals. 13:58 - one SS officer's grab for glory? I would dispute that. Gräbner's SS-Panzer-Aufklärungs-Abteilung 9 had been released from Korps control and he was ordered to rejoin the Hohenstaufen Division, but Gräbner was given out of date intelligence on the British presence at the bridge, so while he was expecting to brush aside about 200 paratroopers with small arms weapons he found himself driving into a fortified perimeter with two batteries of pack howitzers in Oosterbeek zeroed in on the southern ramp and two 6-pounder anti-tank guns covering the northern ramp off the bridge. His 3.Kompanie (consolidated from remains of 3 and 4.Kompanie from the original battalion establishment) was completely destroyed on the bridge. Only five armoured cars from1.Kompanie leading the attack had got through before the British opened fire, and the six half-track armoured cars from the original 2.Kompanie had been left behind in Oosterbeek when Gräbner went south to Nijmegen the previous evening. This only left the 5.schwere (heavy) Kompanie, consisting of five or six half-tracks, three with 7.5cm close support Kanon (SdKfz 251/9), and the 6.Versorgungs (supply) company acting as a lorried infantry company with 115 men, trapped south of the river. 14:30 - Gräbner's unit was SS-Panzer-Aufklärungs-Abteilung 9 from 9.SS-Panzer-Division 'Hohenstaufen' based at Beekbergen near Apeldoorn. There is some question over whether they were loaned to 10.SS-Panzer-Division 'Frundsberg' for the initial reconnaissance, because they were ready to move before the Frundsberg's own reconnaissance battalion under Brinkmann located at Borculo, but it seems Gräbner was actually under Bittrich's II.SS-Panzerkorps control to reconnoitre both Arnhem (assigned to Hohenstaufen Division) and south to Nijmegen (assigned to the Frundsberg) to investigate reports of airborne landings in both locations. Gräbner was released back to Hohenstaufen control when Brinkmann arrived in Arnhem, but he couldn't get to Nijmegen because Frost held the Arnhem bridge. 14:47 - they do know where to be, but the readyness state of different units in the II.SS-Panzerkorps and Frost's taking of the Arnhem bridge had disrupted the rapid deployment of the two SS divisions. It made sense for the Frundsberg to go south to stop XXX Corps at Nijmegen, because apart from Gräbner's unit, the Hohenstaufen only consisted of a few 'alarm' companies of panzer crews and artillerymen acting as light infantry without heavy weapons. They had a few heavy armoured vehicles, but these were kept off the books as non-operational and in 'short-term repair' to avoid a Korps order to hand over equipment to the Frundsberg. The Hohenstaufen were due to withdraw their last (alarm) units by train to Germany for the refit on the Sunday of the airborne attack. Although their reaction time was very quick due to Model's order to form alarm units ready to move on an hour's notice, the response was complicated by the administrative subterfuge of the Hohenstaufen's commander in keeping some of his key assets from the Frundsberg. Bittrich was actually shocked to hear from Harzer that Gräbner's unit would be ready to move after a couple of hours to unload the vehicles and make them 'operational' again. 16:55 - the 'bunkers' were actually toll booths - never used as such because the town found alternative funding for the bridge while it was under construction in 1935. The Germans converted the glass toll booths into bunkers, presumably using sandbags to protect the windows with a small opening left open for an MG, and on each pagoda style roof they constructed a wooden Flak tower, each housing a 2cm Flak kanon. The Flak gun and bunker on the east side was hit by the RAF in the morning of 17 September, leaving only the one on the west side to be dealt with by Frost. A 6-pounder anti-tank gun was man-handled up the embankment to engage the bunker, but could not elevate to hit the Flak gun, and I don't think the gun could depress low enough to hit the anti-tank gun either. I believe it was taken out by a PIAT from a building next to the bridge, and the bunker was then attacked by a flamethrower. The Hollywood film used the bridge at Deventer, which was built without toll booths, so the production had to make their own pillbox to recreate the action with the flamethrower and the ammunition huts (also probably accommodation for the bridge guards and Flak crews) that were behind the pillbox.
@borchen0Күн бұрын
How refreshing to hear all these details; finally someone who knows his Market Garden history!
@davemac1197Күн бұрын
@@borchen0 - it's because I'm not a professional historian like James with deadlines to finish books on D-Day/Bulge/Whatever, and no time to study anything in any real depth. I think Al is a kindred spirit and this is only the first episode I've picked him up on a mistake.
@andrewflindall9048Күн бұрын
Something I've not seen reproduced elsewhere was an old/new overlay plan of the bridge area up in the tower of St Eusebius. Much of the bridge approach was built through an existing park which is why it fitted so neatly into the landscape. The rocking-horse-poo book 'B Company Arrived' has a lot of old photos of the area before the Germans and the Allied air forces remodelled it.
@oddballsokКүн бұрын
18:28 notice the youth juvenile criminals on fatbikes KNOWING to HIDE their faces from the camera becozzzz the RISK of getting recognized...
@theamous2 сағат бұрын
don't forget muslim
@RobJones262Күн бұрын
Thank you so much guys!
@A.J.K87Күн бұрын
It's these individual stories that make it so much more real. It takes you closer to what transpired and the monumental effort it took. Reading about the grand strategy and all the statistics and figures that come with it can give you a detached view of war. It's these smaller stories that put into perspective how horrible it is.
@pendulum1997Күн бұрын
Had goosebumps when Al was talking about Captain Mackay in the school
@oddballsokКүн бұрын
2:20 THOSE trucks and spähwagen were from ss 9th recce and THOSE trucks made it IMPOSSIBLE for the US paras from Gavin to TAKE the Nijmegen bridge at 17th evening !!! HAd FROST actually HARASSED them at THAT EXACT moment, then the americans from Gavin WOULD have taken the NIjmegen bridge !!!
@davemac1197Күн бұрын
"Nuts!" - to coin a phrase. Gräbner's unit did not arrive in Nijmegen until it got dark, around an hour after 1st Battalion 508th PIR should have secured the Nijmegen highway bridge. Colonel Lindquist, against Gavin's orders, had only sent a recon patrol instead: _Captain Chet Graham was assigned as the regimental liaison officer with division headquarters. "I sat in on a high level briefing at division headquarters. Colonel Lindquist was told by General Gavin to move to the Nijmegen bridge as soon as Lindquist thought practical after the jump. Gavin stressed that speed was important. He was also told to stay out of the city and to avoid city streets. He told Lindquist to use the west farm area to get to the bridge as quickly as possible as the bridge was the key to the division's contribution to the success of the operation."_ (Put Us Down In Hell - A Combat History of the 508th PIR in WW2, Phil Nordyke 2012, Chapter 9) _A battalion S-2 patrol led the way and reached the Nijmegen bridge during the daylight hours. Trooper Joe Atkins, HQ 1st, told that story: "I was called on to take the point going into Nijmegen. As we entered the city, a crowd of people gathered around us, and we had to push our way through. Three of us in the lead became separated from the other troopers behind us by the crowds of Dutch people. We three continued to make our way into the city until we came to the bridge. At the bridge, only a few German soldiers were standing around a small artillery weapon. I had a Thompson sub and a .45 pistol. The other two were armed with M1 rifles. They covered me as I jumped up and yelled, ‘Hände hock’ (‘Hands up!’)_ _The Germans were so surprised; the six or seven defenders of the bridge gave up without resisting. We held the prisoners at the entrance to the bridge for about an hour. It began to get dark, and none of our other troopers showed up. We decided to pull back away from the bridge, knowing we could not hold off a German attack. The German prisoners asked to come with us, but we refused, having no way to guard them. As we were leaving, we could hear heavy equipment approaching the bridge."_ (The 508th Connection, Zig Boroughs 2013, Chapter 6 - Nijmegen Bridge) _Captain Chet Graham, the regimental liaison officer with division headquarters, decided to obtain a status of the progress toward the capture of the Nijmegen highway bridge. "I went to the 508th regimental CP and asked Colonel Lindquist when he planned to send the 3rd Battalion to the bridge. His answer was, 'As soon as the DZ is cleared and secured. Tell General Gavin that.' So I went through Indian country to the division CP and relayed Lindquist's message to Gavin. I never saw Gavin so mad. As he climbed into his Jeep, he told me, 'come with me - let's get him moving.' On arriving at the 508th regimental CP, Gavin told Lindquist, 'I told you to move with speed.' "_ (Put Us Down In Hell - A Combat History of the 508th PIR in WW2, Phil Nordyke 2012, Chapter 10) An even more embarrassing account comes from Lt Eustace McNaught, the commander of Z Troop, 1st Airlanding Anti-Tank Battery, that landed in a glider short of the Arnhem LZ and drove a Jeep to Nijmegen, thinking the Americans would be there: _‘Eustace had landed [in glider CN.1005 near Zetten on the 'island' between Nijmegen and Arnhem] and wasn't happy that they were short of where he should be. He took the Jeep and his gunners and left the Glider Pilots and other gun crew, telling them he was off to the Bridge. According to Eustace, he travelled down the main road and was shocked to find it empty with no German troops anywhere to be seen until he got pretty close to the Bridge. Then he saw in the distance a large German armoured force on the main road heading away from Arnhem and a lot of smoke in the distance. Eustace decided that there was no way he could get through and so they turned around the Jeep and decided to head for the Americans at Nijmegen. Again, the road was devoid of any German Troops and Eustace said by this time it was late and pretty dark when they arrived at the road Bridge at Nijmegen. He could hear fighting to the south so headed to the "sound of the guns". They cautiously crossed the Bridge and were completely unchallenged, that's what made him angry also, as why wasn't there any Americans to the north to take it also. He exclaimed "What a lost Opportunity!"._ (A Lost Opportunity - Battery Z Troop, Nigel Simpson, Philip Reinders, Peter Vrolijk, Marcel Zwarts 2022) Frost secured the Arnhem bridge at 2000 hours after observing Gräbner's unit crossing over it an hour before on the approach march, and after his five-hour approach march with machine-guns, mortars and Gräbner's armoured cars on his route. Lindquist landed 30 minutes earlier, had 3 miles shorter route march to the Nijmegen bridge, took the Groesbeek ridge against zero opposition, and was met at De Ploeg by Dutch resistance leader Geert van Hees, who told him the Germans had deserted Nijmegen and left a non-commissioned officer and seventeen men to guard the highway bridge. I would check your targets before opening fire, if I were you...
@georgehetty7857Күн бұрын
⏳🤭🏴
@jimomaha7809Күн бұрын
6:50 Captain Mackay did not escaped with Pegasus operation. In a nutshell: He was captured (did an escape attempt jumping out of a German lorry) and brought to a German collection camp in Emmerich not to far of the border. Here he meets some of his men (Lt Simpson, cpl Charles Weir and Cpl Humphreys who escape once before in Italy). They head towards the river after their escape. They find a rowing boat and tow on the Waal river towards Nijmegen. That were the picture was taken with Nijmegen bridge at the back. This and a few other photos of them reenenacting the moment they enter shore was taken the next day. The battle of the 1st airborne division is still going on in Oosterbeek. The 4 of them wait north of the Nijmegen bridge to look for survivors of their unit after the withdrawl from Oosterbeek 25-26 september. They meet one soldier who after landing could not catch up with them and fought in Oosterbeek until being withdrawn. Mackay actually wrote a small booklet although he left out the fact that after evacuating the Limburg van Stirum school he goes wih his men in another school next (south) were there are the remains of C-company 3rd battalion and their co Major Lewis. Lewis and Mackay do not mention each other in any report. And they both took their owm positions in the building and more or less ignore each other. It appears that both officers had some dissagreement with each other and therefore chosse not to interfere with each other. Although the wounded of both unit ended up in the same room taken care by a private who was attached to c-company for his medical skills although not being an official medic.
@ElgrandeRick810817Күн бұрын
Thank you for this great series. Every year in September, on the anniversary of the battle, the bagpipes march over the bridge to figuratively relieve the battered soldiers after all these years. It is so wonderful, as if you can hear their spirits sighing in relief and whispering to each other, "they are finally here".
@barrysharp9792Күн бұрын
This is possibly the best comment I have read about this battle. It really brings together the military and human. 👍
@martinhodgson2303Күн бұрын
Was really looking forward to this episode and wasn't disappointed! Brilliant guys! Loved the old photos and aerial shots. Really helped to picture it how it was during the battle. Top work!
@LordTed-p6lКүн бұрын
Sir John Killick served as an officer in the Intelligence Corps during World War II, most notably as Officer Commanding 89th Parachute Field Security Section
@borchen0Күн бұрын
14:30 As far as I know Graebners recon unit was part of 9th SS Hohenstaufen
@davemac1197Күн бұрын
Correct. They were under Bittrich's II.SS-Panzerkorps control for the reconnaissance west of Arnhem and south to Nijmegen. On being released back to the Hohenstaufen's control, he was attempting to return to his division across the Arnhem bridge, completely underestimating the British force at the north end.
@TheStandardOperatorКүн бұрын
It would be great to talk about the VC winners or give a small nod to their accounts. I know only a small part of many stories.
@RupertBear412Күн бұрын
fun fact, actress audrey hepburn was in arnhem as a young dutch resistance girl
@borchen0Күн бұрын
The Arnhem part is correct, the Dutch resistance part not... Her mother was actually a member of the British fascist party in the '30s. Audrey did perform on stage for the first time in '44 in Arnhem, because of her moms connections with the Germans. The Airborne museum in Oosterbeek did research on this topic.
@davemac1197Күн бұрын
Because her mother's family home at Huis Zypendaal in Arnhem had been commandeered by the Germans during the occupation (allegedly by the Ortskommandant as his residence, but I haven't been able to verify that), the family had to move out and stay with friends in Velp a few miles to the east. The Huis Zypendaal was actually used as the German headquarters in the Hollywood film Betrayal (1954).
@kfrenchTPL2 күн бұрын
The pin overlay and its movement on the map to where James and Al are is incredible. I have never seen historical photography done this way. Really gives you an idea exactly what and where things are. Great stuff
@Jeroen_K2 күн бұрын
OMG the magnifying lense this episode puts on the abysmal architecture we, the Dutch, built to replace the destroyed buildings...
@WimRijksenКүн бұрын
It was the trend in those days. The British did the same, just look at the Barbican, the National Theatre and the Southbank Centre in London. Also, it was financially impossible to rebuild everything, and we wanted more room for traffic to flow through the cities. Not a pretty sight though.
@Jeroen_KКүн бұрын
@@WimRijksen Sure, and it's just a minor inconvenience compared to the horrors of war.
@henghistbluetooth7882Күн бұрын
Unfortunately the 1960s also hit the UK pretty hard. My home town of Birmingham is famous for its’ hideously soulless ‘concrete rectangle’ architecture which required knocking down old grammar schools, the home of something called the Lunar society and the worlds first commercial graphic design school.
@davemac1197Күн бұрын
You should visit Gloucester and Chester in England. Both were Roman ports and important garrison forts at each end of the Welsh border, and both had fantastic timber-framed buildings preserved from the Middle Ages. In WW2, Gloucester was still used as a port, so it was remodelled by the Luftwaffe and is now a living museum dedicated to the excessive use of concrete in the 1950s and 60s, while Chester still remains a Roman and Medieval treasure. It's not just the Netherlands, we've all done it!
@paulketchupwitheverything767Күн бұрын
I don't think that the buildings are so bad. Wouldn't it be contrived to build effectively replicas of what was there before? As Al and James said, the buildings ended up being close to the bridge because there had been clearances for its construction. It's an urban setting that needed to function for the post war Netherlands.
@nickdanger38022 күн бұрын
3.55 Mark III's
@TheVigilant1092 күн бұрын
Thank you. Illustrates better than anything the battle for the bridge