2 ай бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@alzahravi 2 күн бұрын
why i always got X=0
@alzahravi 2 күн бұрын
ups found it, you just have to press = one more time
@scottcollins7513 2 күн бұрын
@@alzahravi exactly. Good job!
@tameemalshehri15 2 күн бұрын
i have question
@scottcollins7513 2 күн бұрын
I'm not sure I can handle the suspense -- Please ask your question.
@tameemalshehri15 2 күн бұрын
@ how can I solve this equation in Casio fx-991ARX CLASSWIZ x-y=-6 6x-3y=-9
@tameemalshehri15 2 күн бұрын
Because I have a exam tomorrow
@scottcollins7513 2 күн бұрын
@tameemalshehri15 Same general steps as the video. You will be entering 1, -1, -6 for the first line and then 6, -3, -9 for the second line. That should give you the result of x=3 and y=9.
@tameemalshehri15 2 күн бұрын
@@scottcollins7513 he give me no solution
@freakgaming5132 4 күн бұрын
My ans not convert into degree form even after pressing shift
@scottcollins7513 3 күн бұрын
I cannot think of why yours would be different than mine. I would suggest messing around w the DMS button and see if you can get something to work. Sorry I can't be more helpful.
@venkatmahato12 8 күн бұрын
Thanks 🙏
@bblz9171 9 күн бұрын
is the display or the 30xpro faster? when scrolling? I hate how long it takes to go to the start of my input after finding out I messed up something at the start
@scottcollins7513 9 күн бұрын
Great question and something I did not think to show. I would estimate that it scrolls 3 to 4 times faster when pressing and holding the LEFT d-pad. It also scrolls back up through previous results and expressions 2 to 3 times faster when holding the UP d-pad.
@omniakamalmostafa996 9 күн бұрын
I love you ❤
@khannalalkoyalkar9246 14 күн бұрын
Thank you so much sir❤️
@scottcollins7513 10 күн бұрын
You are welcome.
@nomanabdulaziz9695 16 күн бұрын
Brilliant Love ur videos ❤❤🎉🎉
@scottcollins7513 16 күн бұрын
Thank you!
@ashw730 17 күн бұрын
TY
@scottcollins7513 16 күн бұрын
You are welcome
@itxme22 19 күн бұрын
thank uu 🎉
@scottcollins7513 17 күн бұрын
Happy it was helpful.
@somethingrandomfornow 20 күн бұрын
Thanks a lot for this, you introduced me to math print which all this semester I did not know existed this literally feels life changing not having to make it all look like a mess trying to put my fractions and square roots 😭
@scottcollins7513 17 күн бұрын
MathPrint rocks. Glad I helped you find out about it. Thanks for letting me know.
@AdmiringBamboo-tr7mn 24 күн бұрын
Me: 5X-7=(‐3X+9) X= 2 L-R= 0
@scottcollins7513 24 күн бұрын
That is the correct result. You should not need the parentheses -- did you find that they were necessary? I'm curious.
@StanleytheCat-v8z 27 күн бұрын
Can confirm, even with overclocking the Sharp is slow with integrals.
@tonypitsacota2513 27 күн бұрын
Wow.. Very nice! Thanks for the RREF tip. Your right, use it once and it's your new best friend.
@scottcollins7513 26 күн бұрын
Glad you benefited and appreciate you letting me know.
@dio.ahmed3 Ай бұрын
thank you Scott. your videos help me so much, much love from Saudi. شكرا لك من اعماق قلبي
@scottcollins7513 Ай бұрын
I appreciate you letting me know you found it helpful -- always fun to hear from people around the world like Saudi. Take care.
@Islamicshort444-0 Ай бұрын
I am using for 8th class this function o off calculator
@scottcollins7513 Ай бұрын
As a former teacher I would say if math is a struggle for you then using this feature of the calculator will definitely help you, but if you enjoy math and find that it generally makes sense then please be sure to practice doing these sorts of problems without your calculator since it will help you in future math. Best wishes to you.
@zweiwing4435 Ай бұрын
Do you have it in Casio fx-991CW version?
@scottcollins7513 Ай бұрын
I do not have a video for this yet. It is likely very similar to the fx-991EX though.
@zweiwing4435 Ай бұрын
Can use with Casio fx-991CW?
@scottcollins7513 Ай бұрын
Here's a video showing how to do this on the fx-991CW (I think this is what you are asking): kzbin.info/www/bejne/pGOngKKZg5tknJY
@zweiwing4435 Ай бұрын
@@scottcollins7513 Thank You,👍
@zweiwing4435 Ай бұрын
How I can do the other way around. With symbol degree,' , " ? I expecting when I pressing shifts and + , to change to degree symbol, ' , " ? How to do fission, photon and fusion formulas?
@scottcollins7513 Ай бұрын
What calculator model are you using? I'm confused about the Shift and + since my calculator shows that as changing the contrast of the screen. Also, what is an example of one of the formulas?
@zweiwing4435 Ай бұрын
@@scottcollins7513 I have Casio fx-991CW.
@zweiwing4435 Ай бұрын
@@scottcollins7513 CASIO fx-991CW CLASSWIZ, I was trying to calculate the Degrees Minutes and Minutes to degrees. I do not know how to do it, right.
@zweiwing4435 Ай бұрын
@@scottcollins7513 I am using the CASIO fx-991CW CLASSWIZ, I able to use understand of changing the decimal to minute. How i can calculate photons and light years?
@bicqtran Ай бұрын
HP 48 may be slower, with less apps but way easier to use (less key strokes for all functions). I have a HP Prime and it sits gathering dust. It is so easy to do either Base or Unit conversion on the HP48. There are so many key entries for simple unit or base conversion, it is just a joke!
@scottcollins7513 Ай бұрын
The Prime lacked elegance in my view. Great technology, but lacks the cohesiveness of the 28/48 calculators. That might just be b/c I am the wrong generation for it. Sounds like your experience is similar. Thanks for weighing in on the conversation.
@bicqtran Ай бұрын
@@scottcollins7513 The Prime is a Windows GUI math app masquerading as a calculator on a small screen . There is no reason for a calculator to have a drop down menu with multiple layers to call a function. Prime fails to be a decent math app (for that I can use either MatLab or Octave) or a good calculator. As a calculator hp48 reigns supreme with its simplicity and elegance of layout.
@StanleytheCat-v8z Ай бұрын
It would be more accurate to say the Sharp solves for zero. As such instead of typing: 2x=3 You can do: (2x)-(3) It'll solve it.
@scottcollins7513 Ай бұрын
My DM42 works the same way as the Sharp. It works fine even if it is a touch less literal. If you are strong in math, you can make any of these calculators do the job. But, if you are a high school student for whom math is not your natural "language", then the more straight-forward and literal the calculator is, the better. Thanks for the comments. You might be the first cat that has ever left one!
@StanleytheCat-v8z Ай бұрын
@scottcollins7513 That's the beauty of math, isn't it?
@StanleytheCat-v8z Ай бұрын
The Sharp has a massive advantage: It's overclockable. There's an external timing resistor. Change that resistor and you can speed up or slow down the calculator.
@scottcollins7513 Ай бұрын
That is not something I would have ever thought about. Like the "turbo" button on a 90s PC. The Sharp gets little attention in the US, but it is a respectable calculator w/ a nice keyboard. Thanks for leaving the comment.
@StanleytheCat-v8z Ай бұрын
The labels rubbing off thing, I hate that.
@scottcollins7513 Ай бұрын
Agree. Seems silly for that to be an issue.
@Chaitanyaedits-0821 Ай бұрын
Thank you very much 😊
@scottcollins7513 Ай бұрын
You are most welcome - glad it was helpful to you. Thanks for saying so.
@linkhidalgogato Ай бұрын
this convinced me to get it, it feels bad paying 50 bucks for a scientific calculator but i feel that value isnt really a consideration here, any calculator would give me insane value anyways since unless it breaks and they usually dont im gonna be using this thing for like a decade. Great review.
@scottcollins7513 Ай бұрын
Agree that $50 is high, but good point about it being something you will likely use for easily 5 years. I'm not a TI fan, but this particular calculator is my favorite "mainstream" calculator (in my heart of hearts, RPN calcs will always be my favorite). Glad you found the review helpful and let me know.
@StockSlicer Ай бұрын
Are you a calculator collector? Great videos man!
@scottcollins7513 Ай бұрын
Not sure I would go so far as to say I am a collector, but I definitely have more than a typical person needs! Thanks for the kind, encouraging words.
@Azawad20 Ай бұрын
thanks man.
@scottcollins7513 Ай бұрын
Glad you found it helpful and appreciate you saying so.
@TheSuperUser Ай бұрын
Thanks for the comparison. Now that the 991ex is no longer available I am wondering if the 115ES Plus 2nd Ed would make a good backup? Yes there is the Ti 30X Pro MathPrint and it does have nice features such as the persistent memory but I like the Casio layout since I have using them for years.
@scottcollins7513 Ай бұрын
YES. I think the fx-115ES Plus 2nd Edition would make a good backup. I actually prefer it over the 991EX, but I doubt most people would. The other thought would see about buying a 991EX used off ebay.
@TheSuperUser 2 ай бұрын
Nice demo. This is obviously a design flaw by Casio. I think to be 100% sure one should always use parenthesis to avoid confusing the calculator and double check you work. I think 991ex is still the king of the Casio lineup.
@scottcollins7513 Ай бұрын
Thank you for leaving the kind words. Yes, using parentheses for everything is the safest route, but what a headache. 991EX is the best in this price range in terms of performance and quality. Like I said in the other comment, I actually like the 115ES Plus 2nd Ed more, but that is b/c I think it is a bit more straight-forward, has a bigger font, and offers a few more features.
@ys-fz9mt 29 күн бұрын
@scottcollins7513 hi so do u think the 115ES Plus 2nd Ed is better than the CW?
@ys-fz9mt 29 күн бұрын
@scottcollins7513 my first choice was the 991ex however I can't buy it anywhere. These are the available ones 991cw 115es plus 2nd Ed Ti 36x Ti 30x pro mp The ti 30x pro mp is 70 while the rest are only 30 is it worth it to pay more for the ti 30x pro mp?
@scottcollins7513 29 күн бұрын
@@ys-fz9mt Depends what you prioritize. Personally, I prefer the 115ES over the 991CW bc I can get to what I need more quickly and the way it works is fully thought through (ex: scientific notation). I'm willing to give up some speed and display quality.
@scottcollins7513 28 күн бұрын
Just realized you had more in your list. If you take good care of your things, can afford the additional $40 w/out too much pain, and if it is something you will still be using 5 years from now, I think the TI-30X Pro MultiPrint would be the best. If value is highest priority, I would choose either the 115ES Plus 2nd Ed or the TI-36X Pro. 991 CW would be my last choice, but it is still respectable.
@TheSuperUser 2 ай бұрын
Thanks for the comparison. Most brands will only go up to ^3. But if you know basic index rules you can get the power you want. But yes the Casio wins in this department by a large margin.
@scottcollins7513 2 ай бұрын
Thanks for leaving a comment -- agree that it is quite simple to do without a calculator, but that is coming from a math nerd. It's also a rather meaningless concept for most high school students (and anyone else living in the "real" world), so I can understand why they'd want a calculator that could do it for them.
@Opium.arc14 2 ай бұрын
FUCK MY FUCKUING JGINGOIWNOIWEGNOWEIG
@editorinchimp1427 2 ай бұрын
Legend, thanks for this video.
@scottcollins7513 2 ай бұрын
Happy to know you liked the video. Thanks for leaving word.
@nurzy_6148 2 ай бұрын
Comment faire pour que la calculatrice affiche 2π^2 lorsqu'on tape 2π×π
@scottcollins7513 2 ай бұрын
Ce n’est pas quelque chose que la calculatrice fera, mais que vous tapiez 2*pi^2 ou 2*pi*pi, vous obtiendrez le même résultat numérique.
@nurzy_6148 2 ай бұрын
@@scottcollins7513 essaye de me trouver une calculatrice comme la numworks qui peu faire cette fonctionnalité stp
@Soomin-r3w 2 ай бұрын
thanks so much! But I'm using fx-8200 au, and there is no calculation or solve button. only = and exe button 😭
@cylurian 2 ай бұрын
When I program this on my 42, I get a DUP, do you have your flag 11 off or something else, so it will not appear? thx.
@scottcollins7513 2 ай бұрын
It's been a long while since I made that video so I need a little more info. Are you trying to program QUAD (to find roots of a quadratic)?
@fridacastellanos1964 2 ай бұрын
which one is better, 115esplus 2nd edition vs 991cw ,, help
@scottcollins7513 2 ай бұрын
First question is do they sell the TI-30X PRO MathPrint (must be MathPrint) where you live? If so, THAT is the one to get. If not (for ex if you live in the US), then I need to know what are you planning to use it for.
@balloony2515 2 ай бұрын
omg u replied to every comment
@scottcollins7513 2 ай бұрын
That is the goal - for fun, I could have ignored yours! Thanks for the comment.
@sheepcommander_ 2 ай бұрын
THANK YOU!!
@scottcollins7513 2 ай бұрын
Happy to hear you found it helpful -- it's something I wish I knew a long time ago!
@tylerd6517 2 ай бұрын
This helped immensely. Thank you
@scottcollins7513 2 ай бұрын
Happy to hear it helped and appreciate you letting me know.
@TheSuperUser 2 ай бұрын
Nice comparison. It would be good if you did a full review of the new model against the 991-EX.
@scottcollins7513 2 ай бұрын
From what I know, the fx-991EX is discontinued in the USA. Its replacement is the fx-991CW. And, since the TI-30X Pro MathPrint is not even sold in the USA it is hard to justify putting in any more time. Regardless, I appreciate the suggestion and you taking the time to mention it.
@alexmo1941 2 ай бұрын
I'm going to take my precalculus midterm, should I buy the fx-991cw or fx-115es? We've just about covered quadratics, their inequalities and halfway into logarithmics.
@scottcollins7513 2 ай бұрын
A few questions: 1 - Do you live in a country where the TI-30X Pro MathPrint (make sure it is a "MathPrint") is available for around the same price? Even though I have traditionally preferred CASIO (and even SHARP), I like the TI best for this type of calculator. But, if your only option is the TI-36X Pro, it is less compelling b/c it is just an old design. 2 - Would you prefer the benefit fewer keystrokes to get to the answer at the cost of being less user-friendly? Or, do you like the benefit of user-friendly at the cost of things taking more keystrokes to answer? My personal GENERAL preference would be: 1st - TI-30X Pro MathPrint 2nd - CASIO fx-115ES PLUS 2nd Edition 3rd - CASIO fx-991EX 4th - TI-36X Pro My personal PRECALC-specific preference would be: 1st - TI-30X Pro MathPrint 2nd - CASIO fx-991EX 3rd - CASIO fx-991CW 4th - CASIO fx-115ES PLUS 2nd Edition
@alexmo1941 2 ай бұрын
@@scottcollins7513 thank you so much for replying. I'm in the US and I'm looking for the best possible non graphing scientific calculator due to testing restrictions for my class. I do have access to the TI-30x pro. I already own a Numworks calculator and an Nspire Cas II, I don't have any budget constraints when it comes to math learning. I prefer user friendliness but I really do want features like quadratics solvers and inequalities. Thanks again.
@alexmo1941 2 ай бұрын
@@scottcollins7513 Hi, thank you so much for responding. I'm in the US so I don't have access to the TI-30x unless I import it. I own a Numworks calculator and I unfortunately can't use it on these upcoming tests, just non graphing scientific calculators. I don't mind a few menus as long as I can understand what to do intuitively with no hidden commands only learned through a menu. I don't have any budget constraints, math learning is a top priority for me. Thank you for your help!
@scottcollins7513 2 ай бұрын
@@alexmo1941 Could you further clarify what you mean by "no hidden commands only learned thru a menu"?
@alexmo1941 2 ай бұрын
@@scottcollins7513 Sorry, I mean something that doesn't show up on screen as an option and you have to read the manual instead to find out how to proceed.
@tylerd6517 2 ай бұрын
Please help!!! why does this not work with certain numbers. For example the equation 10y^2 + 17y + 3
@scottcollins7513 2 ай бұрын
It will work w/ that equation, but it is trickier. Watch this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/n6bXlox5aslkn9k For your problem the roots that the calculator provides are x1=-1/5 and x2=-3/2 which leads to the factors (5x+1) and (2x+3)
@tylerd6517 2 ай бұрын
@@scottcollins7513 thank you so much!
@scottcollins7513 2 ай бұрын
@@tylerd6517You are welcome.
@MrMarcec85 2 ай бұрын
I am glad I have bought the ex when I could, because the cw looks a like product rushed to market without proper engineering (not only for this flaw). Thanks because I would have never understood that.
@scottcollins7513 2 ай бұрын
Glad you found the video informative. I'm still surprised they made this "error" w/ such a key product. CW is still respectable, but EX is better. Thanks for leaving a comment.
@MrWaalkman 2 ай бұрын
Why would it need to be something using the metric system to use engineering notation? A better example would have been "What if I am doing electronic calculations..." I do like the looks of the ClassWiz, pity that it's not programmable.
@abather11 2 ай бұрын
Can do a video on casio fx 5800p plz
@scottcollins7513 2 ай бұрын
@@abather11 I do not own that calculator. I will do some research on it. Regardless, thanks for the suggestion!
@MrMarcec85 2 ай бұрын
This one is the only function I miss in TI. I don't know why they do not introduce it. I know TI is stuck at the 90's. I still prefer it because it's easier to me, is more logical. But for someone who works daily with 10^x numbers this is very useful (even if probably more useful for students because after a bit i guess the jumps will be as easy as counting from 1 to 10, but don't know)
@scottcollins7513 2 ай бұрын
I think the TI-36X Pro is respectable. The TI-30X Pro Mathprint is better (but hard to get in US). But, no need to make excuses for liking either one -- they are solid. I have not needed the ENG Notation, but understand where it would be useful if trying to express numbers in different units. Seems like something TI could add without too much difficulty. Thanks for weighing in.
@MrMarcec85 2 ай бұрын
@@scottcollins7513 the biggest problem, in my oponion, is the lacks of buttons 😅. Ti has less buttons than Casio, and they are almost all taken, but probably they could think a new "pattern" after 40 years... Yeah well, in Italy texas has almost disappeared... I had to buy the 30x from Germany. (And I am trying to discover any place that still sells the 108... I would like to get one of the 5th ( I think) edition... hope they relaunch it on the market again
@scottcollins7513 2 ай бұрын
@@MrMarcec85 I have never been much of a Texas Instruments calculator fan. BUT, I will say that the TI-30X Pro MathPrint is probably my current favorite among this type of "advanced scientific" (non-CAS) calculators.
@bonjournito 2 ай бұрын
I there is no way to double check, put it in a garbage!
@scottcollins7513 2 ай бұрын
Ha! And if you do, I will probably be digging through your trash.
@maxrkmrose 2 ай бұрын
What a piece of poor programming.
@scottcollins7513 2 ай бұрын
Yes. It is rather amazing that it was released this way.
@alexandredeoliveirapenna198 2 ай бұрын
Thanks scott! Its a shame the old one isn't available anymore... i got one used in pristine state last year to use on master degree due to the prohibition of programmable calculators on my course, and have no regrets. But I still prefer my hp32s in my daily use
@scottcollins7513 2 ай бұрын
The new one is still good, but I do prefer the 991EX. I've never used an hp 32s, but I'm sure that is a nice device. You have 2 winners!
@Silizium_ 2 ай бұрын
can you show how the matrices function work?
@scottcollins7513 2 ай бұрын
Sure. It may be a few weeks before I get to it, but I will make a point to cover Matrices and Vectors. Thanks for the suggestion.
@Silizium_ 2 ай бұрын
@@scottcollins7513 thanks that will help me a lot!