You have to explain to the viewers what an album is :D
@PavSZ9 сағат бұрын
it's the thing that you can touch and smell but it plays music. No WIFI needed
@TomatenDK9 сағат бұрын
@@PavSZ 😂👌
@ShaariКүн бұрын
A topnotch lens optically but the design leaves much to be desired. It's larger, heavier and uglier than all its competitors. I like the direction Nikon is taking with the compact f1.4 primes although the image quality is superior on the Sigma.
@PavSZКүн бұрын
it's an old lens now. They might do version 2 in the future
@ShaariКүн бұрын
I hope they do in the near future. But before that they need to release the long overdue 135mm f1.8 dg gn. L mount still lacks a mirrorless option. Fingers crossed for one from Sigma or Samyang soon
@AkhilKP-g1rКүн бұрын
Can I keep my Sony 7m4 with 35-150mm Tamron lens ??? I mean the lenge suits ,? Pls reply
@PavSZКүн бұрын
probably not. I've started using a new sling bag from ThinkTank, that will take a camera with a bigger lens like that. Video about it coming next week
@kurtbasteltКүн бұрын
greetings from germany :) I bought the 7artisans 35 mm F1,4 Mark II but I am still unsure : is the lense even compatible with my Canon R10?
@PavSZКүн бұрын
you have to buy a lens compatible with your camera mount. I'm not sure if they do RF mount version
@michaelbell75Күн бұрын
I love bridge cameras. Have owned a lot of Panasonic FZ and still own several, like the FZ50 with the constant 2.8 lens which gives a somewhat filmic look with its CCD sensor. I will have to disagree and say that no smartphone will get anywhere close to this optical zoom range. Digital zoom and the little tricks they use to cheat physics like periscoping lenses looks terrible from everything I have seen. Also, I am probably in the minority but I love the look of photos like the ones at 2:44, 9:23 and 10:34 They have a soft, nostalgic kind of look to them that reminds me of film. They look like they could have been taken 30 years ago. I much prefer some character like that instead of the overly sharp, clinical look of modern mirrorless cameras that lack character. I might have to pick one up!
@PavSZКүн бұрын
oh no doubt that nothing can compete with that zoom range. Quality wise my Samsung phone is actually a touch better but it is my personal preference. If you like what this does, it might be a camera for you
@自由风-h4xКүн бұрын
我们买的难道不是同一颗20-60mm镜头?😂来自中国的问候💯
@PavSZКүн бұрын
there is only one 20-60. All three I have are this good
@nature1upcloseКүн бұрын
The files are not visible in my avid composer, is there a way to transform them ?
@PavSZКүн бұрын
I'm not sure. This is computer and your editing software related question. Google is your friend here. Sorry, I have no answer
@nsilva800Күн бұрын
Outstanding pictures Pav! You could sell a beercan and i would buy it after seeing your beautiful photos!
@PavSZКүн бұрын
thank you very much!!! (really old video though)
@MO-hq4iz2 күн бұрын
Really, what about the Tamron 16-300mm, it didn't work well!!!
@PavSZКүн бұрын
you are talking about old DSLR Tamron lens. Totally different class than this
@MO-hq4izКүн бұрын
@PavSZ yes, but still a great lens. Still my most used lens. But I don't have any E mount, and sins Sony dropped MFNR, HDR and panorama I won't go there either.
@CanditoTrainingHQ2 күн бұрын
Every image looks really soft on a LG C1 Oled tbh. Looks like the still frames aren't sharp enough to even have a full 4k resolution in practice. Weird.
@PavSZ2 күн бұрын
you can't really judge picture sharpness looking at compressed KZbin video on a TV screen. I cam only do my best to get my video looking as sharp as possible here and then it is out of my hands how KZbin delivers it or how it is displayed on different screens. I can assure you, there is no lack of sharpness with this lens
@Akhi_Fins_and_Felins_2 күн бұрын
Hi Pav. I love your videos mate keep up the fantastic work. Would you say this is sharper than a Sony 24mm f1.4 gm as I am trying to decide out of these 2. But if the sigma is sharper, I don't mind getting the sigma. Price is not a problem for me as I can get the sigma for £630 and the Sony 24mm gm for £725. Please can you let me know. Thank you.
@PavSZКүн бұрын
Thanks! I don't think I can honestly say that one is sharper than the other. With these new lenses it will also hugely depend on what and how you shoot, how you view and use your photos etc. Both lenses are very good in my opinion
@PavSZ2 күн бұрын
Amz US: amzn.to/3Bf0OfO Amz UK: amzn.to/3MWZYqK
@Ricardo-SW2 күн бұрын
Had some anxiety the cars were going to take you out!
@PavSZКүн бұрын
they nearly have
@AoyagiAichou2 күн бұрын
It's a camera classes could hand out to learn basics on, haha. I think it should be cheaper though. See: G100.
@PavSZКүн бұрын
yes
@berounmv70243 күн бұрын
I would like to ask, would this lens work well as a wildlife lens on the Sony a6400? It has an aps-c sensor, so it would not be 70 - 180, but 105 - 270. Thanks.
@PavSZ2 күн бұрын
yes it would work ok but this is not stabilised lens and a6400 has got no IBIS
@berounmv70242 күн бұрын
@@PavSZ The first version didn't have stabilization, the second version, the G2, does have it, doesn't it? I'm just asking about the G2, the newer one.
@PavSZ2 күн бұрын
@@berounmv7024 Yes, sorry. Version 2 is stabilised (VC)
@berounmv70242 күн бұрын
@@PavSZ That's okay, everyone makes mistakes sometimes. On the contrary, thanks to you, I decided on this lens. I won't buy it now, but I almost certainly will in the future.
@berounmv70242 күн бұрын
@@PavSZ That's okay, everyone makes mistakes sometimes. On the contrary, thanks to you, I decided on this lens. I won't buy it now, but I almost certainly will in the future.
@setaside23 күн бұрын
The Sony RX series are the best bridge cameras ever. The Lumix 1" sensor competitors were very close seconds. Canon's G7 series a very distant 3rd place. All of them with superior images when compared to any modern smartphone.
@PavSZКүн бұрын
Sony RX series are also much more expensive than this
@marksmodellingmadness3 күн бұрын
Yes. In my opinion Panasonic should have continued the FZ330 series.
@PavSZКүн бұрын
maybe
@opal8173 күн бұрын
fyi this is the exact same internals as the 2017 version which explains the outdated quality. The "D" only means they updated the screen, EVF & usb port. It's not really a new camera and people should be aware they're going to get 7 year old results using this.
@PavSZКүн бұрын
your might be right there
@hufman98073 күн бұрын
The 2016 fz30 has a bigger sensor, flip out screen, 2.8 constant apature zoom. You have no idea what youre talking about.
@PavSZ2 күн бұрын
I have zero idea
@EthanMarkMusic3 күн бұрын
As someone looking to have their digital photos/videos look a bit softer and more filmic, this was very helpful! Thanks!
@PavSZКүн бұрын
you're welcome
@DoGoodToThem3 күн бұрын
Thank you
@PavSZ3 күн бұрын
You're welcome
@simonr26604 күн бұрын
I have one issue with mine. I'm using it on my pocket 4k and the Osee is much brighter than my pocket. That means if I would trust the Osee the image would be quite under exposed. My pocket displays the right image and the display is on full brightness. I can't find any way to calibrate this in the menu system?
@PavSZКүн бұрын
interesting. I'd use both and try to get right image in between both
@heidimove80935 күн бұрын
Thank you for your detailed review! Your photos are incredible :) I'm just starting out in this industry and am on the hunt for a camera system I can evolve with! Not interested in a "camera for beginners". I have always been drawn to Fuji above Canon and Nikon. I love that a professional such as yourself, loves working with the X-S20, despite it being an APS-C! This camera just got bumped to the top of my shopping list!
@Simon.00005 күн бұрын
Still better than the hover air and cheaper too it's less than half the price even though they are doing a sale on hover air
@PavSZ4 күн бұрын
in which way is it better than Hover? Please don't say the controller
@Simon.00004 күн бұрын
@@PavSZ films in 4k and you can fly it over water . The hover air needs solid ground under it for the sensors
@PavSZ4 күн бұрын
@@Simon.0000 Neo delivers 4k files, upscaled HD and I don't think it can fly over water either. I have both and Hover seem just a touch better overall. It is also smaller, it fits in the pocket
@hardywoodaway99125 күн бұрын
nice Ad 🙄
@PavSZ4 күн бұрын
how?
@soumikkar50495 күн бұрын
Do they have a Canon EF mount?
@PavSZКүн бұрын
Not that I am aware of
@motomandaraget5 күн бұрын
For the price 🎉❤
@PavSZКүн бұрын
if it is priced as a toy, it should be marketed as one
@ifzarik5 күн бұрын
agree not good quality
@PavSZКүн бұрын
it could have been a touch better
@crystal.argentina5 күн бұрын
Amazing for the price, better in video than photo, ordering the 16 for my fx30
@PavSZКүн бұрын
better for video for sure
@ArtUniverse5 күн бұрын
I was torn between the 14 mm equirectangular and 15 mm fisheye and ultimately went for the latter: - with pinpoint stars all the way to the corners, this is a dream lens for 360° panoramas, requiring as little as 6-8 shots to cover an entire scene around the camera. - you can always undistort photos in post, the resulting field of view is equivalent to that of a 12.5 mm equirectangular lens. Even though the stars get somewhat stretched out in the corners, the quality is still better than the 14 mm.
@PavSZКүн бұрын
cool info! thanks
@comment_below5 күн бұрын
@2:55 omg LMAO
@PavSZКүн бұрын
yep, big hands
@frankkirk31625 күн бұрын
Whant better pay buy better one to your standard you want never satisfied .it's good little drone does what it's made for shouldn't be tight fisted go buy avatar two.
@PavSZКүн бұрын
I bought it as I wanted DJI quality and for it to be better than my Hover Air X1. It is not. The price was relevant for me as I already use bigger DJI drones and I was expecting more from it
@doubleeagle97226 күн бұрын
For the price of a marble, please don’t compare it with a football. It is a damn good marble already 😅
@PavSZКүн бұрын
if it costs as much as a toy, it should be advertised as one
@PianoCover1116 күн бұрын
cool video quality I wonder which camera you used to record this video?
@PavSZКүн бұрын
I've used Lumix S5IIx and Sony a7sIII
@pdtech45246 күн бұрын
You have to factor in.the cost and what you get, to be honest I can't find a decent 4k camera for the price of the Neo £169 here in the UK, nevermind a flying one or one I can fly accro with! 😲😳😁
@PavSZКүн бұрын
it hasn't got decent 4k camera, that's my point. It is upscaled low quality HD only
@pdtech4524Күн бұрын
@PavSZ If you cast your mind back to when DJI released the original Mavic Mini, the camera and range were both lacking, these 2 points were addressed in the next iteration. The Mini 2 got a better camera with higher bit rate and 4k, plus better range with an ocusync 2.0 controller. It's how DJI market ALL their drones and other tech, the first model is always lacking in some important specs, they drip feed you better specs in later models. Like the Avata 2 cured all the issues on the original avata! You'll not have long until the Neo 2 is released....⚠️😲😳😁
@pdtech45246 күн бұрын
Don't worry the Neo 2 will address all the issues and be ready to empty your wallet very soon!! 😲😳😁
@PavSZКүн бұрын
maybe
@fabrizzolla6 күн бұрын
I don't think most "normal" people care about your issues with "low quality"... I have one of these and it's 4K30fps is more than enough for people out of the video production world. If it doesn't fit for you, just be honest.
@PavSZКүн бұрын
I have been honest. I bought it because I was made believe that it is better than it is. 4k footage looks like it is low quality HD upscaled to 4k. Functionality is cool but it is barely fit for low quality social media conent
@Outlaw.cinema6 күн бұрын
I think for the money the camera is what it is 🤷🏼♀️. But after getting mine and flying it over now learned your not suppose to fly over water? Because of the sensors. I live on an island and film ocean, lakes and rivers 😅
@PavSZКүн бұрын
I think it works over water. I haven't done it yet but I have seen people flying it over water
@PavSZКүн бұрын
by the way ... love your channel
@Outlaw.cinema21 сағат бұрын
@@PavSZ ok so I think it works like Normal with remote but for just voice activation mode it can have a hard time if there’s a glare from the water. Also doesn’t work in the dark. I try using it at dusk and it had a hard time landing haha I panicked
@Outlaw.cinema21 сағат бұрын
@@PavSZ thank you 🙏🏼 😊 just getting started. Your channel is great inspo
@PavSZ20 сағат бұрын
@@Outlaw.cinema oh ok. On its own it's different. Good to know
@karstenlaqua41567 күн бұрын
For 199...what else do you want? If you want the extra features there is a drone for you. But not for that price and that simplicity. It's the same discussion with new action cameras. There needs to be compromise for cheaper products. For a lot of people this is all you will need with better quality most people hat 5 years ago!
@prestonurvina7 күн бұрын
Have this lens on order! Looking forward to it!
@DavidMBanes7 күн бұрын
I have the X mount version and loving it after just two weeks. It's replaced my Fujifilm XF 18mm F2 and no need to get the 16mm.
@exil3dlivecom7 күн бұрын
It's why inreturned it. You nailed it.
@PavSZ7 күн бұрын
it could have been better
@exil3dlivecom7 күн бұрын
@@PavSZ yep. The point of all drones of to get acceptable video otherwise it's dumb to fly them for 2010s quality filming. Pretty dumb for dji to release this but I suspect version 2 will fix it. I'm enjoying my avata2 and waiting for the 3rd gen
@Detank20027 күн бұрын
@@exil3dlivecom not that important but just to note that fpv drones exist so quality footage is not the point of all drones
@vivoviv7 күн бұрын
Beautiful!!!❤
@PavSZ7 күн бұрын
yes!
@justinwyatt16187 күн бұрын
Mean canon made one last year
@PavSZ7 күн бұрын
no they have not. Canon is 24-105, much bigger and double the price. This is first 28-105 in this class. Oh and I can't use Canon on my Sony or Lumix cameras
@justinwyatt16185 күн бұрын
@@PavSZ mean there’s adapters
@PavSZ4 күн бұрын
@@justinwyatt1618 there is no AF adapter to adapt RF lenses to any other brand of cameras
@alwaysyouramanda7 күн бұрын
So- not 4k?
@PavSZ7 күн бұрын
4k size files
@daniilzavhorodnii73587 күн бұрын
Does tap to focus function works on sony a7III?
@PavSZ7 күн бұрын
it should
@flat-out8 күн бұрын
I don't care as well, I'm not nit picky I still use and play with my Parrot Mambo it doesn't have a camera 😂. Plus cropping to vertical is not a problem.
@mohdraduanibrahim8 күн бұрын
i dont care
@AlexandreeSantoss8 күн бұрын
I just ordered the green variant, can’t wait! Do you think it will fit a DJI Osmo Pocket, DJI Mini 4, the RC2 Controller, the batteries and their dock?
@PavSZ7 күн бұрын
I fit the drone with batteries, controller and a camera with a lens in it