Love your approach and thoroughly appreciate the intro and overall framing.

Revit 2025 no longer supports the .NET Framework for API development. Autodesk has transitioned to using .NET Core (more specifically, .NET 6 and beyond)

Life lessons and Engineering, sweet.

Definitely he isnot an architect. Architect create space for human not bolt hole detail for CNC

I will send my request now on LinkedIn to you from Ethiopia what u are talking about is very interesting

Hi! Could you teach how add an icon in the Grasshopper component? Thank's!

i think he started a war

Great video, I loved it Do you have a proposed learning path to become a full time Computational Designer?

Super thorough but intelligible to the non-technical designer. Thanks for helping me understand a bit more about the history of NURBS.

It’s crazy that these videos are 3-4 years old… you were so a head of the times!

Dr. What do you mean by c++ not working on Mac? I'm aware this is old content, and probably things have changed. I'm really interested in your content and I'll really appreciate the info. Thank you in advance.

Thank you for this video! I especially appreciate you including instructions for a button on the ribbon.

what just happened?

thank you!

Beautiful explanation. Senior structural engineer here.

Thanks mate. occasionally you say the wrong word without realising: e.g. "we will move fast and create a Rhino plugin" kzbin.info/www/bejne/qZu0Xp5uj5yHZpY ........................ hahah we all know you are creating a Revit plugin

This guy is awsome.. Just stopped by to say this

Architect is the perfect mixture of drama and structural engineeribg xD amazing!

This was the best explanation of where to place the rebar that I have seen. Thank you!

Revit has the capability of digital twins. However it's original use wasnt meant for storing data. The data is sent to a CAFM, IWMS system where it is stored. The next step would be to have clear use cases set out at handover, to the owners facility with the chosen FM system. (ArchiBUS, Dalux, Tandem etc) Typical use cases include Space planning and management, Asset register, work order management. Another useful usecase is linking all OEM information and warranty data to equipment (Typically set as an owner standard for closeout for the engineers and consultants) But to have a true digital twin there needs to be long term planning, for lifecycle management. Most new construction buildings needs to have clear change management processes in place to identify gaps in data, normally from building operating staff or facility managers. A building is a living breathing entity and and needs to be thought of as a whole.

Es malísimo este video, no dice nada

There are some lies here. Revit can do complex parametric design and organize for production using Dynamo. It is not developed for CNC, I don't know why you mentioned it. Some other programs are created for that, and subcontractors use those based on their specialized activities.

I get you, you make valid points but hear me out for a sec. I'm currently working in a fairly recognised office with a good reputation and they're landing important projects in the gulf. Sad reality is that i spend most of the time doing detail development and when i get to work on a concept design project, it's a boring commercial Pinterest hospitality design. Architectural competitions are a chance for me to express my ideas and knowledge into a project, which i never get to at work. It's my only chance to someday get recognised. I don't have any connections and don't get paid enough to start my office. I can only prove myself to the world via a competition which i did recently and got the second prize. I agree with the last point you made, but for me making the profession miserable for established offices who made it there in the business through capital or connections (as you said), doesn't bother me at all tbh

Well... What and architect does, is to imagine, draw, and then gives the details and calculations of the screws sizes to a specialized engineer... This engineer can buy them, manufacture them, can program codes for them, hire a programmer to do it or net... he can have a CNC factory, or he can be a fan of golf or soccer... An architect does not give a sh**

What you are doing is => You are not using Colgate rather your are making toothpaste from scratch. But still I here concepts of BIM infused in your workflow. A BIM is a concept/process not a software.

"Set up the beans, lay them horizontal"- ProArchitect

anybody has tried creating one for Revit 2025 which uses .NET 8.0?

Wut

In system visual Studio is not showing . NET framework 4.8 and I'm working on. Net framework 8.0 but revit showing error 'it's can't be run ' Please help me

You are using data (instead of plan geometry) and automating processes. Even getting rid of unnecessary pars such as manual 2D. That is real BIM (managing information of buildings). ArchiCAD and Revit are most popular tools, and because of misuse or misunderstanding, BIM widely became a buzzword for 3D programs.

I am not an architect, only doing my own projects, but I think 2d is much clearer for actual measurements and parts you are interested at this very moment. You can probably have 3d only workflow but that would require an iPad for every worker on the construction site and also their full fluency with the program, how to hide something, show dimensions, cross section etc, this is not practical.

This is really great. The code is really nicely written too (not too C# specific) which makes it great to learn from. Thanks for this, I hope the courses are going well.

I can't imagine a BIM process as described. As an architect, having to design from scratch at a BIM level of detail for a drill hole! As said in the video, the goal of BIM is collaboration between companies , not for a company to design everything in a single software. I don't think that is possible in reality. Imagine that a company assumes the entire of 2D drawing and 3D modeling, what would happen with legal and insurance responsibilities. I'm not saying that the mentioned software is not good! But I don't know if anyone has had the experience of managing all levels and specialties of construction in a single software :/

I love you sr! Make More videos about this please! ❤

Awsome. Thnx so much 😄

hey milos, i’m following you as well since the beginnings of my studies five years ago and wanted to share that you were a good source of inspiration to take this career choice!

I don't use any of the two. I last used Revit in 2014. I am a BIM Professional certified in Revit Architecture, but still struggling with the next step. How can you help me regain my career? "But I say, Did Israel not know? First Moses said, I will provoke them to jealousy with them that are no people and by a foolish nation I will anger them."(Romans 10:19).

Then what is solution?

Nicely made video! 9:30 the line equation however not quite rightly explained.

Your video is the reason, I got the job as an automation developer in one of the biggest company in India. Thank you so much. keep up the good work.

hi Miloš, may I ask for comment about plugin probability for Rhino (recently I saw FrameBuilder-MRD plugin for SketchUp) all needed for generating .csv format files to drive roll former machine in LGSF industry). Thanks a lot!

I don't think its an architect's job to generate G code for CNC machines. Usually, u send the model to the manufacturers and they generate their own G code. Its not the same code if you mill something on a 5-axis cnc, router on leasr cutter.

Interesting point of view, loaded with lots of keywords to search for, thank you.

Something to think about,,,

amazing!

I enjoy your videos, keep them coming! This video made me wonder, are you are creating a tool which might already exist? I wonder if you are familiar with tools like Inventor, Solidworks, CATIA etc.? I remember having a conversation with an architect once where I said if I had to choose just one of the architectural software available, I wouldn't choose any of them, I'd choose Inventor instead. Software like Inventor is all about manufacturable assemblies, parametric parts and library parts (for example, assemblies: kzbin.info/www/bejne/aoKvaJ2Mm5KFodE, programming parametric parts: kzbin.info/www/bejne/kGSvaJqFbNx0arM). I love Rhino and Grasshopper too, but I would normally choose Inventor for projects with use cases like you are describing. Thanks!

You're telling me? In my university they are still drafting by hand.

I've also noticed a lot of LinkedIn profiles using "Computational Designer" in the headline. It's a trendy substitute for "Parametric Design", but it is the equivalent of saying, "I use current computer-aided technology to design". Anyone who uses a computer to design is a "Computational Designer". It's all CAD (Computer-Aided Design) Back in my day... the idea of using code to generate design was called Algorithmic Architecture, and the best source to learn and experiment with this type of cutting-edge computer-aided design was to purchase a book. The first book I acquired on the subject was unironically titled "Algorithmic Architecture" by Kostas Terzidis, a previous associate professor at Harvard University Graduate School of Design from 2003 until 2012, and currently a professor in China at Tongji University. I remember experimenting with snippets of code in Maya to produce a randomized set of rings in 3D space. At the time, my professors were not impressed, and I can't blame them. This was during a time when Peter Eisenman's research in process driven architecture was considered cold and lifeless. If you're not familiar with Peter Eisenman's work, it's worth checking out. He employed innovative designers such as Greg Lynn, who coined the term blobitecture, and then things in architecture got a little weird for a while. I'm glad to see that generative design is being taken seriously at universities and even at some architecture firms, but it's important to remember to stay focused on the root purpose of computer-aided design. Efficiency. Effectiveness. Optimization. Not in that order, but you get the point. Great video 🤘

Easier then I thought. Thank you for the content, Milos!

I read your thesis when I was doing my research on shell structures !! ❤