I hope there aren’t too many going to hell when they die from these cults

Study the Bible to show your yourselves approved.

Thanks for sharing this. Am a year plus old as an Adventist from a Pentecostal background. I loved how things are done here. But my misgivings have always been with the doctrine of investigative judgement, it does not to my views aligns with the Holy scriptures and two the tendency of members to want to place Ellen Whites writings above the Holy scriptures.

NOI is a cult 😂😂

CAnswersTV is what should be playing on TBN, CBN and Netflix!

Any SDA looking to leave but want to keep the Sabbath day. Try looking into the seventh day Baptist church

God bless you 😊 love the video 😊😊

Adventism operates with a veil of double-speak. What if Adventism bases its doctrines on texts beyond the Bible? Would that not invite the label of a cult? What if Ellen White's writings were elevated to prophetic authority-an authority assumed to be free from error? Adventism claims the title of THE Remnant Church, a unique status supposedly validated by Ellen White's ministry. In doing so, they declare all other Christian denominations as "universal churches," while positioning themselves as the one true church of the last days. Could such exclusivity further justify viewing Adventism as a cult? Yet, to obscure this exclusivity, Adventism introduces a layer of double-speak: They assert that Ellen White's writings are "tested against the Bible." This claim would be credible if her works were ever acknowledged to contain doctrinal errors. Instead, her writings are used to "correct" the church, leaving no room for scrutiny or contradiction. By this standard, the supposed test becomes circular logic-a façade that shields her writings from genuine accountability.

This one minute short video comes from our full length video called "Roman Catholicism Series #11: Scripture Twisting - 20 Ways Religious Cults Misread the Bible" at kzbin.info/www/bejne/h4XCZqObgdOEpaM . To see the entire 16 hour video series called "Roman Catholicism Series" go to our playlist "Dealing With Roman Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy, Idolatry & the Virgin Mary" with 296 videos at kzbin.info/aero/PLFFA8D69D1B914715 . False religions pervert the message of the Bible in many ways. 2 Peter 3:16-17, "as also in all his letters, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand, which the untaught and unstable distort, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures, to their own destruction. 17 You therefore, beloved, knowing this beforehand, be on your guard lest you, having been carried away by the error of unprincipled men, fall from your own steadfastness," "Scripture twisting" refers to the act of intentionally misinterpreting or taking verses from the Bible out of context to support a particular belief or agenda, often done by cults or groups with unorthodox interpretations, essentially distorting the meaning of the scripture to fit their own desired narrative. In Scripture, there are many instances of people who twisted the Scriptures to their own destruction. Jeremiah 23:36, for example, addresses those who were misrepresenting the Word of God: “Each one’s word becomes their own message. So you distort the words of the living God, the Lord Almighty, our God.” In Matthew 23:13-36, Jesus rebukes the Pharisees and teachers of the law for their misinterpretations and hypocritical applications of the Scriptures. They had added human traditions to God’s law, burdening people and obscuring the law’s true intent. Paul personally contended with false teachers who had distorted his doctrine. Speaking to the Galatians, Paul says, “I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel-not that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ” (Galatians 1:6-7, ESV). Paul says that anyone who distorts the gospel of Christ should be “accursed” (verse 8, ESV). This language is similar to Peter’s warning that twisting the Scriptures will lead to destruction. We can identify a false teacher or a false prophet by examining first and foremost their teaching and secondly their behavior in light of Scripture. If what they are teaching is not consistent with what is plainly revealed in Scripture, they are a false teacher and are to be ignored, even if they live extraordinary lives, even if they appear to have supernatural insight, or even if they seem to work great miracles. Jesus warned us that there would be false prophets who would perform great signs and would seek to lead astray, if possible, even the elect (Matthew 24:24, Mark 13:22). It is, therefore, urgent not to be distracted by such things, but to focus on the content of their teaching. Our Lord explained: “Beware of the false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorn bushes nor figs from thistles, are they? So every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a bad tree produce good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. So then, you will know them by their fruits,” (Matthew 7:15-20). The false prophet comes in the clothing of a sheep but is inwardly a wolf. He appears on the outside as a sheep but is secretly a wolf within. We are to know them by their “fruit,” not by their “clothing.” A fig tree bears figs, an apple tree bears apples, a prophet bears prophesy, and a teacher bears teaching. “Either make the tree good and its fruit good, or make the tree bad and its fruit bad; for the tree is known by its fruit. You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks out of that which fills the heart,” (Matthew 12:33-34). Jesus likewise said of the false teachers of his day: “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like whitewashed tombs which on the outside appear beautiful, but inside they are full of dead men’s bones and all uncleanness,” (Matthew 23:27). “Woe to you! For you are like concealed tombs, and the people who walk over them are unaware of it,” (Luke 11:44). The image here, drawing from the Old Testament ceremonial purity laws, is of something that looks innocuous or even pleasing on the outside, but is not only corrupt within but also makes the unsuspecting impure because of its deception. It is, therefore, imperative that we not be distracted by any outward appearance of “goodness,” but rather focus first and foremost on the window we have to what is within: the words.

Que catedra! Preaching the Truth ❤.

Orthodox don’t believe Jesus Christ is God???

What does this say about the Orthodox Church when they declare anathema people who say the Holy Spirit also proceeds from the Jesus, which is stated in the bible, John 20:22 "And when He had said this, He breathed on them and said to them, “Receive the Holy Spirit."

Boy how the natural man works so hard to save himself.

Man that Satanic art project, behind the pope,is chilling.

Click on the time markers provided to analyze this video quickly. Eastern Orthodoxy claims to be the church established by Jesus Christ, but they anathematize the faith of the early church. The reality is that it's Protestants who stand with the church fathers in professing the historic and Biblical faith of the church. This is a presentation of Christ Presbyterian Church, a congregation of the Orthodox Presbyterian denomination in Magna, Utah (www.gospelutah.org) used by CAnswersTV with their permission. Larry Wessels, director of Christian Answers thanks them for their ministry. Their KZbin channel is www.youtube.com/@ancientpathstv . 00:00 - How to use time markers. 7:24 - Presentation begins here with homosexual marriage in Roman Catholicism. 8:00 - The Eastern Orthodox religion curses to hell (anathematizing) the early Western Christian church for adding the "filioque." The filioque is a Latin phrase that means "and from the Son". It was added to the Nicene Creed in 589 AD during the Council of Toledo. The filioque states that the Holy Spirit comes from both the Father and the Son, not just the Father. The filioque was originally added to counter Arianism, which was the belief that Christ was not divine. The filioque was intended to correct the idea that the Son was not as divine as the Father. The filioque has been a source of conflict between the Eastern and Western churches. The Eastern Orthodox churches reject the filioque because they believe it goes against the Council of Chalcedon in 451, which stated that the Nicene Creed should not be changed. The filioque is considered one of the main reasons for the schism between the Eastern and Western churches in 1054. Why does Orthodox reject filioque? They claim It is precisely because it changes the nature of God. It upsets the balance of the three Persons of the Holy Trinity. Because of this they say the Western Church has a different god & thus deserve to be damned. 8:47 - More Orthodox cursing of anyone who accepts the "filioque" especially Protestants! 9:39 - Explanation of what filioque means & church history behind it. 13:17 - Martin Luther is condemned for saying ecumenical councils by men contain errors. However there were common disagreements between Orthodox & Catholic authorities themselves as to which councils were ecumenical & which were not. 15:47 - Who Defines What Is or is Not An Ecumenical Council which they consider to be on the same level as Acts 15:28 "For it seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us"? What a mess when ecumenical councils are analyzed & found to be wanting. 24:26 - Athanasius would later be declared the father of orthodoxy after he had opposed heretical ecumenical councils & the Pope of Rome. 25:20 - The exaltation of Divine & Ecumenical Councils as Infallible is a false claim & pretense. Augustine said Holy Scripture was above ecumenical councils. 27:36 - The Eastern Orthodox religion can rewrite their faith & history anytime they want to. 27:54 - Eastern Orthodox Attacking the Early Christian Church Fathers. 36:28 - Eastern Orthodox Photius (882 AD) admitted that Augustine, Jerome & Ambrose said the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Son and that the West dwells in darkness. Despite this the Eastern Orthodox religion has declared all three of them as "Saints" anyway. 38:11 - Examples of one church ecumenical council contradicting another. 42:51 - The God Crowned King. Different forgeries that were used as support for Roman Catholicism & Eastern Orthodoxy. The twisted historical background of Orthodoxy forced the dishonest rewriting of histories to support their political religious organizations & agendas. Various unsavory political details going on within the Orthodox religion as well as murder & torture concerning icons. Questionable "saints" declared & evil political maneuverings ongoing continually. 54:19 - Ecumenical Patriarch in Istanbul has only a few thousand followers surrounded by multitudes of Muslims. Russian Orthodox in Moscow, Russia claim to be "The Third Rome" & the home of "True Orthodoxy." 55:06 - By what standard? Eastern Orthodoxy & Roman Catholicism both stand on things other than the Bible as their standard. Orthodoxy & Romanism proclaim that they are the true church of Jesus Christ but their own history & the scriptures declare that they are not. They are both under the curse of Galatians 1:6-9, "6 I marvel that you are so quickly deserting Him who called you by the grace of Christ for a different gospel, 7 which is really not another, only there are some who are disturbing you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. 8 But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should proclaim to you a gospel contrary to the gospel we have proclaimed to you, let him be accursed! 9 As we have said before, so I say again now, if any man is proclaiming to you a gospel contrary to what you received, let him be accursed!" 1:03:20 - Subscribe to our KZbin channel & get updates

This one minute clip comes from our full length videos called "Citywide Call-in Bible Answers" series found on our playlist called "End Times, Supernatural Prophecies, Tough Bible Questions" with 88 videos at kzbin.info/aero/PL141F261EEFCFD536 . The "In Defense of the Faith" crew featuring Larry Wessels & David Krill was a special live telecast (at the time it was recorded). The broadcast aired for 15 years on public access television in Austin, Texas to over 300,000 households. The premise for the show was very simple, to answer people's questions & arguments (Jude 3) concerning the Bible & to consistently present the Gospel of Jesus Christ. See our main KZbin channel CAnswersTV (which stands for Christian Answers Television) at kzbin.info/door/Q_EDvOtDAAWfCvGUhd6y3A . See our playlist "Dealing with Seventh-day Adventism & Their "Prophetess" with 77 videos at kzbin.info/aero/PL5316CC6F66F24283 . Acts 20:7, “And on the first day of the week, when we were gathered together to break bread, Paul began talking to them, intending to depart the next day, and he prolonged his message until midnight.” The first day of the week is Sunday, and this is the day the people gathered. This passage can easily be seen as the church meeting on Sunday. It has two important church functions within it: breaking bread (communion) and a message (preaching). Additionally, Luke did not use the Jewish system of counting days: sundown to sundown. He used the Roman system: midnight to midnight. This is a subtle point that shows the Jewish Sabbath system was not the one utilized by Luke. 1 Cor. 16:1-2, “Now concerning the collection for the saints, as I directed the churches of Galatia, so do you also. 2 On the first day of every week let each one of you put aside and save, as he may prosper, that no collections be made when I come.” Notice here that Paul is directing the churches to meet on the first day of each week and put money aside. It would seem that this is tithing. So, the instructed time for the church to meet is Sunday. Is this an official worship day set up by the church? Rev. 1:10-11, “I was in the Spirit on the Lord’s day, and I heard behind me a loud voice like the sound of a trumpet, ... " The New Bible Dictionary says regarding the term, ‘The Lord’s Day’ in Revelation 1:10: “This is the first extant occurrence in Christian literature. “The Lord’s Day” is used to designate Sunday Romans 14:5, “One man regards one day above another, another regards every day alike. Let each man be fully convinced in his own mind.” Colossians 2:16, “Therefore let no one act as your judge in regard to food or drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day.” In creation, God rested on the seventh day. But, since God is all-powerful, He doesn’t get tired. He doesn’t need to take a break and rest. So, why does it say that He rested? The reason is simple: Mark 2:27 says, “The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath.” In other words, God established the Sabbath as a rest for His people - not because He needed a break but because we are mortal and need a time of rest - of focus on God. In this, our spirits and bodies are both renewed. The O.T. system of Law required keeping the Sabbath as part of the overall moral, legal, and sacrificial system by which the Jewish people satisfied God’s requirements for behavior, government, and forgiveness of sins. The Sabbath was part of the Law in that sense. To “remain” in favor with God, you also had to keep the Sabbath. If it was not kept, then the person was in sin and would often be punished (Ezekiel 18:4; Rom. 6:23; Deut. 13:1-9; Num. 35:31; Lev. 20:2, etc.). But with Jesus’ atonement and justification by faith (Rom. 5:1), we no longer are required to keep the Law and hence the Sabbath, which was only a shadow of things to come (Col. 2:16-17). We are not under Law but grace (Rom. 6:14-15). The Sabbath is fulfilled in Jesus because in Him we have rest (Matt. 11:28). We are not obligated to keep the Law, which goes for the Sabbath as well. Summary of Article The Sabbath was given to Israel as a sign between them and God. The Sabbath was part of the Old Covenant Law. Christians are not under the Old Covenant Law. Christians are free to worship on any day they choose. Christians should not be legalistic regarding Sabbath keeping. Please see also our videos on Sabbath keeping called "Sabbath Keeping Is Not Required For New Testament Christians: Seventh-Day Adventists Beware" at kzbin.info/www/bejne/inappWeKhLdpe5o & "Is Sabbath Keeping Essential to Be a Real Christian? Former SDA Pastor Answers This Question" at kzbin.info/www/bejne/rWGvZKWJiLGSfpo . Keeping the Sabbath if You Live in Alaska is a Big Problem -This shows that the Sabbath was a regional, temporary command for Israel and not for the world. See www.truthorfables.com/Sabbath_Not_A_Law.htm .

Matthew 1:25 (ESV): 25 but knew her not until she had given birth to a son. And he called his name Jesus. Debate over

All Believers are Catholics, just not ROMAN CATHOLIC. ROME ruled the world at that time and they tried to make Christianity in their own image and we see the apostate mess they made.

The RCC has faith in there works getting them to Heaven,not in Jesus's sacrifice being sufficient for our salvation.

Larry,you have probably been put on the Jesuits hit list.😊

If God saves heathens because they are ignorant, then missionaries are doing a terrible disservice by giving these people enough truth to send them to Hell.

I recently found out that Ellen g White in 1839 suffered a traumatic brain injury and was left unconscious in bed for 3 weeks when she was 9 years old. in 1842, when she was 12 years old. A man named William Miller, with the "Millerites" inspired her to become a believer whilst travelling and preaching Jesus' second coming. William Miller was known for "The Great Disappointment." One of his other followers, left after his death and founded Jehovah Witness. Ellen left and founded Seventh Day Adventism. All three, the mormons, JW and SDA originated from the same "Great second awakening" era, within a district that was named "the burned-over district" in New York City. Seventh Day Adventism was founded on the grounds of a doomsday nutcase who was completely wrong, whom indoctrinated a 12 year old brain damaged girl which then went on to claim prophesy and found Seventh Day Adventism. SDA teach via sola scriptura, but what you might not realise is that SDA church consider Ellen Whites teachings to be apart of that Sola Scriptura. Be careful before you join any religious denomination, sect, organized thinking tanks. Always look at their history. Christianity for example has a very compelling case for legitimacy and validity, even if most of it comes straight from a Christian Narrative. Seventh Day Adventism isn't compelling at all.

Jesus paid the ransom of MANY of All men,as in,men from every tribe, tongue, nation and people, i.e.,Jews and Gentiles, not all individuals.

I can't help but wonder if most of us who query are plagued by fear of being lead astray from the side of Jesus by Rom'es daughter churches, so we stay in a religion that has vexed our spirits from day one. All of these religions share that in common, fear of the outside doctrines.

Thanks for telling us all the truth God bless you ❤

BILLY THE LIAR

This one minute short video comes from our full length video "Filthy Rich Billy Graham Unites With False Religions & False Gospels To Gain Popularity & More Money" at kzbin.info/www/bejne/eZPbXndrabt8Y5I. See our playlist "Dealing With Roman Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy, Idolatry & the Virgin Mary" with 298 videos at kzbin.info/aero/PLFFA8D69D1B914715. Graham says that the Pope & Graham agree on almost everything & their differences aren't important. 1. Graham receives honorary degree from Catholic college 2. Turns Catholic converts back to Rome. 1950 -- The Billy Graham Evangelistic Association (BGEA) was formed and Harold Ockenga would become one of the directors. That same year Roman Catholic Cardinal Cushing promoted Graham with the words “BRAVO BILLY” splashed on the cover of his magazine, making news all across the country, and leading the evangelist to say: “That was my first real coming to grips with the whole Protestant/Catholic situation. I began to realize that there were Christians everywhere. They might be called modernists, Catholics, or whatever, but they were Christians” (Bookstore Journal, Nov. 1991). 1952 -- Billy Graham told reporter William McElwain of the Pittsburgh Sun-Telegraph (Sept. 6, 1952), “Many of the people who have reached a decision for Christ at our meetings have joined the Catholic church and we have received commendations from Catholic publications for the revived interest in their church following one of our campaigns. After all, one of our prime purposes is to help the churches in a community.” 1953 -- Billy Graham “locked himself into a room in New York City for an entire day” with theological modernists Jesse Bader and John Sutherland Bonnell, that he might ask them questions and receive their counsel. In an article in Look magazine the next year (March 23, 1954), Bonnell testified that he and most other Presbyterian ministers did not believe in the virgin birth and the bodily resurrection of Christ, the inspiration of Scripture, a literal Heaven and Hell, and other doctrines. 1956 -- Christianity Today magazine was formed by Billy Graham, with Carl Henry as its first editor-in-chief. This would be the premier voice of positive-emphasis, non-judgmental, non-separatist, intellectually respectable, New Evangelical Christianity. 1957 -- Billy Graham’s evangelistic crusade in New York City was sponsored by the liberal Protestant Council and featured prominent theological modernists. Here Graham began his life-long practice of praising rank modernists, when he spent about 10 minutes eulogizing Jesse Baird, a well-known liberal and apostate, calling him a great servant of Christ. This crusade was the catalyst for Graham’s break with fundamentalists such as Bob Jones, Sr. and John R. Rice of the Sword of the Lord. --------- Methodist Leslie Weatherhead, who denied the blood atonement of Christ, said, “Graham is helping to fill our churches. We can teach people theology when we have got someone to teach” (Leslie Weatherhead: A Personal Portrait, 1975, p. 199). --------- At his San Francisco Crusade, Billy Graham honored modernist Bishop James Pike by having him sit on the platform & lead in prayer and by speaking at Pike’s Grace Cathedral. Graham honored Pike again at his 1960 Detroit Crusade. 1958 -- An official follow-up of Graham’s San Francisco Crusade reported that of the roughly 1,300 Catholics who came forward, “practically all remained Catholic, continued to pray to Mary, go to mass, and confess to a priest” (Oakland Tribune, Wed., Dec. 17, 1958). The chairøman of this crusade was Methodist Bishop Gerald Kennedy, who denied practically every doctrine of the Christian faith and who had endorsed Nels Ferre’s blasphemous 1953 book The Sun & the Umbrella. 1978 -- In October, Billy Graham held a crusade in Catholic Poland. Upon being met at the airport by Bishop Miziolek, chairman of the Committee on Ecumenism of the Polish Catholic Church, Graham said that this adventure represented a new spirit of cooperation that was a constructive example for Christians in other nations (John Pollock, Billy Graham, p. 308). Four of the rallies were held in Catholic churches, with priests participating on the platform with Graham. While in Poland, Graham visited the Marian shrine of Jasna Gora (featuring an icon of the Black Madonna) in Czestochowa. A picture in Decision magazine for February 1979 showed Graham welcoming pilgrims to the shrine. In the minds of his Catholic observers, this put Graham’s stamp of approval upon the idolatrous Mary veneration that is featured at this influential shrine. In his book Crossing the Threshold of Hope, Pope John Paul II testified that his personal devotion to Mary was developed at Marian sites such as “at Jasna Gora” (p. 220). Click kzbin.infoKgm5R4ILafE for Dave Hunt Says Billy Graham Said Catholicism Was False in 1948 But By 1952 Graham Agreed With It!

that is actually so disgusting

This debate was extremely helpful in knowing the key differences between the two positions. Rob Zins did a fine job in defending Scripture against Gerry’s assertions.

Which part of the prophecies in Daniel and revelation that Ellen white has failed to invite theological perspective.someone is trying to defend unbiblical reasons here.

It has become fashionable of late to convert to Roman Catholicism, a phenomenon with which we interact occasionally in our podcast. (click on www.whitehorseblog.com/2023/05/14/the-mother-of-my-lord/#more-5007 ). It is there that we examine, and then refute, the reasons the typical Protestant gives when deciding to convert. The problem of Mary is often the last stumbling block to fall, but when it does, the floodgates of hyperlatria open wide, and an embarrassing superfluity of worship is heaped upon her. After all, the Roman Catholic priest can “command God … and make Him come down to the altar” to be offered in the Sacrifice of the Mass, but has “no commands to give His holy Mother, who does as She pleases.” So taught the Apparition of Mary at La Laus, France in 1664. And on that basis, the apparitions were determined to be authentic. Not because “Mary” appeared as a humble handmaiden but because she had appeared as Virgin Most Powerful and Queen of the Universe, utterly free of any constraint to her will. Unlike her hapless “Son” who gets bossed around daily like a chump, nobody tells Mary what to do. That is why the Apparition of Mary at La Laus was considered authentic, and the curse of hyperlatria is the wretched misfortune that awaits the Protestant who stumbles into devotion to her. In Roman Catholicism, Mary was not merely reverent and virtuous, but wholly and irreversibly sinless from the moment of conception-not only free of sin, but free of any inclination to sin. She was a virgin both at Jesus’ conception and at His birth-as the Scriptures teach-but Rome insists that she also retained the physical attribute of virginity even in childbirth. They allege she suffered neither sickness, nor tearing of the flesh, nor physical pain, nor even the slightest discomfort. Such humiliations of the weaker sex are reserved for the sinful. And because Jesus is God and Mary is His Mother, Roman Catholicism reasons that Mary is “the Mother of God,” the Theotokos. Rome also teaches that the Ark of the Old Covenant prefigured Mary-anointed in holiness (Exodus 30:26), overlaid in pure gold inside and out (Exodus 25:11), made of ostensibly imperishable acacia wood (Exodus 25:10), both immaculate in holiness and untouchable by men. She contained within her womb the bread of heaven and the tables of stone (Hebrews 9:4)-figures of Christ Whom she had carried, and as Ark of the New Covenant, she is the perfect fulfillment of the typology. Free of sin and its effects, she must have also escaped the curse of Adam, returning to Heaven at the end of her life, glorified in body, physically untouched by the ravages of decomposition, and certainly in no need of resurrection. “Arise, O LORD, into thy rest; thou, and the ark of thy strength” (Psalms 132:8). As Christ had ascended to His rest, so surely had Mary, His Ark, followed Him there. She is therefore said already to be enjoying resurrected glory in Heaven. When trying to convince the gullible and the naïve of these teachings, the typical Roman Catholic will appeal to “two thousand years of historic Christian teaching” (Patrick Madrid, Answer Me This), alleging that the Church has always believed these things about Mary. When Pope Pius IX proclaimed in 1854 that Mary had been conceived without sin, he appealed to “illustrious documents of venerable antiquity, of both the Eastern and the Western Church,” saying that they “very forcibly testify” of Mary’s sinlessness (Ineffabilis Deus, 1854). When Pope Pius XII proclaimed in 1950 that Mary had been assumed body and soul into heaven at the end of her life, he appealed to “holy Fathers and Doctors of the Church” who have “since ancient times” taught “this fact” (Munificentissimus Deus, 16). The claims are so broad in their scope and sweeping in their claim that they nearly always produce the desired effect: to intimidate the timid and dissuade the pliable. The ignorant Protestant, shuddering at the mountains of evidence through which he is challenged to sift, simply capitulates without challenge. The truth, however, is that there absolutely have not been “two thousand years of historic Christian teaching” on the fictional Roman Catholic Mary. And the ancient Eastern and Western Church most certainly did not “forcibly testify” of her immaculacy and assumption. Quite the opposite, in fact. In the ancient Church, Mary was believed to be sinful, Christ’s childbirth to be normal, her physical virginity compromised in a natural delivery that was enormously painful for both mother and Child. Her many sins were cleansed at the Cross rather than prevented at her conception. Far from unapproachable holiness and immaculate purity, Mary was not considered to be the Ark of the New Covenant, but an obstinate, unbelieving mother who came to faith in Christ late in life. Such a woman most certainly had not been assumed bodily into heaven. She would have to wait for the resurrection like the rest of us. It was Christ, His Church, and His Gospel, rather than Mary, Who had been foreshadowed by the Ark. What we find in a review of the historical record is that the Mary of Rome’s imagination did not arrive on the scene until late in the 4th century. Until then, she was considered not only sinful, but obstinate, vainglorious and covetous, more appropriately a figure of the Synagogue that rejected Him than the Bride of Christ who celebrated His arrival. So remarkably candid were the early writers on Mary’s need for healing from her “disease” and cleansing from her sins, that the Roman Catholic Encyclopedia is forced to acknowledge those many “stray private opinions,” and the Roman Catholic Mariologist is forced to acknowledge the casual and “discourteous” familiarity with which the early writers discussed her: … the older Fathers … seem to have been in error on this matter. … But these stray private opinions merely serve to show that theology is a progressive science.” (Catholic Encyclopedia, Immaculate Conception). The pre-Ephesus portrait of Mary is paradoxical. … Before [the council of] Ephesus [in 431 A.D.], Oriental theology is apparently unaware of a problem in this regard. Where the literature touches the sanctity of Mary, it does so … with a disinterest which is disconcerting and at times a familiarity which borders on discourtesy. (Juniper Carol, Mariology, Vol. II, section IV Our Lady’s Holiness) And here is where the Catholic apologist’s proud boasting of “two thousand years” of tradition and the Pope’s pious fabrication of ancient “forcible” testimony, come crashing against the rocky coastline of actual history: The early Church just wasn’t that into her. They Believed Mary Was Sinful Tertullian (160 - 225 AD) When speaking of Jesus’ brethren (John 7:5), Tertullian observed that “neither did his brethren believe in him,” including Mary in the ranks of His immediate family’s unbelief. Even though Martha and other Marys were in constant attendance upon Him, “there is at the same time a want of evidence of His mother’s adherence to Him.” Her unbelief is the reason Mary could be no figure of the Church, but rather was a figure of the Synagogue: In this very passage indeed, their unbelief is evident. … while strangers were intent on Him, His very nearest relatives were absent. … but they prefer to interrupt Him, and wish to call Him away from His great work. … When denying one’s parents in indignation, one [Jesus] does not deny their existence, but censures their faults. … in the abjured mother there is a figure of the synagogue, as well as of the Jews in the unbelieving brethren. In their person Israel remained outside, while the new disciples who kept close to Christ within, hearing and believing, represented the Church, which He called mother in a preferable sense and a worthier brotherhood, with the repudiation of the carnal relationship. (Tertullian, On the Flesh of Christ, chapter 7). Click on link above for much more.

St Matthew 12:26😂😂😂

The Roman's perverted Christianity from the beginning and their apostasy keeps getting worse.

One thing a lesser educated person from the third world with English as my third language I suspected Adventism in simple terms . For example, "In the course of the Investigative Judgement why would Jesus who is God waste his time like mere man going through books and names?" Is God suppose to be eternally more powerful than a super computer?"

This one minute short video comes from our full length video called "Roman Catholicism Series #11: Scripture Twisting - 20 Ways Religious Cults Misread the Bible" at kzbin.info/www/bejne/h4XCZqObgdOEpaM . To see the entire 16 hour video series called "Roman Catholicism Series" go to our playlist "Dealing With Roman Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy, Idolatry & the Virgin Mary" with 296 videos at kzbin.info/aero/PLFFA8D69D1B914715 . False religions pervert the message of the Bible in many ways. Galatians 1:6-9, "6 I marvel that you are so quickly deserting Him who called you by the grace of Christ for a different gospel, 7 which is really not another, only there are some who are disturbing you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. 8 But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should proclaim to you a gospel contrary to the gospel we have proclaimed to you, let him be accursed! 9 As we have said before, so I say again now, if any man is proclaiming to you a gospel contrary to what you received, let him be accursed!" We can identify a false teacher or a false prophet by examining first and foremost their teaching and secondly their behavior in light of Scripture. If what they are teaching is not consistent with what is plainly revealed in Scripture, they are a false teacher and are to be ignored, even if they live extraordinary lives, even if they appear to have supernatural insight, or even if they seem to work great miracles. Jesus warned us that there would be false prophets who would perform great signs and would seek to lead astray, if possible, even the elect (Matthew 24:24, Mark 13:22). It is, therefore, urgent not to be distracted by such things, but to focus on the content of their teaching. Our Lord explained: “Beware of the false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorn bushes nor figs from thistles, are they? So every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a bad tree produce good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. So then, you will know them by their fruits,” (Matthew 7:15-20). The false prophet comes in the clothing of a sheep but is inwardly a wolf. He appears on the outside as a sheep but is secretly a wolf within. We are to know them by their “fruit,” not by their “clothing.” A fig tree bears figs, an apple tree bears apples, a prophet bears prophesy, and a teacher bears teaching. “Either make the tree good and its fruit good, or make the tree bad and its fruit bad; for the tree is known by its fruit. You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks out of that which fills the heart,” (Matthew 12:33-34). Jesus likewise said of the false teachers of his day: “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like whitewashed tombs which on the outside appear beautiful, but inside they are full of dead men’s bones and all uncleanness,” (Matthew 23:27). “Woe to you! For you are like concealed tombs, and the people who walk over them are unaware of it,” (Luke 11:44). The image here, drawing from the Old Testament ceremonial purity laws, is of something that looks innocuous or even pleasing on the outside, but is not only corrupt within but also makes the unsuspecting impure because of its deception. It is, therefore, imperative that we not be distracted by any outward appearance of “goodness,” but rather focus first and foremost on the window we have to what is within: the words. It is no surprise, then, that in one of the earliest church writings outside the New Testament we possess, called the Didache, in Chapter 11 which specifically discusses how to identify false prophets and false teachers, the very first instruction before all others is: “Whosoever, therefore, shall come and teach you all these things that have been said before, receive him; but if the teacher himself be perverted and teach a different doctrine to the destruction thereof, hear him not.” The Bible does provide us some concrete examples: False teachers will often seek to add to the work of Christ some law, work, ritual, or ordinance that a believer must also perform in addition to repentance and faith in Christ, saying that this too must be done to be saved, (Galatians 3, 1 Timothy 4:1-5). On the other hand, many false teachers will do the opposite, proclaiming that, because God is so merciful and salvation is by grace alone, you, therefore, don’t need to repent at all. They pervert God’s grace and make it a license to sin, (Jude 4). Any teacher who subtly denies Jesus (2 Peter 2:1), or His authority (Jude 4), or His deity (1 Corinthians 12:2-3), or that He came down from heaven and took on human flesh and died in our place (1 John 1:1-3), these are clearly false teachers.

This short 1 minute clip comes from our full length video called "Demonic Superstitions in Catholicism Caused by Imitations of the Virgin Mary, Signs & Lying Wonders" at kzbin.info/www/bejne/jH3RfWeXlNl-rac . See also our playlist "Dealing With Roman Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy, Idolatry & the Virgin Mary" with 296 videos at kzbin.info/aero/PLFFA8D69D1B914715 . 2:06 Discussion of popular Missouri Marian Days celebration which has drawn 60,000 or more of Vietnamese Catholics coming to pay honor to the Virgin Mary (www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=joblin+globe+marian+days+draw+60%2C000 ). 4:30 - Marian Days attendees have the "Spirit of Mary" particularly "Our Lady of La Vang" who was a reported Marian apparition (a supernatural appearance of the Virgin Mary) in Vietnam (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marian_Days ). 6:36 Timothy Kauffman begins his presentation on Roman Catholicism. He asks the typical question that many people ask, "Can you be a Christian & a Roman Catholic at the same time?" Tim answers by saying NO because the Catholic Religion is in league with the devil (see our playlist called "Dealing with Roman Catholicism, Idolatry & the Virgin Mary" with 296 videos at kzbin.info/aero/PLFFA8D69D1B914715 ). The importance of the "spirit of Mary." 11:03 The final Marian dogma. Mary Coredemptrix Mediatrix Advocate towards a papal definition. 13:35 Where did the Marian Pope John Paul II get his incredible devotion to Mary? "Crossing the Threshold of Hope" tells how the book called "True Devotion to the Blessed Virgin" says that if God sees someone with a "spirit of Mary" within them then God will send His spirit into them. 15:12 The vision of Mary at Lourdes in 1858. The messages from this apparition - The importance of prayer, the rosary, penance, and humility (kissing the ground as a sign); a message of infinite mercy for sinners and for the care of the sick. Pio X: named Lourdes: “Throne of power and mercy of Mary, where marvelous apparitions of Mary took place.” See our video "APPARITIONS OF MARY: IS THE VIRGIN MARY THE FOURTH PART OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC "TRINITY"?" at kzbin.info/www/bejne/oJW5YYqPp9mBgas . 16:18 The John Paul II connection between the apparition of Mary at Fatima on May 13, 1917 and the May 13, 1981 assassination attempt on his life is based on the pure superstition of the date May 13. John Paul II also has much superstitious love of the vision of Mary at Medjugorje. 19:10 World map of Virgin Mary apparitions. Apparitions contradict the one sacrifice of Christ for sin: Heb. 9:26, 10:12, 10:18. 21:25 The vision of Mary at Medjugorje said on April 5, 1984, "This evening I pray you especially to venerate the Heart of my Son, Jesus. Make reparation for the wound inflicted on the Heart of my Son. That Heart is offended by all kinds of sins." Jesus is the only One who makes reparation for sin. This is a false gospel opposed by Galatians 1:8-9. 26:02 The vision of Mary at Fatima, which is a favorite of Pope John Paul II, says "pray the Rosary each day to bring peace to the world & to bring an end to the war ... pray for the conversion of Russia, to do penance & that God wanted the world to have a devotion to Her Immaculate Heart" [instead of God]. Statues of this Mary are sent around the world to be venerated by adoring Catholics. 2 Thessalonians 2:9-12, "Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, 10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. 11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: 12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness." 27:06 The vision of Mary at Lourdes. 27:39 The vision of Mary at Guadalupe. 28:24 Various Plates & statues of visions of Mary. 29:01 Many Faces of Mary. 29:34 All are statues of Demons impersonating Mary. 30:48 The vision of Mary at Guadalupe & The Miraculous Medal in 1830 are visions of the demonic. 31:45 Demonic vision of Jesus influences Catholic practices for the whole church by an official encyclical about “sacred heart of Jesus.” 36:36 The vision of Mary at Mt. Carmel which brought about the scapular & more on the Medal of Mary. 40:38 The Rosary comes from a false vision of Mary. 43:27 Mary at Lourdes promotes the Immaculate Conception. 44:25 Demonic vision also influences the infallibility of the pope. 45:59 The vision of Mary to Don Bosco. 47:11 The assumption of Mary. 49:45 The Fatima secret in 1917 read by every pope since Pope Pius IX. 55:01 Rome has received much of their doctrine from demonic visions of Mary.

Great testimony and witness of The Truth of Biblical Holy Christianity also this man is Anointed and a genuine evangelist a rarity it seems today. Great job showing the difference in True Holy Grace through Faith in The Blessed Redeemer JESUS THE CHRIST vs roman pagan mixture with Chritsianity pagan romanism and orthodox religions very sad

This one minute video short comes from our long version video called "87% OF EVANGELICAL "CHRISTIANS" DON'T KNOW WHAT THE GOSPEL IS OR WHAT JUSTIFICATION IS" at kzbin.info/www/bejne/n56XoK2vlKqciJY . See our playlist called, "Dealing with Predestination, Arminianism & Calvinism" at kzbin.info/aero/PLA932903698A56780 with 124 videos. According to Barna, Gallop & Hunter polls 87% of people claiming to be Evangelical Christians do not know what Biblical justification is (rather believing that God helps those who help themselves). 77% of this same group believe mankind is basically good by nature. With theology like this, 87% of today's Evangelical "Christians" would qualify as Medieval Roman Catholics except without a pope. True Christians, besides evangelizing other religions, cults & pagans, now must look to the so-called "Evangelicals" as another mission field to reach with the saving Gospel of Jesus Christ. Larry Wessels, director of Christian Answers of Austin, Texas (KZbin channel at kzbin.info , websites: www.BIBLEQUERY.ORG, www.HISTORYCART.COM & www.MUSLIMHOPE.COM ) presents another broadcast of his radio program "Christian Answers Live!" hosted by Lee Meckley. The special guest for this presentation is Dr Michael Horton (website: www.whitehorseinn.org/). Dr Horton is Professor of Theology and Apologetics at Westminster Seminary California, editor-in-chief of Modern Reformation magazine, and host of the nationally syndicated radio broadcast, The White Horse Inn. He was formerly the president of Christians United for Reformation, which later merged to become the Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals from 2001 to 2004. Both Modern Reformation magazine and The White Horse Inn radio broadcast are now entities under the umbrella of White Horse Media, whose offices are located on the campus of Westminster Seminary California. Dr Horton has written and edited more than fifteen books, including: "Putting Amazing Back Into Grace," "The Agony of Deceit: What Some TV Preachers Are Really Teaching," "Made In America: The Shaping of Modern American Evangelicalism," "Power Religion: The Selling Out of The Evangelical Church," "Beyond Culture Wars: Is America A Mission Field or Battlefield?," "Christless Christianity: The Alternative Gospel of the American Church," & others. Guest appearance by R.C. Sproul (www.ligonier.org/learn/series/justified-by-faith-alone ). How Is One Justified? Faith Alone or Faith And Works? Our opponents will argue that there is no single text that explicitly bears the words, justification by faith alone. They are correct, but I am certain that they would regard as simplistic the suggestion that the Scriptures do not teach the doctrine of the Trinity simply because the term is not used. The Scriptures are hardly ambiguous in excluding all human activity from being the instrument of justification with the exception of faith. This is the same as saying 'faith alone.' Or, to put it another way, if the Scriptures teach that we are justified by faith and not by works, then they teach 'faith alone.' The Gospel is announced first in Genesis, after the Fall, where God finds Adam and Eve in their guilt and self-righteousness. Their fig leaves cannot hide their shame from God, but the Redeemer God sacrifices an animal and clothes them in its skins, anticipating 'the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.' Already the Gospel is announced not as divine assistance in producing an inherent righteousness, but as God's covering of the believer with the righteousness of another. It is external to the believing sinner. In Acts 13:39, we read, 'Through Christ everyone who believes is justified from everything you could not be justified from by the law of Moses.' In Acts 15:9, we are told that 'he purified their hearts by faith.' If we are justified by a process of cooperating with grace, we can only have peace with God when we no longer sin. But Paul writes, 'Since we have been justified through faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have gained access by faith into this grace in which we now stand' (Rom.5:1-2). Paul drives this point home further in verse 9: 'Since we have now been justified by his blood, how much more shall we be saved from God's wrath through him!' The famous passage in Ephesians 2:8, 9 could not be clearer: 'For by grace you have been saved, through faith, and none of this is of yourselves; it is all the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast.' Paul tells us that his fellow-Israelites were zealous indeed. 'For I can bear witness of them that they have a great zeal for God, but it is not according to knowledge.' Knowledge of certain things is essential for salvation, and the particular piece of knowledge Paul has in mind is the doctrine of justification by grace alone through faith alone: Romans 10:1-4

But the Lord said if you love me, you’ll keep my commandments.

The JW say the Lord Jesus Christ didn’t die on the cross. That must be some of that new light the JW talk about. It is not light but darkness what comes out of the JW

JW is a satanic religion.

Luke 11:13 “If you then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him!” No one speaks on this verse, but I figured this must be where they got the “ask Jesus into your heart” idea. Am I wrong about what this passage is saying?

I left the SDA church months ago. Not just because I did some research on my own on the Bible or other sources, but mostly because deep down in my heart I knew there was something not right about this. I’ve always felt like ‘Is this really a church of Christ?’ And I always knew something was off about the teachings of Ellen G White. When I finally realized ‘enough is enough’, I finally told my wife I no longer believe in the SDA church and belief that Ellen G White is a false prophet and a liar, she didn’t took it that well as she’s a very devoted SDA member. But after a long argument, she accepted my decision of leaving the SDA church. Though I am unsure if our marriage holds as it hasn’t been going well for years and strongly states she wants to leave me, I know God will always be there for me even in the most difficult times.

Someone commented on our channel saying "Daughter of the Devil SDA Ellen White called Fanny Bolton and Marian Davis her “ bookmakers.” They wrote all of Ellen’s books. They both wrote about being overwhelmed when they discovered they were part of a conspiracy to defraud the readers. Ellen was a liar and a thief. Adventists are not in a denomination - they are in a dangerous spiritual counterfeit which is an abomination. Adventism has always been about the lies of Ellen White. Ellen forbids you to say you are saved." In response to this see "Who were Fannie Bolton and Marian Davis to Ellen G. White?" at in-him.com/SDA/Fannie-Bolton.htm part of which says "Fannie Bolton exposed Ellen G. White’s plagiarism a few years after going to work for her. “During a camp meeting in January of 1894, Fannie said, “she was “writing all the time for Sister White.” Furthermore, she said that most of what she wrote was “published in the Review and Herald...as having been written by Sister White under inspiration of God...I am greatly distressed over this matter, for I feel that I am acting a deceptive part. The people are being deceived about the inspiration of what I write. I feel that it is a great wrong that anything which I write should go out under Sister White’s name as an article specially inspired of God. What I write should go out over my own signature; then credit would be given where credit belongs.” [2] Marian Davis also had great misgivings about Ellen White’s plagiarism the entire time she worked with her. “Vesta J. Farnsworth, who was in Australia during the time Ellen was there, wrote that Marian “had shared in the decision to leave out quotation marks in the early edition of [The] Great Controversy and to the using of the general acknowledgment in the Preface. Then when there came severe criticism for this, she, with Sister White and her associates, felt it very keenly.” That Marian was upset and weeping herself to sleep night after night eventually got back to the family, according to Obadiah, and they worried about her because the health of their sister was not robust. Dudley M. Canright, one of Ellen’s biographers, wrote that Marian “was one day heard moaning in her room. Going in, another worker inquired the cause of her trouble. Miss Davis replied: ‘I wish I could die! I wish I could die!’ ‘Why, what is the matter?’ asked the other. ‘Oh,’ Miss Davis said, ‘this terrible plagiarism.’” [3] Fannie wrote, “…I have to some degree believed that [Sister] White was a prophet of God; but some things in connection with using matter from other writers and the editorial relation that were out of harmony with my early school training and the maxim’s applicable to secular literature and uninspired literature, started doubt and questioning as to why this relation was not thoroughly acknowledged, and the sources of quotation credited as in the authors of the world. [Sister] White writes about quotations in the last page of the preface of Great Controversy as follows: “The events which have marked the progress of reform are matters of history. . . In some cased where a historian has so grouped together events as to afford, in brief, a comprehensive view of the subject, or has summarized details in a convenient manner, his words have been quoted; but except in a few instances no specific credit has been given, since they are not quoted for the purpose of citing authority, but because his statements affords a ready and forcible presentation of the subject. This uncredited matter and an unacknowledged editorial relation with some human frailties in [Sister] White, with dull spiritual perception and a distorted vision of truth, caused me to lose sight of the sacred character of the work, and I lost to a great extent my realization that the work through [Sister] White was “the testimony of Jesus.” I tried for years to harmonize what seemed to me inconsistency in the work with a worldly literary maxim that requires an author to acknowledge his editors and to give credit to all works from which he quotes. In contending that [Sister] White was not open and honest about this matter, I supposed myself standing for a principle of ordinary justice and literary honesty….” [4] All the evidence proves Ellen G. White was a false prophet. She contradicted the Bible many times, and she made well documented, false prophecies and then said it was God who showed her those things in vision. According to Fannie Bolton and Marian Davis (Ellen White’s closest literary assistants), she plagiarized the words of other authors and then tried to cover up her theft. When the Seventh-day Adventist Church promotes her they are telling people to believe in a liar, a fraud, and a wolf in sheep’s clothing. The Seventh-day Adventist Church has allowed Ellen G. White to destroy people’s lives, twist the scriptures and defraud their members. They need to acknowledge that Ellen G. White was a liar and a false prophet and discard her writings altogether. References: 1. Fannie’s Folly: Part 1 of the Unfinished Story of Fannie Bolton and Marian Davis. 2. ibid. 3. Marian the Bookmaker: Part 2 of the Unfinished Story of Fannie Bolton and Marian Davis. 4. Fannie Bolton’s confession in 1901. 5. Fannie’s Folly: Part 1 of the Unfinished Story of Fannie Bolton and Marian Davis. 6. Steve Daily. Ellen G. White A Psychobiography (Kindle page locations 3200-3201). Page Publishing, Inc. Kindle Edition. 7. ibid. 8. What Does it Mean to Be a Prophet? 9. What Does ’Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing’ Mean & How to Spot One? See also: Was Ellen G. White a Plagiarist? at in-him.com/SDA/Was-Ellen-White-a-Plagiarist.htm Ellen G. White: The Shut Door Visions and Cover-up! at in-him.com/SDA/the-shut-door.htm The Cultic Doctrines of the Seventh-day Adventist Church. at in-him.com/SDA/Cultic-Doctrines.htm The Christian Church is under obligation to test the prophets. at in-him.com/SDA/test-the-prophets.htm Ellen G. White had cultic Arian beliefs throughout her entire life. at in-him.com/SDA/Ellen-Whites-false-god.htm Seventh-day Adventist Resource Page at in-him.com/SDA/Resources-on-SDA.htm Links to Helpful Websites, Books and Videos on the SDAs The Seventh-day Adventist Church: (Beliefs and Errors) at in-him.com/SDA/index.htm

Someone commented on our channel saying "Daughter of the Devil SDA Ellen White called Fanny Bolton and Marian Davis her “ bookmakers.” They wrote all of Ellen’s books. They both wrote about being overwhelmed when they discovered they were part of a conspiracy to defraud the readers. Ellen was a liar and a thief. Adventists are not in a denomination - they are in a dangerous spiritual counterfeit which is an abomination. Adventism has always been about the lies of Ellen White. Ellen forbids you to say you are saved." In response to this see "Who were Fannie Bolton and Marian Davis to Ellen G. White?" at in-him.com/SDA/Fannie-Bolton.htm part of which says "Fannie Bolton exposed Ellen G. White’s plagiarism a few years after going to work for her. “During a camp meeting in January of 1894, Fannie said, “she was “writing all the time for Sister White.” Furthermore, she said that most of what she wrote was “published in the Review and Herald...as having been written by Sister White under inspiration of God...I am greatly distressed over this matter, for I feel that I am acting a deceptive part. The people are being deceived about the inspiration of what I write. I feel that it is a great wrong that anything which I write should go out under Sister White’s name as an article specially inspired of God. What I write should go out over my own signature; then credit would be given where credit belongs.” [2] Marian Davis also had great misgivings about Ellen White’s plagiarism the entire time she worked with her. “Vesta J. Farnsworth, who was in Australia during the time Ellen was there, wrote that Marian “had shared in the decision to leave out quotation marks in the early edition of [The] Great Controversy and to the using of the general acknowledgment in the Preface. Then when there came severe criticism for this, she, with Sister White and her associates, felt it very keenly.” That Marian was upset and weeping herself to sleep night after night eventually got back to the family, according to Obadiah, and they worried about her because the health of their sister was not robust. Dudley M. Canright, one of Ellen’s biographers, wrote that Marian “was one day heard moaning in her room. Going in, another worker inquired the cause of her trouble. Miss Davis replied: ‘I wish I could die! I wish I could die!’ ‘Why, what is the matter?’ asked the other. ‘Oh,’ Miss Davis said, ‘this terrible plagiarism.’” [3] Fannie wrote, “…I have to some degree believed that [Sister] White was a prophet of God; but some things in connection with using matter from other writers and the editorial relation that were out of harmony with my early school training and the maxim’s applicable to secular literature and uninspired literature, started doubt and questioning as to why this relation was not thoroughly acknowledged, and the sources of quotation credited as in the authors of the world. [Sister] White writes about quotations in the last page of the preface of Great Controversy as follows: “The events which have marked the progress of reform are matters of history. . . In some cased where a historian has so grouped together events as to afford, in brief, a comprehensive view of the subject, or has summarized details in a convenient manner, his words have been quoted; but except in a few instances no specific credit has been given, since they are not quoted for the purpose of citing authority, but because his statements affords a ready and forcible presentation of the subject. This uncredited matter and an unacknowledged editorial relation with some human frailties in [Sister] White, with dull spiritual perception and a distorted vision of truth, caused me to lose sight of the sacred character of the work, and I lost to a great extent my realization that the work through [Sister] White was “the testimony of Jesus.” I tried for years to harmonize what seemed to me inconsistency in the work with a worldly literary maxim that requires an author to acknowledge his editors and to give credit to all works from which he quotes. In contending that [Sister] White was not open and honest about this matter, I supposed myself standing for a principle of ordinary justice and literary honesty….” [4] All the evidence proves Ellen G. White was a false prophet. She contradicted the Bible many times, and she made well documented, false prophecies and then said it was God who showed her those things in vision. According to Fannie Bolton and Marian Davis (Ellen White’s closest literary assistants), she plagiarized the words of other authors and then tried to cover up her theft. When the Seventh-day Adventist Church promotes her they are telling people to believe in a liar, a fraud, and a wolf in sheep’s clothing. The Seventh-day Adventist Church has allowed Ellen G. White to destroy people’s lives, twist the scriptures and defraud their members. They need to acknowledge that Ellen G. White was a liar and a false prophet and discard her writings altogether. References: 1. Fannie’s Folly: Part 1 of the Unfinished Story of Fannie Bolton and Marian Davis. 2. ibid. 3. Marian the Bookmaker: Part 2 of the Unfinished Story of Fannie Bolton and Marian Davis. 4. Fannie Bolton’s confession in 1901. 5. Fannie’s Folly: Part 1 of the Unfinished Story of Fannie Bolton and Marian Davis. 6. Steve Daily. Ellen G. White A Psychobiography (Kindle page locations 3200-3201). Page Publishing, Inc. Kindle Edition. 7. ibid. 8. What Does it Mean to Be a Prophet? 9. What Does ’Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing’ Mean & How to Spot One? See also: Was Ellen G. White a Plagiarist? at in-him.com/SDA/Was-Ellen-White-a-Plagiarist.htm Ellen G. White: The Shut Door Visions and Cover-up! at in-him.com/SDA/the-shut-door.htm The Cultic Doctrines of the Seventh-day Adventist Church. at in-him.com/SDA/Cultic-Doctrines.htm The Christian Church is under obligation to test the prophets. at in-him.com/SDA/test-the-prophets.htm Ellen G. White had cultic Arian beliefs throughout her entire life. at in-him.com/SDA/Ellen-Whites-false-god.htm Seventh-day Adventist Resource Page at in-him.com/SDA/Resources-on-SDA.htm Links to Helpful Websites, Books and Videos on the SDAs The Seventh-day Adventist Church: (Beliefs and Errors) at in-him.com/SDA/index.htm

A forewarning against Roman Catholicism

To sad by the time we realize our mistakes our apostasy. It will be to late. There will be wailing an nashing of teeth or gums .

Which is the truth church/dedomination..shall we establish new dedomination that worship at Shabbat day, or what is your idea?

How can anybody believe Mary has more mercy than Christ when Christ is the one that came here as a human to die in our place? Can man be more merciful than God?

Amen to the true gospel 🙏