👍The 90 minute talk made a FOOL of his "Science can account for everything" claim @ 1:03:27... Science also can't account for why I could still hear Dr Atkins AFTER Dr Craig dropped the mic 😎🎤

Just think for people who believe in God, how can this gobbledegook, bullshittery by Dr Atkins convince them of anything apart from the obvious fact that Dr Atkins is a very sad, deluded and silly man? Like anyone is gonna listen to his +ve and -ve charge crap and go, well hell now I just know there no way in the world that HE exists?

I began watching this with a preconception about Dr Craig. He surprised me with his understanding, humility, knowledge and intelligence. By the end of the debate I was a in open-mouthed admiration of him. This is by far the best demolition of Dr Atkins of the several I have seen before.

Most of the people are against Dr. Atkins, but I believe in the future the society will evolve and likely science will be able to explain the origen of the universe, the life and many other things. By that time, religion will be history. We have to recognize we are animals and our brains can't understand everything, in the same way animals can not comprehend quantum physics.

How come I'm just seeing this in 2024. A Craig, Plantinga duo is unmatched.

Thomas Richard Clark Jennifer Lewis Margaret

Dr Craig wins again with this atheist

Why is Atkins trying to convince anyone? Those who are convinced, are chemically destined to believe his view, and those who aren't, the same.

That moderator was a tyrant

I find it hilarious when atheists argue that the etymology of the term "atheism" is "a-" (denoting without) + "theism" (denoting god-belief) because the term "atheism" *predates* the term "theism" by nearly a century. That *cannot* be the etymology. Sure, they can stipulate any meaning they like because language is descriptive and not prescriptive. However, that doesn't alter the fact that they *_DID_* redefine the term.

This is a debate of the metaphysical and the philosophical logic vs the materialistic and naturalistic position held by Atkins. Is it any wonder the are talking right past each other. Atkins like Mike Dillihunty, Dawkins et al would ignore any empirical proofs no matter how strong

Was that Ravi Zacherius in the audience?

Dr. Lane Craig lied about islam and prophet muhammad(saw).

That is not naturalism. Almost all of us believe in god.

Atkins lost at minute 50

Dr. Atkins simply doesn't understand, it pretend not to understand, anything of the points Dr. Craig is making. Paul said it best 1900 years ago people suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them for God has made it plain to them. How proud do you have to be to state outright that science can explain everything. He didn't even understand when Craig pointed out that that's not a scientific statement.

1:17:14

Wasn't a fair fight. The few exchanges before WFB's "Put that in your pipe and smoke it." are perpetual inspiration for metaphysics.

You actually can experimentally prove that nothing is faster than light. Yes, there could be an experiment disproving this, but just like every established scientific fact can be disproven in the future!

You may not agree or like Dr. Atkins, But what you can't refute is he helped a lot of people lose weight with his Atkins diet!! 😂😂😂😂😅

All Religions and The myth of jesus (including the others) are nothing but make believe and wishful thinking of a weak mind...

Looks buff! Chad Christian philosopher, WLC.

So God popped out of nothing, and came from nowhere, just like the "big bang". 😂

Why is this theist using science and only science and mathematics used by Hawking to make his point when his only real truth (if you can call it that) is the Bible.

You're saying that atheists say the universe came from nothing. But you're also saying that God came from nothing. Clever! How can Craig talk such dribble of an argument. He's not arguing for God or time, he's fighting against his opponent. Trying to tell him what he's going to say, when he hasn't even stood yet.

who s here because of the documentary "the signs" ? 😅

1:03:30 here is the mic drop movement

Denying God is like denying that you have a tongue with your own tongue!

Turns out doctors can talk a lot of bollocks too

4:56

Amazing that in this day of science and discovery we are still discussing God.

Did anyone truly believes Sam won? If so how

Atkins: "God didn't need to create anything. It was already there." God: ‭Genesis 1:4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness.

Чтобы требовать начала у Вселенной, необходимо доказать, что нечто может пропасть из неё, т.е. доказать конечность материи. Не видоизменение её формы из атома, в энергию, которая путешествует по вселенной, встречается с другой энергией, флуктуирует и снова создаёт атом. А непосредственно продемонстрировать конечность материи. До тех пор, требование к началу не имеет оснований.

Peter Atkins was married 3 times. He can't figure out the basic elements of a personal relationship yet he claims to that he figured out the nature of the Universe. A Narcissist of the first order.

I like Craig because he provides evidence, hope and truth. Atkins presents suspicion, doubt and a meaningless existence. Given that both sides can not give 100% evidence of their case, I'll go for a happier and more optimistic life experience and stick with Craig. You da Man William Lane Craig.

Hosted by William Buckley no less

It's great to know that somebody understands the universe. I don't even understand lightning. So there must be a god

Craig need to show me the evidence for the absence of an invisibile teapot in the space. He says there's, I don't see it. Also he attacks a strawman : none ever said that teapot was launched in the space by us.

It is a clear cut example of genetic fallacy

"Low-Bar Bill Craig". Still "LYING FOR JESUS".

It is shocking that Dr Atkins is so poorly educated in other fields like history, philosophy and other branches of science. For example, He really made a fool of himself in not understanding the principle of how Occam's razor works and misapplying it repeatedly even after being corrected. I mean this is very basic undergraduate stuff...inexcusable.

Dr. Atkins admitted in his opening statement that science cannot account for the origins of the universe, life, and consciousness, but then proclaims science explains everything. He is in contradiction to his own thesis. Yet, he professes himself to be wise. Now, where did I read an explanation for Atkins’ thinking? I think I read something about this in a first century A.D. publication by a Jewish scholar named Saul who was Paul who put stylus to parchment and said-“Although they claim to be wise, they became fools.”

I didn't know that CP30 was such a staunch advocate for atheism.

Atkins: often wrong, never in doubt.

It’s interesting how the atheist still claims this ‘God of the Gaps’ which is exactly what they themselves do, it’s the ‘science of the gaps’ the ‘time of the gaps’ as well as their ‘evolution of the gaps’ they are claiming that science will answer everything. Most of the athletes arguments are just that. Evolution requires a self replicating cell. A replicating cell requires evolution. This to them is ‘science’ its called circular reasoning. Another thing they accuse theists of doing. Atheist project most of their own flaws. Here Atkins is pointed out that he is using circular reasoning in his own books. He doesn’t even try to address it. So smug. These atheists brought more people to God with their hatred shown by their insults and their dishonesty shown by their strawman arguments, special, pleading and circular reasoning. It’s just sad. Then they have Sam Harris as their moral leader. Lol basically do whatever he says and it will lead to human flourishing and the ends justify the means.

Craig's cosmological argument is actually the most powerful and persuasive argument for God. I've never heard an atheist debate it.

Found it 🙏🏻

Wait, this is the Peter Atkins who wrote the Physical Chemistry textbook??

It seems like William Lane Crack sucked on his pipe too much.