Ancestral Recall is awful. Requiring your opponent to draw cards first is just awful in Yu-Gi-Oh. Especially since the conditions cannot be met during normal matches.
@SheruMuko3 күн бұрын
For Black Lotus there is a problem. Tokens cannot be used as material for an XYZ summon. That’s a game rule.
@Eliot_Draws3 күн бұрын
that's why block lotus has the effect to tribute the tokens to summon monsters in their place.
@Thermascorch3 күн бұрын
You definitely did not have to go through the effort to try and balance these cards, it’s appreciated though
@DragoShivan3 күн бұрын
Well the black lotus in ygo suffers a lot of restrictions.
@Eliot_Draws3 күн бұрын
that what you get from being the ultimate generic starter.
@supermintsoda7433 күн бұрын
if we're being lore accurate Blac Lotus would just be a continuous spell which can send itself to the grave to draw 3 cards. Since there's no mana system, cards are the resources of yugioh, and thus black lotus would give you free resources same as it does in magic. Yes it would probably be banned immediatly, but that's kind of on brand for what is MTGs most rare and powerful card that's banned forever.
@chicabu673 күн бұрын
I really disagree Because the biggest analog to mana in Yu-Gi-Oh is either bodies(monsters or i guess in Magic it's creatures) or your 1 normal summon per turn although the normal summon is a closer analog to playing a land) Anyway what I meant is that the closest analog to black lotus in Yu-Gi-Oh is a spell that creates 3 tokens of any level, attributes and type or making it more balanced a card that gives you 3 normal summons a turn
@andresmarrero86664 күн бұрын
Shouldn't the Ultimate Nightmare be a legendary demon dragon horror token instead. That would prevent Terror Incarnate from popping up another version of itself by specifying a legendary demon dragon horror which is the Ultimate Nightmare. It also kinda goes with the evolution of Yubel starting out as a demon then becoming a demon dragon and ending up as a demon dragon horror. Also what about the Yubel fusion monster?
@Eliot_Draws4 күн бұрын
I was running out of text space with it having the legendary and token super type.
@andresmarrero86664 күн бұрын
@@Eliot_Draws ah that explains it.
@andresmarrero86664 күн бұрын
I figured that field spells would become enchantment lands and artifact lands because that kinda sounds like what a field spell is. They are more often than not physical locations.
@Eliot_Draws4 күн бұрын
but if they became lands you could only play 1 every turn.
@andresmarrero86664 күн бұрын
@Eliot_Draws but isn't that the case with field spells in general? You are kinda supposed to play them and not immediately replace them. So only being able to be played one at a time doesn't seem to be that much of a problem. Unless you can only activate the effects of a single land per turn? If so I wasn't aware that was a thing with lands.
@Eliot_Draws4 күн бұрын
@@andresmarrero8666 actually some decks have multiple field spells and cycle through them in the same turn to refresh their effects, gain advantage from being sent to the grave or end on a detrimental field spell after using up the effects of their first field spell to impede your opponent.
@andresmarrero86664 күн бұрын
@Eliot_Draws I am aware that some people do that and the Triamids' whole gimmick is swapping out their multiple field spells, but in general field spells aren't really designed to be used that way. They are mostly written with the expectation of them sticking around for a bit baring exceptions.
@sobbles62424 күн бұрын
what is absolutely crazy about the black lotus is that a its a one card 3 tokens that are any type u want and b it allows you to cheat out any monster from your deck that can still activate their effects in grave AKA BETTER HALQ (tho not being able to use the monsters as links could be a bit troublesome tbh). time walk and encestral recall are both unusable garbage tbh (i mean it could be a maxx c/mulcharmy counter but even then thats kinda ass). and time twister is pretty broken provided you can activate shifter or play a pendulum deck, the requirement of no cards in grave is pretty much irrelevant (you could also play this in a trap deck where you only set floodgates and then just refill your hand.)
@Eliot_Draws4 күн бұрын
you wouldn't be able to use time twister after shifter since the card sends itself to the graveyard to activate it's effect.
@sobbles62423 күн бұрын
@@Eliot_Draws yeah but its not rare to see certain decks like floo or bysteal decks that can banish the shifter.
@andresmarrero86664 күн бұрын
I can't wait for the ABCs and their combinations to be done as this would make the first white construct deck as constructs are usually a blue or colorless thing. Though a couple of cards do have to lightly tap into blue and black to use their effects. Black is weird since these cards don't really align with any of the asthetics or traits of black. Wouldn't Union Hanger be a land as that is essentially what field spells are? What about Union Carrier as well since it is a link monster? You are probably going to have to use the meld, transform, and equipment mechanics a lot for this archetype.
@Eliot_Draws4 күн бұрын
I gave them black or blue costs since all the cards require a discard of some sort to activate their effects, though I gave some of them black costs because their single target destruction effects. field spells as lands are some what limiting as you can only play one land a turn and while they could generate mana as of right now I'm not sure if that would make them too powerful. for Union Carrier It will probably be a either a card with emerge or offering and have it target equipments with the same colour as the target creature.
@AggronOverlord_3064 күн бұрын
If i remember correctly, Continuous Spells cannot have Quick Effects on them, only trigger effects. Why not make Black Lotus a Continuous Trap that can be used from the hand with some requirements (Like the opponent controlling more cards than you)? I think that would solve a lot of issues. Otherwise, I really like how it turned out!
@YukiFubuki.4 күн бұрын
fast effect you mean, quick effect is monster exclusive
@AggronOverlord_3064 күн бұрын
@YukiFubuki. You're right
@andresmarrero86664 күн бұрын
So infernitys is a vengeful Grixas deck. Shame that they don't have more blue in them given their use of constructs.
@gauwal4 күн бұрын
You shouldn't have added stuff for balancing, the entire point of the power nine is that they are unbalanced to a cosmical point
@Eliot_Draws4 күн бұрын
these videos are more or less what they would look like in the current landscape as I realized It's not fun to make extremely over or under powered cards with a more direct translation.
@felipercalvo3 күн бұрын
The problem is that both points are valid
@computernerd11014 күн бұрын
You worded Yubel as a Transforming DFC, but you used the frame of a Modal DFC.
@YukiFubuki.4 күн бұрын
dnt think it really makes sense for black lotus to be a continuous spell outside of flavor reason given it technically does nothing but exist to remove itself from the field like that, being a continuous spell also means its unable to function at spell speed 2 too outside of possibly having its effect be categorized as trigger effect but this then means it must have a trigger condition too rather then something you can manually do on your turn and that it would fail to resolve on principal since as a continuous spell it requires the card to remain faceup on field at resolution to even be able to resolve at all the grave’s saying “quick effect” alos shouldnt be there too since its exclusively used for monster to grant their effects a fast effect timing which is only natural to quick play spells and all traps by nature and as other have mentioned it will miss timing every time since going to grave isnt the last thing to happen but not that this would even function as a balance in the first place since the player can simply make sure to always only use it as chain link 1 so it wouldnt miss timing makes more sense for it to be probably a normal/quickplay spell or a normal/counter trap instead and just have the second effect start with “and if you do: you can banish this card then apply one of these effects” so that the banish is part of the effect on resolution while its still resolving on field and not a cost giving the opponent a way to prevent the 2nd effect by destroying it before it can banish itself from the field
@carpedm98464 күн бұрын
You can give mox jet the ability to be counted as 2 monsters for an xyz summon, like how the new shark and heraldic monsters do. And pearl could have a destrudo-esque effect to level manupilate. Reduce a monster's level(maybe your opp's even?) by an amount of your choice, summon pearl as a tuner.
@carpedm98464 күн бұрын
We do sorta have time twister and ancestral recall. That are fiber jar and graceful charity.
@carpedm98464 күн бұрын
I dont think making black lotus able to miss timing changes much, since its going to be sent to the gy by its own cost. I am not that polished with the minute details, but it may be unactivatable if you tribute and then summon the tokens, since the tokens being summoned is the last thing to happen. But Im not sure.
@brandoncastellano18584 күн бұрын
From my understanding, the power nine are the most powerful cards in early magic. They’ve been translated into modern Yugioh. I personally don’t think many of these would see play as they are. That’s absolutely fine. It’s a neat idea.
@OtakuNoShitpost5 күн бұрын
Original Gatewatch planeswalkers conversation would be interesting to see
@Eliot_Draws5 күн бұрын
I would like to know which iteration you would want to be converted.
@Vankaskan5 күн бұрын
You cant use tokens for xyz summons
@Eliot_Draws5 күн бұрын
Thats why black lotus lets you summon monsters from your deck by tributing it's tokens. You can also xyz summon using trap cards that count themselves as monsters too.
@Vankaskan5 күн бұрын
@Eliot_Draws the reason why traps work is because the card still exists, when tokens leave the field, they stop existing
@Eliot_Draws5 күн бұрын
@ I specifically added an effect to replace the tokens with monster from your deck to xyz with
@Vankaskan5 күн бұрын
@Eliot_Draws k
@DrepaChorusTCG5 күн бұрын
if we had mox emerald in yugioh , rituals would actually be viable. you could turn one 2 mox emeralds into any ritual monster, as mox emerald uses monsters to ritual summon it can use the other mox emerald to ritual summon
@Veryfreshveryflourish244 күн бұрын
Tbf most recent ritual decks have gotten tops. Voiceless voice Libromancer Mikanko(if it counts) Drytron post support too has gotten couple stray tops. Also upcoming reptile deck of mitsurugi is seen to be strong with ogdoadic and ryzeal.
@MsMiDC3 күн бұрын
@@Veryfreshveryflourish24 I wouldn't really say Mikanko is a Ritual deck, it can rely on its other normal main deck effect monsters pretty well. Although Ohime is really good.
@ThisisThatman5 күн бұрын
So unfortunately I didn't catch this earlier and I'm not super confident on my knowledge with missing timing but black lotus might cause itself to miss timing because the last thing that happens is the tokens being summoned All in all pretty good errata of your previous video on this the difference is incredible
@leorick24545 күн бұрын
I Like how Black Lotus, Time walk and the Moxes turned out. Time walk especially seems fun to try to make work in a deck. Great video as always
@ThisisThatman26 күн бұрын
What a year it's crazy how many cards you've gone through I'm excited to what comes next
@nitro5247Ай бұрын
This is really cool! I will note though, the way you narrate does sound pretty unnatural, I’d just stick with one intonation the whole way through, or just not keep rising and falling throughout the sentence. Still, really cool video and I’d love to see what you do next!
@BlueHawkPictures17Ай бұрын
you can have 2 field spells, they dont destroy each other anymore
@Eliot_DrawsАй бұрын
Each player can only have one though.
@theshinobigamer5737Ай бұрын
Hot. Keep it up🗣️🔥
@johncosco2348Ай бұрын
You should convert the Signer Dragons into Magic cards.
@Eliot_DrawsАй бұрын
Signer dragons will be hard to convert unless I choose a specific tuner monster to convert since all of them are completely generic.
@johncosco2348Ай бұрын
@ You can choose Tuners that their Signer used in the anime.
@Eliot_DrawsАй бұрын
@@johncosco2348 What I mean about picking one is that the current way I transform synchros is by physically flipping the card over to transform them meaning it would be best to transform a specific tuner monster to transform into the specified synchro. The problem is that they use a bunch of different tuners to make the same monster, so it will be hard to just pick one. Jack Atlas as a secondary archetype of tuners called resonators just to make the one dragon.
@johncosco2348Ай бұрын
@ pick the one they use the most.
@carstan62Ай бұрын
Anarchronos has to either banish face-up or only banish face-up monsters. Banishing face-down monsters face-down temporarily is way too ripe for cheating.
@Eliot_DrawsАй бұрын
But you need to tribute summon anachronos for this effect, meaning you need to sacrifice 2 monsters and give up your normal summon.
@carstan62Ай бұрын
@Eliot_Draws In not talking about how strong the effect is, I'm talking about, when playing paper, this would ruin the game-state. If you banish an unknown card face-down when they already have cards banished face-down, it would become a judging nightmare to make sure someone didn't cheat.
@anime_penguinАй бұрын
Should have flying not reach, you can see the wings on all the cards
@Eliot_DrawsАй бұрын
but if it had flying there would be cases where your opponents couldn't block yubel even if they wanted to.
@pavi42069Ай бұрын
I don't play mtg, would this card be good in today mtg's meta?
@monkfishy6348Ай бұрын
I'm not sure how it works in Magic, but the fact you are preventing all damage done to Yubel, could mean it only ever deals 0 damage back to that creature's controller. Instead it could maybe be "If Yubel would be dealt combat damage by an opponent's attack or blocking creature, deal that much damage to that creature's controller instead". This also puts in the combat damage protection by default, as combat damage is never dealt to it. Should also have Flying, Haste and Vigilance.
@Eliot_DrawsАй бұрын
Yubel deals damage based on that creature's power not by how much damage it takes according to it's current effect. Brash taunter is the closest thing to the reflect damage effect but it needs to be indestructible for this effect to work and yubel need to die to trigger the other effects.
@christopherb501Ай бұрын
Convert Pendulums! Are they MDFCs with the back face being an enchantment subtype? Is the Scale indicated in the upper-left? What does the Scale flavorfully mean? Is it a supertype? I must know!
@Eliot_DrawsАй бұрын
They probably would be MDFC I just don't know how to add the scale effect. The scales are the red and blue arrows in the top text box and if you have two Pendulums in the left and right most spell and trap zone slot. If you do You can summon monsters directly from your hand once per turn as long as the monsters levels are higher then the low scale and lower then the high scale. I don't think there's an elegant way of imitating a scales other then placing counters and having the cards look for other enchantments with counters. They'd probably just reduce the generic costs of the card for the next creature card you play.
@elvenatheart982Ай бұрын
Make Stardust cards next (I dont think you did )
@Eliot_DrawsАй бұрын
It'd be hard to do since a majority of the cards are generic synchro's, though I could probably do synchrons.
@verysmallTKАй бұрын
Should probably increase it's toughness to 10. In YGO defense is arbitrary compared to how toughness in MTG works. It just seems unlike Yubel to die to getting hit by a -1/-1 effect or another for of ping
@vector1257Ай бұрын
That's why Yubel works though. It's strong to battle, destruction effects summons the next Yubel, but removal counters it. -1/-1 would trigger the "on death" effect and just bring out the next Yubel, Don't know a ton about Magic, but depending on how common other forms of removal are, it might be better to change it to a "when destroyed" instead of death.
@verysmallTKАй бұрын
@vector1257 oh fair. I'd forgotten that you're trying to cycle through your Yubels through death. I do think though that magic has more exile effects that would get around this but that's the counterplay of course. It occurs to me that you can emerge another copy of Yubel onto the first to flip the first one XD