Weird that they let him collect his winnings before he attempted the real pull. Why’d the other vehicles struggle so hard to move this thing?

What a lot of folks don't understand is that the military trucks based on the M44 chassis was not designed to be a "powerhouse", rather it was designed to carry a rated load efficiently over adverse terrain.

Ank MK38 it is U ???

Nice food trays lmao

It's truly insane how much torque those trucks produce with that little horsepower

Next up: Hemmt 10x10 and then an M1A1. 😂

My M88 would have pulled those together without ANY hesitation

yea i think he won XD

....and video EXACTLY like this make me want to spend an insane amount of money on something i really dont need parked in my backyard next to my boat and hot tub and ram and mustang that is already there haha

This car numberone.

I drove this beautiful machine for 8 years. That thing is impossible to get stuck in. Like, you deliberately have to get it stuck in something and even then, it's not stuck for long.

Would love a 5 ton

According too the distortion of that camera that truck was starting to time warp at the end.

Best full pull I've seen in a while except the Dodge General Lee.

It's all about the torque and geared down horse power 💪🇺🇲

To race go to 2:40s

Isnt that a 5 ton?

Seems to me that hitching to a point at or above the rear axles is going to lift the front end resulting in a loss of traction which was seen here. Yes it was a full pull, but if more sled weight is added it could well be a different outcome.

It probably would have pulled easier, if he did get on the highway.🤣

"Let's see what happens" is my philosophy on life.

ha ha ha...that was awesome!

Fun fact, that's also the top speed of duece and a half!

Love mine. 3 color camo green, with winch (M925a2), and rooftop gun turret ring. Unstoppable.

Don't have enough weight to stop it

Knew before he started how far he would go... run out of track.. make a great firewood truck but not enough room by over filling to slow it

Go on hiway😂😂

OMG!!!!!!! AWESOME!!!!

Used to have a video where they hooked an Abrams tank up to one of those sleds. It pulled it as far as they had room for. The tank won.

That is TORQUE and TRACTION 💪

Did we expect anything less¿ Go Army!!

Just a stroll in the park for what he was built for.

lol hoping to get a crx soon fuck these 12 year old comments lol i wanna do this

I have owned two of these, just used for parades, great trucks. Something that helps here is that the truck weighs 11 tons empty, gives you traction.

Want.

100ft. About right for 5.4 Excursion

Between this and the M88, I smile like a little boy seeing these in action, cant wait to finish H8.

I would love to do that with my HEMTT wrecker when I get it running, yes I own one the M984E1

This is pure genius. I never even would have thought about a camera in a crab trap. Awesome video !

Thank you so much for sharing MADE IN U.S.A ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

Rip crx

Le matériel américain est très fort

Wonder what the 7 ton would do. 🤔

2020 bought me here

Finally someone aired down first.

Might as well put his signal on and hopped on the freeway

Leading cause of death where I'm from is you just out for a RIP are ya bud?

🤦🏼‍♂️

This one has the ACERT C15 Caterpillar.

The M923A2's much like the A1's before them were one of the best five ton trucks out of all the cargo trucks/troop carriers. A2's were 1987-1994 and A1's were 1984-1987 while the original M923's rolled out in 1982. One of the main differences was that the A1's just like the M812's-M820's before them had the N/A NHC-250's from Cummins,until the A2's got the 12V 6CT's. Another thing was that their 1400×20's on the A2's had different tread and were updated with CTIS,A1's still had the super singles but never CTIS which would be seen since the front rims never had wheel guards in order to keep the air valves separated,and then the basic versions only had 42 inch dual tires,never 48 inch like the later variations. Even though the 8.3L in the A2's wasn't as power packed as the 14.0L,it was more durable and reliable in the long run.You couldn't run the SC 250 in the older series trucks at 2,100 RPM for a long time because they were notorious for breaking valve seals and piston bearings from that,or even throwing rods too.That was common when TM manuals suggested the engines were fine at 2,300 RPM...Wrong. It was a great thing when the Seabees and USMC went with the MTVR's and USMC also got the LVSR's when the old equipment was being phased out. It was a mistake getting rid of these elsewhere and going with the FMTV's...No longevity or long term reliability.

good stuff, thanks