Would loss aversion explain why government departments all become obsessed with justifying their own existence (beyond what is for the good of the society/economy)?
@whatabouttheearth Жыл бұрын
This is a rare video of Dorothy after she returned to Kansas explaining what she learned on her trip to Oz and back.
@blixten29282 жыл бұрын
WOW THIS GUY IS INTERESTING! And he explains so well. GREAT TEACHER. Thank you so much!!
@friendlyfire34122 жыл бұрын
So we have pretty much a Mission to make. They said "Write Summary of the Mental Accounting" And most of em are at least 34 pages. And Im litterallly worst at Summaries :D But hey I got my english right here and the Nice teacher right here to save my back! Thank you alot! I will add this to the summary! Also funny enough, This teached me more than the Pdf's I saw and wrote...
@benjaminrackley18932 жыл бұрын
Anyone else here from a philosophy of science class?
@decidinghowtodecide2 жыл бұрын
Mr. Ariely is an inspiration for all of us. Here is another video on the Endowment Effect (subtitles in Spanish): kzbin.info/www/bejne/m5_Yn6l4iambqqc
@satya-nr3sm2 жыл бұрын
Sir i had a brain surgery earlier but after three I got injured on same side of surgery I not had any problem since one year but now I am getting flashes in my eyes. I had check up to retina it is perfect. Is there problem of ocipital lobe. Due to injured one year ago
@wisdomfromthecave2 жыл бұрын
I dunno, after getting so many mugs for free being a teacher, I would swap a few mugs for a chocolate bar in a minute!
@roberthermens9042 жыл бұрын
Department stores’ fitting rooms: IT’S A TRAP!
@anxietyatwheel85122 жыл бұрын
Twelve years ago I had a head injury from car accident. On impact I heard a popping noise on the upper back of my head. MRIs were normal. Now12 years later, I have increased memory loss. More than after accident. MRI showed unspecified parietal lobe atrophy abnormal for my age.
@LearnEnglishwithMsYael2 жыл бұрын
Great Video! Any chance you could add the links to the comments as we can't access the links that you recommended. Thanks!
@willieboynton90673 жыл бұрын
Inmatcher form of organisms that turn in to very different adult
@bobpratt56253 жыл бұрын
our CREATOR JESUS is masterful. even healed my son with a temporal mass.
@Equinhoxy3 жыл бұрын
how would this be implemented into mental accounting?
@findouthere87353 жыл бұрын
SO DEEP GUYS NICE VIDEO VERY CLEAR
@ajmarr56713 жыл бұрын
Good presentation, but with one important error, or two In classical economics, humans are judged to be broadly rational creatures, while behavioral economics demonstrates that there are intrinsic limits to rationality, or to major decision making. A common thread in both disciplines is that decision is dispassionate, with affect being the byproduct of cognition. In contrast, for the study of mammalian decision making or ‘learning theory’, and as rendered through contemporary affective neuroscience, affect is an unrelenting, distorting, and animating factor for all cognition and thus for all momentary as well as major decisions. In other words, everything we think and do is influenced by conscious or non-consciously continuously perceived affect, or emotion, and to be effective, we have to understand how affect guides every momentary choice we make. The fact that behavioral economics is based on social psychological experiments, rather than deriving from first principles as to how incentive motivation is instantiated in human brains makes its conclusions piecemeal and disjointed. Or in the words of the economist David Gal (linked below), “behavioral economists are too often concerned with describing how human behavior deviates from the assumptions of standard economic models, rather than with understanding why people behave the way they do.” The following linked treatise for a lay audience, written in consultation and with the endorsement of the distinguished affective neuroscientist Kent Berridge, perhaps can provide a counterpoint to this perspective that may illuminate, confirm, and often disconfirm many ideas in behavioral economics. Also linked is an history of incentive motivation by Dr. Berridge. www.scribd.com/document/495438436/A-Mouse-s-Tale-a-practical-explanation-and-handbook-of-motivation-from-the-perspective-of-a-humble-creature Berridge and Incentive Motivation sites.lsa.umich.edu/berridge-lab/wp-content/uploads/sites/743/2020/09/Berridge-2001-Reward-learning-chapter.pdf Berridge Lab, University of Michigan sites.lsa.umich.edu/berridge-lab/ Gal’s Criticism of behavioral economics --- and his take on why the concept of loss aversion is wrong www.nytimes.com/2018/10/06/opinion/sunday/behavioral-economics.html
@roberthermens9042 жыл бұрын
Now, a clever man would put the poison into his own goblet, because he would know that only a great fool would reach for what he was given. I am not a great fool, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of you. But you must have known I was not a great fool, you would have counted on it, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of me. -Vizzini
@matsuross50623 жыл бұрын
The video was super helpful and love the narrator. Good job!
@nickf20014 жыл бұрын
yooo U of U philosophy what's good
@alliehunter4 жыл бұрын
yes sirrrr
@shrutijoshi5534 жыл бұрын
i agree with the person said about oneness with universe. right view
@riantmimi93954 жыл бұрын
great video, you really well explained!!
@jayassharma6594 жыл бұрын
UvA sent me here
@armandojaviercavazossalaza18204 жыл бұрын
Excellent!
@poorvaldhotre4 жыл бұрын
Where is this from? Where can I find the whole playlist?
@kyogirikon4 жыл бұрын
It is from a now-not-available Coursera course. The whole playlist is here: kzbin.info/aero/PLUc5eJ1g5zWxz3lTpJy5Jtc5BJVJdk1NQ
@vanvanvonvoyage64844 жыл бұрын
Interesting..i am left paretial lobe cavernoma 2cm left lesion ? And.C2 axial fracture lucency through base of dens? Previous C7 C6 C5 issues and bilateral foraminal stenosis and much more..the seem to.be missing.disgnosis of frontal lobe dysfunction.and much more
@makhdoomshabir10585 жыл бұрын
great vid, 'perihelion of mercury' at 3:20 for those who struggled slightly
@dneend4625 жыл бұрын
I feel like this kind of lost focus. He started talking about the temporal lobe, but then got lost in the left vs right side of the brain as a whole. It was still interesting, though.
@deirdrestewart43945 жыл бұрын
Mine was just medicated for years with the wrong drugs failed to diagnose the abnormality diagnosed in there care doc had put down this was related to halucinations was the damage to the occipital region Multiple head traumas none of it recorded in there notes then they scanned me never even informed me i was living with a tbi just kept on medicating me breach of duty care disgraceful neglectful people then the cyst arachanoid )left temporal area near my eye double vision etc effecting my muscle control balance etc cerebellar damage not to mention the cocktail of drugs they medicated me with atrophy of the muscles to late now for anything to be done think well aware of the prognosis! oh they tried to say i was born with them then another doc says. Of no significance any joe blog would have them jokable lesions found. Of no relevance according to a gp made out my symptoms of balance issues were of a psychogenic nature far from it im afraid even though eye deteriation was apparent but not passed on for further investigation disgraceful practise you all messed up i spent 20 years in and out of your unit time i will never get back you failed my care ! holywell hospital northern trust ni no wander i had body image problems. Seeing double with vision problems and you people were referring me to eating disorder services talk about stupidity so your covering your own backs and also *domestic* *abuse** not good practise that is it in todays society!
@aleksandartodorovic88365 жыл бұрын
What is the relation between the loss aversion and the status quo bias?
@FruityAssassin4 жыл бұрын
Aleksandar Todorovic Little late to answering your question but felt the need as I’ve been updating my lectures on these topics. In explaining such a relationship, you would have to look at the particularities of the situation you are dealing with. The status quo bias is related to loss aversion, but also the negativity bias, mere ownership effect and familiarity bias. Factors such as individual differences, framing, techniques of persuasion, authority, who any exchange is with and time mean there is no one straight answer to your question I’m afraid.
@stlilah5 жыл бұрын
the one dislike on this video is Descartes
@xavierrobles14975 жыл бұрын
lol
@aartdevletter58225 жыл бұрын
What is exactly "irrational" about exhibiting loss aversive behavior?
@Berbb4205 жыл бұрын
Under full rationality the loss shouldnt be valued more than the gains, i.e. gaining 2.5$ from 0$ should be equal to losing 2.5$ after having 5$, however research shows that losing 2.5$ is seen as gaining ~5$, which is irrational. However, it should be noted that irrational does not mean "not understable" if you feel that just earning the same amount is less valuable than being given an endowment and then losing the difference, then you are just demonstrating that natural behavior is different to what economic theory predicts
@vivekdoshi95405 жыл бұрын
Thank you. I am clear now.
@KathySolita5 жыл бұрын
ABOOT
@kateanne46926 жыл бұрын
Hello, how can I access the resources given in the end of the video? Thanks!
@thehairblairbunchjones62096 жыл бұрын
I don’t think constructive empiricists would say that things from out distant evolutionary past are observable in the sense they are interested in. So I don’t think that the examples given provide much of an argument .
@lesherj6 жыл бұрын
Read chapter 4 of his book Predictably Irrational for even a better understanding
@danktankdragkings71176 жыл бұрын
I had a lobotomy. It's a fucking trip. Age 12.5 right temporal lobecTomy for epilepsy control.
@danktankdragkings71176 жыл бұрын
I've had multiple traumatic brain injuries. So I'm studying up on myself because neurologists are useless in this town.
@rowanscovell-lightfoot70286 жыл бұрын
great video, interseting. It's funny though how he sais for us to think about how we could manipulate others for financial gain using this. Love Capitilasim.
@rafaelrivazlaaguila21837 жыл бұрын
My temporal lobe is swollen it sticks out further tjan it should why is that ? Should i be worried?
@manpreetsehdeva57856 жыл бұрын
Rafael Rivaz La Aguila you did an mri?
@AntonioFragaOK7 жыл бұрын
In a nutshell, people say one thing but then they go and do another. I find the study very interesting. It could be the case that when people have time to think about things, they get it right. And then when they meet face to face they get nervous and make mistakes. Imagine one person that is very good when comunicating via email, but when she has to speak face to face is a disaster. That doesnt mean she has to rethink the way she writes email in order to fit the face to face experience. My point is: from the same information I could argue that people in online dating decide better than in person. They know what they want. Its just that when phisical emotions get in the way, they get confused. Not that I belive what i just said, but I think that last idea is also a posible conclusion given the information in this video. Not that we dont know what we want, but that we have difficulties when taking theory to practice.
@rajnish8217 жыл бұрын
thank you very much... Its amazing theory.
@sheilayoung65907 жыл бұрын
Can one see or hallucinate seeing bugs for a few minutes ? Would that maybe be a seizure?
@adeleaccount20247 жыл бұрын
very helpful tutorial, Dan Ariely can really explain it well!
@GTLx167 жыл бұрын
THIS IS SO BORING
@narutokiwi7 жыл бұрын
He is University of Toronto Prof, psya01/psya02. So happy to see his video.
@211teitake8 жыл бұрын
While physical phenomenon can be observed to objectively determine if it is a fact, how do you objectively determine moral principals as facts?
@panagiotispapadopoulos46098 жыл бұрын
Really good, and simple explanation. Cute italian accent as well. Thanks for sharing.
@zes38138 жыл бұрын
wronx, not instincx bad memoetc.
@markstuber47318 жыл бұрын
One difference between the tick holdes and the non tickit holders is the the non-ticket-holders will have to go over their budget to get the ticket while the owners won't go over their budget to keep the ticket.