Why do we accept complex illogical explanations that we cannot easily understand as truth? Einstein said that if your explanation needs an explanation, you probably do not understand the question? I disagree with your premise that math is a science. It is not a science, it is the language of science. Don’t blame the math for poor explanations. Blame the theory.
@user-if7kr5yu3n2 сағат бұрын
That is a very nice, informative and easier explanation. Thank you very much... ❤❤❤
@wadigkin955 сағат бұрын
*Italians died in the making of this video.*
@mustardroshi4189 сағат бұрын
or just do it under water
@mohamads975911 сағат бұрын
Very Great.
@inyobill12 сағат бұрын
So class size has no affect on students' performance? That's counter intuitive. So, maybe we could increase classes to 1,000 students, and not expect any hit on performance?
@DaveMcIroy12 сағат бұрын
I'm not giving away any cake.
@Flowfn1714 сағат бұрын
All that science for a sphagetti💀
@kokopiko215 сағат бұрын
First try or never
@bhagirathjangid343216 сағат бұрын
Let me know if I'm wrong Pi*r^2 = x^2 3.14*r^2 = x^2 1.77*r = x Now just use the perpendicular bisector method using compass untill u get 0.75r (which is possible) and add r to it and enjoy 🤷♂️
@Veddy167416 сағат бұрын
as an italian, i'm italian
@HarleyAMV17 сағат бұрын
Scientists: "We invented a new thing!" Public: "Cool. What's it for?" Scientists: "*Shrug* Uhnno" 😂
@moneymoves88818 сағат бұрын
Not a paradox. Maybe I’m being trolled lol. But the position of the wheels are not the same. By the wheel being lifted to the centre puts it in a different spacial position. It’s two different size wheels and has to be treated as such. The smaller wheel is a parasite and being dragged along, slippage, lol.
@fateh811519 сағат бұрын
😭😭😭😭🤧👌👌
@modestasst216120 сағат бұрын
At the start why did u have a spaggeto mustache
@TheReal_DarkVoid21 сағат бұрын
These physicists are stupid.... Just make your hands closer when you break it
@briefcasemanx21 сағат бұрын
Now, if only someone would explain the way of doing DFT with matrices in a way that was this intuitive...
@apin294323 сағат бұрын
The italians be mad af 💀
@justagame101Күн бұрын
5:10 Absolutely love the passive aggressiveness 😅
@app7435Күн бұрын
She just declared a war to ITALY Where is lionfield?
@MeghUpadhyaКүн бұрын
Great Application for Micro bio robots for drug deliveries
@NovaX-wb8rqКүн бұрын
Ain’t this video stolen?? I feel like I’ve heard this exact script before
@Ohi2023Күн бұрын
Me:nahhh i just cut them with a scissors
@dieg0639Күн бұрын
a dick
@gotnutsprodКүн бұрын
Dumb
@Mochii_icecreamКүн бұрын
You're using equations with numbers in it...
@johngavin6622Күн бұрын
…nerdism aside …. If I were 40 yrs younger …. 🤪
@buhwhatidkКүн бұрын
Why did i never realize feynman looks exactly like saul goodman
@robertlewis6915Күн бұрын
0:15 Is that AoE2 music?
@Light_zappКүн бұрын
After all that she did it on her own
@swarley2500Күн бұрын
This is the genius equivalent of forgetting a minus sign
@H4v5nКүн бұрын
Those two Italian ytubers are nearing your location
@thewindwakinghero7423Күн бұрын
It doesn't do what you think it does It summons a very angry Italian
@jnhrtmnКүн бұрын
Show me time outside of YOUR mind, then explain why this made up dimension is suddenly adjustable using "TRANSFORM" equations based on a "declaration" from a dead guy. Dimensions 1 and 2 don't even exist without math, so maybe the 4th needs a rethink. This ONLY works on paper AFTER you change the numbers using a number between 0 and 1 (transform). There could very well be something else changing that allows you to BLAME time. Humans used to think they were the center of the Universe, and "light speed constant relative to the observer" is that SAME mistake AGAIN! It makes no sense. You must BELIEVE in it FIRST, then ride the bandwagon and never second-guess a constant.
@Zaeemulislam1Күн бұрын
Can't image such visualization of that boaring topic. Thanks.
@michaelfoye1135Күн бұрын
They should ask a machinist. Every machinist is expert at squaring circles and circling squares.
@miloszmoleda29012 күн бұрын
😂😂😂
@garygallegos83552 күн бұрын
Some people actually can hare alien conversations but the words are mixed up , one way to understand theme is by using a rotating fan that has a slite vibration the frequency has to be set at it right banding . Et use's a shirt hand type of symbol 1, a two part of set the half sound , then a none usable sound then a usable sound , 2, by rotating the fan just right we will hear a meaning of words . You may think no way , but any high end intelligence dose take all variables in to account , and these sound will com out clear .
@montanaharkin2 күн бұрын
Any updates?
@Walczyk2 күн бұрын
there needs to be some limit, not just any line. it probably must be smooth, like you can’t have it make a right angle. can you make it follow a hyperbolic trajectory?
@VULNICURRA2 күн бұрын
loona reference
@VULNICURRA2 күн бұрын
loona typa shit
@andrewfrank50992 күн бұрын
This is the pictograph we sent out, not what was sent back.
@kaiblack44892 күн бұрын
Here's the list of mistakes I spotted: - His name is pronounced "gayorg", *not* "jorj". - 4:25 minor point: irrational numbers can have patterns, they just can't have repeating patterns. My favorite example is 0.11010001...., i.e. the number between 0 and 1 with 1s at every position that's a power of 2, and 0s everywhere else. In fact, this number is transcendental! - Plenty of other people have mentioned it I think, but your proof that there are more reals than naturals doesn't work at all. You can do exactly the same process with the rationals instead of the reals and you still arrive at the same supposed "contradiction", even though |Q|=|N|. - 8:54 not technically a mistake, but there are more than 2 types of infinity. As Cantor showed, the size of any set is strictly less than the size of its power set, so you can keep using power sets to generate larger and larger infinities. - 10:11 another minor point: you need to be careful here, because you've forgotten to account for the fact that a single real number can have multiple different decimal expansions. For example, 0.1 = 0.0999999.... To solve this, you need to replace 9s with a digit that isn't 0. 11:10: again not a mistake, just a fun fact: that actually goes for every pair of infinities! If K is any infinite cardinal, then K+K = K*K = K, so in a way that means that K is "infinitely smaller" than the next infinity, and any that come after it. I'm not trying to be mean, I really like your videos! I just thought these things were worth mentioning.
@kaiblack44892 күн бұрын
Quick point: There isn't actually any paradox with Frege's theory of concepts and extensions at all (as it was presented in this video at least); that idea is used in ZFC set theory all the time (every well-defined property φ induces a class of sets satisfying φ). The reason this isn't a contradiction is that there is no notion of a class containing another class - so you can't have a class of classes that do not contain themself. The contradiction seems to just be in the way he defined "set". If you swap it for the modern idea of a set, then you get a perfectly good model for set theory.
@johndoe61882 күн бұрын
Or you could just... place your fingies in the middle.