Savician

Пікірлер

@Lanooski 5 күн бұрын

it's so adorable that Charlie and everyone else in his journalistic role are pretending not to know why he got the boot.

@jitinginotra3414 13 күн бұрын

During last few minutes, Graeber seems to be indicating diabolical forces within structures of power. I personally would have liked if he could say more on it.

@oneofus6924 16 күн бұрын

the burden of legitimacy is on the authority to prove

@oneofus6924 16 күн бұрын

the ideals of anarchism equates to common sense.

@JaranBraco 23 күн бұрын

You should learn from this guy.

@harmarka5462 24 күн бұрын

Kudos to Yale for kicking this comically deluded charlatan out - play silly games, win silly prizes.

@404no57 Ай бұрын

Man, Charlie sure is dumb

@Naga483 Ай бұрын

Anarchist world is possible only if people just be kind

@DelFlo Ай бұрын

Zizek always uses the same examples and jokes in every talk, just to make slightly different points about different subjects 😂

@baglespelledwrong8159 2 ай бұрын

anarchism more like crapartism LOL

@thrasher606 2 ай бұрын

All of these comments have horrendous grammar. Anarchy attracts dipshits. If you are the top 1% of anarchists, great. But the idea is eternally false if no one can grasp it and do anything with it. It's a horrendously false idea if, by default, normal people can't agree with it. Communism is the same, and religion is the exception. Get as mad and smart as you want, but you live in a world where humans reign. They are eternally flawed, they are stupid, they are smart, they are self-obsessed, and they are insane.

@LateStageComradism Ай бұрын

If humans are flawed, then we should not give them power over others. As Kropotkin argues in "Are We Good Enough?", both rulers and the ruled are spoiled by authority. Furthermore, he says that "We [anarchists] admit the imperfections of human nature, but we make no exception for the rulers. They make it, although sometimes unconsciously, and because we make no such exception, they say that we are dreamers, ‘unpractical men’. "

@SethDixon-w8q 2 ай бұрын

It's the best way to live

@DroolRockworm 3 ай бұрын

KZbin been trying to stuff this one down my throat for at least a year now, constantly showing up in my stupid sidebar or whatever. Whatever, I'll bite

@CharlesHatley-e9h 3 ай бұрын

Harris Kimberly Jackson Jessica Taylor Charles

@dinatesfay3766 3 ай бұрын

real one RIP

@LauraRodriguez-ib3pt 3 ай бұрын

Love Chomsky

@robertmunciework 3 ай бұрын

Am the only person that thinks this guy talks in circles?

@RobertJones-st3wj 3 ай бұрын

Paxman is such a condescending wanker but he completely goes silent when he knows hes talking to someone way smarter than.him

@peteraleksandrovich5923 3 ай бұрын

Rose can be really dense sometimes...

@ComplainingIsRecreation 3 ай бұрын

These so called anarchists all just vote for socialists though. They talk a lot about systems free of coercion blah blah blah but then they vote for systems that confiscate more and more of your shit, all rings pretty hollow to me.

@mojoeye 3 ай бұрын

Once upon a time when there were thoughtful interviews.

@iuliasima3599 3 ай бұрын

Haahaaaa. He was so young. Wow

@lesweenmachine 4 ай бұрын

Only an anarchist would be protesting the WEF before it was cool haha

@prodcdebeatz7205 4 ай бұрын

This was great. Anyone recommend any books by him or that perhaps were influences?

@insight827 3 ай бұрын

All his books are good, as are his talks on KZbin. Bullshit jobs, a talk given at RSA is great.

@iCupTV247 4 ай бұрын

Note this is 5 yrs prior to OWS of which he was instrumental in laying the groundwork for it's organizational structure

@vampyros1 4 ай бұрын

Anyone who ascribes to the viability of anarchy is necessarily very (idealistically) dense.

@LateStageComradism Ай бұрын

I highly recommend that you read "Are We Good Enough?" by Kropotkin. It's not terribly long by any metric. However, I will cite what I consider to be the most relevant part to this discussion: "We [anarchists] admit the imperfections of human nature, but we make no exception for the rulers. They make it, although sometimes unconsciously, and because we make no such exception, they say that we are dreamers, ‘unpractical men’."

@vampyros1 Ай бұрын

@LateStageComradism I don't understand that quote; break it down for me please if, you yourself, understand it.

@LateStageComradism Ай бұрын

@@vampyros1 Simply put, Kropotkin says that humans are imperfect, true. However, anarchists do not make exceptions for rulers. If humans are imperfect, than why should we give one imperfect human power or authority over another?

@vampyros1 Ай бұрын

@LateStageComradism People are imperfect; the objective, therefore, is to dissuasively minimize the fallout to prospective victims. People will wrong you, hence, sans laws that are conceptually steeped in a dissuasive mechanism (one, itself, reliant upon treating others as you'd have them treat you), that 'unchecked' propensity inordinately results in the mistreatment of others and the consequentially reciprocal increased likelihood of being mistreated. The above parenthetical is the linchpin.

@LateStageComradism Ай бұрын

@@vampyros1 The state has done far more damage to victims than any individual without the state has. Anarchy is not chaos; Anarchy is not a lack of organization; Anarchy is not the absence of rules.

@b.w.6152 4 ай бұрын

I keep thinking anarchy needs to have a majority people that want anarchy, like globally we already have anarchy i guess, but people built those structures out of deliberate or non-deliberate choice?

@ownagepwnagemaster 4 ай бұрын

Charlie rose is a nice old man and retard iiiiioo

@jay-ki6ie 4 ай бұрын

I have basic questions about the practicality of an anarchic system. Who protects me if my things are stolen? How do I get basic things like heathcare? That is what governments offer right? Various protections like human rights, public services like infrastructure and healthcare. I imagine the large systems are efficient for these large tasks

@BradyA1124 4 ай бұрын

Wait til yall realize aliens are real, and are here

@Obscura-pg1mk 4 ай бұрын

so, arch libertarianism?

@Leftistattheparty 4 ай бұрын

@Obscura-pg1mk 4 ай бұрын

@@Leftistattheparty Or yes.

@insight827 3 ай бұрын

@@Obscura-pg1mkGraeber is an anti-capitalist

@homelesseconomist 4 ай бұрын

This guy protested the WEF before it was a click bait KZbin trend

@superdeluxesmell 4 ай бұрын

The very idea of an “anarchist” that wants to work at a contemporary top-tier university is utterly hilarious.

@Leftistattheparty 4 ай бұрын

Not if you know what anarchism actually is.

@superdeluxesmell 3 ай бұрын

@@Leftistattheparty I have a solid understanding of most of the major forms of anarchism. Universities are corporations, you might as well work for Goldman Sachs.

@LateStageComradism Ай бұрын

@@superdeluxesmell Being successful in capitalism does not make you not an anarchist. If he exploited others, or rather, he was a member of the capitalist class, then yes, he would be hypocritical.

@BushyHairedStranger 4 ай бұрын

0:38,..!!! what happened here? Edited out his answer?

@lucastanga6732 4 ай бұрын

What are the best anarchic societies? Ehhhhmmm, in the Amazon for example... You mean where people live covered with leaves and hunt with bows and arrows? Yeah, but there must be thousands others (in my dreams) that exist. A guy at Yale studying anarchism and then not being able to cite one single example is clearly a demonstration that it is all a bunch of baloney for which he gets paid fat dollars.

@insight827 3 ай бұрын

Madagascar, the other example he cited if you were listening. He lived there, wrote a pretty good book about it. That’s what he gets paid for.

@lucastanga6732 3 ай бұрын

@@insight827 Man, missionaries cae to my high school to raise funds to build wells there cause people didn't have drinking water, so excuse me if I don't take them as an example to be copied.

@insight827 3 ай бұрын

@@lucastanga6732 you’re mixing up his definition of direct action (which, by the way, does not include the odd example you cited) with his time in Madagascar. The well thing was illustrative, it didn’t actually happen.

@LateStageComradism Ай бұрын

CNT-FAI.

@jmgresham93 4 ай бұрын

Deontological ethics either judge violations of law as crime or sin. This highlights the rules based assumptions by those who judged David. There is no warranted evidence of 'sin.'

@ErgoCogita 4 ай бұрын

Anarchism in many of its forms are great on paper. Application in the long term will always lead to stifling corruption. Same as any other governance. The common thread, Human nature.

@Leftistattheparty 4 ай бұрын

How can it lead to corruption when there isn't a dynamic to build corruption on?

@ErgoCogita 4 ай бұрын

@@Leftistattheparty all social groupings are susceptible to corruption. In a hierarchal vacuum social grouping inevitably emerges and clan vs. clan mentality follows suit. Again, human nature demands it. We are hardwired for it through many millions of years of evolution. (See: Thomas Hobbes and Bertrand Russell)

@ErgoCogita 4 ай бұрын

@@Leftistattheparty In a hierarchal vacuum, social groupings will inevitably emerge and clan vs. clan will follow suit in short order. The clans with the most resources become the arbiters. Hierarchy reestablishes. We are hardwired for it over many millions of years. Anarchism is ultimately self defeating since it is a social contract with no social contract. See: Thomas Hobbes and Bertrand Russell.

@LateStageComradism Ай бұрын

@@ErgoCogita There would be no power vacuum in an anarchist society, hence the common phrase "all the power to all the people."

@ErgoCogita Ай бұрын

@@LateStageComradism Anarchism is defined by a power vacuum. Neato phrases don’t change that fact. What always happens in a power vacuum? I’ll give you one guess.

@renzo6490 4 ай бұрын

gen-OH-wah ?? Genoa,Italy.

@speedrunner9907 5 ай бұрын

Graeber was murdered. Acute pancreatic necrosis? He was poisoned.

@jonn7291 5 ай бұрын

I think you need an organised nation state to protect the population and territory from invasion.

@insight827 3 ай бұрын

Invasion from whom? Other nation states? Look up Rojava. They’ve managed to fight off isis, and they’re anarchists

@mattolivier1835 5 ай бұрын

Most Anarchists are actually statists and have no idea what they're talking about. Most Anarchists are violent fools who don't follow the NAP. The NAP is the ONLY thing that matters, along with property rights. A lot of Anarchists believe there is a difference between property and possessions. They are fools. Anarchy is basically not having any rulers. A ruler is a person who uses violence to force people to follow them. What we need are leaders, NOT rulers. Leaders must use persuasion to convince others to follow them. The initiation of violence is immoral.

@ThomSonnyYeah 5 ай бұрын

Let the man talk for Christ sake Charlie

@thedolphin5428 5 ай бұрын

Intellectual anarchists are idealist wankers. Real anarchists are LIVING A LIFE outside of society and its laws, working communes, organic communities ... as I have done for some 50 years. You won't/can't "change the system". 2000+ years of religious, legal, social systems ain't gunna allow anyone to undo them.

@LateStageComradism Ай бұрын

They want to free everyone. Is that so awful?

@jonasdowner 5 ай бұрын

damn, charlie is trashed. he's clearly super drunk.

@alexanderclaylavin 5 ай бұрын

Yeah a lot of people got pink slips back in those days, bud, but some of us actually had demands at the Occupy Wall Street protests.

@insight827 3 ай бұрын

Lol. Graeber coined the phrase “we are the 99%”. He is occupy.

@CH-lc4zi 5 ай бұрын

Yeah, as an engineering geologist with a state's environmental regulator, there are reasons why you shouldn't just go to someone's property and just dig a well. There are areas with restrictions due to groundwater pollution that must be accounted for and with no government, good luck!

@garyhynes 5 ай бұрын

How did they get polluted?

@bobbybecker3572 5 ай бұрын

What a god

@Pfth 5 ай бұрын

Such a wonderful, intellectually gifted man. Is there any substance to the theory that he was poisoned?

@insight827 3 ай бұрын

Not really. His wife believes that Covid 19 exacerbated the symptoms, but he wasn’t poisoned

@libertarianonwheels1172 5 ай бұрын

The rich tapestry of anarchist history is what led me to anarchism as well as to the anarchist handbook by Michael malice 🎉🎉🎉 the Black Flag comes in many colors but they all agree on freedom though they disagree on much

@XD226 5 ай бұрын

what an idiot

Ең жақсы KZbin

Пікірлер