Am the only person that thinks this guy talks in circles?
@HaydnArlene-i9y7 күн бұрын
Smith Elizabeth Moore George Brown Jeffrey
@RobertJones-st3wj8 күн бұрын
Paxman is such a condescending wanker but he completely goes silent when he knows hes talking to someone way smarter than.him
@peteraleksandrovich59238 күн бұрын
Rose can be really dense sometimes...
@Cuttuttlefish11 күн бұрын
These so called anarchists all just vote for socialists though. They talk a lot about systems free of coercion blah blah blah but then they vote for systems that confiscate more and more of your shit, all rings pretty hollow to me.
@JacksonEverley-f2m11 күн бұрын
Johnson Brian Lee Nancy Rodriguez Kevin
@mojoeye14 күн бұрын
Once upon a time when there were thoughtful interviews.
@iuliasima359916 күн бұрын
Haahaaaa. He was so young. Wow
@lesweenmachine20 күн бұрын
Only an anarchist would be protesting the WEF before it was cool haha
@prodcdebeatz720523 күн бұрын
This was great. Anyone recommend any books by him or that perhaps were influences?
@insight82718 күн бұрын
All his books are good, as are his talks on KZbin. Bullshit jobs, a talk given at RSA is great.
@iCupTV24725 күн бұрын
Note this is 5 yrs prior to OWS of which he was instrumental in laying the groundwork for it's organizational structure
@vampyros125 күн бұрын
Anyone who ascribes to the viability of anarchy is necessarily very (idealistically) dense.
@b.w.615226 күн бұрын
I keep thinking anarchy needs to have a majority people that want anarchy, like globally we already have anarchy i guess, but people built those structures out of deliberate or non-deliberate choice?
@ownagepwnagemasterАй бұрын
Charlie rose is a nice old man and retard iiiiioo
@jay-ki6ieАй бұрын
I have basic questions about the practicality of an anarchic system. Who protects me if my things are stolen? How do I get basic things like heathcare? That is what governments offer right? Various protections like human rights, public services like infrastructure and healthcare. I imagine the large systems are efficient for these large tasks
@BradyA1124Ай бұрын
Wait til yall realize aliens are real, and are here
@Obscura-pg1mkАй бұрын
so, arch libertarianism?
@LeftistatthepartyАй бұрын
No
@Obscura-pg1mkАй бұрын
@@Leftistattheparty Or yes.
@insight82718 күн бұрын
@@Obscura-pg1mkGraeber is an anti-capitalist
@homelesseconomistАй бұрын
This guy protested the WEF before it was a click bait KZbin trend
@superdeluxesmellАй бұрын
The very idea of an “anarchist” that wants to work at a contemporary top-tier university is utterly hilarious.
@LeftistatthepartyАй бұрын
Not if you know what anarchism actually is.
@BushyHairedStrangerАй бұрын
0:38,..!!! what happened here? Edited out his answer?
@lucastanga6732Ай бұрын
What are the best anarchic societies? Ehhhhmmm, in the Amazon for example... You mean where people live covered with leaves and hunt with bows and arrows? Yeah, but there must be thousands others (in my dreams) that exist. A guy at Yale studying anarchism and then not being able to cite one single example is clearly a demonstration that it is all a bunch of baloney for which he gets paid fat dollars.
@insight82718 күн бұрын
Madagascar, the other example he cited if you were listening. He lived there, wrote a pretty good book about it. That’s what he gets paid for.
@lucastanga673218 күн бұрын
@@insight827 Man, missionaries cae to my high school to raise funds to build wells there cause people didn't have drinking water, so excuse me if I don't take them as an example to be copied.
@insight82718 күн бұрын
@@lucastanga6732 you’re mixing up his definition of direct action (which, by the way, does not include the odd example you cited) with his time in Madagascar. The well thing was illustrative, it didn’t actually happen.
@jmgresham93Ай бұрын
Deontological ethics either judge violations of law as crime or sin. This highlights the rules based assumptions by those who judged David. There is no warranted evidence of 'sin.'
@ErgoCogitaАй бұрын
Anarchism in many of its forms are great on paper. Application in the long term will always lead to stifling corruption. Same as any other governance. The common thread, Human nature.
@LeftistatthepartyАй бұрын
How can it lead to corruption when there isn't a dynamic to build corruption on?
@ErgoCogitaАй бұрын
@@Leftistattheparty all social groupings are susceptible to corruption. In a hierarchal vacuum social grouping inevitably emerges and clan vs. clan mentality follows suit. Again, human nature demands it. We are hardwired for it through many millions of years of evolution. (See: Thomas Hobbes and Bertrand Russell)
@ErgoCogitaАй бұрын
@@Leftistattheparty In a hierarchal vacuum, social groupings will inevitably emerge and clan vs. clan will follow suit in short order. The clans with the most resources become the arbiters. Hierarchy reestablishes. We are hardwired for it over many millions of years. Anarchism is ultimately self defeating since it is a social contract with no social contract. See: Thomas Hobbes and Bertrand Russell.
@renzo6490Ай бұрын
gen-OH-wah ?? Genoa,Italy.
@speedrunner9907Ай бұрын
Graeber was murdered. Acute pancreatic necrosis? He was poisoned.
@jonn7291Ай бұрын
I think you need an organised nation state to protect the population and territory from invasion.
@insight82718 күн бұрын
Invasion from whom? Other nation states? Look up Rojava. They’ve managed to fight off isis, and they’re anarchists
@mattolivier1835Ай бұрын
Most Anarchists are actually statists and have no idea what they're talking about. Most Anarchists are violent fools who don't follow the NAP. The NAP is the ONLY thing that matters, along with property rights. A lot of Anarchists believe there is a difference between property and possessions. They are fools. Anarchy is basically not having any rulers. A ruler is a person who uses violence to force people to follow them. What we need are leaders, NOT rulers. Leaders must use persuasion to convince others to follow them. The initiation of violence is immoral.
@ThomSonnyYeahАй бұрын
Let the man talk for Christ sake Charlie
@thedolphin5428Ай бұрын
Intellectual anarchists are idealist wankers. Real anarchists are LIVING A LIFE outside of society and its laws, working communes, organic communities ... as I have done for some 50 years. You won't/can't "change the system". 2000+ years of religious, legal, social systems ain't gunna allow anyone to undo them.
@jonasdownerАй бұрын
damn, charlie is trashed. he's clearly super drunk.
@alexanderclaylavinАй бұрын
Yeah a lot of people got pink slips back in those days, bud, but some of us actually had demands at the Occupy Wall Street protests.
@insight82718 күн бұрын
Lol. Graeber coined the phrase “we are the 99%”. He is occupy.
@CH-lc4ziАй бұрын
Yeah, as an engineering geologist with a state's environmental regulator, there are reasons why you shouldn't just go to someone's property and just dig a well. There are areas with restrictions due to groundwater pollution that must be accounted for and with no government, good luck!
@garyhynesАй бұрын
How did they get polluted?
@bobbybecker3572Ай бұрын
What a god
@PfthАй бұрын
Such a wonderful, intellectually gifted man. Is there any substance to the theory that he was poisoned?
@insight82718 күн бұрын
Not really. His wife believes that Covid 19 exacerbated the symptoms, but he wasn’t poisoned
@libertarianonwheels11722 ай бұрын
The rich tapestry of anarchist history is what led me to anarchism as well as to the anarchist handbook by Michael malice 🎉🎉🎉 the Black Flag comes in many colors but they all agree on freedom though they disagree on much
@XD2262 ай бұрын
what an idiot
@JacquesMornard04912 ай бұрын
Another title: Noam Chomsky, State Actor on Philosophies that are Nonthreatening to the State.
@authenticallysuperficial98742 ай бұрын
Democracy is the opposite of anarchy. Democracy is tyranny. Democrqcy is 51% deciding to rnslave the other 49%.
@ardien.5353 ай бұрын
Miss you sir
@paulheinrichdietrich95183 ай бұрын
12:06 Lol.
@kahwigulum3 ай бұрын
His definition of anarchism as democracy without the government is a poor definition, and it makes me wonder if was anarchistic at all. Democracy is rule by the mob. Just because you get rid of the government, it doesn't mean the mob still gets to speak for me. What a clown. He is not a serious thinker. Anarchism is the belief that power is arbitrary, and everything else after that is application
@im-radio3 ай бұрын
rest in power
@EricSmith90003 ай бұрын
The reason was because they're Yale.
@stewiegrif13 ай бұрын
I really appreciated this video being posted. I’ve just started following David after I watched a DW documentary about work, which he was a main contributor to in terms of screen time (and perhaps even philosophy). I appreciate that David doesn’t seem to be trying to sell something or coerce the interviewer. This feels like a natural conversation of ideas, and while I happen to agree with David on many points, I don’t think David would require that I do so. His candor and way of conversation feels non-threatening, yet also intellectually confrontational in the greatest sense of mutual respect.
@ejbarkermusic21 күн бұрын
What was the documentary?
@LongDefiant4 ай бұрын
I welcome the days of Bolo'Bolo
@DJK-cq2uy4 ай бұрын
This guy could make sense n give meaning to gnats humping in broad daylight..utter genius